Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry
Many construction safety issues are closely connected to environmental problems. The consolidation of safety and environmental regulation at federal and state levels, either partially or totally, would provide the construction industry with a single agency that would provide uniform and accurate gui...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of construction engineering and management 1995, Vol.121 (1), p.95-99 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 99 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 95 |
container_title | Journal of construction engineering and management |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Kibert, Charles J Coble, Richard J |
description | Many construction safety issues are closely connected to environmental problems. The consolidation of safety and environmental regulation at federal and state levels, either partially or totally, would provide the construction industry with a single agency that would provide uniform and accurate guidance, avoid unnecessary duplication of guidance and information, and virtually eliminate conflicts that are currently caused by multiagency oversight. In addition to benefits to the industry, there are also significant cost savings that could be attained by the various levels of government involved in monitoring the construction industry by combining their various safety and environmental regulatory functions. Combining certain Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) functions would increase efficiency and provide a good model for the contemporary movement to reinvent government. The resulting consistency of regulation would decrease conflicting guidance from agencies that are regulating similar issues and, at the same time, increase the quality of worker safety and environmental protection. In addition to the regulation of hazardous materials by both agencies, there are significant additional opportunities for consolidating operations and regulation of the construction industry. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29803490</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29803490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-28622016e00ab477b62624f141c518d268f863bd82a7118627a41c7fdcf20cf23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk1LxDAQhoMouH78hx5E1kM1k6RJI3iQuuqKIviBx5Btk6XSTTVphf33pq561A1kMkOezLzwBqFDwMeAOZyMzx-LyREWlKaScjYGKbMjIHAK45hsoBFIRlORc7KJRr_YNtoJ4RVjYFxmI3Q9dZ2Ze93Vbp48amu6ZaJdlUzcR-1btzCu003yYOZ9E5nWJa1NitaFzvflVz11VR-r5R7asroJZv_73EXPl5On4jq9vb-aFue3qc4o6VIS5RAM3GCsZ0yIGSecMAsMygzyivDc5pzOqpxoARBhoeOVsFVpCY6b7qLDVd833773JnRqUYfSNI12pu2DIjLHlEm8BshozvkaoIg6BWX_gsClZIzxdUCSxRDBsxVY-jYEb6x68_VC-6UCrAaTlRpMVoN7anBPDSaraLICJbP4_uB7kA6lbqzXrqzDbxPKMpnTYczLCouUUa9t7120SN0Uk7sLhuNfIICH9RVltsp_FPwp4BPos73f</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16925169</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry</title><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014</source><creator>Kibert, Charles J ; Coble, Richard J</creator><creatorcontrib>Kibert, Charles J ; Coble, Richard J</creatorcontrib><description>Many construction safety issues are closely connected to environmental problems. The consolidation of safety and environmental regulation at federal and state levels, either partially or totally, would provide the construction industry with a single agency that would provide uniform and accurate guidance, avoid unnecessary duplication of guidance and information, and virtually eliminate conflicts that are currently caused by multiagency oversight. In addition to benefits to the industry, there are also significant cost savings that could be attained by the various levels of government involved in monitoring the construction industry by combining their various safety and environmental regulatory functions. Combining certain Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) functions would increase efficiency and provide a good model for the contemporary movement to reinvent government. The resulting consistency of regulation would decrease conflicting guidance from agencies that are regulating similar issues and, at the same time, increase the quality of worker safety and environmental protection. In addition to the regulation of hazardous materials by both agencies, there are significant additional opportunities for consolidating operations and regulation of the construction industry.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0733-9364</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1943-7862</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95)</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCEMD4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Environmental protection ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hazardous materials ; Q1 ; Regulation. Standardization ; TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><ispartof>Journal of construction engineering and management, 1995, Vol.121 (1), p.95-99</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1995 American Society of Civil Engineers</rights><rights>1995 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-28622016e00ab477b62624f141c518d268f863bd82a7118627a41c7fdcf20cf23</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95)$$EPDF$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95)$$EHTML$$P50$$Gasce$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4014,27914,27915,27916,75954,75962</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=3459839$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kibert, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Richard J</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry</title><title>Journal of construction engineering and management</title><description>Many construction safety issues are closely connected to environmental problems. The consolidation of safety and environmental regulation at federal and state levels, either partially or totally, would provide the construction industry with a single agency that would provide uniform and accurate guidance, avoid unnecessary duplication of guidance and information, and virtually eliminate conflicts that are currently caused by multiagency oversight. In addition to benefits to the industry, there are also significant cost savings that could be attained by the various levels of government involved in monitoring the construction industry by combining their various safety and environmental regulatory functions. Combining certain Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) functions would increase efficiency and provide a good model for the contemporary movement to reinvent government. The resulting consistency of regulation would decrease conflicting guidance from agencies that are regulating similar issues and, at the same time, increase the quality of worker safety and environmental protection. In addition to the regulation of hazardous materials by both agencies, there are significant additional opportunities for consolidating operations and regulation of the construction industry.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Environmental protection</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hazardous materials</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>Regulation. Standardization</subject><subject>TECHNICAL PAPERS</subject><issn>0733-9364</issn><issn>1943-7862</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk1LxDAQhoMouH78hx5E1kM1k6RJI3iQuuqKIviBx5Btk6XSTTVphf33pq561A1kMkOezLzwBqFDwMeAOZyMzx-LyREWlKaScjYGKbMjIHAK45hsoBFIRlORc7KJRr_YNtoJ4RVjYFxmI3Q9dZ2Ze93Vbp48amu6ZaJdlUzcR-1btzCu003yYOZ9E5nWJa1NitaFzvflVz11VR-r5R7asroJZv_73EXPl5On4jq9vb-aFue3qc4o6VIS5RAM3GCsZ0yIGSecMAsMygzyivDc5pzOqpxoARBhoeOVsFVpCY6b7qLDVd833773JnRqUYfSNI12pu2DIjLHlEm8BshozvkaoIg6BWX_gsClZIzxdUCSxRDBsxVY-jYEb6x68_VC-6UCrAaTlRpMVoN7anBPDSaraLICJbP4_uB7kA6lbqzXrqzDbxPKMpnTYczLCouUUa9t7120SN0Uk7sLhuNfIICH9RVltsp_FPwp4BPos73f</recordid><startdate>1995</startdate><enddate>1995</enddate><creator>Kibert, Charles J</creator><creator>Coble, Richard J</creator><general>American Society of Civil Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1995</creationdate><title>Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry</title><author>Kibert, Charles J ; Coble, Richard J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a532t-28622016e00ab477b62624f141c518d268f863bd82a7118627a41c7fdcf20cf23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Environmental protection</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hazardous materials</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>Regulation. Standardization</topic><topic>TECHNICAL PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kibert, Charles J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coble, Richard J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kibert, Charles J</au><au>Coble, Richard J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry</atitle><jtitle>Journal of construction engineering and management</jtitle><date>1995</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>121</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>95-99</pages><issn>0733-9364</issn><eissn>1943-7862</eissn><coden>JCEMD4</coden><abstract>Many construction safety issues are closely connected to environmental problems. The consolidation of safety and environmental regulation at federal and state levels, either partially or totally, would provide the construction industry with a single agency that would provide uniform and accurate guidance, avoid unnecessary duplication of guidance and information, and virtually eliminate conflicts that are currently caused by multiagency oversight. In addition to benefits to the industry, there are also significant cost savings that could be attained by the various levels of government involved in monitoring the construction industry by combining their various safety and environmental regulatory functions. Combining certain Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) functions would increase efficiency and provide a good model for the contemporary movement to reinvent government. The resulting consistency of regulation would decrease conflicting guidance from agencies that are regulating similar issues and, at the same time, increase the quality of worker safety and environmental protection. In addition to the regulation of hazardous materials by both agencies, there are significant additional opportunities for consolidating operations and regulation of the construction industry.</abstract><cop>Reston, VA</cop><pub>American Society of Civil Engineers</pub><doi>10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95)</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0733-9364 |
ispartof | Journal of construction engineering and management, 1995, Vol.121 (1), p.95-99 |
issn | 0733-9364 1943-7862 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29803490 |
source | Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); American Society of Civil Engineers:NESLI2:Journals:2014 |
subjects | Applied sciences Buildings. Public works Environmental protection Exact sciences and technology Hazardous materials Q1 Regulation. Standardization TECHNICAL PAPERS |
title | Integrating Safety and Environmental Regulation of Construction Industry |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T20%3A02%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Safety%20and%20Environmental%20Regulation%20of%20Construction%20Industry&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20construction%20engineering%20and%20management&rft.au=Kibert,%20Charles%20J&rft.date=1995&rft.volume=121&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=95-99&rft.issn=0733-9364&rft.eissn=1943-7862&rft.coden=JCEMD4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1995)121:1(95)&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29803490%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16925169&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |