Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors
Like all biological wastewater treatment systems, the UASB reactor produces sludge that accumulates in the reactor. Since the storage capacity is limited, the sludge will eventually be discharged together with the effluent, when the reactor is full of sludge. To avoid the discharge of sludge in the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 1999, Vol.40 (8), p.211-219 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 219 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 211 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J MENEZES SILVA, J. K VAN HAANDEL, A |
description | Like all biological wastewater treatment systems, the UASB reactor produces sludge that accumulates in the reactor. Since the storage capacity is limited, the sludge will eventually be discharged together with the effluent, when the reactor is full of sludge. To avoid the discharge of sludge in the effluent, it is necessary that excess sludge be discharged periodically from the reactor before its storage capacity is exhausted. For minimum operational costs it is preferable to have large discharges with a low frequency. On the other hand the discharges cannot be excessive in order to avoid deterioration of the reactor performance after the discharges. An experimental investigation was carried out at pilot scale to establish the influence of the magnitude of excess sludge discharge on the performance of UASB reactors, treating municipal sewage. UASB reactors were operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4 and 8 h, and excess sludge discharges of varying magnitude were applied. The performance and operational stability of these reactors after the discharges were observed and the sludge accumulation and unintentional discharge (wash-out) with the effluent were determined. During periods of steady state without excess sludge discharge, the sludge production was determined from the settleable solids in the effluent. The data show that for discharges of up to 50% of the sludge mass in reactors with HRT = 4 hours and 60% with HRT = 8 hours, the reactor efficiency and operational stability were affected very little and only during the first few days after the discharge. Discharges of up to 80% of the sludge did not cause instability, but a reduction of the COD removal efficiency was observed during 1 to 2 weeks after the discharge. Independent of the magnitude of sludge discharge, the effluent pH remained in the narrow range of 6.8 to 7.0 and the ratio between alkalinity (average 275 ppm CaCO sub(3)) and VFA concentration (average of 28 ppm HAc) was always very high so that there was never a danger of souring of the reactor contents. Based on the obtained experimental data an operational procedure for optimisation of excess sludge discharges was developed. It is believed that along with the favourable natural conditions during the experimental investigation (average temperature of 27 degree C), the observed reactor stability can be attributed to a large extent to the design of the used phase separator, which is much more efficient than the conventional one. I |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00628-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29750253</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>28898072</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e52f756b9f5064bf5491edcf0b3d07b3d896fecd7fc50306c8c595bb992750a33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0ctKJDEUBuDgKNheHkEocBBdlJ7k5HaWjngDwYW6DqlUMraUXZp0w_j2xlYccKObJIvvPxzyM7bD4ZAD10c3IAy2XAjcJzoA0MK2tMImnEi3ZFD8YttkLIAFidoYs8omn5F1tlHKAwAYlDBhePovxFKaMiz6v7HppyXc-1xfKcfnRZyFlyaNubk7vvnT5OjDfMxli60lP5S4_XFvsruz09uTi_bq-vzy5PiqDWjsvI1KJKN0R0mBll1SknjsQ4IOezD1sKRTDL1JQQGCDjYoUl1HJIwCj7jJ9t7nPuWx7lLm7rGuF4fBz-K4KE5QdUL9AFpLFoz4HnKJnKz8FnKjrUKLP4BSIiGvcPcLfBgXeVb_z3GStQujl0q9q5DHUnJM7ilPH31-cRzcW_luWb57a9IRuWX5jmru98d0X4IfUvazMC3_w9yISvEVe6epPw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943407631</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F ; SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J ; MENEZES SILVA, J. K ; VAN HAANDEL, A</creator><contributor>Chamy, R ; Tilche, A ; Ruiz, G (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F ; SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J ; MENEZES SILVA, J. K ; VAN HAANDEL, A ; Chamy, R ; Tilche, A ; Ruiz, G (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>Like all biological wastewater treatment systems, the UASB reactor produces sludge that accumulates in the reactor. Since the storage capacity is limited, the sludge will eventually be discharged together with the effluent, when the reactor is full of sludge. To avoid the discharge of sludge in the effluent, it is necessary that excess sludge be discharged periodically from the reactor before its storage capacity is exhausted. For minimum operational costs it is preferable to have large discharges with a low frequency. On the other hand the discharges cannot be excessive in order to avoid deterioration of the reactor performance after the discharges. An experimental investigation was carried out at pilot scale to establish the influence of the magnitude of excess sludge discharge on the performance of UASB reactors, treating municipal sewage. UASB reactors were operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4 and 8 h, and excess sludge discharges of varying magnitude were applied. The performance and operational stability of these reactors after the discharges were observed and the sludge accumulation and unintentional discharge (wash-out) with the effluent were determined. During periods of steady state without excess sludge discharge, the sludge production was determined from the settleable solids in the effluent. The data show that for discharges of up to 50% of the sludge mass in reactors with HRT = 4 hours and 60% with HRT = 8 hours, the reactor efficiency and operational stability were affected very little and only during the first few days after the discharge. Discharges of up to 80% of the sludge did not cause instability, but a reduction of the COD removal efficiency was observed during 1 to 2 weeks after the discharge. Independent of the magnitude of sludge discharge, the effluent pH remained in the narrow range of 6.8 to 7.0 and the ratio between alkalinity (average 275 ppm CaCO sub(3)) and VFA concentration (average of 28 ppm HAc) was always very high so that there was never a danger of souring of the reactor contents. Based on the obtained experimental data an operational procedure for optimisation of excess sludge discharges was developed. It is believed that along with the favourable natural conditions during the experimental investigation (average temperature of 27 degree C), the observed reactor stability can be attributed to a large extent to the design of the used phase separator, which is much more efficient than the conventional one. It is possible that results with a conventional UASB reactor would have been different.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780080436777</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0080436773</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00628-9</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSTED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Pergamon Press</publisher><subject>Alkalinity ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological sewage treatment ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biological wastewater treatment ; Bioreactors ; Biotechnology ; Calcium carbonate ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Discharge ; Discharge (fluid mechanics) ; Discharge frequency ; Effluents ; Environment and pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Hazards ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; Instability ; Municipal wastes ; Municipal wastewater ; Operating costs ; Optimization ; Pollution ; Reactors ; Reduction ; Removal ; Settleable solids ; Sewage ; Sludge ; Stability ; Storage capacity ; Storage conditions ; Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors ; Wastewater ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1999, Vol.40 (8), p.211-219</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Oct 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e52f756b9f5064bf5491edcf0b3d07b3d896fecd7fc50306c8c595bb992750a33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,4022,4048,4049,27922,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1172006$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Chamy, R</contributor><contributor>Tilche, A</contributor><contributor>Ruiz, G (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENEZES SILVA, J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HAANDEL, A</creatorcontrib><title>Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Like all biological wastewater treatment systems, the UASB reactor produces sludge that accumulates in the reactor. Since the storage capacity is limited, the sludge will eventually be discharged together with the effluent, when the reactor is full of sludge. To avoid the discharge of sludge in the effluent, it is necessary that excess sludge be discharged periodically from the reactor before its storage capacity is exhausted. For minimum operational costs it is preferable to have large discharges with a low frequency. On the other hand the discharges cannot be excessive in order to avoid deterioration of the reactor performance after the discharges. An experimental investigation was carried out at pilot scale to establish the influence of the magnitude of excess sludge discharge on the performance of UASB reactors, treating municipal sewage. UASB reactors were operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4 and 8 h, and excess sludge discharges of varying magnitude were applied. The performance and operational stability of these reactors after the discharges were observed and the sludge accumulation and unintentional discharge (wash-out) with the effluent were determined. During periods of steady state without excess sludge discharge, the sludge production was determined from the settleable solids in the effluent. The data show that for discharges of up to 50% of the sludge mass in reactors with HRT = 4 hours and 60% with HRT = 8 hours, the reactor efficiency and operational stability were affected very little and only during the first few days after the discharge. Discharges of up to 80% of the sludge did not cause instability, but a reduction of the COD removal efficiency was observed during 1 to 2 weeks after the discharge. Independent of the magnitude of sludge discharge, the effluent pH remained in the narrow range of 6.8 to 7.0 and the ratio between alkalinity (average 275 ppm CaCO sub(3)) and VFA concentration (average of 28 ppm HAc) was always very high so that there was never a danger of souring of the reactor contents. Based on the obtained experimental data an operational procedure for optimisation of excess sludge discharges was developed. It is believed that along with the favourable natural conditions during the experimental investigation (average temperature of 27 degree C), the observed reactor stability can be attributed to a large extent to the design of the used phase separator, which is much more efficient than the conventional one. It is possible that results with a conventional UASB reactor would have been different.</description><subject>Alkalinity</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological sewage treatment</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biological wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Bioreactors</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Discharge (fluid mechanics)</subject><subject>Discharge frequency</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Hazards</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>Instability</subject><subject>Municipal wastes</subject><subject>Municipal wastewater</subject><subject>Operating costs</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Settleable solids</subject><subject>Sewage</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Stability</subject><subject>Storage capacity</subject><subject>Storage conditions</subject><subject>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>9780080436777</isbn><isbn>0080436773</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0ctKJDEUBuDgKNheHkEocBBdlJ7k5HaWjngDwYW6DqlUMraUXZp0w_j2xlYccKObJIvvPxzyM7bD4ZAD10c3IAy2XAjcJzoA0MK2tMImnEi3ZFD8YttkLIAFidoYs8omn5F1tlHKAwAYlDBhePovxFKaMiz6v7HppyXc-1xfKcfnRZyFlyaNubk7vvnT5OjDfMxli60lP5S4_XFvsruz09uTi_bq-vzy5PiqDWjsvI1KJKN0R0mBll1SknjsQ4IOezD1sKRTDL1JQQGCDjYoUl1HJIwCj7jJ9t7nPuWx7lLm7rGuF4fBz-K4KE5QdUL9AFpLFoz4HnKJnKz8FnKjrUKLP4BSIiGvcPcLfBgXeVb_z3GStQujl0q9q5DHUnJM7ilPH31-cRzcW_luWb57a9IRuWX5jmru98d0X4IfUvazMC3_w9yISvEVe6epPw</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F</creator><creator>SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J</creator><creator>MENEZES SILVA, J. K</creator><creator>VAN HAANDEL, A</creator><general>Pergamon Press</general><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>7TB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors</title><author>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F ; SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J ; MENEZES SILVA, J. K ; VAN HAANDEL, A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-e52f756b9f5064bf5491edcf0b3d07b3d896fecd7fc50306c8c595bb992750a33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Alkalinity</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological sewage treatment</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biological wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Bioreactors</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Discharge (fluid mechanics)</topic><topic>Discharge frequency</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Hazards</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>Instability</topic><topic>Municipal wastes</topic><topic>Municipal wastewater</topic><topic>Operating costs</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Settleable solids</topic><topic>Sewage</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Stability</topic><topic>Storage capacity</topic><topic>Storage conditions</topic><topic>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MENEZES SILVA, J. K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>VAN HAANDEL, A</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FEITOSA CAVALCANTI, P. F</au><au>SOUTO MEDEIROS, E. J</au><au>MENEZES SILVA, J. K</au><au>VAN HAANDEL, A</au><au>Chamy, R</au><au>Tilche, A</au><au>Ruiz, G (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>211</spage><epage>219</epage><pages>211-219</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>9780080436777</isbn><isbn>0080436773</isbn><coden>WSTED4</coden><abstract>Like all biological wastewater treatment systems, the UASB reactor produces sludge that accumulates in the reactor. Since the storage capacity is limited, the sludge will eventually be discharged together with the effluent, when the reactor is full of sludge. To avoid the discharge of sludge in the effluent, it is necessary that excess sludge be discharged periodically from the reactor before its storage capacity is exhausted. For minimum operational costs it is preferable to have large discharges with a low frequency. On the other hand the discharges cannot be excessive in order to avoid deterioration of the reactor performance after the discharges. An experimental investigation was carried out at pilot scale to establish the influence of the magnitude of excess sludge discharge on the performance of UASB reactors, treating municipal sewage. UASB reactors were operated at hydraulic retention times (HRT) of 4 and 8 h, and excess sludge discharges of varying magnitude were applied. The performance and operational stability of these reactors after the discharges were observed and the sludge accumulation and unintentional discharge (wash-out) with the effluent were determined. During periods of steady state without excess sludge discharge, the sludge production was determined from the settleable solids in the effluent. The data show that for discharges of up to 50% of the sludge mass in reactors with HRT = 4 hours and 60% with HRT = 8 hours, the reactor efficiency and operational stability were affected very little and only during the first few days after the discharge. Discharges of up to 80% of the sludge did not cause instability, but a reduction of the COD removal efficiency was observed during 1 to 2 weeks after the discharge. Independent of the magnitude of sludge discharge, the effluent pH remained in the narrow range of 6.8 to 7.0 and the ratio between alkalinity (average 275 ppm CaCO sub(3)) and VFA concentration (average of 28 ppm HAc) was always very high so that there was never a danger of souring of the reactor contents. Based on the obtained experimental data an operational procedure for optimisation of excess sludge discharges was developed. It is believed that along with the favourable natural conditions during the experimental investigation (average temperature of 27 degree C), the observed reactor stability can be attributed to a large extent to the design of the used phase separator, which is much more efficient than the conventional one. It is possible that results with a conventional UASB reactor would have been different.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Pergamon Press</pub><doi>10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00628-9</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 1999, Vol.40 (8), p.211-219 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29750253 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Alkalinity Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Biological sewage treatment Biological treatment of waters Biological wastewater treatment Bioreactors Biotechnology Calcium carbonate Chemical oxygen demand Discharge Discharge (fluid mechanics) Discharge frequency Effluents Environment and pollution Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General purification processes Hazards Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects Instability Municipal wastes Municipal wastewater Operating costs Optimization Pollution Reactors Reduction Removal Settleable solids Sewage Sludge Stability Storage capacity Storage conditions Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors Wastewater Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water treatment and pollution |
title | Excess sludge discharge frequency for UASB reactors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T12%3A21%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Excess%20sludge%20discharge%20frequency%20for%20UASB%20reactors&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=FEITOSA%20CAVALCANTI,%20P.%20F&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=211&rft.epage=219&rft.pages=211-219&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=9780080436777&rft.isbn_list=0080436773&rft.coden=WSTED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00628-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E28898072%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943407631&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |