Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate
Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with li...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 104 |
---|---|
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Water science and technology |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Hadjivassilis, I Tebai, L Nicolaou, M |
description | Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.2166/wst.1994.0452 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29718205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29684038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0XtB8Nb5kpfmhzcZ8xcDBec5ZG0KHV07mxTZf2_KvOhlPeURPjx4730JuaYwY1SIu28fZlRrPgOesRMyibVItUR2SibAJKaUMTwnF95vAEAihwl5f22rJiSrztmwdbFqy-SlKXofusrWyaIs6z5-3ydz613yEfpiP5BltbXet_Uf64MN7pKclbb27ur3nZLPx8Vq_pwu355e5g_LNOcKQkpRrDWXhXK4LhwvmVCZ1hZQ2BwziSgkSspQranGQvGsLJAXzDGVSQlxjim5PfTdde1X73ww28rnrq5t49reG6YlVQyyEVAoDqhGQATIOI6AsaeE45AKzZhWY6DQAIofhygE03SAN__gpu27Jl7EUB1niM34sJv0oPKu9b5zpdl18bLd3lAwQ6ZMzJQZMmWGTOEP-sy7bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943308445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M</creator><contributor>Andreadakis, AD ; Christoulas, DG (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M ; Andreadakis, AD ; Christoulas, DG (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.1994.0452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Activated sludge process ; Aeration ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Biological treatment ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Chemical sludge ; Chemical treatment ; Chlorination ; Coagulation ; Effluent treatment ; Effluents ; Equalization ; Flocculation ; Flotation ; Impaired water use ; Industrial effluents ; Industrial wastewater ; Irrigation water ; Lime ; Q1 ; Reclaimed water ; Sludge ; Trace elements ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater treatment ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing May 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Andreadakis, AD</contributor><contributor>Christoulas, DG (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, M</creatorcontrib><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Activated sludge process</subject><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Biological treatment</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Chemical sludge</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Effluent treatment</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Equalization</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Impaired water use</subject><subject>Industrial effluents</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Lime</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>Reclaimed water</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0XtB8Nb5kpfmhzcZ8xcDBec5ZG0KHV07mxTZf2_KvOhlPeURPjx4730JuaYwY1SIu28fZlRrPgOesRMyibVItUR2SibAJKaUMTwnF95vAEAihwl5f22rJiSrztmwdbFqy-SlKXofusrWyaIs6z5-3ydz613yEfpiP5BltbXet_Uf64MN7pKclbb27ur3nZLPx8Vq_pwu355e5g_LNOcKQkpRrDWXhXK4LhwvmVCZ1hZQ2BwziSgkSspQranGQvGsLJAXzDGVSQlxjim5PfTdde1X73ww28rnrq5t49reG6YlVQyyEVAoDqhGQATIOI6AsaeE45AKzZhWY6DQAIofhygE03SAN__gpu27Jl7EUB1niM34sJv0oPKu9b5zpdl18bLd3lAwQ6ZMzJQZMmWGTOEP-sy7bQ</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>Hadjivassilis, I</creator><creator>Tebai, L</creator><creator>Nicolaou, M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><author>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Activated sludge process</topic><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Biological treatment</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Chemical sludge</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Effluent treatment</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Equalization</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Impaired water use</topic><topic>Industrial effluents</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Lime</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>Reclaimed water</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadjivassilis, I</au><au>Tebai, L</au><au>Nicolaou, M</au><au>Andreadakis, AD</au><au>Christoulas, DG (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>99-104</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.1994.0452</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
ispartof | Water science and technology, 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104 |
issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29718205 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Activated sludge Activated sludge process Aeration Biochemical oxygen demand Biological treatment Chemical oxygen demand Chemical sludge Chemical treatment Chlorination Coagulation Effluent treatment Effluents Equalization Flocculation Flotation Impaired water use Industrial effluents Industrial wastewater Irrigation water Lime Q1 Reclaimed water Sludge Trace elements Wastewater discharges Wastewater treatment Water treatment plants |
title | Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20Treatment%20of%20Industrial%20Effluent:%20Case%20Study%20of%20Limassol%20Industrial%20Estate&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Hadjivassilis,%20I&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=99-104&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.1994.0452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29684038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943308445&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |