Biomechanical Comparison of Ulnar Collateral Ligament Reconstruction Between Palmaris Longus Autograft and Knee Medial Collateral Ligament Allograft
Background: Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injury can cause significant pain and alter throwing mechanics. Common autograft options for mUCL reconstruction (UCLR) include the palmaris longus (PL) and hamstring tendons. Allograft use may reduce donor site morbidity and decrease function rela...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine 2024-03, Vol.12 (3), p.23259671241234685-23259671241234685 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Medial ulnar collateral ligament (mUCL) injury can cause significant pain and alter throwing mechanics. Common autograft options for mUCL reconstruction (UCLR) include the palmaris longus (PL) and hamstring tendons. Allograft use may reduce donor site morbidity and decrease function related to PL autografts.
Purpose:
To compare varus stability and load to failure between a novel allograft for UCLR—knee medial collateral ligament (kMCL)—and a PL autograft in human donor elbow specimens.
Study Design:
Controlled laboratory study.
Methods:
A total of 24 fresh-frozen human elbows were dissected to expose the mUCL. Medial elbow stability was tested with the mUCL intact (native), deficient, and reconstructed utilizing the humeral single-docking technique with either a (1) kMCL allograft (n = 12) or (2) a PL autograft (n = 12). A 3-N·m valgus torque was applied to the elbow, and valgus rotation of the ulna was recorded via motion tracking cameras. The elbow was cycled through a full range of motion 5 times. After kinematic testing, specimens were loaded to failure at 70° of elbow flexion, and failure modes were recorded.
Results:
The mUCL-deficient elbows demonstrated significantly greater valgus rotation compared with the intact and reconstructed elbows at every flexion angle tested (10°-120°) (P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2325-9671 2325-9671 |
DOI: | 10.1177/23259671241234685 |