Ventricular arrhythmia inducibility in porcine infarct model after stereotactic body radiation therapy

Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is the primary mechanism of sudden death in patients with structural heart disease. Cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered to the scar in the left ventricle significantly reduces the burden of VA. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Heart rhythm 2024-07, Vol.21 (7), p.1154-1160
Hauptverfasser: Kancharla, Krishna, Olson, Adam, Salavatian, Siamak, Kuwabara, Yuki, Martynyuk, Yuriy, Dutta, Partha, Vasamsetti, Sathish, Mahajan, Aman, Howard-Quijano, Kimberley, Saba, Samir
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is the primary mechanism of sudden death in patients with structural heart disease. Cardiac stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) delivered to the scar in the left ventricle significantly reduces the burden of VA. The goal of this study was to investigate the impact of SBRT on scar morphology and VA inducibility in a porcine infarct model. Myocardial infarction (MI) was created in 10 Yorkshire pigs involving the left anterior descending artery territory. Cardiac positron emission tomography and computed tomography were performed for targeted SBRT. Alternative pigs received SBRT at 25 Gy in a single fraction. The terminal experiment included endocardial mapping, programmed ventricular stimulation, and tissue harvesting. Of the 10 pigs infarcted, 2 died prematurely after MI and 8 (4 MI and 4 MI+SBRT) survived. Mean time from MI to SBRT was 48 ± 12 days, and mean time from SBRT to harvest was 32 ± 12 days. Scar was localized on intracardiac mapping in all pigs, and the scar was denser in the MI+SBRT compared with the MI-only group (33% ± 20% vs 14% ± 11%; P = .07). All 4 MI pigs had inducible VA during programmed stimulation, whereas only 1 of 4 pigs had inducible VA in the MI+SBRT arm (100% vs 25%; P = .07). No myocardial fibrosis was seen in the remote areas in either group. SBRT reduced VA inducibility in pigs with scarring after MI. Endocardial mapping revealed denser scar in pigs receiving SBRT compared with those that did not, suggesting that SBRT suppresses VA inducibility through better scar homogenization. [Display omitted]
ISSN:1547-5271
1556-3871
1556-3871
DOI:10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.02.037