Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal

In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation af...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166
Hauptverfasser: Ubay-Cokgor, E, Randall, C W, Orhon, D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 166
container_issue 11
container_start_page 159
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 51
creator Ubay-Cokgor, E
Randall, C W
Orhon, D
description In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.2005.0402
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29933271</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1024650510</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-75671b6a249d9994adaade8f19cbbfd56dbbde8f81b15e717189bb9fdb9e07df3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun4cvUpBEC9dM0mbNEdZ_ALBi55r0kx1ZdusSerivzfFFcGDesmQzJM3Qx5CDoFOGQhxtgpxyigtp7SgbINMQCmRK8nZJplQJnkOjPEdshvCC6VU8oJukx0QAIVgakIeL970YtBx7vrMtVl8xmyJvnW-032DX0f37yH1L52zIVvpEHGlI_osetSxwz5my4VOa7qW9fPo3RP2mcfOpex9stXqRcCDdd0jD5cX97Pr_Pbu6mZ2fps3BYWYy1JIMEKzQlmlVKGt1harFlRjTGtLYY0Z9xUYKFGChEoZo1prFFJpW75HTj5zl969Dhhi3c1Dg4s0GLoh1EwpzpmEf4CSV6USf4IgGFCQMoGnv4OUFaKkJdCEHv9AX9zg-_QxNaiCl1Uac3w5_6Qa70Lw2NZLP--0f09R9Wi9Ttbr0Xo9Wk_80Tp1MB3ab3qtmX8A9ASo8w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943582996</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</creator><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2005.0402</identifier><identifier>PMID: 16114629</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Ammonium ; Ammonium compounds ; Average flow ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Bioreactors ; Computer Simulation ; Denitrification ; Discharge ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; Flow rates ; Flow velocity ; Food ; Food plants ; Industrial Waste ; Meat-Packing Industry ; Mineral nutrients ; Models, Theoretical ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - isolation &amp; purification ; Nitrogen removal ; Nutrient removal ; Oxygen demand ; Oxygen requirement ; Phosphorus ; Removal ; Software ; Suspended particulate matter ; Total oxygen demand ; Total suspended solids ; Virginia ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewater treatment plants ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Jun 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23921,23922,25131,27915,27916</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16114629$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</description><subject>Ammonium</subject><subject>Ammonium compounds</subject><subject>Average flow</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Denitrification</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>Flow rates</subject><subject>Flow velocity</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Food plants</subject><subject>Industrial Waste</subject><subject>Meat-Packing Industry</subject><subject>Mineral nutrients</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Nitrogen removal</subject><subject>Nutrient removal</subject><subject>Oxygen demand</subject><subject>Oxygen requirement</subject><subject>Phosphorus</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Suspended particulate matter</subject><subject>Total oxygen demand</subject><subject>Total suspended solids</subject><subject>Virginia</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment plants</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU1LxDAQhoMoun4cvUpBEC9dM0mbNEdZ_ALBi55r0kx1ZdusSerivzfFFcGDesmQzJM3Qx5CDoFOGQhxtgpxyigtp7SgbINMQCmRK8nZJplQJnkOjPEdshvCC6VU8oJukx0QAIVgakIeL970YtBx7vrMtVl8xmyJvnW-032DX0f37yH1L52zIVvpEHGlI_osetSxwz5my4VOa7qW9fPo3RP2mcfOpex9stXqRcCDdd0jD5cX97Pr_Pbu6mZ2fps3BYWYy1JIMEKzQlmlVKGt1harFlRjTGtLYY0Z9xUYKFGChEoZo1prFFJpW75HTj5zl969Dhhi3c1Dg4s0GLoh1EwpzpmEf4CSV6USf4IgGFCQMoGnv4OUFaKkJdCEHv9AX9zg-_QxNaiCl1Uac3w5_6Qa70Lw2NZLP--0f09R9Wi9Ttbr0Xo9Wk_80Tp1MB3ab3qtmX8A9ASo8w</recordid><startdate>20050101</startdate><enddate>20050101</enddate><creator>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creator><creator>Randall, C W</creator><creator>Orhon, D</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</title><author>Ubay-Cokgor, E ; Randall, C W ; Orhon, D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c401t-75671b6a249d9994adaade8f19cbbfd56dbbde8f81b15e717189bb9fdb9e07df3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Ammonium</topic><topic>Ammonium compounds</topic><topic>Average flow</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Denitrification</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>Flow rates</topic><topic>Flow velocity</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Food plants</topic><topic>Industrial Waste</topic><topic>Meat-Packing Industry</topic><topic>Mineral nutrients</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Nitrogen removal</topic><topic>Nutrient removal</topic><topic>Oxygen demand</topic><topic>Oxygen requirement</topic><topic>Phosphorus</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Suspended particulate matter</topic><topic>Total oxygen demand</topic><topic>Total suspended solids</topic><topic>Virginia</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment plants</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ubay-Cokgor, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Randall, C W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Orhon, D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ubay-Cokgor, E</au><au>Randall, C W</au><au>Orhon, D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2005-01-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>159</spage><epage>166</epage><pages>159-166</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>In this paper, the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant with an average flow rate of 6500 m3/d was evaluated before and after upgrading of the treatment system for nitrogen removal. This study was also covered with an additional recommendation of BIOWIN BNR program simulation after the modification period to achieve an additional nutrient removal. The results clearly show that the upgrading was very successful for improved nitrogen removal, with a 57% decrease on the total nitrogen discharge. There also were slight reductions in the discharged loads of biological oxygen demand, total suspended solids, ammonium and total phosphorus with denitrification, even though the effluent flow was higher during operation of the nitrogen removal configuration.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>16114629</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2005.0402</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 2005-01, Vol.51 (11), p.159-166
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29933271
source MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Ammonium
Ammonium compounds
Average flow
Biochemical oxygen demand
Bioreactors
Computer Simulation
Denitrification
Discharge
Evaluation
Evaluation Studies as Topic
Flow rates
Flow velocity
Food
Food plants
Industrial Waste
Meat-Packing Industry
Mineral nutrients
Models, Theoretical
Nitrogen
Nitrogen - isolation & purification
Nitrogen removal
Nutrient removal
Oxygen demand
Oxygen requirement
Phosphorus
Removal
Software
Suspended particulate matter
Total oxygen demand
Total suspended solids
Virginia
Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods
Wastewater
Wastewater treatment
Wastewater treatment plants
Water Pollutants, Chemical - isolation & purification
Water treatment
title Evaluation of the performance of the Tyson Foods wastewater treatment plant for nitrogen removal
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T21%3A21%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20performance%20of%20the%20Tyson%20Foods%20wastewater%20treatment%20plant%20for%20nitrogen%20removal&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Ubay-Cokgor,%20E&rft.date=2005-01-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=159&rft.epage=166&rft.pages=159-166&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2005.0402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1024650510%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943582996&rft_id=info:pmid/16114629&rfr_iscdi=true