Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass

The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252
Hauptverfasser: YAMAURA, Ken, IRITA, Kazuo, KANDABASHI, Tadashi, TOHYAMA, Kohei, TAKAHASHI, Shosuke
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 252
container_issue 4
container_start_page 249
container_title Journal of clinical monitoring and computing
container_volume 21
creator YAMAURA, Ken
IRITA, Kazuo
KANDABASHI, Tadashi
TOHYAMA, Kohei
TAKAHASHI, Shosuke
description The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF. PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF). The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30085942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1302120001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1rFTEUBuAgFlurP8CNBEV3o-ckM_lYllK1UOimrmMmk3hTZiZjMiPef28u90JBcJV38ZzDCS8hbxA-IYD8XBCUlE2NjQaFDTwjF9hJ3jCB7fOauZINcpDn5GUpjwCgFccX5BxlJ5WQ_IL8uPltx82uMc00BRri_NNnaueBhpT9ztuBLttYPE1_4uRXnwsdtlwVneI40N1-SevO5yk66mweYqp6SrPNe9rvF1vKK3IWbF3w-vReku9fbh6uvzV3919vr6_uGse0Xhv0gIrVg73qBt-KFntwLDjR91aIzmMfguyRayYZCtVrKbhWQTruGGDQ_JJ8PO5dcvq1-bKaKRbnx9HOPm3FcADV6ZZV-P4f-Ji2PNfbDBOiFQJBd1W9-69CiZwJkBXhEbmcSsk-mCXHqf7dIJhDQ-bYkDnEQ0MG6szb0-Ktn_zwNHGqpIIPJ2CLs2PIdnaxPDmltNTQ8b9RKJhn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217132607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF. PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF). The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17578673</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMCFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aorta ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Failure ; Female ; Fingers ; Forehead ; Humans ; Hypothermia, Induced ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Oximetry ; Oximetry - instrumentation ; Oximetry - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Pulse oximetry ; Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18897905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17578673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRITA, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF. PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF). The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Forehead</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothermia, Induced</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Oximetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Oximetry - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulse oximetry</subject><subject>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1rFTEUBuAgFlurP8CNBEV3o-ckM_lYllK1UOimrmMmk3hTZiZjMiPef28u90JBcJV38ZzDCS8hbxA-IYD8XBCUlE2NjQaFDTwjF9hJ3jCB7fOauZINcpDn5GUpjwCgFccX5BxlJ5WQ_IL8uPltx82uMc00BRri_NNnaueBhpT9ztuBLttYPE1_4uRXnwsdtlwVneI40N1-SevO5yk66mweYqp6SrPNe9rvF1vKK3IWbF3w-vReku9fbh6uvzV3919vr6_uGse0Xhv0gIrVg73qBt-KFntwLDjR91aIzmMfguyRayYZCtVrKbhWQTruGGDQ_JJ8PO5dcvq1-bKaKRbnx9HOPm3FcADV6ZZV-P4f-Ji2PNfbDBOiFQJBd1W9-69CiZwJkBXhEbmcSsk-mCXHqf7dIJhDQ-bYkDnEQ0MG6szb0-Ktn_zwNHGqpIIPJ2CLs2PIdnaxPDmltNTQ8b9RKJhn</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>YAMAURA, Ken</creator><creator>IRITA, Kazuo</creator><creator>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creator><creator>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creator><creator>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><author>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Forehead</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothermia, Induced</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Oximetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Oximetry - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulse oximetry</topic><topic>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRITA, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YAMAURA, Ken</au><au>IRITA, Kazuo</au><au>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</au><au>TOHYAMA, Kohei</au><au>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>249-252</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><coden>JCMCFG</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF. PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p &lt; 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF). The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>17578673</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1387-1307
ispartof Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252
issn 1387-1307
1573-2614
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30085942
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Aged
Anesthesia
Anesthesia depending on type of surgery
Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy
Aorta
Biological and medical sciences
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care
Equipment Failure Analysis
Failure
Female
Fingers
Forehead
Humans
Hypothermia, Induced
Intensive care medicine
Male
Medical sciences
Middle Aged
Monitoring
Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation
Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods
Oximetry
Oximetry - instrumentation
Oximetry - methods
Prospective Studies
Pulse oximetry
Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass
title Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20finger%20and%20forehead%20pulse%20oximeters%20during%20mild%20hypothermic%20cardiopulmonary%20bypass&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=YAMAURA,%20Ken&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=249-252&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft.coden=JCMCFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1302120001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217132607&rft_id=info:pmid/17578673&rfr_iscdi=true