Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies
A special structure of combined sewer overflow tanks is the inline storage sewer with downstream discharge (SKU). This layout has the advantage that besides the sewer system, no other structures are required for storm water treatment. Consequently only very little space is required and compared to c...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 2004-01, Vol.50 (11), p.89-96 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 96 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 11 |
| container_start_page | 89 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 50 |
| creator | Frehmann, T Mietzel, T Kutzner, R Spengler, B Geiger, W F |
| description | A special structure of combined sewer overflow tanks is the inline storage sewer with downstream discharge (SKU). This layout has the advantage that besides the sewer system, no other structures are required for storm water treatment. Consequently only very little space is required and compared to combined sewer overflow tanks, there is an enormous potential in reducing costs during construction. To investigate the efficiency of an inline storage sewer, a monitoring station was established in Dortmund-Scharnhorst, Germany. The monitoring station was in operation for a period of 2.5 years. Within this period water samples were taken during a total of 20 discharge events. Besides the complete hydraulic data collection, seven water samplers took more than 5,000 water samples during dry and wet weather. This adds up to a total of more than 20,000 individual lab analyses. The average of the total efficiency for the SKU-West is 86%. 29% of this efficiency can be attributed to the throttle flow. The remaining 57% can be divided into a part of 48% that can be attributed to the process storage and 9% that can be attributed to sedimentation and erosion process. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.2004.0675 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29752473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>14720782</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7683be23078da550ed02459bf87d686ae73e773c665820640849f0e0b9a6833</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNks1r20AQxZekJXZTH3MNgkLoRe7s5-weg2nSQkovoVexlkZGwZKc3TUm_31WjaGQQ1KYYeDxmwczPMYuOCwFN-bbIaalAFBLMKhP2Jw7Z0qHUpyyhUPLrZLSKYv4gc1BoCy5EHLGPsX4AAAoFZyxGdfGamfVnP35NQ5dGkM3bIpuyLXtBipiVvwmTzpQiEU7hr9Sf_CJQpEC-dTTkIo0Fg1lqZ-WqG27uqMhd_zMPrZ-G2lxnOfs_ub7_epHeff79ufq-q6slRSpbNBYuSYhAW3jtQZqQCjt1q3FxljjCSUhytoYbQUYBVa5FgjWzudNec6uXmx3YXzcU0xV38Watls_0LiPlXCohcL_ARU4LfS7IDfcOgnmfVChyFeJDH59G8wXG4VcY0a_vEIfxn0Y8gMr7pRUQnMzGZYvVB3GGAO11S50vQ9P2aqaMlLljFRTRqopI5m_PLru1z01_-hjCOQzQyqzXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943425162</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Frehmann, T ; Mietzel, T ; Kutzner, R ; Spengler, B ; Geiger, W F</creator><contributor>Langergraber, G ; Haberl, R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frehmann, T ; Mietzel, T ; Kutzner, R ; Spengler, B ; Geiger, W F ; Langergraber, G ; Haberl, R</creatorcontrib><description>A special structure of combined sewer overflow tanks is the inline storage sewer with downstream discharge (SKU). This layout has the advantage that besides the sewer system, no other structures are required for storm water treatment. Consequently only very little space is required and compared to combined sewer overflow tanks, there is an enormous potential in reducing costs during construction. To investigate the efficiency of an inline storage sewer, a monitoring station was established in Dortmund-Scharnhorst, Germany. The monitoring station was in operation for a period of 2.5 years. Within this period water samples were taken during a total of 20 discharge events. Besides the complete hydraulic data collection, seven water samplers took more than 5,000 water samples during dry and wet weather. This adds up to a total of more than 20,000 individual lab analyses. The average of the total efficiency for the SKU-West is 86%. 29% of this efficiency can be attributed to the throttle flow. The remaining 57% can be divided into a part of 48% that can be attributed to the process storage and 9% that can be attributed to sedimentation and erosion process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781843394877</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1843394871</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.2004.0675</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15685984</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Combined sewer overflows ; Construction costs ; Data collection ; Discharge ; Efficiency ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Erosion ; Freshwater ; Models, Statistical ; Monitoring ; Overflow ; Rain ; Samplers ; Sedimentation ; Sewage ; Sewage tanks ; Sewer construction ; Sewer systems ; Sewers ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Statistics as Topic ; Storage tanks ; Storms ; Stormwater ; Tanks ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Water analysis ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants ; Water Pollution ; Water Purification ; Water sampling ; Water treatment</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 2004-01, Vol.50 (11), p.89-96</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Dec 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,27922,27923</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15685984$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Langergraber, G</contributor><contributor>Haberl, R</contributor><creatorcontrib>Frehmann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mietzel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutzner, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, W F</creatorcontrib><title>Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies</title><title>Water science and technology</title><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><description>A special structure of combined sewer overflow tanks is the inline storage sewer with downstream discharge (SKU). This layout has the advantage that besides the sewer system, no other structures are required for storm water treatment. Consequently only very little space is required and compared to combined sewer overflow tanks, there is an enormous potential in reducing costs during construction. To investigate the efficiency of an inline storage sewer, a monitoring station was established in Dortmund-Scharnhorst, Germany. The monitoring station was in operation for a period of 2.5 years. Within this period water samples were taken during a total of 20 discharge events. Besides the complete hydraulic data collection, seven water samplers took more than 5,000 water samples during dry and wet weather. This adds up to a total of more than 20,000 individual lab analyses. The average of the total efficiency for the SKU-West is 86%. 29% of this efficiency can be attributed to the throttle flow. The remaining 57% can be divided into a part of 48% that can be attributed to the process storage and 9% that can be attributed to sedimentation and erosion process.</description><subject>Combined sewer overflows</subject><subject>Construction costs</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Erosion</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Monitoring</subject><subject>Overflow</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Samplers</subject><subject>Sedimentation</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sewage tanks</subject><subject>Sewer construction</subject><subject>Sewer systems</subject><subject>Sewers</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Statistics as Topic</subject><subject>Storage tanks</subject><subject>Storms</subject><subject>Stormwater</subject><subject>Tanks</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Water analysis</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants</subject><subject>Water Pollution</subject><subject>Water Purification</subject><subject>Water sampling</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>9781843394877</isbn><isbn>1843394871</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqNks1r20AQxZekJXZTH3MNgkLoRe7s5-weg2nSQkovoVexlkZGwZKc3TUm_31WjaGQQ1KYYeDxmwczPMYuOCwFN-bbIaalAFBLMKhP2Jw7Z0qHUpyyhUPLrZLSKYv4gc1BoCy5EHLGPsX4AAAoFZyxGdfGamfVnP35NQ5dGkM3bIpuyLXtBipiVvwmTzpQiEU7hr9Sf_CJQpEC-dTTkIo0Fg1lqZ-WqG27uqMhd_zMPrZ-G2lxnOfs_ub7_epHeff79ufq-q6slRSpbNBYuSYhAW3jtQZqQCjt1q3FxljjCSUhytoYbQUYBVa5FgjWzudNec6uXmx3YXzcU0xV38Watls_0LiPlXCohcL_ARU4LfS7IDfcOgnmfVChyFeJDH59G8wXG4VcY0a_vEIfxn0Y8gMr7pRUQnMzGZYvVB3GGAO11S50vQ9P2aqaMlLljFRTRqopI5m_PLru1z01_-hjCOQzQyqzXQ</recordid><startdate>20040101</startdate><enddate>20040101</enddate><creator>Frehmann, T</creator><creator>Mietzel, T</creator><creator>Kutzner, R</creator><creator>Spengler, B</creator><creator>Geiger, W F</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040101</creationdate><title>Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies</title><author>Frehmann, T ; Mietzel, T ; Kutzner, R ; Spengler, B ; Geiger, W F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c432t-d7683be23078da550ed02459bf87d686ae73e773c665820640849f0e0b9a6833</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Combined sewer overflows</topic><topic>Construction costs</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Erosion</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Monitoring</topic><topic>Overflow</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Samplers</topic><topic>Sedimentation</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sewage tanks</topic><topic>Sewer construction</topic><topic>Sewer systems</topic><topic>Sewers</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Statistics as Topic</topic><topic>Storage tanks</topic><topic>Storms</topic><topic>Stormwater</topic><topic>Tanks</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Water analysis</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants</topic><topic>Water Pollution</topic><topic>Water Purification</topic><topic>Water sampling</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Frehmann, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mietzel, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kutzner, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spengler, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geiger, W F</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Frehmann, T</au><au>Mietzel, T</au><au>Kutzner, R</au><au>Spengler, B</au><au>Geiger, W F</au><au>Langergraber, G</au><au>Haberl, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><addtitle>Water Sci Technol</addtitle><date>2004-01-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>89</spage><epage>96</epage><pages>89-96</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>9781843394877</isbn><isbn>1843394871</isbn><abstract>A special structure of combined sewer overflow tanks is the inline storage sewer with downstream discharge (SKU). This layout has the advantage that besides the sewer system, no other structures are required for storm water treatment. Consequently only very little space is required and compared to combined sewer overflow tanks, there is an enormous potential in reducing costs during construction. To investigate the efficiency of an inline storage sewer, a monitoring station was established in Dortmund-Scharnhorst, Germany. The monitoring station was in operation for a period of 2.5 years. Within this period water samples were taken during a total of 20 discharge events. Besides the complete hydraulic data collection, seven water samplers took more than 5,000 water samples during dry and wet weather. This adds up to a total of more than 20,000 individual lab analyses. The average of the total efficiency for the SKU-West is 86%. 29% of this efficiency can be attributed to the throttle flow. The remaining 57% can be divided into a part of 48% that can be attributed to the process storage and 9% that can be attributed to sedimentation and erosion process.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><pmid>15685984</pmid><doi>10.2166/wst.2004.0675</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 2004-01, Vol.50 (11), p.89-96 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29752473 |
| source | MEDLINE; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Combined sewer overflows Construction costs Data collection Discharge Efficiency Environmental Monitoring - methods Erosion Freshwater Models, Statistical Monitoring Overflow Rain Samplers Sedimentation Sewage Sewage tanks Sewer construction Sewer systems Sewers Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Statistics as Topic Storage tanks Storms Stormwater Tanks Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Water analysis Water Movements Water Pollutants Water Pollution Water Purification Water sampling Water treatment |
| title | Monitoring in inline storage sewers for stormwater treatment to determine efficiencies |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T00%3A02%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Monitoring%20in%20inline%20storage%20sewers%20for%20stormwater%20treatment%20to%20determine%20efficiencies&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Frehmann,%20T&rft.date=2004-01-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=89&rft.epage=96&rft.pages=89-96&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=9781843394877&rft.isbn_list=1843394871&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.2004.0675&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14720782%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943425162&rft_id=info:pmid/15685984&rfr_iscdi=true |