The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995
A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Marine pollution bulletin 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 77 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 64 |
container_title | Marine pollution bulletin |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Law, Robin J. Klungsøyr, Jarle Freriks, Ivo L. |
description | A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29941327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X97001240</els_id><sourcerecordid>16558411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9qFDEYxQdRcK0-gpALkRY6mv-ZeCNLWW1hi5VtwbvwTSahIzOTNZkV5s67PoBv6JOY7S693b36PsLvnJOQUxRvCf5AMJEfVxhTUTIqf5xqdYYxobzEz4oZqZQuGZPseTF7Ql4Wr1L6iTFWVJFZ8XB779D3u_nq6npxvUBLqEOEMcQJ3bjoQ-xhsA6txk0zoeDROnSTnWzXWgQx9DDm5X5qYrAQ6zAkdHozvzz7hOYpuZR6N4xb1ZgzfBvTmLfoHIphMzTpHBGt-b8_f_MQr4sXHrrk3uznSXH3ZXF7cVkuv329upgvSxBKjqVSwBwl3HLVVNxiaDgTvrZNBVzUsqqxllZ4rhijngCrLW8YUKhAC0_ywUnxfue7juHXxqXR9G2yrutgcGGTDM1XIoyqY0DGK02OABXDXOhjQKKVkAdBIoWoODkcTTivlDjiMYRJuXcUO9DGkFJ03qxj20OcDMFmWzbzWDazbZLRyjyWzeCse7cPgGSh8zHXpk1PYko1V3Rr_3mHufzFv1sXTbKtyw1r2ujsaJrQHgj6Dwqi54I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13668411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><description>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPNBAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine and brackish environment ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Seawaters, estuaries ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2294721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><description>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine and brackish environment</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Seawaters, estuaries</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkt9qFDEYxQdRcK0-gpALkRY6mv-ZeCNLWW1hi5VtwbvwTSahIzOTNZkV5s67PoBv6JOY7S693b36PsLvnJOQUxRvCf5AMJEfVxhTUTIqf5xqdYYxobzEz4oZqZQuGZPseTF7Ql4Wr1L6iTFWVJFZ8XB779D3u_nq6npxvUBLqEOEMcQJ3bjoQ-xhsA6txk0zoeDROnSTnWzXWgQx9DDm5X5qYrAQ6zAkdHozvzz7hOYpuZR6N4xb1ZgzfBvTmLfoHIphMzTpHBGt-b8_f_MQr4sXHrrk3uznSXH3ZXF7cVkuv329upgvSxBKjqVSwBwl3HLVVNxiaDgTvrZNBVzUsqqxllZ4rhijngCrLW8YUKhAC0_ywUnxfue7juHXxqXR9G2yrutgcGGTDM1XIoyqY0DGK02OABXDXOhjQKKVkAdBIoWoODkcTTivlDjiMYRJuXcUO9DGkFJ03qxj20OcDMFmWzbzWDazbZLRyjyWzeCse7cPgGSh8zHXpk1PYko1V3Rr_3mHufzFv1sXTbKtyw1r2ujsaJrQHgj6Dwqi54I</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Law, Robin J.</creator><creator>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creator><creator>Freriks, Ivo L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><author>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine and brackish environment</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Seawaters, estuaries</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Law, Robin J.</au><au>Klungsøyr, Jarle</au><au>Freriks, Ivo L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>64-77</pages><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><coden>MPNBAZ</coden><abstract>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-326X |
ispartof | Marine pollution bulletin, 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77 |
issn | 0025-326X 1879-3363 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29941327 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Analysis methods Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Marine and brackish environment Natural water pollution Pollution Pollution, environment geology Seawaters, estuaries Water treatment and pollution |
title | The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20QUASIMEME%20Laboratory%20Performance%20Study%20of%20polycyclic%20aromatic%20hydrocarbons%20(PAH):%20Assessment%20of%20the%20first%20three%20rounds,%201994%E2%80%931995&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Law,%20Robin%20J.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=64-77&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft.coden=MPNBAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16558411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13668411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0025326X97001240&rfr_iscdi=true |