Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada
Evaluating the impacts of farming systems on biodiversity is increasingly important given the need to stem biodiversity loss, decrease fossil fuel dependency, and maintain ecosystem services benefiting farmers. We recorded woody and herbaceous plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in 4...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ecological applications 2024-06, Vol.34 (4), p.e2943-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e2943 |
container_title | Ecological applications |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Kirk, David Anthony Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés Forsyth, Douglas J. Martin, Amanda E. |
description | Evaluating the impacts of farming systems on biodiversity is increasingly important given the need to stem biodiversity loss, decrease fossil fuel dependency, and maintain ecosystem services benefiting farmers. We recorded woody and herbaceous plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in 43 wetland‐adjacent prairie remnants beside crop fields managed using conventional, minimum tillage, organic, or perennial cover (wildlife‐friendly) land management in the Prairie Pothole Region. We used a hierarchical framework to estimate diversity at regional and local scales (gamma, alpha), and how these are related through species turnover (beta diversity). We tested the expectation that gamma richness/evenness and beta diversity of all plants would be higher in remnants adjacent to perennial cover and organic fields than in conventional and minimum tillage fields. We expected the same findings for plants providing ecosystem services (bee‐pollinated species) and disservices (introduced species). We predicted similar relative effects of land management on alpha diversity, but with the expectation that the benefits of organic farming would decrease with increasing grassland in surrounding landscapes. Gamma richness and evenness of all plants were highest for perennial cover, followed by minimum tillage, organic, and conventional sites. Bee‐pollinated species followed a similar pattern for richness, but for evenness organic farming came second, after perennial cover sites, followed by minimum tillage and conventional. For introduced species, organic sites had the highest gamma richness and evenness. Grassland amount moderated the effect of land management type on all plants and bee‐pollinated plant richness, but not as expected. The richness of organic sites increased with the amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape. Conversely, for conventional sites, richness increased as the amount of grassland in the landscape declined. Our results are consistent with the expectation that adopting wildlife‐friendly land management practices can benefit biodiversity at regional and local scales, in particular the use of perennial cover to benefit plant diversity at regional scales. At more local extents, organic farming increased plant richness, but only when sufficient grassland was available in the surrounding landscape; organic farms also had the highest beta diversity for all plants and bee‐pollinated plants. Maintaining native cover in agroecosystems, in additi |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eap.2943 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2972706647</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3072307094</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p3113-2ef2bf2559a820c5b1b1b14ca29bf2b6bc059297d94e53947387f988182a42a43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUVtLwzAUDqK4OQV_gQR88aUzl6ZtHsfYVBg4RJ9D2p5uGb3ZpM79e1M2fTAnyZfkfOdCPoRuKZlSQtgj6HbKZMjP0JhKLgMhEnbuz0TQgMQRHaEra3fED8bYJRrxRJBQSDlGbqm7Cle61huooHZY1zku_WYz3QLOmtrBt8N2O9xa73A4N1_QWeMOWDu8BzewMeQbsNjU2G0BrzttOuOxcdumBPwGG9PUuCnw3BfK9TW6KHRp4eaEE_SxXLzPn4PV69PLfLYKWk4pDxgULC2YEFInjGQipYOFmWbSP6dRmhEhmYxzGYLgMox5EhcySWjCdOgnn6CHY962az57sE5VxmZQ-o6h6a3ysSwmUeQjJ-j-H3XX9F3tu1OcxMwvIoeEdydWn1aQq7Yzle4O6vc_PSE4EvamhMOfnxI16KS8TmrQSS1m6wH5Dxw0g5I</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3072307094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Kirk, David Anthony ; Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés ; Forsyth, Douglas J. ; Martin, Amanda E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony ; Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés ; Forsyth, Douglas J. ; Martin, Amanda E.</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluating the impacts of farming systems on biodiversity is increasingly important given the need to stem biodiversity loss, decrease fossil fuel dependency, and maintain ecosystem services benefiting farmers. We recorded woody and herbaceous plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in 43 wetland‐adjacent prairie remnants beside crop fields managed using conventional, minimum tillage, organic, or perennial cover (wildlife‐friendly) land management in the Prairie Pothole Region. We used a hierarchical framework to estimate diversity at regional and local scales (gamma, alpha), and how these are related through species turnover (beta diversity). We tested the expectation that gamma richness/evenness and beta diversity of all plants would be higher in remnants adjacent to perennial cover and organic fields than in conventional and minimum tillage fields. We expected the same findings for plants providing ecosystem services (bee‐pollinated species) and disservices (introduced species). We predicted similar relative effects of land management on alpha diversity, but with the expectation that the benefits of organic farming would decrease with increasing grassland in surrounding landscapes. Gamma richness and evenness of all plants were highest for perennial cover, followed by minimum tillage, organic, and conventional sites. Bee‐pollinated species followed a similar pattern for richness, but for evenness organic farming came second, after perennial cover sites, followed by minimum tillage and conventional. For introduced species, organic sites had the highest gamma richness and evenness. Grassland amount moderated the effect of land management type on all plants and bee‐pollinated plant richness, but not as expected. The richness of organic sites increased with the amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape. Conversely, for conventional sites, richness increased as the amount of grassland in the landscape declined. Our results are consistent with the expectation that adopting wildlife‐friendly land management practices can benefit biodiversity at regional and local scales, in particular the use of perennial cover to benefit plant diversity at regional scales. At more local extents, organic farming increased plant richness, but only when sufficient grassland was available in the surrounding landscape; organic farms also had the highest beta diversity for all plants and bee‐pollinated plants. Maintaining native cover in agroecosystems, in addition to low‐intensity farming practices, could sustain plant biodiversity and facilitate important ecosystem services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1051-0761</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-5582</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eap.2943</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38504599</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agricultural ecosystems ; Agricultural practices ; Bees ; bee‐pollinated plants ; Biodiversity ; Biodiversity loss ; biotic homogenization ; Crop fields ; Ecosystem services ; ecosystem services/function ; Ecosystems ; evenness ; Farm management ; Farming ; Farming systems ; Farms ; Fossil fuels ; grassland ; Grasslands ; Introduced species ; Land management ; Land use planning ; Landscape ; Organic farming ; Plant diversity ; plant gamma richness ; Plant species ; Plants (botany) ; Potholes ; Species diversity ; species richness ; species turnover ; Tillage ; Wetlands ; Wildlife ; Wildlife management</subject><ispartof>Ecological applications, 2024-06, Vol.34 (4), p.e2943-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada and The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada.</rights><rights>2024 His Majesty the King in Right of Canada and The Authors. Ecological Applications published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Ecological Society of America. Reproduced with the permission of the Minister of Environment and Climate Change Canada.</rights><rights>Copyright Ecological Society of America Jun 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-1692-1168 ; 0000-0002-3080-1058</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Feap.2943$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Feap.2943$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38504599$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Amanda E.</creatorcontrib><title>Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada</title><title>Ecological applications</title><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><description>Evaluating the impacts of farming systems on biodiversity is increasingly important given the need to stem biodiversity loss, decrease fossil fuel dependency, and maintain ecosystem services benefiting farmers. We recorded woody and herbaceous plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in 43 wetland‐adjacent prairie remnants beside crop fields managed using conventional, minimum tillage, organic, or perennial cover (wildlife‐friendly) land management in the Prairie Pothole Region. We used a hierarchical framework to estimate diversity at regional and local scales (gamma, alpha), and how these are related through species turnover (beta diversity). We tested the expectation that gamma richness/evenness and beta diversity of all plants would be higher in remnants adjacent to perennial cover and organic fields than in conventional and minimum tillage fields. We expected the same findings for plants providing ecosystem services (bee‐pollinated species) and disservices (introduced species). We predicted similar relative effects of land management on alpha diversity, but with the expectation that the benefits of organic farming would decrease with increasing grassland in surrounding landscapes. Gamma richness and evenness of all plants were highest for perennial cover, followed by minimum tillage, organic, and conventional sites. Bee‐pollinated species followed a similar pattern for richness, but for evenness organic farming came second, after perennial cover sites, followed by minimum tillage and conventional. For introduced species, organic sites had the highest gamma richness and evenness. Grassland amount moderated the effect of land management type on all plants and bee‐pollinated plant richness, but not as expected. The richness of organic sites increased with the amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape. Conversely, for conventional sites, richness increased as the amount of grassland in the landscape declined. Our results are consistent with the expectation that adopting wildlife‐friendly land management practices can benefit biodiversity at regional and local scales, in particular the use of perennial cover to benefit plant diversity at regional scales. At more local extents, organic farming increased plant richness, but only when sufficient grassland was available in the surrounding landscape; organic farms also had the highest beta diversity for all plants and bee‐pollinated plants. Maintaining native cover in agroecosystems, in addition to low‐intensity farming practices, could sustain plant biodiversity and facilitate important ecosystem services.</description><subject>Agricultural ecosystems</subject><subject>Agricultural practices</subject><subject>Bees</subject><subject>bee‐pollinated plants</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biodiversity loss</subject><subject>biotic homogenization</subject><subject>Crop fields</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>ecosystem services/function</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>evenness</subject><subject>Farm management</subject><subject>Farming</subject><subject>Farming systems</subject><subject>Farms</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>grassland</subject><subject>Grasslands</subject><subject>Introduced species</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Organic farming</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>plant gamma richness</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Plants (botany)</subject><subject>Potholes</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>species richness</subject><subject>species turnover</subject><subject>Tillage</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><subject>Wildlife</subject><subject>Wildlife management</subject><issn>1051-0761</issn><issn>1939-5582</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUVtLwzAUDqK4OQV_gQR88aUzl6ZtHsfYVBg4RJ9D2p5uGb3ZpM79e1M2fTAnyZfkfOdCPoRuKZlSQtgj6HbKZMjP0JhKLgMhEnbuz0TQgMQRHaEra3fED8bYJRrxRJBQSDlGbqm7Cle61huooHZY1zku_WYz3QLOmtrBt8N2O9xa73A4N1_QWeMOWDu8BzewMeQbsNjU2G0BrzttOuOxcdumBPwGG9PUuCnw3BfK9TW6KHRp4eaEE_SxXLzPn4PV69PLfLYKWk4pDxgULC2YEFInjGQipYOFmWbSP6dRmhEhmYxzGYLgMox5EhcySWjCdOgnn6CHY962az57sE5VxmZQ-o6h6a3ysSwmUeQjJ-j-H3XX9F3tu1OcxMwvIoeEdydWn1aQq7Yzle4O6vc_PSE4EvamhMOfnxI16KS8TmrQSS1m6wH5Dxw0g5I</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Kirk, David Anthony</creator><creator>Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés</creator><creator>Forsyth, Douglas J.</creator><creator>Martin, Amanda E.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Ecological Society of America</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-1168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-1058</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada</title><author>Kirk, David Anthony ; Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés ; Forsyth, Douglas J. ; Martin, Amanda E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p3113-2ef2bf2559a820c5b1b1b14ca29bf2b6bc059297d94e53947387f988182a42a43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agricultural ecosystems</topic><topic>Agricultural practices</topic><topic>Bees</topic><topic>bee‐pollinated plants</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biodiversity loss</topic><topic>biotic homogenization</topic><topic>Crop fields</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>ecosystem services/function</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>evenness</topic><topic>Farm management</topic><topic>Farming</topic><topic>Farming systems</topic><topic>Farms</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>grassland</topic><topic>Grasslands</topic><topic>Introduced species</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Organic farming</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>plant gamma richness</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Plants (botany)</topic><topic>Potholes</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>species richness</topic><topic>species turnover</topic><topic>Tillage</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><topic>Wildlife</topic><topic>Wildlife management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kirk, David Anthony</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forsyth, Douglas J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Amanda E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kirk, David Anthony</au><au>Martínez‐Lanfranco, Juan Andrés</au><au>Forsyth, Douglas J.</au><au>Martin, Amanda E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada</atitle><jtitle>Ecological applications</jtitle><addtitle>Ecol Appl</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e2943</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2943-n/a</pages><issn>1051-0761</issn><eissn>1939-5582</eissn><abstract>Evaluating the impacts of farming systems on biodiversity is increasingly important given the need to stem biodiversity loss, decrease fossil fuel dependency, and maintain ecosystem services benefiting farmers. We recorded woody and herbaceous plant species diversity, composition, and abundance in 43 wetland‐adjacent prairie remnants beside crop fields managed using conventional, minimum tillage, organic, or perennial cover (wildlife‐friendly) land management in the Prairie Pothole Region. We used a hierarchical framework to estimate diversity at regional and local scales (gamma, alpha), and how these are related through species turnover (beta diversity). We tested the expectation that gamma richness/evenness and beta diversity of all plants would be higher in remnants adjacent to perennial cover and organic fields than in conventional and minimum tillage fields. We expected the same findings for plants providing ecosystem services (bee‐pollinated species) and disservices (introduced species). We predicted similar relative effects of land management on alpha diversity, but with the expectation that the benefits of organic farming would decrease with increasing grassland in surrounding landscapes. Gamma richness and evenness of all plants were highest for perennial cover, followed by minimum tillage, organic, and conventional sites. Bee‐pollinated species followed a similar pattern for richness, but for evenness organic farming came second, after perennial cover sites, followed by minimum tillage and conventional. For introduced species, organic sites had the highest gamma richness and evenness. Grassland amount moderated the effect of land management type on all plants and bee‐pollinated plant richness, but not as expected. The richness of organic sites increased with the amount of grassland in the surrounding landscape. Conversely, for conventional sites, richness increased as the amount of grassland in the landscape declined. Our results are consistent with the expectation that adopting wildlife‐friendly land management practices can benefit biodiversity at regional and local scales, in particular the use of perennial cover to benefit plant diversity at regional scales. At more local extents, organic farming increased plant richness, but only when sufficient grassland was available in the surrounding landscape; organic farms also had the highest beta diversity for all plants and bee‐pollinated plants. Maintaining native cover in agroecosystems, in addition to low‐intensity farming practices, could sustain plant biodiversity and facilitate important ecosystem services.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38504599</pmid><doi>10.1002/eap.2943</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1692-1168</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3080-1058</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1051-0761 |
ispartof | Ecological applications, 2024-06, Vol.34 (4), p.e2943-n/a |
issn | 1051-0761 1939-5582 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2972706647 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Agricultural ecosystems Agricultural practices Bees bee‐pollinated plants Biodiversity Biodiversity loss biotic homogenization Crop fields Ecosystem services ecosystem services/function Ecosystems evenness Farm management Farming Farming systems Farms Fossil fuels grassland Grasslands Introduced species Land management Land use planning Landscape Organic farming Plant diversity plant gamma richness Plant species Plants (botany) Potholes Species diversity species richness species turnover Tillage Wetlands Wildlife Wildlife management |
title | Farm management and landscape context shape plant diversity at wetland edges in the Prairie Pothole Region of Canada |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T22%3A16%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Farm%20management%20and%20landscape%20context%20shape%20plant%20diversity%20at%20wetland%20edges%20in%20the%20Prairie%20Pothole%20Region%20of%20Canada&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20applications&rft.au=Kirk,%20David%20Anthony&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e2943&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2943-n/a&rft.issn=1051-0761&rft.eissn=1939-5582&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eap.2943&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E3072307094%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3072307094&rft_id=info:pmid/38504599&rfr_iscdi=true |