Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities

Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle transportation has increased over the past 15 years, with a resulting increase in shared-use pathways, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks in many parts of the United States. This has caused communities to ask questions: Where is pedestrian and bi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Transportation research record 2005-01, Vol.1939 (1939), p.77-90
Hauptverfasser: Schneider, Robert, Patten, Robert, Toole, Jennifer
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 90
container_issue 1939
container_start_page 77
container_title Transportation research record
container_volume 1939
creator Schneider, Robert
Patten, Robert
Toole, Jennifer
description Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle transportation has increased over the past 15 years, with a resulting increase in shared-use pathways, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks in many parts of the United States. This has caused communities to ask questions: Where is pedestrian and bicycle activity taking place? What effect does facility construction have on levels of bicycling and walking? What are the characteristics of nonmotorized transportation users? How many miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available? Where are existing facilities located? This paper provides a summary of recent research that was sponsored by FHWA and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center to review and evaluate bicycle and pedestrian data collection methods throughout the United States. It uses a case study approach to evaluate pedestrian and bicycle data collection in 29 different agencies throughout the country in communities ranging in size from 6,000 residents (Sandpoint, Idaho) to 8 million residents (New York City). These case studies are analyzed in the following data collection categories: manual counts, automated counts, surveys targeting nonmotorized transportation users, surveys sampling a general population, inventories, and spatial analyses. The results provide information about the methods and the optimum timing for pedestrian and bicycle data collection; emerging technologies that can be used to gather and analyze data; the benefits, limitations, and costs of different data collection techniques; and implications for a national data collection strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.3141/1939-10
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29765257</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29765257</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-a7377cb967713ead2928fdc86d9e70edb423386760553419e90af012698f83373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtOwzAURL0AifIQv-AVrFJ8cxM7XpbwlCoBKl1Hrn0jGTlOiZNF_p5WZTWa0dFoNIzdglgiFPAAGnUG4owtBErIQFdwwS5T-hECsVC4YF-1ScQ34-RmvoomzMkn3rf8kxylcfAmchMdf_R2toH4kxkNr_sQyI6-j9xHvl1uloeo66boR0_pmp23JiS6-dcrtn15_q7fsvXH63u9WmcWFIyZUaiU3WmpFCAZl-u8ap2tpNOkBLldkSNWUklRlliAJi1MKyCXumorRIVX7O7Uux_63-kwtul8shSCidRPqcm1kmVeHsH7E2iHPqWB2mY_-M4McwOiOd7UHG86GPwDV4dZmg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29765257</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities</title><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Schneider, Robert ; Patten, Robert ; Toole, Jennifer</creator><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Robert ; Patten, Robert ; Toole, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><description>Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle transportation has increased over the past 15 years, with a resulting increase in shared-use pathways, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks in many parts of the United States. This has caused communities to ask questions: Where is pedestrian and bicycle activity taking place? What effect does facility construction have on levels of bicycling and walking? What are the characteristics of nonmotorized transportation users? How many miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available? Where are existing facilities located? This paper provides a summary of recent research that was sponsored by FHWA and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center to review and evaluate bicycle and pedestrian data collection methods throughout the United States. It uses a case study approach to evaluate pedestrian and bicycle data collection in 29 different agencies throughout the country in communities ranging in size from 6,000 residents (Sandpoint, Idaho) to 8 million residents (New York City). These case studies are analyzed in the following data collection categories: manual counts, automated counts, surveys targeting nonmotorized transportation users, surveys sampling a general population, inventories, and spatial analyses. The results provide information about the methods and the optimum timing for pedestrian and bicycle data collection; emerging technologies that can be used to gather and analyze data; the benefits, limitations, and costs of different data collection techniques; and implications for a national data collection strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0361-1981</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3141/1939-10</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Transportation research record, 2005-01, Vol.1939 (1939), p.77-90</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-a7377cb967713ead2928fdc86d9e70edb423386760553419e90af012698f83373</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patten, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toole, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><title>Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities</title><title>Transportation research record</title><description>Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle transportation has increased over the past 15 years, with a resulting increase in shared-use pathways, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks in many parts of the United States. This has caused communities to ask questions: Where is pedestrian and bicycle activity taking place? What effect does facility construction have on levels of bicycling and walking? What are the characteristics of nonmotorized transportation users? How many miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available? Where are existing facilities located? This paper provides a summary of recent research that was sponsored by FHWA and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center to review and evaluate bicycle and pedestrian data collection methods throughout the United States. It uses a case study approach to evaluate pedestrian and bicycle data collection in 29 different agencies throughout the country in communities ranging in size from 6,000 residents (Sandpoint, Idaho) to 8 million residents (New York City). These case studies are analyzed in the following data collection categories: manual counts, automated counts, surveys targeting nonmotorized transportation users, surveys sampling a general population, inventories, and spatial analyses. The results provide information about the methods and the optimum timing for pedestrian and bicycle data collection; emerging technologies that can be used to gather and analyze data; the benefits, limitations, and costs of different data collection techniques; and implications for a national data collection strategy.</description><issn>0361-1981</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtOwzAURL0AifIQv-AVrFJ8cxM7XpbwlCoBKl1Hrn0jGTlOiZNF_p5WZTWa0dFoNIzdglgiFPAAGnUG4owtBErIQFdwwS5T-hECsVC4YF-1ScQ34-RmvoomzMkn3rf8kxylcfAmchMdf_R2toH4kxkNr_sQyI6-j9xHvl1uloeo66boR0_pmp23JiS6-dcrtn15_q7fsvXH63u9WmcWFIyZUaiU3WmpFCAZl-u8ap2tpNOkBLldkSNWUklRlliAJi1MKyCXumorRIVX7O7Uux_63-kwtul8shSCidRPqcm1kmVeHsH7E2iHPqWB2mY_-M4McwOiOd7UHG86GPwDV4dZmg</recordid><startdate>200501</startdate><enddate>200501</enddate><creator>Schneider, Robert</creator><creator>Patten, Robert</creator><creator>Toole, Jennifer</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200501</creationdate><title>Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities</title><author>Schneider, Robert ; Patten, Robert ; Toole, Jennifer</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-a7377cb967713ead2928fdc86d9e70edb423386760553419e90af012698f83373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patten, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toole, Jennifer</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schneider, Robert</au><au>Patten, Robert</au><au>Toole, Jennifer</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities</atitle><jtitle>Transportation research record</jtitle><date>2005-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>1939</volume><issue>1939</issue><spage>77</spage><epage>90</epage><pages>77-90</pages><issn>0361-1981</issn><abstract>Federal funding for pedestrian and bicycle transportation has increased over the past 15 years, with a resulting increase in shared-use pathways, paved shoulders, bicycle lanes, and sidewalks in many parts of the United States. This has caused communities to ask questions: Where is pedestrian and bicycle activity taking place? What effect does facility construction have on levels of bicycling and walking? What are the characteristics of nonmotorized transportation users? How many miles of pedestrian and bicycle facilities are available? Where are existing facilities located? This paper provides a summary of recent research that was sponsored by FHWA and the Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center to review and evaluate bicycle and pedestrian data collection methods throughout the United States. It uses a case study approach to evaluate pedestrian and bicycle data collection in 29 different agencies throughout the country in communities ranging in size from 6,000 residents (Sandpoint, Idaho) to 8 million residents (New York City). These case studies are analyzed in the following data collection categories: manual counts, automated counts, surveys targeting nonmotorized transportation users, surveys sampling a general population, inventories, and spatial analyses. The results provide information about the methods and the optimum timing for pedestrian and bicycle data collection; emerging technologies that can be used to gather and analyze data; the benefits, limitations, and costs of different data collection techniques; and implications for a national data collection strategy.</abstract><doi>10.3141/1939-10</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0361-1981
ispartof Transportation research record, 2005-01, Vol.1939 (1939), p.77-90
issn 0361-1981
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29765257
source SAGE Complete A-Z List
title Case Study Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Data Collection in U.S. Communities
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T11%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Case%20Study%20Analysis%20of%20Pedestrian%20and%20Bicycle%20Data%20Collection%20in%20U.S.%20Communities&rft.jtitle=Transportation%20research%20record&rft.au=Schneider,%20Robert&rft.date=2005-01&rft.volume=1939&rft.issue=1939&rft.spage=77&rft.epage=90&rft.pages=77-90&rft.issn=0361-1981&rft_id=info:doi/10.3141/1939-10&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29765257%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29765257&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true