Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal
In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation af...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 166 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 159 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Ubay-Cokgor, E Randall, C W Orhon, D |
description | In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2005.0402 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29933271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024650510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-75671b6a249d9994adaade8f19cbbfd56dbbde8f81b15e717189bb9fdb9e07df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun4cvUpBEC9dM0mbNEdZ_ALBi55r0kx1ZdusSerivzfFFcGDesmQzJM3Qx5CDoFOGQhxtgpxyigtp7SgbINMQCmRK8nZJplQJnkOjPEdshvCC6VU8oJukx0QAIVgakIeL970YtBx7vrMtVl8xmyJvnW-032DX0f37yH1L52zIVvpEHGlI_osetSxwz5my4VOa7qW9fPo3RP2mcfOpex9stXqRcCDdd0jD5cX97Pr_Pbu6mZ2fps3BYWYy1JIMEKzQlmlVKGt1harFlRjTGtLYY0Z9xUYKFGChEoZo1prFFJpW75HTj5zl969Dhhi3c1Dg4s0GLoh1EwpzpmEf4CSV6USf4IgGFCQMoGnv4OUFaKkJdCEHv9AX9zg-_QxNaiCl1Uac3w5_6Qa70Lw2NZLP--0f09R9Wi9Ttbr0Xo9Wk_80Tp1MB3ab3qtmX8A9ASo8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943582996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16114629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Ammonium compounds ; Average flow ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Bioreactors ; Computer Simulation ; Denitrification ; Discharge ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Food ; Food plants ; Industrial Waste ; Meat-Packing Industry ; Mineral nutrients ; Models, Theoretical ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - isolation & purification ; Nitrogen removal ; Nutrient removal ; Oxygen demand ; Oxygen requirement ; Phosphorus ; Removal ; Software ; Suspended particulate matter ; Total oxygen demand ; Total suspended solids ; Virginia ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23921,23922,25131,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16114629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium compounds</subject><subject>Average flow</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Industrial Waste</subject><subject>Meat-Packing Industry</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Oxygen demand</subject><subject>Oxygen requirement</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Suspended particulate matter</subject><subject>Total oxygen demand</subject><subject>Total suspended solids</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun4cvUpBEC9dM0mbNEdZ_ALBi55r0kx1ZdusSerivzfFFcGDesmQzJM3Qx5CDoFOGQhxtgpxyigtp7SgbINMQCmRK8nZJplQJnkOjPEdshvCC6VU8oJukx0QAIVgakIeL970YtBx7vrMtVl8xmyJvnW-032DX0f37yH1L52zIVvpEHGlI_osetSxwz5my4VOa7qW9fPo3RP2mcfOpex9stXqRcCDdd0jD5cX97Pr_Pbu6mZ2fps3BYWYy1JIMEKzQlmlVKGt1harFlRjTGtLYY0Z9xUYKFGChEoZo1prFFJpW75HTj5zl969Dhhi3c1Dg4s0GLoh1EwpzpmEf4CSV6USf4IgGFCQMoGnv4OUFaKkJdCEHv9AX9zg-_QxNaiCl1Uac3w5_6Qa70Lw2NZLP--0f09R9Wi9Ttbr0Xo9Wk_80Tp1MB3ab3qtmX8A9ASo8w</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creator><creator>Randall, C W</creator><creator>Orhon, D</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><author>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-75671b6a249d9994adaade8f19cbbfd56dbbde8f81b15e717189bb9fdb9e07df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium compounds</topic><topic>Average flow</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Industrial Waste</topic><topic>Meat-Packing Industry</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Oxygen demand</topic><topic>Oxygen requirement</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Suspended particulate matter</topic><topic>Total oxygen demand</topic><topic>Total suspended solids</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ubay-Cokgor, E</au><au>Randall, C W</au><au>Orhon, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>159-166</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>16114629</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2005.0402</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29933271 |
source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Ammonium Ammonium compounds Average flow Biochemical oxygen demand Bioreactors Computer Simulation Denitrification Discharge Evaluation Evaluation Studies as Topic Flow rates Flow velocity Food Food plants Industrial Waste Meat-Packing Industry Mineral nutrients Models, Theoretical Nitrogen Nitrogen - isolation & purification Nitrogen removal Nutrient removal Oxygen demand Oxygen requirement Phosphorus Removal Software Suspended particulate matter Total oxygen demand Total suspended solids Virginia Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewater treatment plants Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification Water treatment |
title | Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20performance%20of%20the%20Tyson%20Foods%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20for%20nitrogen%20removal&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Ubay-Cokgor,%20E&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=159-166&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2005.0402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024650510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943582996&rft_id=info:pmid/16114629&rfr_iscdi=true |