Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
Objectives To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement. Materials and Methods PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement am...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Clinical oral implants research 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.598-608 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 608 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 598 |
| container_title | Clinical oral implants research |
| container_volume | 35 |
| creator | Wu, Xin‐Yu Shi, Jun‐Yu Qiao, Shi‐Chong Tonetti, Maurizio S. Lai, Hong‐Chang |
| description | Objectives
To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement.
Materials and Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta‐analyses were undertaken.
Results
Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported.
Conclusion
Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/clr.14255 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2974004277</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2974004277</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-919c263d5f00003bd632efffa94202288e78759576f947a1bea2d9f2f96e1ac93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVIaVy3h7xAEOSSHNYeSavVKjdjkrZgCIT2LGTtKGzY9TrSbsze8gh9xj5J5drJoVAdRjB88_PzEXLOYMbSm7smzFjOpTwhE1YAZCCBnZIJaJCZYgU7I59ifAKAQpf6IzkTpWQKpJgQu3BuCNaNtPM0dOuurx2NQ3jEMFLfBVrhprcNrdttYzc9TdNhm3Y3dEHjGHts7f4k4EuNO2o3FW2xt79ff9mNbcZYx8_kg7dNxC_Hf0p-3t3-WH7LVvdfvy8Xq8wJJmSmmXa8EJX0qSaIdVUIjt57q3MOnJclqlJJLVXhda4sW6Pllfbc6wKZdVpMydUhdxu65wFjb9o6OmxSbeyGaLhWOUDOlUro5T_oUzeE1DcaAYUs81LleaKuD5QLXYwBvdmGurVhNAzM3rtJ3s1f74m9OCYO6xard_JNdALmB2BXNzj-P8ksVw-HyD9gx4zI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3065848744</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Wu, Xin‐Yu ; Shi, Jun‐Yu ; Qiao, Shi‐Chong ; Tonetti, Maurizio S. ; Lai, Hong‐Chang</creator><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xin‐Yu ; Shi, Jun‐Yu ; Qiao, Shi‐Chong ; Tonetti, Maurizio S. ; Lai, Hong‐Chang</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives
To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement.
Materials and Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta‐analyses were undertaken.
Results
Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported.
Conclusion
Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0905-7161</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1600-0501</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/clr.14255</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38517053</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Denmark: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Cone-Beam Computed Tomography ; Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods ; Dental Implants ; Dental prosthetics ; Deviation ; digital dentistry ; Humans ; Meta-analysis ; Patients ; Robotic surgery ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Statistical analysis ; Systematic review ; Teeth</subject><ispartof>Clinical oral implants research, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.598-608</ispartof><rights>2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-919c263d5f00003bd632efffa94202288e78759576f947a1bea2d9f2f96e1ac93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1310-1452 ; 0000-0002-2743-0137</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fclr.14255$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fclr.14255$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,778,782,1414,27907,27908,45557,45558</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38517053$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xin‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jun‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Shi‐Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonetti, Maurizio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hong‐Chang</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><title>Clinical oral implants research</title><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><description>Objectives
To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement.
Materials and Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta‐analyses were undertaken.
Results
Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported.
Conclusion
Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</subject><subject>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</subject><subject>Dental Implants</subject><subject>Dental prosthetics</subject><subject>Deviation</subject><subject>digital dentistry</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Meta-analysis</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Robotic surgery</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teeth</subject><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kMFqGzEQhkVIaVy3h7xAEOSSHNYeSavVKjdjkrZgCIT2LGTtKGzY9TrSbsze8gh9xj5J5drJoVAdRjB88_PzEXLOYMbSm7smzFjOpTwhE1YAZCCBnZIJaJCZYgU7I59ifAKAQpf6IzkTpWQKpJgQu3BuCNaNtPM0dOuurx2NQ3jEMFLfBVrhprcNrdttYzc9TdNhm3Y3dEHjGHts7f4k4EuNO2o3FW2xt79ff9mNbcZYx8_kg7dNxC_Hf0p-3t3-WH7LVvdfvy8Xq8wJJmSmmXa8EJX0qSaIdVUIjt57q3MOnJclqlJJLVXhda4sW6Pllfbc6wKZdVpMydUhdxu65wFjb9o6OmxSbeyGaLhWOUDOlUro5T_oUzeE1DcaAYUs81LleaKuD5QLXYwBvdmGurVhNAzM3rtJ3s1f74m9OCYO6xard_JNdALmB2BXNzj-P8ksVw-HyD9gx4zI</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Wu, Xin‐Yu</creator><creator>Shi, Jun‐Yu</creator><creator>Qiao, Shi‐Chong</creator><creator>Tonetti, Maurizio S.</creator><creator>Lai, Hong‐Chang</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-0137</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</title><author>Wu, Xin‐Yu ; Shi, Jun‐Yu ; Qiao, Shi‐Chong ; Tonetti, Maurizio S. ; Lai, Hong‐Chang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3135-919c263d5f00003bd632efffa94202288e78759576f947a1bea2d9f2f96e1ac93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Cone-Beam Computed Tomography</topic><topic>Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods</topic><topic>Dental Implants</topic><topic>Dental prosthetics</topic><topic>Deviation</topic><topic>digital dentistry</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Meta-analysis</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Robotic surgery</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teeth</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xin‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, Jun‐Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qiao, Shi‐Chong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tonetti, Maurizio S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Hong‐Chang</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wu, Xin‐Yu</au><au>Shi, Jun‐Yu</au><au>Qiao, Shi‐Chong</au><au>Tonetti, Maurizio S.</au><au>Lai, Hong‐Chang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis</atitle><jtitle>Clinical oral implants research</jtitle><addtitle>Clin Oral Implants Res</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>598</spage><epage>608</epage><pages>598-608</pages><issn>0905-7161</issn><issn>1600-0501</issn><eissn>1600-0501</eissn><abstract>Objectives
To systematically analyze the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement.
Materials and Methods
PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched on October 25, 2023. Model studies or clinical studies reporting the accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement among patients with missing or hopeless teeth were included. Risks of bias in clinical studies were assessed. Meta‐analyses were undertaken.
Results
Data from 8 clinical studies reporting on 109 patients and 242 implants and 13 preclinical studies were included. Positional accuracy was measured by comparing the implant plan in presurgery CBCT and the actual implant position in postsurgery CBCT. For clinical studies, the pooled (95% confidence interval) platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.68 (0.57, 0.79) mm, 0.67 (0.58, 0.75) mm, and 1.69 (1.25, 2.12)°, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the accuracy of implants placed in partially or fully edentulous patients. For model studies, the pooled platform deviation, apex deviation, and angular deviation were 0.72 (0.58, 0.86) mm, 0.90 (0.74, 1.06) mm, and 1.46 (1.22, 1.70)°, respectively. No adverse event was reported.
Conclusion
Within the limitation of the present systematic review, robotic surgery for dental implant placement showed suitable implant positional accuracy and had no reported obvious harm. Both robotic systems and clinical studies on robotic surgery for dental implant placement should be further developed.</abstract><cop>Denmark</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38517053</pmid><doi>10.1111/clr.14255</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1310-1452</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2743-0137</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0905-7161 |
| ispartof | Clinical oral implants research, 2024-06, Vol.35 (6), p.598-608 |
| issn | 0905-7161 1600-0501 1600-0501 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2974004277 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
| subjects | Accuracy Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Dental Implantation, Endosseous - methods Dental Implants Dental prosthetics Deviation digital dentistry Humans Meta-analysis Patients Robotic surgery Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Statistical analysis Systematic review Teeth |
| title | Accuracy of robotic surgery for dental implant placement: A systematic review and meta‐analysis |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T13%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20robotic%20surgery%20for%20dental%20implant%20placement:%20A%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta%E2%80%90analysis&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20oral%20implants%20research&rft.au=Wu,%20Xin%E2%80%90Yu&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=598&rft.epage=608&rft.pages=598-608&rft.issn=0905-7161&rft.eissn=1600-0501&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/clr.14255&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2974004277%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3065848744&rft_id=info:pmid/38517053&rfr_iscdi=true |