Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control

This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of water resources planning and management 2001-06, Vol.127 (3), p.194-201
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Chi-Yuan, Field, Richard, Pisano, William C, Barsanti, James, Joyce, James J, Sorenson, Harvey
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 201
container_issue 3
container_start_page 194
container_title Journal of water resources planning and management
container_volume 127
creator Fan, Chi-Yuan
Field, Richard
Pisano, William C
Barsanti, James
Joyce, James J
Sorenson, Harvey
description This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of hydrogen sulfide production resulting in the reduction of associated pollution and sewerline corrosion. During low-flow dry-weather periods, sanitary wastewater solids deposited in combined sewer systems can generate hydrogen sulfide and methane gases due to anaerobic conditions. Sulfates are reduced to hydrogen sulfide gas that can then be oxidized to sulfuric acid on pipes and structure walls by further biochemical transformation. Furthermore, these solids deposits or sediments are discharged to the urban streams during storm events that can cause degradation of receiving-water quality. Thus, dry-weather sewer sedimentation not only creates hazardous conditions and sewer degradation but contributes significant pollutant loads to the urban receiving waters during wet-weather high-flow periods. Performance of two technologies [i.e., the tipping flusher and the flushing gate (FG)] was evaluated by a detailed examination of 18 facilities in Germany, Canada, and United States. As a result, both the tipping flusher and FG technology appear to be the most cost-effective means for flushing solids and debris from combined sewer overflow-storage tanks, while the FG is considered to be the most efficient method for flushing large diameter, flat sewers. In addition, capsulated reviews of several cost-effectiveness analyses are reported demonstrating the comparative benefits of flushing technology.
doi_str_mv 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29881029</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>26752880</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-70ed8a6c3c07458c0114d1a70d5bdfd980f14bcafad980afa3ea82a3ef0414753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhq1pk9Z1_IdcQSuRcfwV21xMQh1lICYQBcGd5SYOhKUxsxMh_v3sFrgEfOFzLD96LZ8HoR0MPzAUeG9ysJgdTkFQmiumigkBwFNMxD6dYMWmn9AoFppzxslnNHrlvqJvIdwDgABORmi-sI_WZ6arskvT_c3m7RDumu42q53PFrZqVrbrd7OZ896FxnW7a_Tcte3Qx2O86Hrv2u_oS23aYLee6xhdzQ8vZ7_z07Oj49nBaW44EX0uwFbSFCUtQTAuS8CYVdgIqPiyqislocZsWZrapD4Wao0kca-BYSY4HaPtTe6Dd_8GG3q9akJp29Z01g1BEyUlBqI-ABYFj0N4HywUlww-8HQhOJES3gWxBKFYwSL4cwOWcbbB21o_-GZl_JPGoJNjrZNjndzp5E4nxzo61lQnuWN0swkwMV_fu8F3cfj65Priz6_4OYgkpEVTr9i6xy_Zb0f_B_KysW8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>18079464</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control</title><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Fan, Chi-Yuan ; Field, Richard ; Pisano, William C ; Barsanti, James ; Joyce, James J ; Sorenson, Harvey</creator><creatorcontrib>Fan, Chi-Yuan ; Field, Richard ; Pisano, William C ; Barsanti, James ; Joyce, James J ; Sorenson, Harvey</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of hydrogen sulfide production resulting in the reduction of associated pollution and sewerline corrosion. During low-flow dry-weather periods, sanitary wastewater solids deposited in combined sewer systems can generate hydrogen sulfide and methane gases due to anaerobic conditions. Sulfates are reduced to hydrogen sulfide gas that can then be oxidized to sulfuric acid on pipes and structure walls by further biochemical transformation. Furthermore, these solids deposits or sediments are discharged to the urban streams during storm events that can cause degradation of receiving-water quality. Thus, dry-weather sewer sedimentation not only creates hazardous conditions and sewer degradation but contributes significant pollutant loads to the urban receiving waters during wet-weather high-flow periods. Performance of two technologies [i.e., the tipping flusher and the flushing gate (FG)] was evaluated by a detailed examination of 18 facilities in Germany, Canada, and United States. As a result, both the tipping flusher and FG technology appear to be the most cost-effective means for flushing solids and debris from combined sewer overflow-storage tanks, while the FG is considered to be the most efficient method for flushing large diameter, flat sewers. In addition, capsulated reviews of several cost-effectiveness analyses are reported demonstrating the comparative benefits of flushing technology.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9496</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-5452</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Canada ; Germany ; TECHNICAL PAPERS ; USA</subject><ispartof>Journal of water resources planning and management, 2001-06, Vol.127 (3), p.194-201</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-70ed8a6c3c07458c0114d1a70d5bdfd980f14bcafad980afa3ea82a3ef0414753</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-70ed8a6c3c07458c0114d1a70d5bdfd980f14bcafad980afa3ea82a3ef0414753</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,75964,75972</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fan, Chi-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisano, William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsanti, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Harvey</creatorcontrib><title>Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control</title><title>Journal of water resources planning and management</title><description>This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of hydrogen sulfide production resulting in the reduction of associated pollution and sewerline corrosion. During low-flow dry-weather periods, sanitary wastewater solids deposited in combined sewer systems can generate hydrogen sulfide and methane gases due to anaerobic conditions. Sulfates are reduced to hydrogen sulfide gas that can then be oxidized to sulfuric acid on pipes and structure walls by further biochemical transformation. Furthermore, these solids deposits or sediments are discharged to the urban streams during storm events that can cause degradation of receiving-water quality. Thus, dry-weather sewer sedimentation not only creates hazardous conditions and sewer degradation but contributes significant pollutant loads to the urban receiving waters during wet-weather high-flow periods. Performance of two technologies [i.e., the tipping flusher and the flushing gate (FG)] was evaluated by a detailed examination of 18 facilities in Germany, Canada, and United States. As a result, both the tipping flusher and FG technology appear to be the most cost-effective means for flushing solids and debris from combined sewer overflow-storage tanks, while the FG is considered to be the most efficient method for flushing large diameter, flat sewers. In addition, capsulated reviews of several cost-effectiveness analyses are reported demonstrating the comparative benefits of flushing technology.</description><subject>Canada</subject><subject>Germany</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><subject>USA</subject><issn>0733-9496</issn><issn>1943-5452</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkV1P2zAUhq1pk9Z1_IdcQSuRcfwV21xMQh1lICYQBcGd5SYOhKUxsxMh_v3sFrgEfOFzLD96LZ8HoR0MPzAUeG9ysJgdTkFQmiumigkBwFNMxD6dYMWmn9AoFppzxslnNHrlvqJvIdwDgABORmi-sI_WZ6arskvT_c3m7RDumu42q53PFrZqVrbrd7OZ896FxnW7a_Tcte3Qx2O86Hrv2u_oS23aYLee6xhdzQ8vZ7_z07Oj49nBaW44EX0uwFbSFCUtQTAuS8CYVdgIqPiyqislocZsWZrapD4Wao0kca-BYSY4HaPtTe6Dd_8GG3q9akJp29Z01g1BEyUlBqI-ABYFj0N4HywUlww-8HQhOJES3gWxBKFYwSL4cwOWcbbB21o_-GZl_JPGoJNjrZNjndzp5E4nxzo61lQnuWN0swkwMV_fu8F3cfj65Priz6_4OYgkpEVTr9i6xy_Zb0f_B_KysW8</recordid><startdate>20010601</startdate><enddate>20010601</enddate><creator>Fan, Chi-Yuan</creator><creator>Field, Richard</creator><creator>Pisano, William C</creator><creator>Barsanti, James</creator><creator>Joyce, James J</creator><creator>Sorenson, Harvey</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010601</creationdate><title>Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control</title><author>Fan, Chi-Yuan ; Field, Richard ; Pisano, William C ; Barsanti, James ; Joyce, James J ; Sorenson, Harvey</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a527t-70ed8a6c3c07458c0114d1a70d5bdfd980f14bcafad980afa3ea82a3ef0414753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>Canada</topic><topic>Germany</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><topic>USA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fan, Chi-Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Field, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pisano, William C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barsanti, James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joyce, James J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sorenson, Harvey</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of water resources planning and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fan, Chi-Yuan</au><au>Field, Richard</au><au>Pisano, William C</au><au>Barsanti, James</au><au>Joyce, James J</au><au>Sorenson, Harvey</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of water resources planning and management</jtitle><date>2001-06-01</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>127</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>194</spage><epage>201</epage><pages>194-201</pages><issn>0733-9496</issn><eissn>1943-5452</eissn><abstract>This paper presents an overview of causes of sewer deterioration together with a discussion of control methods that can prevent or arrest this deterioration. In particular, this paper covers inline and combined sewer overflow storage tank flushing systems for removal of sediments and minimization of hydrogen sulfide production resulting in the reduction of associated pollution and sewerline corrosion. During low-flow dry-weather periods, sanitary wastewater solids deposited in combined sewer systems can generate hydrogen sulfide and methane gases due to anaerobic conditions. Sulfates are reduced to hydrogen sulfide gas that can then be oxidized to sulfuric acid on pipes and structure walls by further biochemical transformation. Furthermore, these solids deposits or sediments are discharged to the urban streams during storm events that can cause degradation of receiving-water quality. Thus, dry-weather sewer sedimentation not only creates hazardous conditions and sewer degradation but contributes significant pollutant loads to the urban receiving waters during wet-weather high-flow periods. Performance of two technologies [i.e., the tipping flusher and the flushing gate (FG)] was evaluated by a detailed examination of 18 facilities in Germany, Canada, and United States. As a result, both the tipping flusher and FG technology appear to be the most cost-effective means for flushing solids and debris from combined sewer overflow-storage tanks, while the FG is considered to be the most efficient method for flushing large diameter, flat sewers. In addition, capsulated reviews of several cost-effectiveness analyses are reported demonstrating the comparative benefits of flushing technology.</abstract><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0733-9496
ispartof Journal of water resources planning and management, 2001-06, Vol.127 (3), p.194-201
issn 0733-9496
1943-5452
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29881029
source American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014
subjects Canada
Germany
TECHNICAL PAPERS
USA
title Sewer and Tank Flushing for Sediment, Corrosion, and Pollution Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T05%3A44%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sewer%20and%20Tank%20Flushing%20for%20Sediment,%20Corrosion,%20and%20Pollution%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20water%20resources%20planning%20and%20management&rft.au=Fan,%20Chi-Yuan&rft.date=2001-06-01&rft.volume=127&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=194&rft.epage=201&rft.pages=194-201&rft.issn=0733-9496&rft.eissn=1943-5452&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2001)127:3(194)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E26752880%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=18079464&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true