Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities
Background The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual‐task cost (DTC) that the DT...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of intellectual disability research 2024-06, Vol.68 (6), p.610-619 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 619 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | 610 |
| container_title | Journal of intellectual disability research |
| container_volume | 68 |
| creator | Cabrera‐Linares, J. C. Latorre Román, P. Á. Párraga Montilla, J. A. Andrade‐Lara, K. E. Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J. Gutierrez‐Cruz, C. |
| description | Background
The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual‐task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.
Methods
A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.
Results
Single support time was lower for participants with ID (P |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jir.13134 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2968920017</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3044913770</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-46384744bb1468d01f02f973f6e8bfa46d10b33d6016a5a9c1ab389eb60e56413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kLtOwzAYRi0EouUy8ALIEgsMgd-x6zgjqspNlZAQzJaT2OCSJsF2qLrxCDwjT4JpgQEJL7-Ho6NPB6EDAqckvrOZdaeEEso20JBQPkrSTIhNNIScsyTllA7QjvczAOCE8W00oGIEQHMyRHZijC6Dx63BCle9qj_e3oPyz1iVwb7asMRtgx-VDbhTTs110G4Fd7rtao0XNjxh1VSrT9sHbJug6zoqowpX1qvC1jZY7ffQllG11_vfdxc9XEzux1fJ9Pbyenw-TUrKBEsYp4JljBVFnCoqIAZSk2fUcC0KoxivCBSUVhwIVyOVl0QVVOS64KBHnBG6i47X3s61L732Qc6tL-Mm1ei29zLNuchTAJJF9OgPOmt718R1kgJjOaFZBpE6WVOla7132sjO2blyS0lAfvWXsb9c9Y_s4bexL-a6-iV_gkfgbA0sbK2X_5vkzfXdWvkJspOPjQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3044913770</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><creator>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C. ; Latorre Román, P. Á. ; Párraga Montilla, J. A. ; Andrade‐Lara, K. E. ; Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J. ; Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C. ; Latorre Román, P. Á. ; Párraga Montilla, J. A. ; Andrade‐Lara, K. E. ; Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J. ; Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual‐task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.
Methods
A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.
Results
Single support time was lower for participants with ID (P < 0.01), while double support time was higher (P < 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single‐task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (P < 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-2633</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2788</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jir.13134</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38500391</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; adults ; Change agents ; dual task ; Female ; Gait ; Gait - physiology ; Humans ; Intellectual disabilities ; Intellectual Disability ; Intellectual Disability - physiopathology ; Learning disabled people ; Male ; Men ; Middle Aged ; mild and moderate disability ; motor control ; Psychomotor Performance - physiology ; spatiotemporal gait parameter ; Walking ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of intellectual disability research, 2024-06, Vol.68 (6), p.610-619</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research published by John Wiley & Sons and MENCAP.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-46384744bb1468d01f02f973f6e8bfa46d10b33d6016a5a9c1ab389eb60e56413</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1059-5154</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fjir.13134$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fjir.13134$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,30999,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38500391$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre Román, P. Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Párraga Montilla, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade‐Lara, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities</title><title>Journal of intellectual disability research</title><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><description>Background
The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual‐task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.
Methods
A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.
Results
Single support time was lower for participants with ID (P < 0.01), while double support time was higher (P < 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single‐task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (P < 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>adults</subject><subject>Change agents</subject><subject>dual task</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Gait</subject><subject>Gait - physiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intellectual disabilities</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability</subject><subject>Intellectual Disability - physiopathology</subject><subject>Learning disabled people</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>mild and moderate disability</subject><subject>motor control</subject><subject>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</subject><subject>spatiotemporal gait parameter</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0964-2633</issn><issn>1365-2788</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kLtOwzAYRi0EouUy8ALIEgsMgd-x6zgjqspNlZAQzJaT2OCSJsF2qLrxCDwjT4JpgQEJL7-Ho6NPB6EDAqckvrOZdaeEEso20JBQPkrSTIhNNIScsyTllA7QjvczAOCE8W00oGIEQHMyRHZijC6Dx63BCle9qj_e3oPyz1iVwb7asMRtgx-VDbhTTs110G4Fd7rtao0XNjxh1VSrT9sHbJug6zoqowpX1qvC1jZY7ffQllG11_vfdxc9XEzux1fJ9Pbyenw-TUrKBEsYp4JljBVFnCoqIAZSk2fUcC0KoxivCBSUVhwIVyOVl0QVVOS64KBHnBG6i47X3s61L732Qc6tL-Mm1ei29zLNuchTAJJF9OgPOmt718R1kgJjOaFZBpE6WVOla7132sjO2blyS0lAfvWXsb9c9Y_s4bexL-a6-iV_gkfgbA0sbK2X_5vkzfXdWvkJspOPjQ</recordid><startdate>202406</startdate><enddate>202406</enddate><creator>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C.</creator><creator>Latorre Román, P. Á.</creator><creator>Párraga Montilla, J. A.</creator><creator>Andrade‐Lara, K. E.</creator><creator>Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J.</creator><creator>Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-5154</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202406</creationdate><title>Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities</title><author>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C. ; Latorre Román, P. Á. ; Párraga Montilla, J. A. ; Andrade‐Lara, K. E. ; Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J. ; Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3484-46384744bb1468d01f02f973f6e8bfa46d10b33d6016a5a9c1ab389eb60e56413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>adults</topic><topic>Change agents</topic><topic>dual task</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Gait</topic><topic>Gait - physiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intellectual disabilities</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability</topic><topic>Intellectual Disability - physiopathology</topic><topic>Learning disabled people</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>mild and moderate disability</topic><topic>motor control</topic><topic>Psychomotor Performance - physiology</topic><topic>spatiotemporal gait parameter</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latorre Román, P. Á.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Párraga Montilla, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrade‐Lara, K. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cabrera‐Linares, J. C.</au><au>Latorre Román, P. Á.</au><au>Párraga Montilla, J. A.</au><au>Andrade‐Lara, K. E.</au><au>Ruiz‐Peralvarez, F. J.</au><au>Gutierrez‐Cruz, C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities</atitle><jtitle>Journal of intellectual disability research</jtitle><addtitle>J Intellect Disabil Res</addtitle><date>2024-06</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>610</spage><epage>619</epage><pages>610-619</pages><issn>0964-2633</issn><eissn>1365-2788</eissn><abstract>Background
The main objective of this study was to evaluate gait parameters in people with intellectual disability (ID) and without intellectual disability (WID) in two different walking conditions [single task vs. dual task (DT)]. A secondary aim was to evaluate the dual‐task cost (DTC) that the DT causes in each group.
Methods
A total of 119 participants joined in this study: 56 ID (30 men) and 63 WID (30 men). The OptoGait system was used to assess gait. In addition, Witty photocells were added to assess gait under the DT condition.
Results
Single support time was lower for participants with ID (P < 0.01), while double support time was higher (P < 0.05). All coefficients of variation for gait parameters were higher in participants with ID. Additionally, changes in gait were observed in both groups during the DT condition compared with the single‐task condition. These changes were larger for participants with ID in step length, double support time and gait speed (P < 0.001), resulting in a higher DTC in these variables in the ID group (P < 0.01).
Conclusions
Both groups reduced gait performance in the DT condition. However, greater gait variability occurred in the ID group. In addition, DTC was higher for the ID group in all variables analysed. Therefore, people with ID show worse gait performance during a DT than people WID.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38500391</pmid><doi>10.1111/jir.13134</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1059-5154</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0964-2633 |
| ispartof | Journal of intellectual disability research, 2024-06, Vol.68 (6), p.610-619 |
| issn | 0964-2633 1365-2788 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2968920017 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA) |
| subjects | Adult adults Change agents dual task Female Gait Gait - physiology Humans Intellectual disabilities Intellectual Disability Intellectual Disability - physiopathology Learning disabled people Male Men Middle Aged mild and moderate disability motor control Psychomotor Performance - physiology spatiotemporal gait parameter Walking Young Adult |
| title | Effects of a dual‐task activity on gait parameters of people with and without intellectual disabilities |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A50%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20a%20dual%E2%80%90task%20activity%20on%20gait%20parameters%20of%20people%20with%20and%20without%20intellectual%20disabilities&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20intellectual%20disability%20research&rft.au=Cabrera%E2%80%90Linares,%20J.%20C.&rft.date=2024-06&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=610&rft.epage=619&rft.pages=610-619&rft.issn=0964-2633&rft.eissn=1365-2788&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jir.13134&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3044913770%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3044913770&rft_id=info:pmid/38500391&rfr_iscdi=true |