Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility

Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Color research and application 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.176-194
Hauptverfasser: Wyble, David R., Rich, Danny C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 194
container_issue 3
container_start_page 176
container_title Color research and application
container_volume 32
creator Wyble, David R.
Rich, Danny C.
description Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the terminology and procedures used to evaluate color measuring instruments. In this article, we develop reproducibility results from a medium‐term study of 10 commercial spectrocolorimeters. The comparisons are presented so as to contrast between the traditional color difference based specifications found in the historical literature and in manufacturer's literature and the more complex multidimensional methods specified in E2214. Instrument to instrument contrasts are reported as well as tests of agreement across a set of instruments as a whole. The results confirm common understandings. Hemispherical diffuse instruments exhibit a higher level of inter‐instrument agreement than do bidirectional (45:0) instruments. The results also provide support for a surprising conclusion about the statistical significance of the minor differences in both inter‐instrument agreement and inter‐model agreement for a single manufacturer. Some speculations on the impact of these conclusions to the development of future comparisons of spectrocolorimeters are given. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 32, 176–294, 2007
doi_str_mv 10.1002/col.20308
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30077769</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>30077769</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-9d954206669e7ba89c0b7b42fc4b16ba95b3fd9bea3a7b13907d3d5e7647f2813</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQhS1UJFLg0H_gE1IPG8brrL3bWxXRNFIIILUg9WLZu7PE7e462N5ADvx3NoS2J04jzXxv3swj5BODMQNIz0vXjFPgkB-QEctSSASX-QcyAi5YknImj8jHEH4DQMZzOSLPFxvd9Dpa11FX0xbjylWB1s7TDXpbb213T-MK6Rr90Gx1V-IOHHycT1rUofc7xHYh-r7FLoYxvdY-0vn8C513EX3yf0Y9rr2r-tIa29i4PSGHtW4Cnr7VY_Lz28WP6fdkcTWbT78uknI4Mk-KqsgmKQghCpRG50UJRppJWpcTw4TRRWZ4XRUGNdfSMF6ArHiVoRQTWac548fkbL93cH_oMUTV2lBi0-gOXR8UB5BSimIAP-_B0rsQPNZq7W2r_VYxULuA1fC4eg14YM_37KNtcPs-qKZXi7-KZK-wIeLTP4X2f5SQXGbqbjlTt784v13CjbrkL7yzjuM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>30077769</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Journals</source><creator>Wyble, David R. ; Rich, Danny C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wyble, David R. ; Rich, Danny C.</creatorcontrib><description>Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the terminology and procedures used to evaluate color measuring instruments. In this article, we develop reproducibility results from a medium‐term study of 10 commercial spectrocolorimeters. The comparisons are presented so as to contrast between the traditional color difference based specifications found in the historical literature and in manufacturer's literature and the more complex multidimensional methods specified in E2214. Instrument to instrument contrasts are reported as well as tests of agreement across a set of instruments as a whole. The results confirm common understandings. Hemispherical diffuse instruments exhibit a higher level of inter‐instrument agreement than do bidirectional (45:0) instruments. The results also provide support for a surprising conclusion about the statistical significance of the minor differences in both inter‐instrument agreement and inter‐model agreement for a single manufacturer. Some speculations on the impact of these conclusions to the development of future comparisons of spectrocolorimeters are given. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 32, 176–294, 2007</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-2317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-6378</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/col.20308</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>color measurement ; color tolerances ; instrumentation</subject><ispartof>Color research and application, 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.176-194</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-9d954206669e7ba89c0b7b42fc4b16ba95b3fd9bea3a7b13907d3d5e7647f2813</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-9d954206669e7ba89c0b7b42fc4b16ba95b3fd9bea3a7b13907d3d5e7647f2813</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcol.20308$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcol.20308$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wyble, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Danny C.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility</title><title>Color research and application</title><addtitle>Color Res. Appl</addtitle><description>Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the terminology and procedures used to evaluate color measuring instruments. In this article, we develop reproducibility results from a medium‐term study of 10 commercial spectrocolorimeters. The comparisons are presented so as to contrast between the traditional color difference based specifications found in the historical literature and in manufacturer's literature and the more complex multidimensional methods specified in E2214. Instrument to instrument contrasts are reported as well as tests of agreement across a set of instruments as a whole. The results confirm common understandings. Hemispherical diffuse instruments exhibit a higher level of inter‐instrument agreement than do bidirectional (45:0) instruments. The results also provide support for a surprising conclusion about the statistical significance of the minor differences in both inter‐instrument agreement and inter‐model agreement for a single manufacturer. Some speculations on the impact of these conclusions to the development of future comparisons of spectrocolorimeters are given. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 32, 176–294, 2007</description><subject>color measurement</subject><subject>color tolerances</subject><subject>instrumentation</subject><issn>0361-2317</issn><issn>1520-6378</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFPGzEQhS1UJFLg0H_gE1IPG8brrL3bWxXRNFIIILUg9WLZu7PE7e462N5ADvx3NoS2J04jzXxv3swj5BODMQNIz0vXjFPgkB-QEctSSASX-QcyAi5YknImj8jHEH4DQMZzOSLPFxvd9Dpa11FX0xbjylWB1s7TDXpbb213T-MK6Rr90Gx1V-IOHHycT1rUofc7xHYh-r7FLoYxvdY-0vn8C513EX3yf0Y9rr2r-tIa29i4PSGHtW4Cnr7VY_Lz28WP6fdkcTWbT78uknI4Mk-KqsgmKQghCpRG50UJRppJWpcTw4TRRWZ4XRUGNdfSMF6ArHiVoRQTWac548fkbL93cH_oMUTV2lBi0-gOXR8UB5BSimIAP-_B0rsQPNZq7W2r_VYxULuA1fC4eg14YM_37KNtcPs-qKZXi7-KZK-wIeLTP4X2f5SQXGbqbjlTt784v13CjbrkL7yzjuM</recordid><startdate>200706</startdate><enddate>200706</enddate><creator>Wyble, David R.</creator><creator>Rich, Danny C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200706</creationdate><title>Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility</title><author>Wyble, David R. ; Rich, Danny C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3878-9d954206669e7ba89c0b7b42fc4b16ba95b3fd9bea3a7b13907d3d5e7647f2813</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>color measurement</topic><topic>color tolerances</topic><topic>instrumentation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wyble, David R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rich, Danny C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Color research and application</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wyble, David R.</au><au>Rich, Danny C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility</atitle><jtitle>Color research and application</jtitle><addtitle>Color Res. Appl</addtitle><date>2007-06</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>176</spage><epage>194</epage><pages>176-194</pages><issn>0361-2317</issn><eissn>1520-6378</eissn><abstract>Part I described an experiment in which the repeatability of a number of common, commercially available spectrocolorimeters was compared using ASTM procedures. ASTM E2214‐02 Standard Practice for Specifying and Verifying the Performance of Color‐Measuring Instruments is intended to standardize the terminology and procedures used to evaluate color measuring instruments. In this article, we develop reproducibility results from a medium‐term study of 10 commercial spectrocolorimeters. The comparisons are presented so as to contrast between the traditional color difference based specifications found in the historical literature and in manufacturer's literature and the more complex multidimensional methods specified in E2214. Instrument to instrument contrasts are reported as well as tests of agreement across a set of instruments as a whole. The results confirm common understandings. Hemispherical diffuse instruments exhibit a higher level of inter‐instrument agreement than do bidirectional (45:0) instruments. The results also provide support for a surprising conclusion about the statistical significance of the minor differences in both inter‐instrument agreement and inter‐model agreement for a single manufacturer. Some speculations on the impact of these conclusions to the development of future comparisons of spectrocolorimeters are given. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Col Res Appl, 32, 176–294, 2007</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/col.20308</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-2317
ispartof Color research and application, 2007-06, Vol.32 (3), p.176-194
issn 0361-2317
1520-6378
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_30077769
source Wiley-Blackwell Journals
subjects color measurement
color tolerances
instrumentation
title Evaluation of methods for verifying the performance of color-measuring instruments. Part II: Inter-instrument reproducibility
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-20T23%3A37%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20methods%20for%20verifying%20the%20performance%20of%20color-measuring%20instruments.%20Part%20II:%20Inter-instrument%20reproducibility&rft.jtitle=Color%20research%20and%20application&rft.au=Wyble,%20David%20R.&rft.date=2007-06&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=176&rft.epage=194&rft.pages=176-194&rft.issn=0361-2317&rft.eissn=1520-6378&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/col.20308&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E30077769%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=30077769&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true