Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast

The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the compressive and tensile strength of different types of record base materials made of different materials and processing techniques. The compressive and tensile strength of 4 types of injection moulded materials were compared with a control of con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Curēus (Palo Alto, CA) CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e54676-e54676
Hauptverfasser: R, Shakir Ahmed, Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija, Shankar, Shyam Sundar, Hariharan, Annapoorni
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e54676
container_issue 2
container_start_page e54676
container_title Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)
container_volume 16
creator R, Shakir Ahmed
Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija
Shankar, Shyam Sundar
Hariharan, Annapoorni
description The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the compressive and tensile strength of different types of record base materials made of different materials and processing techniques. The compressive and tensile strength of 4 types of injection moulded materials were compared with a control of conventional compression moulded material. Twenty test specimens (10 tensile and 10 compressive) were fabricated from each material. A test was done using the Instron 3382 (Norwood, MA, USA) universal testing machine. Compressive and tensile test values showed significant differences between the record base resin groups tested for both compressive and tensile strength tests (p=0.00). The mean tensile strength value was greatest for Group V (66.0 MPa) and lowest for Group III (41.9MPa) and the mean compressive strength value was greatest for Group I (74.5 MPa) followed by Group V (70.2 MPa) and lowest for Group III (10.8 MPa). Injection moulded acetal resin showed the highest tensile strength value; it was comparable to that of conventional compression moulded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Compression moulding is reported to have the highest compressive strength values followed by injection moulded acetal resin material. Injection moulded acetal resin material attributed to its advantages and superior strength value, can be used as a material of choice in various clinical scenarios.
doi_str_mv 10.7759/cureus.54676
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2985798164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2985798164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-af9bef1784ff53da363fcad0fca72aa81e011944f4e03fc6a76daef5372ad2c83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KVBBw41xZ4sKhATtxYue4LC0ggZDaco5m7TEYZZOt7SDtlV_e2e62qnqxZ-Z9MyPNY-xUigut6_bSThGndFGrRjcf2GEpG1MYadTeP_EBO0npVQghhS6FFh_ZQWXqUgmjDtn7fFyuIEIOb8hnA_TrFBIfPf-eIw7P-WUTXwfvkdLcr_nMEgoZHb-mAq3nV5CQP1ApBugTvxtsP7kwPPNvaAmhDszQU5bCUGxgx6_C6EiCVQ8pH7N9T414svuP2NPXLz_mt8X9483dfHZf2FKpXIBvF-ilNsr7unJQNZW34AQ9ugQwEoWUrVJeoSClAd04QEJJdaU11RE7385dxfHnhCl3y5As9j0MOE6pK1tT69bIRhF69h_6Ok6RrpO6StANW9GYmqjPW8rGMaWIvlvFsIS47qToNvZ0W3u63_YQ_mk3dFos0f2F_5hR_QJz0o5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3020790685</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast</title><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>R, Shakir Ahmed ; Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija ; Shankar, Shyam Sundar ; Hariharan, Annapoorni</creator><creatorcontrib>R, Shakir Ahmed ; Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija ; Shankar, Shyam Sundar ; Hariharan, Annapoorni</creatorcontrib><description>The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the compressive and tensile strength of different types of record base materials made of different materials and processing techniques. The compressive and tensile strength of 4 types of injection moulded materials were compared with a control of conventional compression moulded material. Twenty test specimens (10 tensile and 10 compressive) were fabricated from each material. A test was done using the Instron 3382 (Norwood, MA, USA) universal testing machine. Compressive and tensile test values showed significant differences between the record base resin groups tested for both compressive and tensile strength tests (p=0.00). The mean tensile strength value was greatest for Group V (66.0 MPa) and lowest for Group III (41.9MPa) and the mean compressive strength value was greatest for Group I (74.5 MPa) followed by Group V (70.2 MPa) and lowest for Group III (10.8 MPa). Injection moulded acetal resin showed the highest tensile strength value; it was comparable to that of conventional compression moulded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Compression moulding is reported to have the highest compressive strength values followed by injection moulded acetal resin material. Injection moulded acetal resin material attributed to its advantages and superior strength value, can be used as a material of choice in various clinical scenarios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2168-8184</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54676</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38524084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Cureus Inc</publisher><subject>Biocompatibility ; Dentures ; Injection molding ; Polymerization ; Polymers ; Polymethyl methacrylate ; Prostheses ; Resins ; Tensile strength ; Variance analysis</subject><ispartof>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e54676-e54676</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024, R et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024, R et al. This work is published under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-af9bef1784ff53da363fcad0fca72aa81e011944f4e03fc6a76daef5372ad2c83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38524084$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>R, Shakir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Shyam Sundar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hariharan, Annapoorni</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast</title><title>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</title><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><description>The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the compressive and tensile strength of different types of record base materials made of different materials and processing techniques. The compressive and tensile strength of 4 types of injection moulded materials were compared with a control of conventional compression moulded material. Twenty test specimens (10 tensile and 10 compressive) were fabricated from each material. A test was done using the Instron 3382 (Norwood, MA, USA) universal testing machine. Compressive and tensile test values showed significant differences between the record base resin groups tested for both compressive and tensile strength tests (p=0.00). The mean tensile strength value was greatest for Group V (66.0 MPa) and lowest for Group III (41.9MPa) and the mean compressive strength value was greatest for Group I (74.5 MPa) followed by Group V (70.2 MPa) and lowest for Group III (10.8 MPa). Injection moulded acetal resin showed the highest tensile strength value; it was comparable to that of conventional compression moulded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Compression moulding is reported to have the highest compressive strength values followed by injection moulded acetal resin material. Injection moulded acetal resin material attributed to its advantages and superior strength value, can be used as a material of choice in various clinical scenarios.</description><subject>Biocompatibility</subject><subject>Dentures</subject><subject>Injection molding</subject><subject>Polymerization</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Polymethyl methacrylate</subject><subject>Prostheses</subject><subject>Resins</subject><subject>Tensile strength</subject><subject>Variance analysis</subject><issn>2168-8184</issn><issn>2168-8184</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFP3DAQha0KVBBw41xZ4sKhATtxYue4LC0ggZDaco5m7TEYZZOt7SDtlV_e2e62qnqxZ-Z9MyPNY-xUigut6_bSThGndFGrRjcf2GEpG1MYadTeP_EBO0npVQghhS6FFh_ZQWXqUgmjDtn7fFyuIEIOb8hnA_TrFBIfPf-eIw7P-WUTXwfvkdLcr_nMEgoZHb-mAq3nV5CQP1ApBugTvxtsP7kwPPNvaAmhDszQU5bCUGxgx6_C6EiCVQ8pH7N9T414svuP2NPXLz_mt8X9483dfHZf2FKpXIBvF-ilNsr7unJQNZW34AQ9ugQwEoWUrVJeoSClAd04QEJJdaU11RE7385dxfHnhCl3y5As9j0MOE6pK1tT69bIRhF69h_6Ok6RrpO6StANW9GYmqjPW8rGMaWIvlvFsIS47qToNvZ0W3u63_YQ_mk3dFos0f2F_5hR_QJz0o5Y</recordid><startdate>20240222</startdate><enddate>20240222</enddate><creator>R, Shakir Ahmed</creator><creator>Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija</creator><creator>Shankar, Shyam Sundar</creator><creator>Hariharan, Annapoorni</creator><general>Cureus Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240222</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast</title><author>R, Shakir Ahmed ; Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija ; Shankar, Shyam Sundar ; Hariharan, Annapoorni</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c244t-af9bef1784ff53da363fcad0fca72aa81e011944f4e03fc6a76daef5372ad2c83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Biocompatibility</topic><topic>Dentures</topic><topic>Injection molding</topic><topic>Polymerization</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Polymethyl methacrylate</topic><topic>Prostheses</topic><topic>Resins</topic><topic>Tensile strength</topic><topic>Variance analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>R, Shakir Ahmed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shankar, Shyam Sundar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hariharan, Annapoorni</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>R, Shakir Ahmed</au><au>Kalidasan Selvi, Bharanija</au><au>Shankar, Shyam Sundar</au><au>Hariharan, Annapoorni</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast</atitle><jtitle>Curēus (Palo Alto, CA)</jtitle><addtitle>Cureus</addtitle><date>2024-02-22</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>e54676</spage><epage>e54676</epage><pages>e54676-e54676</pages><issn>2168-8184</issn><eissn>2168-8184</eissn><abstract>The aim of this study is to comparatively analyse the compressive and tensile strength of different types of record base materials made of different materials and processing techniques. The compressive and tensile strength of 4 types of injection moulded materials were compared with a control of conventional compression moulded material. Twenty test specimens (10 tensile and 10 compressive) were fabricated from each material. A test was done using the Instron 3382 (Norwood, MA, USA) universal testing machine. Compressive and tensile test values showed significant differences between the record base resin groups tested for both compressive and tensile strength tests (p=0.00). The mean tensile strength value was greatest for Group V (66.0 MPa) and lowest for Group III (41.9MPa) and the mean compressive strength value was greatest for Group I (74.5 MPa) followed by Group V (70.2 MPa) and lowest for Group III (10.8 MPa). Injection moulded acetal resin showed the highest tensile strength value; it was comparable to that of conventional compression moulded polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). Compression moulding is reported to have the highest compressive strength values followed by injection moulded acetal resin material. Injection moulded acetal resin material attributed to its advantages and superior strength value, can be used as a material of choice in various clinical scenarios.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Cureus Inc</pub><pmid>38524084</pmid><doi>10.7759/cureus.54676</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2168-8184
ispartof Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), 2024-02, Vol.16 (2), p.e54676-e54676
issn 2168-8184
2168-8184
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2985798164
source PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Biocompatibility
Dentures
Injection molding
Polymerization
Polymers
Polymethyl methacrylate
Prostheses
Resins
Tensile strength
Variance analysis
title Comparative Analysis of Strength of Differently Activated Denture Base Materials Including Recent Acetal Resin-Based Biodentaplast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T03%3A32%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Strength%20of%20Differently%20Activated%20Denture%20Base%20Materials%20Including%20Recent%20Acetal%20Resin-Based%20Biodentaplast&rft.jtitle=Cur%C4%93us%20(Palo%20Alto,%20CA)&rft.au=R,%20Shakir%20Ahmed&rft.date=2024-02-22&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=e54676&rft.epage=e54676&rft.pages=e54676-e54676&rft.issn=2168-8184&rft.eissn=2168-8184&rft_id=info:doi/10.7759/cureus.54676&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2985798164%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3020790685&rft_id=info:pmid/38524084&rfr_iscdi=true