Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation

Because of an increasing interest in the use of cold-formed steel for commercial and residential framing, both design and installation guidelines are needed. The wall framing, which typically consists of axial load bearing C-section studs, is laterally braced and attached at the bottom and top of th...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of architectural engineering 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-110
Hauptverfasser: LaBoube, R. A, Findlay, P. F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 110
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Journal of architectural engineering
container_volume 13
creator LaBoube, R. A
Findlay, P. F
description Because of an increasing interest in the use of cold-formed steel for commercial and residential framing, both design and installation guidelines are needed. The wall framing, which typically consists of axial load bearing C-section studs, is laterally braced and attached at the bottom and top of the wall to a track section. The common bottom and top attachment consists of the wall stud and track of nominally the same cross-section depth. Because the nominal depths of the C-section and the track are similar, a tight connection is often not achieved and a gap occurs. The Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing—General Provisions specifies that the gap between the wall stud and track in a wall assembly must not exceed 1∕8 in. This gap dimension is consistent with the gap specified by ASTM C 1007. The value of 1∕8 in. is based on industry experience and practice but had not been experimentally verified. To explore both the stud-to-track connection strength and the aesthetic concerns associated with a gap between the axial load bearing stud and the track in a typical cold-formed steel wall assembly, a test program was initiated at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Based on the findings of the 54 wall assembly tests and short column tests performed in this experimental study, design guidelines are proposed for a typical wall stud assembly.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29969918</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29969918</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-887d3735718b0c60ae50acee16eea3df4b2e07508348c25f2846308d17467e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoRfHdqi-SZp_Aw9jzDkYeNjAY8jaVDq7tiat6Lc3ZVNvnhLCk9_vfR-ERhjuMHB8P55t5osJBsFjSCgeEwAxwXRKxhjY5AwNsEpozBiX5-H-g12iK-_3ACC5oANEXkxZRpu2y-K2jrfOpG_R0jTTaPHZWFccbNWaMlpVH9a3xatpi7q6Rhe5Kb29OZ1DtH1cbOdP8fp5uZrP1rGhQrWxlCKjgjKB5Q5SDsYyMKm1mFtraJYnO2JBMJA0kSlhOZEJpyAzLBIubEKHaHSMbVz93oV6fSh8asvSVLbuvCZKcaWwDODDEUxd7b2zuW7C4MZ9aQy6N6V1b0r3CnSvQPemNKaahDcW_t-eioxPTZk7U6WF_wuRQnHJeeDUkQuY1fu6c1VY_7fk345vxxN43A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29969918</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>LaBoube, R. A ; Findlay, P. F</creator><creatorcontrib>LaBoube, R. A ; Findlay, P. F</creatorcontrib><description>Because of an increasing interest in the use of cold-formed steel for commercial and residential framing, both design and installation guidelines are needed. The wall framing, which typically consists of axial load bearing C-section studs, is laterally braced and attached at the bottom and top of the wall to a track section. The common bottom and top attachment consists of the wall stud and track of nominally the same cross-section depth. Because the nominal depths of the C-section and the track are similar, a tight connection is often not achieved and a gap occurs. The Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing—General Provisions specifies that the gap between the wall stud and track in a wall assembly must not exceed 1∕8 in. This gap dimension is consistent with the gap specified by ASTM C 1007. The value of 1∕8 in. is based on industry experience and practice but had not been experimentally verified. To explore both the stud-to-track connection strength and the aesthetic concerns associated with a gap between the axial load bearing stud and the track in a typical cold-formed steel wall assembly, a test program was initiated at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Based on the findings of the 54 wall assembly tests and short column tests performed in this experimental study, design guidelines are proposed for a typical wall stud assembly.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-0431</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5568</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAEIED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings ; Buildings. Public works ; Exact sciences and technology ; External envelopes ; Joints ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; Wall. Partition</subject><ispartof>Journal of architectural engineering, 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-110</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-887d3735718b0c60ae50acee16eea3df4b2e07508348c25f2846308d17467e43</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,75939,75947</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18796866$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>LaBoube, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, P. F</creatorcontrib><title>Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation</title><title>Journal of architectural engineering</title><description>Because of an increasing interest in the use of cold-formed steel for commercial and residential framing, both design and installation guidelines are needed. The wall framing, which typically consists of axial load bearing C-section studs, is laterally braced and attached at the bottom and top of the wall to a track section. The common bottom and top attachment consists of the wall stud and track of nominally the same cross-section depth. Because the nominal depths of the C-section and the track are similar, a tight connection is often not achieved and a gap occurs. The Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing—General Provisions specifies that the gap between the wall stud and track in a wall assembly must not exceed 1∕8 in. This gap dimension is consistent with the gap specified by ASTM C 1007. The value of 1∕8 in. is based on industry experience and practice but had not been experimentally verified. To explore both the stud-to-track connection strength and the aesthetic concerns associated with a gap between the axial load bearing stud and the track in a typical cold-formed steel wall assembly, a test program was initiated at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Based on the findings of the 54 wall assembly tests and short column tests performed in this experimental study, design guidelines are proposed for a typical wall stud assembly.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External envelopes</subject><subject>Joints</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>Wall. Partition</subject><issn>1076-0431</issn><issn>1943-5568</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9LwzAYh4MoOKffoRfHdqi-SZp_Aw9jzDkYeNjAY8jaVDq7tiat6Lc3ZVNvnhLCk9_vfR-ERhjuMHB8P55t5osJBsFjSCgeEwAxwXRKxhjY5AwNsEpozBiX5-H-g12iK-_3ACC5oANEXkxZRpu2y-K2jrfOpG_R0jTTaPHZWFccbNWaMlpVH9a3xatpi7q6Rhe5Kb29OZ1DtH1cbOdP8fp5uZrP1rGhQrWxlCKjgjKB5Q5SDsYyMKm1mFtraJYnO2JBMJA0kSlhOZEJpyAzLBIubEKHaHSMbVz93oV6fSh8asvSVLbuvCZKcaWwDODDEUxd7b2zuW7C4MZ9aQy6N6V1b0r3CnSvQPemNKaahDcW_t-eioxPTZk7U6WF_wuRQnHJeeDUkQuY1fu6c1VY_7fk345vxxN43A</recordid><startdate>20070601</startdate><enddate>20070601</enddate><creator>LaBoube, R. A</creator><creator>Findlay, P. F</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070601</creationdate><title>Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation</title><author>LaBoube, R. A ; Findlay, P. F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a379t-887d3735718b0c60ae50acee16eea3df4b2e07508348c25f2846308d17467e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External envelopes</topic><topic>Joints</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>Wall. Partition</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>LaBoube, R. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Findlay, P. F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>LaBoube, R. A</au><au>Findlay, P. F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation</atitle><jtitle>Journal of architectural engineering</jtitle><date>2007-06-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>110</epage><pages>105-110</pages><issn>1076-0431</issn><eissn>1943-5568</eissn><coden>JAEIED</coden><abstract>Because of an increasing interest in the use of cold-formed steel for commercial and residential framing, both design and installation guidelines are needed. The wall framing, which typically consists of axial load bearing C-section studs, is laterally braced and attached at the bottom and top of the wall to a track section. The common bottom and top attachment consists of the wall stud and track of nominally the same cross-section depth. Because the nominal depths of the C-section and the track are similar, a tight connection is often not achieved and a gap occurs. The Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing—General Provisions specifies that the gap between the wall stud and track in a wall assembly must not exceed 1∕8 in. This gap dimension is consistent with the gap specified by ASTM C 1007. The value of 1∕8 in. is based on industry experience and practice but had not been experimentally verified. To explore both the stud-to-track connection strength and the aesthetic concerns associated with a gap between the axial load bearing stud and the track in a typical cold-formed steel wall assembly, a test program was initiated at the University of Missouri-Rolla. Based on the findings of the 54 wall assembly tests and short column tests performed in this experimental study, design guidelines are proposed for a typical wall stud assembly.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-0431
ispartof Journal of architectural engineering, 2007-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-110
issn 1076-0431
1943-5568
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29969918
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Applied sciences
Buildings
Buildings. Public works
Exact sciences and technology
External envelopes
Joints
TECHNICAL PAPERS
Wall. Partition
title Wall Stud-to-Track Gap: Experimental Investigation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T19%3A29%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Wall%20Stud-to-Track%20Gap:%20Experimental%20Investigation&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20architectural%20engineering&rft.au=LaBoube,%20R.%20A&rft.date=2007-06-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=110&rft.pages=105-110&rft.issn=1076-0431&rft.eissn=1943-5568&rft.coden=JAEIED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0431(2007)13:2(105)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29969918%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29969918&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true