Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate

Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with li...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Water science and technology 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104
Hauptverfasser: Hadjivassilis, I, Tebai, L, Nicolaou, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104
container_issue 9
container_start_page 99
container_title Water science and technology
container_volume 29
creator Hadjivassilis, I
Tebai, L
Nicolaou, M
description Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.
doi_str_mv 10.2166/wst.1994.0452
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29718205</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29684038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0XtB8Nb5kpfmhzcZ8xcDBec5ZG0KHV07mxTZf2_KvOhlPeURPjx4730JuaYwY1SIu28fZlRrPgOesRMyibVItUR2SibAJKaUMTwnF95vAEAihwl5f22rJiSrztmwdbFqy-SlKXofusrWyaIs6z5-3ydz613yEfpiP5BltbXet_Uf64MN7pKclbb27ur3nZLPx8Vq_pwu355e5g_LNOcKQkpRrDWXhXK4LhwvmVCZ1hZQ2BwziSgkSspQranGQvGsLJAXzDGVSQlxjim5PfTdde1X73ww28rnrq5t49reG6YlVQyyEVAoDqhGQATIOI6AsaeE45AKzZhWY6DQAIofhygE03SAN__gpu27Jl7EUB1niM34sJv0oPKu9b5zpdl18bLd3lAwQ6ZMzJQZMmWGTOEP-sy7bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943308445</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M</creator><contributor>Andreadakis, AD ; Christoulas, DG (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M ; Andreadakis, AD ; Christoulas, DG (eds)</creatorcontrib><description>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.2166/wst.1994.0452</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: IWA Publishing</publisher><subject>Activated sludge ; Activated sludge process ; Aeration ; Biochemical oxygen demand ; Biological treatment ; Chemical oxygen demand ; Chemical sludge ; Chemical treatment ; Chlorination ; Coagulation ; Effluent treatment ; Effluents ; Equalization ; Flocculation ; Flotation ; Impaired water use ; Industrial effluents ; Industrial wastewater ; Irrigation water ; Lime ; Q1 ; Reclaimed water ; Sludge ; Trace elements ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater treatment ; Water treatment plants</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104</ispartof><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing May 1994</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Andreadakis, AD</contributor><contributor>Christoulas, DG (eds)</contributor><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, M</creatorcontrib><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</description><subject>Activated sludge</subject><subject>Activated sludge process</subject><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Biochemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Biological treatment</subject><subject>Chemical oxygen demand</subject><subject>Chemical sludge</subject><subject>Chemical treatment</subject><subject>Chlorination</subject><subject>Coagulation</subject><subject>Effluent treatment</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Equalization</subject><subject>Flocculation</subject><subject>Flotation</subject><subject>Impaired water use</subject><subject>Industrial effluents</subject><subject>Industrial wastewater</subject><subject>Irrigation water</subject><subject>Lime</subject><subject>Q1</subject><subject>Reclaimed water</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Trace elements</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment plants</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AgCs7p0XtB8Nb5kpfmhzcZ8xcDBec5ZG0KHV07mxTZf2_KvOhlPeURPjx4730JuaYwY1SIu28fZlRrPgOesRMyibVItUR2SibAJKaUMTwnF95vAEAihwl5f22rJiSrztmwdbFqy-SlKXofusrWyaIs6z5-3ydz613yEfpiP5BltbXet_Uf64MN7pKclbb27ur3nZLPx8Vq_pwu355e5g_LNOcKQkpRrDWXhXK4LhwvmVCZ1hZQ2BwziSgkSspQranGQvGsLJAXzDGVSQlxjim5PfTdde1X73ww28rnrq5t49reG6YlVQyyEVAoDqhGQATIOI6AsaeE45AKzZhWY6DQAIofhygE03SAN__gpu27Jl7EUB1niM34sJv0oPKu9b5zpdl18bLd3lAwQ6ZMzJQZMmWGTOEP-sy7bQ</recordid><startdate>19940101</startdate><enddate>19940101</enddate><creator>Hadjivassilis, I</creator><creator>Tebai, L</creator><creator>Nicolaou, M</creator><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19940101</creationdate><title>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</title><author>Hadjivassilis, I ; Tebai, L ; Nicolaou, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c480t-136b947d8e3bde4f268599a036ac3573367371238b193d845fd34d2e285770223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>Activated sludge</topic><topic>Activated sludge process</topic><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Biochemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Biological treatment</topic><topic>Chemical oxygen demand</topic><topic>Chemical sludge</topic><topic>Chemical treatment</topic><topic>Chlorination</topic><topic>Coagulation</topic><topic>Effluent treatment</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Equalization</topic><topic>Flocculation</topic><topic>Flotation</topic><topic>Impaired water use</topic><topic>Industrial effluents</topic><topic>Industrial wastewater</topic><topic>Irrigation water</topic><topic>Lime</topic><topic>Q1</topic><topic>Reclaimed water</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Trace elements</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment plants</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hadjivassilis, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tebai, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nicolaou, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hadjivassilis, I</au><au>Tebai, L</au><au>Nicolaou, M</au><au>Andreadakis, AD</au><au>Christoulas, DG (eds)</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1994-01-01</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>99</spage><epage>104</epage><pages>99-104</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><abstract>Wastewater at 1000-1200 m 3 per day and 220-264 kg BOD per day from an industrial estate was treated chemically and then biologically. The former processes consisted of pumping and screening, flow balancing, the removal of oil, fat and other matter by flotation, then coagulation-flocculation with lime, ferrous sulphate and polyelectrolyte. After pH adjustment, some nitrogen and phosphorus were added in a selector tank before passage to an aeration tank, final sedimentation and chlorination. Overall removals of BOD, COD and suspended solids were 91.6, 90.1 and 93.8 per cent, respectively. Detailed results are provided.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>IWA Publishing</pub><doi>10.2166/wst.1994.0452</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-1223
ispartof Water science and technology, 1994-01, Vol.29 (9), p.99-104
issn 0273-1223
1996-9732
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29718205
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Activated sludge
Activated sludge process
Aeration
Biochemical oxygen demand
Biological treatment
Chemical oxygen demand
Chemical sludge
Chemical treatment
Chlorination
Coagulation
Effluent treatment
Effluents
Equalization
Flocculation
Flotation
Impaired water use
Industrial effluents
Industrial wastewater
Irrigation water
Lime
Q1
Reclaimed water
Sludge
Trace elements
Wastewater discharges
Wastewater treatment
Water treatment plants
title Joint Treatment of Industrial Effluent: Case Study of Limassol Industrial Estate
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T12%3A39%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Joint%20Treatment%20of%20Industrial%20Effluent:%20Case%20Study%20of%20Limassol%20Industrial%20Estate&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=Hadjivassilis,%20I&rft.date=1994-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=99&rft.epage=104&rft.pages=99-104&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft_id=info:doi/10.2166/wst.1994.0452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29684038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943308445&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true