Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule

In this paper, we focus on the performance of adjustment rules for a machine that produces items in batches and that can experience errors at each setup operation performed before machining a batch. The adjustment rule is applied to compensate for the setup offset in order to bring back the process...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Quality and reliability engineering international 2006-06, Vol.22 (4), p.403-418
Hauptverfasser: Lian, Z., Colosimo, B. M., del Castillo, E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 418
container_issue 4
container_start_page 403
container_title Quality and reliability engineering international
container_volume 22
creator Lian, Z.
Colosimo, B. M.
del Castillo, E.
description In this paper, we focus on the performance of adjustment rules for a machine that produces items in batches and that can experience errors at each setup operation performed before machining a batch. The adjustment rule is applied to compensate for the setup offset in order to bring back the process to target. In particular, we deal with the case in which no prior information about the distribution of the offset or about the within‐batch variability is available. Under such conditions, adjustment rules that can be applied are Grubbs' rules, the exponentially‐weighted moving average (EWMA) controller and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) adjustment rule, based on a Bayesian sequential estimation of unknown parameters that uses MCMC simulation. The performance metric of the different adjustment rules is the sum of the quadratic off‐target costs over the set of batches machined. Given the number of batches and the batch size, different production scenarios (characterized by different values of the lot‐to‐lot and the within‐lot variability and of the mean offset over the set of batches) are considered. The MCMC adjustment rule is shown to have better performance in almost all of the cases examined. Furthermore, a closer study of the cases in which the MCMC policy is not the best adjustment rule motivates a modified version of this rule which outperforms alternative adjustment policies in all the scenarios considered. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/qre.718
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29674552</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29674552</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-c32eda3a0b1ea3f50b7a5a9a0c221cac61d11033aa6604a07cbb676169d7de1a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10E9PwjAYx_HGaCKi8S30pAczfLqydvNGFgQTwAj-Sbw0z7aSDMcGbSfu3Tsz483L81w--R2-hFwyGDAA_3Zv9ECy8Ij0GESRxwQPj0kP5DD0QmDylJxZuwFobRT2yHSlXb2jY2MqQ0fZprZuq0t3R1e6tLnLP3PX0FGJRWNzS7HMKNKFPtB5PI9pXJXOVAVd1oU-JydrLKy--P198nI_fo6n3uxx8hCPZl7KOYTt9XWGHCFhGvk6gERigBFC6vssxVSwjDHgHFEIGCLINEmEFExEmcw0Q94nV93uzlT7WluntrlNdVFgqavaKj8SchgEfguvO5iaylqj12pn8i2aRjFQP6VUW0q1pVp508lDXujmP6aeluNOe53OrdNffxrNhxKSy0C9LSZKvM74BN4XivFvXRZ3_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29674552</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Lian, Z. ; Colosimo, B. M. ; del Castillo, E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lian, Z. ; Colosimo, B. M. ; del Castillo, E.</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, we focus on the performance of adjustment rules for a machine that produces items in batches and that can experience errors at each setup operation performed before machining a batch. The adjustment rule is applied to compensate for the setup offset in order to bring back the process to target. In particular, we deal with the case in which no prior information about the distribution of the offset or about the within‐batch variability is available. Under such conditions, adjustment rules that can be applied are Grubbs' rules, the exponentially‐weighted moving average (EWMA) controller and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) adjustment rule, based on a Bayesian sequential estimation of unknown parameters that uses MCMC simulation. The performance metric of the different adjustment rules is the sum of the quadratic off‐target costs over the set of batches machined. Given the number of batches and the batch size, different production scenarios (characterized by different values of the lot‐to‐lot and the within‐lot variability and of the mean offset over the set of batches) are considered. The MCMC adjustment rule is shown to have better performance in almost all of the cases examined. Furthermore, a closer study of the cases in which the MCMC policy is not the best adjustment rule motivates a modified version of this rule which outperforms alternative adjustment policies in all the scenarios considered. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0748-8017</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1638</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/qre.718</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Bayesian hierarchical models ; Markov chain Monte Carlo ; random effects model ; setup adjustment ; statistical quality control</subject><ispartof>Quality and reliability engineering international, 2006-06, Vol.22 (4), p.403-418</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-c32eda3a0b1ea3f50b7a5a9a0c221cac61d11033aa6604a07cbb676169d7de1a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-c32eda3a0b1ea3f50b7a5a9a0c221cac61d11033aa6604a07cbb676169d7de1a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fqre.718$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fqre.718$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lian, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colosimo, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Castillo, E.</creatorcontrib><title>Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule</title><title>Quality and reliability engineering international</title><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><description>In this paper, we focus on the performance of adjustment rules for a machine that produces items in batches and that can experience errors at each setup operation performed before machining a batch. The adjustment rule is applied to compensate for the setup offset in order to bring back the process to target. In particular, we deal with the case in which no prior information about the distribution of the offset or about the within‐batch variability is available. Under such conditions, adjustment rules that can be applied are Grubbs' rules, the exponentially‐weighted moving average (EWMA) controller and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) adjustment rule, based on a Bayesian sequential estimation of unknown parameters that uses MCMC simulation. The performance metric of the different adjustment rules is the sum of the quadratic off‐target costs over the set of batches machined. Given the number of batches and the batch size, different production scenarios (characterized by different values of the lot‐to‐lot and the within‐lot variability and of the mean offset over the set of batches) are considered. The MCMC adjustment rule is shown to have better performance in almost all of the cases examined. Furthermore, a closer study of the cases in which the MCMC policy is not the best adjustment rule motivates a modified version of this rule which outperforms alternative adjustment policies in all the scenarios considered. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Bayesian hierarchical models</subject><subject>Markov chain Monte Carlo</subject><subject>random effects model</subject><subject>setup adjustment</subject><subject>statistical quality control</subject><issn>0748-8017</issn><issn>1099-1638</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10E9PwjAYx_HGaCKi8S30pAczfLqydvNGFgQTwAj-Sbw0z7aSDMcGbSfu3Tsz483L81w--R2-hFwyGDAA_3Zv9ECy8Ij0GESRxwQPj0kP5DD0QmDylJxZuwFobRT2yHSlXb2jY2MqQ0fZprZuq0t3R1e6tLnLP3PX0FGJRWNzS7HMKNKFPtB5PI9pXJXOVAVd1oU-JydrLKy--P198nI_fo6n3uxx8hCPZl7KOYTt9XWGHCFhGvk6gERigBFC6vssxVSwjDHgHFEIGCLINEmEFExEmcw0Q94nV93uzlT7WluntrlNdVFgqavaKj8SchgEfguvO5iaylqj12pn8i2aRjFQP6VUW0q1pVp508lDXujmP6aeluNOe53OrdNffxrNhxKSy0C9LSZKvM74BN4XivFvXRZ3_A</recordid><startdate>200606</startdate><enddate>200606</enddate><creator>Lian, Z.</creator><creator>Colosimo, B. M.</creator><creator>del Castillo, E.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200606</creationdate><title>Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule</title><author>Lian, Z. ; Colosimo, B. M. ; del Castillo, E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3308-c32eda3a0b1ea3f50b7a5a9a0c221cac61d11033aa6604a07cbb676169d7de1a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Bayesian hierarchical models</topic><topic>Markov chain Monte Carlo</topic><topic>random effects model</topic><topic>setup adjustment</topic><topic>statistical quality control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lian, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Colosimo, B. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>del Castillo, E.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lian, Z.</au><au>Colosimo, B. M.</au><au>del Castillo, E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule</atitle><jtitle>Quality and reliability engineering international</jtitle><addtitle>Qual. Reliab. Engng. Int</addtitle><date>2006-06</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>403</spage><epage>418</epage><pages>403-418</pages><issn>0748-8017</issn><eissn>1099-1638</eissn><abstract>In this paper, we focus on the performance of adjustment rules for a machine that produces items in batches and that can experience errors at each setup operation performed before machining a batch. The adjustment rule is applied to compensate for the setup offset in order to bring back the process to target. In particular, we deal with the case in which no prior information about the distribution of the offset or about the within‐batch variability is available. Under such conditions, adjustment rules that can be applied are Grubbs' rules, the exponentially‐weighted moving average (EWMA) controller and the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) adjustment rule, based on a Bayesian sequential estimation of unknown parameters that uses MCMC simulation. The performance metric of the different adjustment rules is the sum of the quadratic off‐target costs over the set of batches machined. Given the number of batches and the batch size, different production scenarios (characterized by different values of the lot‐to‐lot and the within‐lot variability and of the mean offset over the set of batches) are considered. The MCMC adjustment rule is shown to have better performance in almost all of the cases examined. Furthermore, a closer study of the cases in which the MCMC policy is not the best adjustment rule motivates a modified version of this rule which outperforms alternative adjustment policies in all the scenarios considered. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/qre.718</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0748-8017
ispartof Quality and reliability engineering international, 2006-06, Vol.22 (4), p.403-418
issn 0748-8017
1099-1638
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29674552
source Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Bayesian hierarchical models
Markov chain Monte Carlo
random effects model
setup adjustment
statistical quality control
title Setup Error Adjustment: Sensitivity Analysis and a New MCMC Control Rule
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T23%3A23%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setup%20Error%20Adjustment:%20Sensitivity%20Analysis%20and%20a%20New%20MCMC%20Control%20Rule&rft.jtitle=Quality%20and%20reliability%20engineering%20international&rft.au=Lian,%20Z.&rft.date=2006-06&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=403&rft.epage=418&rft.pages=403-418&rft.issn=0748-8017&rft.eissn=1099-1638&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/qre.718&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29674552%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29674552&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true