Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted
Purpose To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different methods of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the surgery of subluxated cataracts. Methods In this retrospective, comparative, clinical interventional study, the medical records of patients who underwent IOL implantation wi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International ophthalmology 2024-03, Vol.44 (1), p.152-152, Article 152 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 152 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 152 |
| container_title | International ophthalmology |
| container_volume | 44 |
| creator | Ahmet, Sibel Kemer Atik, Burcu Kandemir Beşek, Nilay Kırgız, Ahmet Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem |
| description | Purpose
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different methods of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the surgery of subluxated cataracts.
Methods
In this retrospective, comparative, clinical interventional study, the medical records of patients who underwent IOL implantation with sutureless 27-gauge needle-assisted transconjunctival intrascleral (Group 1), Z-suture knotless transscleral (Group 2), and Cionni capsular tension ring (Cionni-CTR) assisted (Group 3) simultaneously with subluxated cataract extraction between June 2010 and June 2022 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, follow-up times, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive values, and spherical equivalent (SE) values of three groups were compared. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results
There were 20 eyes in Group 1, 35 eyes in Group 2, and 40 eyes in Group 3. In all groups, statistically significant improvement was observed in postoperative UDVA and CDVA compared to preoperative values (each p 0.05).
Conclusion
The study suggests that three different IOL implantation techniques for simultaneous IOL implantation in subluxated cataract surgery have similar effects on visual and refractive outcomes. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2973101533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2969814312</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c4ad0875c07c3036f0892d119f9b29282c8ed7693f8b60ae915175dcdffece7b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTYsCPjnJo7ZoSv-pEpsyoZN5DiT1hfHDh4b3T4pr4PTlIJYsLI18805ozlV9ZTRV4xS-RoZlYrXlO9qKmjX1Md71SlrpKh5K-j9v_4n1SPEA6VUSdU-rE5E11C1E91p9XMf5kVHi8GTMJF0FQFIAnPl7fcMSKYQCdo5u6Q9hIzE-hR1MNnpSBz4UpgXp33SyRYJ6wnmweWjTjASo5OO2qRSi5cQr9-Qi6g9muAP2Ztkf2i36aFxELV7Sb7WmFOOQL75kBwgkrRO3PW1H8m-GHlbxBe82SKVLVbvaP0l0YgWi_fj6sGkHcKT2_es-vL-3cX-Y33--cOn_dvz2gjeptrs9Eg72RgqjaCinWin-MiYmtTAFe-46WCUrRJTN7RUg2INk81oxmkCA3IQZ9WLTXeJYT1Y6meLBpzbztVzJQWjrBGioM__QQ8hR1-2K1SrOrYTjBeKb5SJATHC1C_Rzjpe94z2a-z9FntfYu9vYu-PZejZrXQeZhjvRn7nXACxAbisZ4L4x_s_sr8AsiDAkA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2969814312</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Ahmet, Sibel ; Kemer Atik, Burcu ; Kandemir Beşek, Nilay ; Kırgız, Ahmet ; Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş ; Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmet, Sibel ; Kemer Atik, Burcu ; Kandemir Beşek, Nilay ; Kırgız, Ahmet ; Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş ; Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different methods of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the surgery of subluxated cataracts.
Methods
In this retrospective, comparative, clinical interventional study, the medical records of patients who underwent IOL implantation with sutureless 27-gauge needle-assisted transconjunctival intrascleral (Group 1), Z-suture knotless transscleral (Group 2), and Cionni capsular tension ring (Cionni-CTR) assisted (Group 3) simultaneously with subluxated cataract extraction between June 2010 and June 2022 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, follow-up times, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive values, and spherical equivalent (SE) values of three groups were compared. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results
There were 20 eyes in Group 1, 35 eyes in Group 2, and 40 eyes in Group 3. In all groups, statistically significant improvement was observed in postoperative UDVA and CDVA compared to preoperative values (each p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the groups in postoperative UDVA and CDVA values. (p = 0.130, p = 0.167 respectively). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of postoperative spherical, cylindrical, and SE values (each p > 0.05).
Conclusion
The study suggests that three different IOL implantation techniques for simultaneous IOL implantation in subluxated cataract surgery have similar effects on visual and refractive outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0165-5701</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38509438</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acuity ; Cataract - complications ; Cataract Extraction - adverse effects ; Cataracts ; Complications ; Eye ; Eye surgery ; Humans ; Implantation ; Intraocular lenses ; Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods ; Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects ; Medical records ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Ophthalmology ; Postoperative ; Retrospective Studies ; Statistical analysis ; Surgery ; Sutures ; Sutures - adverse effects ; Visual acuity ; Visual effects</subject><ispartof>International ophthalmology, 2024-03, Vol.44 (1), p.152-152, Article 152</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c4ad0875c07c3036f0892d119f9b29282c8ed7693f8b60ae915175dcdffece7b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4052-7280 ; 0000-0003-3637-2466 ; 0000-0002-1842-4077 ; 0000-0001-6597-6184 ; 0000-0001-7498-3693 ; 0000-0003-4878-0213</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,41467,42536,51297</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38509438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmet, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemer Atik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandemir Beşek, Nilay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırgız, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted</title><title>International ophthalmology</title><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different methods of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the surgery of subluxated cataracts.
Methods
In this retrospective, comparative, clinical interventional study, the medical records of patients who underwent IOL implantation with sutureless 27-gauge needle-assisted transconjunctival intrascleral (Group 1), Z-suture knotless transscleral (Group 2), and Cionni capsular tension ring (Cionni-CTR) assisted (Group 3) simultaneously with subluxated cataract extraction between June 2010 and June 2022 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, follow-up times, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive values, and spherical equivalent (SE) values of three groups were compared. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results
There were 20 eyes in Group 1, 35 eyes in Group 2, and 40 eyes in Group 3. In all groups, statistically significant improvement was observed in postoperative UDVA and CDVA compared to preoperative values (each p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the groups in postoperative UDVA and CDVA values. (p = 0.130, p = 0.167 respectively). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of postoperative spherical, cylindrical, and SE values (each p > 0.05).
Conclusion
The study suggests that three different IOL implantation techniques for simultaneous IOL implantation in subluxated cataract surgery have similar effects on visual and refractive outcomes.</description><subject>Acuity</subject><subject>Cataract - complications</subject><subject>Cataract Extraction - adverse effects</subject><subject>Cataracts</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye surgery</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Intraocular lenses</subject><subject>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</subject><subject>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</subject><subject>Medical records</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Ophthalmology</subject><subject>Postoperative</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Sutures</subject><subject>Sutures - adverse effects</subject><subject>Visual acuity</subject><subject>Visual effects</subject><issn>1573-2630</issn><issn>0165-5701</issn><issn>1573-2630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1TAQhSMEoqXwAiyQJTYsCPjnJo7ZoSv-pEpsyoZN5DiT1hfHDh4b3T4pr4PTlIJYsLI18805ozlV9ZTRV4xS-RoZlYrXlO9qKmjX1Md71SlrpKh5K-j9v_4n1SPEA6VUSdU-rE5E11C1E91p9XMf5kVHi8GTMJF0FQFIAnPl7fcMSKYQCdo5u6Q9hIzE-hR1MNnpSBz4UpgXp33SyRYJ6wnmweWjTjASo5OO2qRSi5cQr9-Qi6g9muAP2Ztkf2i36aFxELV7Sb7WmFOOQL75kBwgkrRO3PW1H8m-GHlbxBe82SKVLVbvaP0l0YgWi_fj6sGkHcKT2_es-vL-3cX-Y33--cOn_dvz2gjeptrs9Eg72RgqjaCinWin-MiYmtTAFe-46WCUrRJTN7RUg2INk81oxmkCA3IQZ9WLTXeJYT1Y6meLBpzbztVzJQWjrBGioM__QQ8hR1-2K1SrOrYTjBeKb5SJATHC1C_Rzjpe94z2a-z9FntfYu9vYu-PZejZrXQeZhjvRn7nXACxAbisZ4L4x_s_sr8AsiDAkA</recordid><startdate>20240320</startdate><enddate>20240320</enddate><creator>Ahmet, Sibel</creator><creator>Kemer Atik, Burcu</creator><creator>Kandemir Beşek, Nilay</creator><creator>Kırgız, Ahmet</creator><creator>Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş</creator><creator>Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-7280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-2466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-6184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-3693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0213</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240320</creationdate><title>Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted</title><author>Ahmet, Sibel ; Kemer Atik, Burcu ; Kandemir Beşek, Nilay ; Kırgız, Ahmet ; Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş ; Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c4ad0875c07c3036f0892d119f9b29282c8ed7693f8b60ae915175dcdffece7b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Acuity</topic><topic>Cataract - complications</topic><topic>Cataract Extraction - adverse effects</topic><topic>Cataracts</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye surgery</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Intraocular lenses</topic><topic>Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods</topic><topic>Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects</topic><topic>Medical records</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Ophthalmology</topic><topic>Postoperative</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Sutures</topic><topic>Sutures - adverse effects</topic><topic>Visual acuity</topic><topic>Visual effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmet, Sibel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kemer Atik, Burcu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandemir Beşek, Nilay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kırgız, Ahmet</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmet, Sibel</au><au>Kemer Atik, Burcu</au><au>Kandemir Beşek, Nilay</au><au>Kırgız, Ahmet</au><au>Gümüş Kasapoğlu, Güneş</au><au>Yayla Akıncılar, Gizem</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted</atitle><jtitle>International ophthalmology</jtitle><stitle>Int Ophthalmol</stitle><addtitle>Int Ophthalmol</addtitle><date>2024-03-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>152</spage><epage>152</epage><pages>152-152</pages><artnum>152</artnum><issn>1573-2630</issn><issn>0165-5701</issn><eissn>1573-2630</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate and compare the clinical outcomes of three different methods of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in the surgery of subluxated cataracts.
Methods
In this retrospective, comparative, clinical interventional study, the medical records of patients who underwent IOL implantation with sutureless 27-gauge needle-assisted transconjunctival intrascleral (Group 1), Z-suture knotless transscleral (Group 2), and Cionni capsular tension ring (Cionni-CTR) assisted (Group 3) simultaneously with subluxated cataract extraction between June 2010 and June 2022 were evaluated. Demographic characteristics, follow-up times, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), spherical and cylindrical refractive values, and spherical equivalent (SE) values of three groups were compared. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded.
Results
There were 20 eyes in Group 1, 35 eyes in Group 2, and 40 eyes in Group 3. In all groups, statistically significant improvement was observed in postoperative UDVA and CDVA compared to preoperative values (each p < 0.05). There was no statistical difference between the groups in postoperative UDVA and CDVA values. (p = 0.130, p = 0.167 respectively). No significant difference was observed between the groups in terms of postoperative spherical, cylindrical, and SE values (each p > 0.05).
Conclusion
The study suggests that three different IOL implantation techniques for simultaneous IOL implantation in subluxated cataract surgery have similar effects on visual and refractive outcomes.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>38509438</pmid><doi>10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-7280</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3637-2466</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1842-4077</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-6184</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7498-3693</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4878-0213</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1573-2630 |
| ispartof | International ophthalmology, 2024-03, Vol.44 (1), p.152-152, Article 152 |
| issn | 1573-2630 0165-5701 1573-2630 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2973101533 |
| source | MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
| subjects | Acuity Cataract - complications Cataract Extraction - adverse effects Cataracts Complications Eye Eye surgery Humans Implantation Intraocular lenses Lens Implantation, Intraocular - methods Lenses, Intraocular - adverse effects Medical records Medicine Medicine & Public Health Ophthalmology Postoperative Retrospective Studies Statistical analysis Surgery Sutures Sutures - adverse effects Visual acuity Visual effects |
| title | Comparison of three techniques for simultaneous intraocular lens implantation in subluxated cataract surgery: Transconjunctival intrascleral, Z-suture knotless transscleral, and Cionni capsular tension ring assisted |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T12%3A29%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20techniques%20for%20simultaneous%20intraocular%20lens%20implantation%20in%20subluxated%20cataract%20surgery:%20Transconjunctival%20intrascleral,%20Z-suture%20knotless%20transscleral,%20and%20Cionni%20capsular%20tension%20ring%20assisted&rft.jtitle=International%20ophthalmology&rft.au=Ahmet,%20Sibel&rft.date=2024-03-20&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=152&rft.epage=152&rft.pages=152-152&rft.artnum=152&rft.issn=1573-2630&rft.eissn=1573-2630&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10792-024-03085-x&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2969814312%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2969814312&rft_id=info:pmid/38509438&rfr_iscdi=true |