Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies

Results from caged mussel experiments agreed with benthic invertebrate surveys, but not with trends observed for fish. On three occasions between 1998 and 2000, freshwater mussels were collected by divers in Lake Memphremagog during the spring and transplanted to various locations in the St-François...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental pollution (1987) 2003-08, Vol.124 (3), p.471-483
Hauptverfasser: Martel, Pierre, Kovacs, Tibor, Voss, Ron, Megraw, Stan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 483
container_issue 3
container_start_page 471
container_title Environmental pollution (1987)
container_volume 124
creator Martel, Pierre
Kovacs, Tibor
Voss, Ron
Megraw, Stan
description Results from caged mussel experiments agreed with benthic invertebrate surveys, but not with trends observed for fish. On three occasions between 1998 and 2000, freshwater mussels were collected by divers in Lake Memphremagog during the spring and transplanted to various locations in the St-François River (Quebec, Canada). Mussel growth was monitored by comparing total weight and length at the beginning and end of the exposure period. In 1998, mussels were caged for 60 days at 10 stations, including locations receiving treated effluents from three pulp and paper mills. Overall, there was an apparent trend of increased mussel growth from upstream to downstream along the river. However, mussels caged downstream from the effluent discharge of a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill grew more slowly than those caged immediately upstream in the river. In 1999 and 2000, we further investigated the situation in the vicinity of this bleached kraft mill. The measurements again indicated that growth of mussels in the effluent plume from this mill was reduced in comparison to sites upstream. Overall, in terms of growth, the caged mussels responded both positively and negatively to different environmental conditions. Compared with other monitoring approaches used at these sites during the same period, the caged mussel experiment results were consistent with the trends observed with the benthic invertebrate survey but not with the trends observed for fish.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00011-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29799455</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749103000113</els_id><sourcerecordid>19594621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-89b8816cb4db6f5dbe72b94989a740c9028bab34cd25a39ed1fdad839989360c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1rFDEYwPEgil2rH0HJRWkPo3mdSU4iZX2Bigf1HDLJM21kJqlJZsVvb7a72OOSQCD88gJ_hF5S8pYS2r_7Tlivu0FoekH4JSGE0o4_QhuqBt71gonHaPOfnKFnpfxqSHDOn6IzygapCBs2KG93dl5tDSniNGFnb8DjKUO5_WMrZLyspcBcsG0zYju3vdj0DvAC9TY1mzKGuAs5xQVitTOGaQJXC15SDDXlEG_wxXb79RKXuvoA5Tl6Mtm5wIvjeo5-ftz-uPrcXX_79OXqw3XnJJW1U3pUivZuFH7sJ-lHGNiohVbaDoI4TZga7ciF80xarsHTyVuvuG6C98Txc_TmcO9dTr9XKNUsoTiYZxshrcUwPWgtpDwNlRo0o-okpFpq0TN6Goq-l0SwBuUBupxKyTCZuxwWm_8aSsy-s7nvbPYRDeHmvrPh7dyr4wPruIB_OHUM28DrI7DF2XnKNrpQHpxQ-7H_wPuDa5FhFyCb4gJEBz7kVtH4FE585R8iFsU_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14665042</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Martel, Pierre ; Kovacs, Tibor ; Voss, Ron ; Megraw, Stan</creator><creatorcontrib>Martel, Pierre ; Kovacs, Tibor ; Voss, Ron ; Megraw, Stan</creatorcontrib><description>Results from caged mussel experiments agreed with benthic invertebrate surveys, but not with trends observed for fish. On three occasions between 1998 and 2000, freshwater mussels were collected by divers in Lake Memphremagog during the spring and transplanted to various locations in the St-François River (Quebec, Canada). Mussel growth was monitored by comparing total weight and length at the beginning and end of the exposure period. In 1998, mussels were caged for 60 days at 10 stations, including locations receiving treated effluents from three pulp and paper mills. Overall, there was an apparent trend of increased mussel growth from upstream to downstream along the river. However, mussels caged downstream from the effluent discharge of a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill grew more slowly than those caged immediately upstream in the river. In 1999 and 2000, we further investigated the situation in the vicinity of this bleached kraft mill. The measurements again indicated that growth of mussels in the effluent plume from this mill was reduced in comparison to sites upstream. Overall, in terms of growth, the caged mussels responded both positively and negatively to different environmental conditions. Compared with other monitoring approaches used at these sites during the same period, the caged mussel experiment results were consistent with the trends observed with the benthic invertebrate survey but not with the trends observed for fish.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00011-3</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12758027</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ENVPAF</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bivalvia ; Bivalvia - drug effects ; Bivalvia - growth &amp; development ; Caged mussel ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Elliptio complanata ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Fresh Water ; Fresh water environment ; Freshwater ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Industry ; Mill effluent ; Mollusca ; Monitoring ; Quebec ; Unionidae ; Water Pollution, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2003-08, Vol.124 (3), p.471-483</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-89b8816cb4db6f5dbe72b94989a740c9028bab34cd25a39ed1fdad839989360c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-89b8816cb4db6f5dbe72b94989a740c9028bab34cd25a39ed1fdad839989360c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00011-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14848482$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12758027$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Martel, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megraw, Stan</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Results from caged mussel experiments agreed with benthic invertebrate surveys, but not with trends observed for fish. On three occasions between 1998 and 2000, freshwater mussels were collected by divers in Lake Memphremagog during the spring and transplanted to various locations in the St-François River (Quebec, Canada). Mussel growth was monitored by comparing total weight and length at the beginning and end of the exposure period. In 1998, mussels were caged for 60 days at 10 stations, including locations receiving treated effluents from three pulp and paper mills. Overall, there was an apparent trend of increased mussel growth from upstream to downstream along the river. However, mussels caged downstream from the effluent discharge of a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill grew more slowly than those caged immediately upstream in the river. In 1999 and 2000, we further investigated the situation in the vicinity of this bleached kraft mill. The measurements again indicated that growth of mussels in the effluent plume from this mill was reduced in comparison to sites upstream. Overall, in terms of growth, the caged mussels responded both positively and negatively to different environmental conditions. Compared with other monitoring approaches used at these sites during the same period, the caged mussel experiment results were consistent with the trends observed with the benthic invertebrate survey but not with the trends observed for fish.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bivalvia</subject><subject>Bivalvia - drug effects</subject><subject>Bivalvia - growth &amp; development</subject><subject>Caged mussel</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Elliptio complanata</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Fresh Water</subject><subject>Fresh water environment</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Industry</subject><subject>Mill effluent</subject><subject>Mollusca</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Quebec</subject><subject>Unionidae</subject><subject>Water Pollution, Chemical - adverse effects</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1rFDEYwPEgil2rH0HJRWkPo3mdSU4iZX2Bigf1HDLJM21kJqlJZsVvb7a72OOSQCD88gJ_hF5S8pYS2r_7Tlivu0FoekH4JSGE0o4_QhuqBt71gonHaPOfnKFnpfxqSHDOn6IzygapCBs2KG93dl5tDSniNGFnb8DjKUO5_WMrZLyspcBcsG0zYju3vdj0DvAC9TY1mzKGuAs5xQVitTOGaQJXC15SDDXlEG_wxXb79RKXuvoA5Tl6Mtm5wIvjeo5-ftz-uPrcXX_79OXqw3XnJJW1U3pUivZuFH7sJ-lHGNiohVbaDoI4TZga7ciF80xarsHTyVuvuG6C98Txc_TmcO9dTr9XKNUsoTiYZxshrcUwPWgtpDwNlRo0o-okpFpq0TN6Goq-l0SwBuUBupxKyTCZuxwWm_8aSsy-s7nvbPYRDeHmvrPh7dyr4wPruIB_OHUM28DrI7DF2XnKNrpQHpxQ-7H_wPuDa5FhFyCb4gJEBz7kVtH4FE585R8iFsU_</recordid><startdate>20030801</startdate><enddate>20030801</enddate><creator>Martel, Pierre</creator><creator>Kovacs, Tibor</creator><creator>Voss, Ron</creator><creator>Megraw, Stan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030801</creationdate><title>Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies</title><author>Martel, Pierre ; Kovacs, Tibor ; Voss, Ron ; Megraw, Stan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c515t-89b8816cb4db6f5dbe72b94989a740c9028bab34cd25a39ed1fdad839989360c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bivalvia</topic><topic>Bivalvia - drug effects</topic><topic>Bivalvia - growth &amp; development</topic><topic>Caged mussel</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Elliptio complanata</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Fresh Water</topic><topic>Fresh water environment</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Industry</topic><topic>Mill effluent</topic><topic>Mollusca</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Quebec</topic><topic>Unionidae</topic><topic>Water Pollution, Chemical - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Martel, Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kovacs, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Voss, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Megraw, Stan</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Martel, Pierre</au><au>Kovacs, Tibor</au><au>Voss, Ron</au><au>Megraw, Stan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2003-08-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>124</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>471</spage><epage>483</epage><pages>471-483</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><coden>ENVPAF</coden><abstract>Results from caged mussel experiments agreed with benthic invertebrate surveys, but not with trends observed for fish. On three occasions between 1998 and 2000, freshwater mussels were collected by divers in Lake Memphremagog during the spring and transplanted to various locations in the St-François River (Quebec, Canada). Mussel growth was monitored by comparing total weight and length at the beginning and end of the exposure period. In 1998, mussels were caged for 60 days at 10 stations, including locations receiving treated effluents from three pulp and paper mills. Overall, there was an apparent trend of increased mussel growth from upstream to downstream along the river. However, mussels caged downstream from the effluent discharge of a bleached kraft pulp and paper mill grew more slowly than those caged immediately upstream in the river. In 1999 and 2000, we further investigated the situation in the vicinity of this bleached kraft mill. The measurements again indicated that growth of mussels in the effluent plume from this mill was reduced in comparison to sites upstream. Overall, in terms of growth, the caged mussels responded both positively and negatively to different environmental conditions. Compared with other monitoring approaches used at these sites during the same period, the caged mussel experiment results were consistent with the trends observed with the benthic invertebrate survey but not with the trends observed for fish.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>12758027</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00011-3</doi><tpages>13</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0269-7491
ispartof Environmental pollution (1987), 2003-08, Vol.124 (3), p.471-483
issn 0269-7491
1873-6424
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29799455
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Animals
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bivalvia
Bivalvia - drug effects
Bivalvia - growth & development
Caged mussel
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Elliptio complanata
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Fresh Water
Fresh water environment
Freshwater
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Industry
Mill effluent
Mollusca
Monitoring
Quebec
Unionidae
Water Pollution, Chemical - adverse effects
title Evaluation of caged freshwater mussels as an alternative method for environmental effects monitoring (EEM) studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A18%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20caged%20freshwater%20mussels%20as%20an%20alternative%20method%20for%20environmental%20effects%20monitoring%20(EEM)%20studies&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Martel,%20Pierre&rft.date=2003-08-01&rft.volume=124&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=471&rft.epage=483&rft.pages=471-483&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft.coden=ENVPAF&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0269-7491(03)00011-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19594621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14665042&rft_id=info:pmid/12758027&rft_els_id=S0269749103000113&rfr_iscdi=true