A Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety, Reactogenicity, and Immunogenicity of Different Prime-Boost Vaccination Schedules of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) Inactivated Influenza Virus Vaccines Administered With and Without AS03 Adjuvant in Healthy US Adults

Abstract Introduction A surge of human influenza A(H7N9) cases began in 2016 in China from an antigenically distinct lineage. Data are needed about the safety and immunogenicity of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) and the effects of AS03 adjuvant, prime-boost interval, and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical infectious diseases 2024-06, Vol.78 (6), p.1757-1768
Hauptverfasser: Rostad, Christina A, Atmar, Robert L, Walter, Emmanuel B, Frey, Sharon, Meier, Jeffery L, Sherman, Amy C, Lai, Lilin, Tsong, Rachel, Kao, Carol M, Raabe, Vanessa, El Sahly, Hana M, Keitel, Wendy A, Whitaker, Jennifer A, Smith, Michael J, Schmader, Kenneth E, Swamy, Geeta K, Abate, Getahun, Winokur, Patricia, Buchanan, Wendy, Cross, Kaitlyn, Wegel, Ashley, Xu, Yongxian, Yildirim, Inci, Kamidani, Satoshi, Rouphael, Nadine, Roberts, Paul C, Mulligan, Mark J, Anderson, Evan J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Introduction A surge of human influenza A(H7N9) cases began in 2016 in China from an antigenically distinct lineage. Data are needed about the safety and immunogenicity of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines (IIVs) and the effects of AS03 adjuvant, prime-boost interval, and priming effects of 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) IIVs. Methods Healthy adults (n = 180), ages 19–50 years, were enrolled into this partially blinded, randomized, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 6 vaccination groups evaluating homologous versus heterologous prime-boost strategies with 2 different boost intervals (21 vs 120 days) and 2 dosages (3.75 or 15 μg of hemagglutinin) administered with or without AS03 adjuvant. Reactogenicity, safety, and immunogenicity measured by hemagglutination inhibition and neutralizing antibody titers were assessed. Results Two doses of A(H7N9) IIV were well tolerated, and no safety issues were identified. Although most participants had injection site and systemic reactogenicity, these symptoms were mostly mild to moderate in severity; injection site reactogenicity was greater in vaccination groups receiving adjuvant. Immune responses were greater after an adjuvanted second dose, and with a longer interval between prime and boost. The highest hemagglutination inhibition geometric mean titer (95% confidence interval) observed against the 2017 A(H7N9) strain was 133.4 (83.6–212.6) among participants who received homologous, adjuvanted 3.75 µg + AS03/2017 doses with delayed boost interval. Conclusions Administering AS03 adjuvant with the second H7N9 IIV dose and extending the boost interval to 4 months resulted in higher peak antibody responses. These observations can broadly inform strategic approaches for pandemic preparedness. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03589807. The 2013 and 2017 A(H7N9) inactivated influenza vaccines were well tolerated and no new safety concerns were identified. Administering AS03 adjuvant with the second H7N9 inactivated influenza vaccine dose and extending the boost interval to 4 months resulted in higher peak antibody responses.
ISSN:1058-4838
1537-6591
1537-6591
DOI:10.1093/cid/ciae173