Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass
The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion. About 20 adu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 252 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | YAMAURA, Ken IRITA, Kazuo KANDABASHI, Tadashi TOHYAMA, Kohei TAKAHASHI, Shosuke |
description | The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion.
About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF.
PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF).
The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30085942</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1302120001</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10U1rFTEUBuAgFlurP8CNBEV3o-ckM_lYllK1UOimrmMmk3hTZiZjMiPef28u90JBcJV38ZzDCS8hbxA-IYD8XBCUlE2NjQaFDTwjF9hJ3jCB7fOauZINcpDn5GUpjwCgFccX5BxlJ5WQ_IL8uPltx82uMc00BRri_NNnaueBhpT9ztuBLttYPE1_4uRXnwsdtlwVneI40N1-SevO5yk66mweYqp6SrPNe9rvF1vKK3IWbF3w-vReku9fbh6uvzV3919vr6_uGse0Xhv0gIrVg73qBt-KFntwLDjR91aIzmMfguyRayYZCtVrKbhWQTruGGDQ_JJ8PO5dcvq1-bKaKRbnx9HOPm3FcADV6ZZV-P4f-Ji2PNfbDBOiFQJBd1W9-69CiZwJkBXhEbmcSsk-mCXHqf7dIJhDQ-bYkDnEQ0MG6szb0-Ktn_zwNHGqpIIPJ2CLs2PIdnaxPDmltNTQ8b9RKJhn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>217132607</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creator><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion.
About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF.
PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF).
The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1387-1307</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2614</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17578673</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCMCFG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Aged ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia depending on type of surgery ; Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy ; Aorta ; Biological and medical sciences ; Cardiopulmonary Bypass ; Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Failure ; Female ; Fingers ; Forehead ; Humans ; Hypothermia, Induced ; Intensive care medicine ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Middle Aged ; Monitoring ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation ; Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods ; Oximetry ; Oximetry - instrumentation ; Oximetry - methods ; Prospective Studies ; Pulse oximetry ; Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18897905$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17578673$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRITA, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><title>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</title><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><description>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion.
About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF.
PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF).
The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</subject><subject>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</subject><subject>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Fingers</subject><subject>Forehead</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypothermia, Induced</subject><subject>Intensive care medicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</subject><subject>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</subject><subject>Oximetry</subject><subject>Oximetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Oximetry - methods</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Pulse oximetry</subject><subject>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</subject><issn>1387-1307</issn><issn>1573-2614</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10U1rFTEUBuAgFlurP8CNBEV3o-ckM_lYllK1UOimrmMmk3hTZiZjMiPef28u90JBcJV38ZzDCS8hbxA-IYD8XBCUlE2NjQaFDTwjF9hJ3jCB7fOauZINcpDn5GUpjwCgFccX5BxlJ5WQ_IL8uPltx82uMc00BRri_NNnaueBhpT9ztuBLttYPE1_4uRXnwsdtlwVneI40N1-SevO5yk66mweYqp6SrPNe9rvF1vKK3IWbF3w-vReku9fbh6uvzV3919vr6_uGse0Xhv0gIrVg73qBt-KFntwLDjR91aIzmMfguyRayYZCtVrKbhWQTruGGDQ_JJ8PO5dcvq1-bKaKRbnx9HOPm3FcADV6ZZV-P4f-Ji2PNfbDBOiFQJBd1W9-69CiZwJkBXhEbmcSsk-mCXHqf7dIJhDQ-bYkDnEQ0MG6szb0-Ktn_zwNHGqpIIPJ2CLs2PIdnaxPDmltNTQ8b9RKJhn</recordid><startdate>200708</startdate><enddate>200708</enddate><creator>YAMAURA, Ken</creator><creator>IRITA, Kazuo</creator><creator>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creator><creator>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creator><creator>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200708</creationdate><title>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</title><author>YAMAURA, Ken ; IRITA, Kazuo ; KANDABASHI, Tadashi ; TOHYAMA, Kohei ; TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c299t-1e0182138e85de4641b0c2fc6bba665e1bff7b139272168b976398f7c3c201f93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia depending on type of surgery</topic><topic>Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Cardiopulmonary Bypass</topic><topic>Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Fingers</topic><topic>Forehead</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypothermia, Induced</topic><topic>Intensive care medicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation</topic><topic>Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods</topic><topic>Oximetry</topic><topic>Oximetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Oximetry - methods</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Pulse oximetry</topic><topic>Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YAMAURA, Ken</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>IRITA, Kazuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TOHYAMA, Kohei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YAMAURA, Ken</au><au>IRITA, Kazuo</au><au>KANDABASHI, Tadashi</au><au>TOHYAMA, Kohei</au><au>TAKAHASHI, Shosuke</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical monitoring and computing</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Monit Comput</addtitle><date>2007-08</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>252</epage><pages>249-252</pages><issn>1387-1307</issn><eissn>1573-2614</eissn><coden>JCMCFG</coden><abstract>The purpose of this study was to examine and compare the four combination of pulse oximeters (POs) and monitoring sites, the Nihon Kohden BSS-9800 (N), the Masimo SET Radical (M), the Nellcor N550 D-25 (N-D) and the Nellcor N550 Max-Fast (N-MF) in patients with peripheral hypoperfusion.
About 20 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery using mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied prospectively. PO sensors were applied on fingers in N, M and N-D, while on the forehead in N-MF.
PO failure was defined as failure to show no SpO2 value or incorrect SpO2 values. PO failure occurred in 12 patients with N, ten patients with M, four patients with N-D and ten patients with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. N, M, N-MF). The duration of PO failure was 19 +/- 30% of aortic cross-clamping with N, 29 +/- 33% with M, 10 +/- 26% with N-D and 43 +/- 57% with N-MF, respectively (p < 0.05 N-D vs. M and N-MF).
The results suggested that N-D is most useful among four combinations of POs and monitoring sites tested in this study for monitoring SpO2 during hypoperfusion. The superiority of N-MF during hypoperfusion was not evident in the present study.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>17578673</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1387-1307 |
ispartof | Journal of clinical monitoring and computing, 2007-08, Vol.21 (4), p.249-252 |
issn | 1387-1307 1573-2614 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30085942 |
source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Aged Anesthesia Anesthesia depending on type of surgery Anesthesia. Intensive care medicine. Transfusions. Cell therapy and gene therapy Aorta Biological and medical sciences Cardiopulmonary Bypass Emergency and intensive cardiocirculatory care. Cardiogenic shock. Coronary intensive care Equipment Failure Analysis Failure Female Fingers Forehead Humans Hypothermia, Induced Intensive care medicine Male Medical sciences Middle Aged Monitoring Monitoring, Intraoperative - instrumentation Monitoring, Intraoperative - methods Oximetry Oximetry - instrumentation Oximetry - methods Prospective Studies Pulse oximetry Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. Cardiopulmonary bypass |
title | Evaluation of finger and forehead pulse oximeters during mild hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T12%3A48%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20finger%20and%20forehead%20pulse%20oximeters%20during%20mild%20hypothermic%20cardiopulmonary%20bypass&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20monitoring%20and%20computing&rft.au=YAMAURA,%20Ken&rft.date=2007-08&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=252&rft.pages=249-252&rft.issn=1387-1307&rft.eissn=1573-2614&rft.coden=JCMCFG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10877-007-9081-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1302120001%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=217132607&rft_id=info:pmid/17578673&rfr_iscdi=true |