Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests

Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations were measured in pole-sized northern hardwood and aspen forests to quantify the potential for various nutrient amendments to increase tree growth, as well as potential deleterious effects on vegetation. Four...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Forest ecology and management 2003-04, Vol.177 (1), p.95-116
Hauptverfasser: Feldkirchner, Drew C, Wang, Chuankuan, Gower, Stith T, Kruger, Eric L, Ferris, Jim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 116
container_issue 1
container_start_page 95
container_title Forest ecology and management
container_volume 177
creator Feldkirchner, Drew C
Wang, Chuankuan
Gower, Stith T
Kruger, Eric L
Ferris, Jim
description Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations were measured in pole-sized northern hardwood and aspen forests to quantify the potential for various nutrient amendments to increase tree growth, as well as potential deleterious effects on vegetation. Four blocks were installed in each forest type containing the following treatments: control, N+Ca+Mg+K+P+S (complete), wood-fired boiler ash (ash), N+wood-fired boiler ash (N+ash), and two rates of paper mill sludge (sludge and 2× sludge). The northern hardwood forests had three additional treatments: N, Ca+Mg+K (base cations), and N+Ca+Mg+K (N+base cations). Fertilizer treatments were designed to provide N at a rate of 100 kg ha −1. Other nutrients were applied in proportion to N so that N, P, K, S, Mg, and Ca were applied at a ratio of 100:50:33:9:5:4, respectively. Total ANPP was not significantly different among treatments for the maple stands, but plots treated with wood ash were 10% greater than controls. ANPP was greater in 1998 and 1999 for aspen plots receiving N+ash, but results were only statistically significant ( p=0.013) in 1999. Basal area differed by 40–60% among experimental plots within any given block and was positively correlated to wood increment. Wood increment, adjusted for basal area, did not differ significantly among treatments for the aspen stands, but the N+ash treatment was 30% greater than the control. A two-way factorial comparison indicated that ash had a significant ( p=0.024) positive effect on wood increment and N had a significant ( p=0.044) negative effect on wood increment for the maple stands. Tree growth was not correlated to foliar nutrient concentrations, but ratios of K to other elements (K:Ca, K:Mg, K:N, and K:P) were highest, on average, for wood ash plots. These differences were not statistically significant with the exception of K:N for the aspen stands and K:Ca for the maple stands. We did not observe any beneficial effects of paper mill sludge on forest growth, but there was some evidence that wood ash increased annual wood production.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00318-3
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29693460</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0378112702003183</els_id><sourcerecordid>14658574</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c9f62b5d827ad56974e6189d0415c00cae6293d18ab7dbe863a730e366834f933</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1LXDEYhUOx0NH2JxSysdjFtflO7kpE_ALBRdt1yCRvOpF7b6ZJRum_750Z0aUuQjbPOSfkQegrJaeUUPXjJ-HadJQyfULYd0I4NR3_gBbUaNZpItgBWrwgn9BhrQ-EECmFWaDxMkbwreIc8bRpJcHUsJsCXrs1FDymYcDLlGseUqjYjTCF-Wz5CbcV4D8lP7XVLvESr821za5x5Up4yjngmAvUVj-jj9ENFb4830fo99Xlr4ub7u7--vbi_K7zQtHW-T4qtpTBMO2CVL0WoKjpAxFUekK8A8V6HqhxSx2WYBR3mhPgShkuYs_5Efq2712X_HczL9sxVQ_D4CbIm2pZr3ouFHkHyASX72ikikpj5tY3QaGkkVrMoNyDvuRaC0S7Lml05Z-lxG692p1Xu5VmCbM7r3b7kuPnAVe9G2Jxk0_1NSyUElqxmTvbczB_9GOCYquf9XgIqczGbcjpjaX_WQu3Ww</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14658574</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Feldkirchner, Drew C ; Wang, Chuankuan ; Gower, Stith T ; Kruger, Eric L ; Ferris, Jim</creator><creatorcontrib>Feldkirchner, Drew C ; Wang, Chuankuan ; Gower, Stith T ; Kruger, Eric L ; Ferris, Jim</creatorcontrib><description>Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations were measured in pole-sized northern hardwood and aspen forests to quantify the potential for various nutrient amendments to increase tree growth, as well as potential deleterious effects on vegetation. Four blocks were installed in each forest type containing the following treatments: control, N+Ca+Mg+K+P+S (complete), wood-fired boiler ash (ash), N+wood-fired boiler ash (N+ash), and two rates of paper mill sludge (sludge and 2× sludge). The northern hardwood forests had three additional treatments: N, Ca+Mg+K (base cations), and N+Ca+Mg+K (N+base cations). Fertilizer treatments were designed to provide N at a rate of 100 kg ha −1. Other nutrients were applied in proportion to N so that N, P, K, S, Mg, and Ca were applied at a ratio of 100:50:33:9:5:4, respectively. Total ANPP was not significantly different among treatments for the maple stands, but plots treated with wood ash were 10% greater than controls. ANPP was greater in 1998 and 1999 for aspen plots receiving N+ash, but results were only statistically significant ( p=0.013) in 1999. Basal area differed by 40–60% among experimental plots within any given block and was positively correlated to wood increment. Wood increment, adjusted for basal area, did not differ significantly among treatments for the aspen stands, but the N+ash treatment was 30% greater than the control. A two-way factorial comparison indicated that ash had a significant ( p=0.024) positive effect on wood increment and N had a significant ( p=0.044) negative effect on wood increment for the maple stands. Tree growth was not correlated to foliar nutrient concentrations, but ratios of K to other elements (K:Ca, K:Mg, K:N, and K:P) were highest, on average, for wood ash plots. These differences were not statistically significant with the exception of K:N for the aspen stands and K:Ca for the maple stands. We did not observe any beneficial effects of paper mill sludge on forest growth, but there was some evidence that wood ash increased annual wood production.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0378-1127</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7042</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00318-3</identifier><identifier>CODEN: FECMDW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; ANPP ; Biological and medical sciences ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General agronomy. Plant production ; Generalities. Analysis and diagnosis methods ; Net primary productivity ; Northern hardwoods ; Paper mill biosolids ; Paper mill sludge ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; Sugar maple ; Wood ash</subject><ispartof>Forest ecology and management, 2003-04, Vol.177 (1), p.95-116</ispartof><rights>2002 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c9f62b5d827ad56974e6189d0415c00cae6293d18ab7dbe863a730e366834f933</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c9f62b5d827ad56974e6189d0415c00cae6293d18ab7dbe863a730e366834f933</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00318-3$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14664762$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Feldkirchner, Drew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chuankuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gower, Stith T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Eric L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Jim</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests</title><title>Forest ecology and management</title><description>Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations were measured in pole-sized northern hardwood and aspen forests to quantify the potential for various nutrient amendments to increase tree growth, as well as potential deleterious effects on vegetation. Four blocks were installed in each forest type containing the following treatments: control, N+Ca+Mg+K+P+S (complete), wood-fired boiler ash (ash), N+wood-fired boiler ash (N+ash), and two rates of paper mill sludge (sludge and 2× sludge). The northern hardwood forests had three additional treatments: N, Ca+Mg+K (base cations), and N+Ca+Mg+K (N+base cations). Fertilizer treatments were designed to provide N at a rate of 100 kg ha −1. Other nutrients were applied in proportion to N so that N, P, K, S, Mg, and Ca were applied at a ratio of 100:50:33:9:5:4, respectively. Total ANPP was not significantly different among treatments for the maple stands, but plots treated with wood ash were 10% greater than controls. ANPP was greater in 1998 and 1999 for aspen plots receiving N+ash, but results were only statistically significant ( p=0.013) in 1999. Basal area differed by 40–60% among experimental plots within any given block and was positively correlated to wood increment. Wood increment, adjusted for basal area, did not differ significantly among treatments for the aspen stands, but the N+ash treatment was 30% greater than the control. A two-way factorial comparison indicated that ash had a significant ( p=0.024) positive effect on wood increment and N had a significant ( p=0.044) negative effect on wood increment for the maple stands. Tree growth was not correlated to foliar nutrient concentrations, but ratios of K to other elements (K:Ca, K:Mg, K:N, and K:P) were highest, on average, for wood ash plots. These differences were not statistically significant with the exception of K:N for the aspen stands and K:Ca for the maple stands. We did not observe any beneficial effects of paper mill sludge on forest growth, but there was some evidence that wood ash increased annual wood production.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>ANPP</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>Generalities. Analysis and diagnosis methods</subject><subject>Net primary productivity</subject><subject>Northern hardwoods</subject><subject>Paper mill biosolids</subject><subject>Paper mill sludge</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>Sugar maple</subject><subject>Wood ash</subject><issn>0378-1127</issn><issn>1872-7042</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1LXDEYhUOx0NH2JxSysdjFtflO7kpE_ALBRdt1yCRvOpF7b6ZJRum_750Z0aUuQjbPOSfkQegrJaeUUPXjJ-HadJQyfULYd0I4NR3_gBbUaNZpItgBWrwgn9BhrQ-EECmFWaDxMkbwreIc8bRpJcHUsJsCXrs1FDymYcDLlGseUqjYjTCF-Wz5CbcV4D8lP7XVLvESr821za5x5Up4yjngmAvUVj-jj9ENFb4830fo99Xlr4ub7u7--vbi_K7zQtHW-T4qtpTBMO2CVL0WoKjpAxFUekK8A8V6HqhxSx2WYBR3mhPgShkuYs_5Efq2712X_HczL9sxVQ_D4CbIm2pZr3ouFHkHyASX72ikikpj5tY3QaGkkVrMoNyDvuRaC0S7Lml05Z-lxG692p1Xu5VmCbM7r3b7kuPnAVe9G2Jxk0_1NSyUElqxmTvbczB_9GOCYquf9XgIqczGbcjpjaX_WQu3Ww</recordid><startdate>20030407</startdate><enddate>20030407</enddate><creator>Feldkirchner, Drew C</creator><creator>Wang, Chuankuan</creator><creator>Gower, Stith T</creator><creator>Kruger, Eric L</creator><creator>Ferris, Jim</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030407</creationdate><title>Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests</title><author>Feldkirchner, Drew C ; Wang, Chuankuan ; Gower, Stith T ; Kruger, Eric L ; Ferris, Jim</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c461t-c9f62b5d827ad56974e6189d0415c00cae6293d18ab7dbe863a730e366834f933</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>ANPP</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>Generalities. Analysis and diagnosis methods</topic><topic>Net primary productivity</topic><topic>Northern hardwoods</topic><topic>Paper mill biosolids</topic><topic>Paper mill sludge</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>Sugar maple</topic><topic>Wood ash</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Feldkirchner, Drew C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Chuankuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gower, Stith T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kruger, Eric L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferris, Jim</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Feldkirchner, Drew C</au><au>Wang, Chuankuan</au><au>Gower, Stith T</au><au>Kruger, Eric L</au><au>Ferris, Jim</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests</atitle><jtitle>Forest ecology and management</jtitle><date>2003-04-07</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>177</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>95</spage><epage>116</epage><pages>95-116</pages><issn>0378-1127</issn><eissn>1872-7042</eissn><coden>FECMDW</coden><abstract>Aboveground net primary productivity (ANPP) and soil and vegetation nutrient concentrations were measured in pole-sized northern hardwood and aspen forests to quantify the potential for various nutrient amendments to increase tree growth, as well as potential deleterious effects on vegetation. Four blocks were installed in each forest type containing the following treatments: control, N+Ca+Mg+K+P+S (complete), wood-fired boiler ash (ash), N+wood-fired boiler ash (N+ash), and two rates of paper mill sludge (sludge and 2× sludge). The northern hardwood forests had three additional treatments: N, Ca+Mg+K (base cations), and N+Ca+Mg+K (N+base cations). Fertilizer treatments were designed to provide N at a rate of 100 kg ha −1. Other nutrients were applied in proportion to N so that N, P, K, S, Mg, and Ca were applied at a ratio of 100:50:33:9:5:4, respectively. Total ANPP was not significantly different among treatments for the maple stands, but plots treated with wood ash were 10% greater than controls. ANPP was greater in 1998 and 1999 for aspen plots receiving N+ash, but results were only statistically significant ( p=0.013) in 1999. Basal area differed by 40–60% among experimental plots within any given block and was positively correlated to wood increment. Wood increment, adjusted for basal area, did not differ significantly among treatments for the aspen stands, but the N+ash treatment was 30% greater than the control. A two-way factorial comparison indicated that ash had a significant ( p=0.024) positive effect on wood increment and N had a significant ( p=0.044) negative effect on wood increment for the maple stands. Tree growth was not correlated to foliar nutrient concentrations, but ratios of K to other elements (K:Ca, K:Mg, K:N, and K:P) were highest, on average, for wood ash plots. These differences were not statistically significant with the exception of K:N for the aspen stands and K:Ca for the maple stands. We did not observe any beneficial effects of paper mill sludge on forest growth, but there was some evidence that wood ash increased annual wood production.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00318-3</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0378-1127
ispartof Forest ecology and management, 2003-04, Vol.177 (1), p.95-116
issn 0378-1127
1872-7042
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29693460
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
ANPP
Biological and medical sciences
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General agronomy. Plant production
Generalities. Analysis and diagnosis methods
Net primary productivity
Northern hardwoods
Paper mill biosolids
Paper mill sludge
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
Sugar maple
Wood ash
title Effects of nutrient and paper mill biosolids amendments on the growth and nutrient status of hardwood forests
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A15%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20nutrient%20and%20paper%20mill%20biosolids%20amendments%20on%20the%20growth%20and%20nutrient%20status%20of%20hardwood%20forests&rft.jtitle=Forest%20ecology%20and%20management&rft.au=Feldkirchner,%20Drew%20C&rft.date=2003-04-07&rft.volume=177&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=95&rft.epage=116&rft.pages=95-116&rft.issn=0378-1127&rft.eissn=1872-7042&rft.coden=FECMDW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00318-3&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E14658574%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14658574&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0378112702003183&rfr_iscdi=true