The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995

A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Marine pollution bulletin 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77
Hauptverfasser: Law, Robin J., Klungsøyr, Jarle, Freriks, Ivo L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 77
container_issue 1
container_start_page 64
container_title Marine pollution bulletin
container_volume 35
creator Law, Robin J.
Klungsøyr, Jarle
Freriks, Ivo L.
description A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29941327</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0025326X97001240</els_id><sourcerecordid>16558411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt9qFDEYxQdRcK0-gpALkRY6mv-ZeCNLWW1hi5VtwbvwTSahIzOTNZkV5s67PoBv6JOY7S693b36PsLvnJOQUxRvCf5AMJEfVxhTUTIqf5xqdYYxobzEz4oZqZQuGZPseTF7Ql4Wr1L6iTFWVJFZ8XB779D3u_nq6npxvUBLqEOEMcQJ3bjoQ-xhsA6txk0zoeDROnSTnWzXWgQx9DDm5X5qYrAQ6zAkdHozvzz7hOYpuZR6N4xb1ZgzfBvTmLfoHIphMzTpHBGt-b8_f_MQr4sXHrrk3uznSXH3ZXF7cVkuv329upgvSxBKjqVSwBwl3HLVVNxiaDgTvrZNBVzUsqqxllZ4rhijngCrLW8YUKhAC0_ywUnxfue7juHXxqXR9G2yrutgcGGTDM1XIoyqY0DGK02OABXDXOhjQKKVkAdBIoWoODkcTTivlDjiMYRJuXcUO9DGkFJ03qxj20OcDMFmWzbzWDazbZLRyjyWzeCse7cPgGSh8zHXpk1PYko1V3Rr_3mHufzFv1sXTbKtyw1r2ujsaJrQHgj6Dwqi54I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13668411</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><description>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-326X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-3363</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPNBAZ</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis methods ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Marine and brackish environment ; Natural water pollution ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Seawaters, estuaries ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Marine pollution bulletin, 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77</ispartof><rights>1997</rights><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3548,23929,23930,25139,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=2294721$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><title>Marine pollution bulletin</title><description>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</description><subject>Analysis methods</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Marine and brackish environment</subject><subject>Natural water pollution</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Seawaters, estuaries</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0025-326X</issn><issn>1879-3363</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1997</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkt9qFDEYxQdRcK0-gpALkRY6mv-ZeCNLWW1hi5VtwbvwTSahIzOTNZkV5s67PoBv6JOY7S693b36PsLvnJOQUxRvCf5AMJEfVxhTUTIqf5xqdYYxobzEz4oZqZQuGZPseTF7Ql4Wr1L6iTFWVJFZ8XB779D3u_nq6npxvUBLqEOEMcQJ3bjoQ-xhsA6txk0zoeDROnSTnWzXWgQx9DDm5X5qYrAQ6zAkdHozvzz7hOYpuZR6N4xb1ZgzfBvTmLfoHIphMzTpHBGt-b8_f_MQr4sXHrrk3uznSXH3ZXF7cVkuv329upgvSxBKjqVSwBwl3HLVVNxiaDgTvrZNBVzUsqqxllZ4rhijngCrLW8YUKhAC0_ywUnxfue7juHXxqXR9G2yrutgcGGTDM1XIoyqY0DGK02OABXDXOhjQKKVkAdBIoWoODkcTTivlDjiMYRJuXcUO9DGkFJ03qxj20OcDMFmWzbzWDazbZLRyjyWzeCse7cPgGSh8zHXpk1PYko1V3Rr_3mHufzFv1sXTbKtyw1r2ujsaJrQHgj6Dwqi54I</recordid><startdate>19970101</startdate><enddate>19970101</enddate><creator>Law, Robin J.</creator><creator>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creator><creator>Freriks, Ivo L.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19970101</creationdate><title>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</title><author>Law, Robin J. ; Klungsøyr, Jarle ; Freriks, Ivo L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a576t-77a3e214c47d84c0ad435fbcd8a45b68b096c5f47332f1a3bc4d3a2a8a95f11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1997</creationdate><topic>Analysis methods</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Marine and brackish environment</topic><topic>Natural water pollution</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Seawaters, estuaries</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Law, Robin J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klungsøyr, Jarle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freriks, Ivo L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Law, Robin J.</au><au>Klungsøyr, Jarle</au><au>Freriks, Ivo L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995</atitle><jtitle>Marine pollution bulletin</jtitle><date>1997-01-01</date><risdate>1997</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>64</spage><epage>77</epage><pages>64-77</pages><issn>0025-326X</issn><eissn>1879-3363</eissn><coden>MPNBAZ</coden><abstract>A Laboratory Performance Study (LPS) has been undertaken to improve the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) in marine sediments as part of the QUASIMEME project. The first three rounds of the exercise included the analysis of standard solutions, and both raw and cleaned-up sediment extracts, and were intended to test calibration, chromatographic performance and clean-up techniques. The methods used were based on both gas chromatography (GC) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The number of participating laboratories was 25 in Rounds 1 and 2, and 16 in Round 3. For the 10 PAH determined, robust coefficients of variation for the analysis of standard solutions varied from 8–30%, 13–22%, and 8.8–21% in the three rounds of the exercise to date. For a raw sediment extract the robust coefficients of variation varied from 17–34%. The two major factors limiting performance were calibration procedures, which seemed to apply across the range of PAH determined, and the need to avoid errors when calculating results. Good results can be obtained using both GC and HPLC techniques when methods are selected and applied properly, with appropriate care and control.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-326X
ispartof Marine pollution bulletin, 1997-01, Vol.35 (1), p.64-77
issn 0025-326X
1879-3363
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29941327
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Analysis methods
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Applied sciences
Biological and medical sciences
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics
Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Marine and brackish environment
Natural water pollution
Pollution
Pollution, environment geology
Seawaters, estuaries
Water treatment and pollution
title The QUASIMEME Laboratory Performance Study of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH): Assessment of the first three rounds, 1994–1995
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T20%3A03%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20QUASIMEME%20Laboratory%20Performance%20Study%20of%20polycyclic%20aromatic%20hydrocarbons%20(PAH):%20Assessment%20of%20the%20first%20three%20rounds,%201994%E2%80%931995&rft.jtitle=Marine%20pollution%20bulletin&rft.au=Law,%20Robin%20J.&rft.date=1997-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=64&rft.epage=77&rft.pages=64-77&rft.issn=0025-326X&rft.eissn=1879-3363&rft.coden=MPNBAZ&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0025-326X(97)00124-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16558411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13668411&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0025326X97001240&rfr_iscdi=true