Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins
The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Ergonomics 2002-05, Vol.45 (6), p.399-414 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 414 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 399 |
container_title | Ergonomics |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Ferguson, S. A. Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L. Marras, W. S. Waters, T. R. Davis, K. G. |
description | The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior - posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior - posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00140130210123507 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29657795</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>389182531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ca45329884d9340df1aefaa2bcfdaf6c4de6c3984cec79bd7baebd54a8b175bb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuAgFnut_oBuZBC0q9FkkkwScCPFfkDBRet6OPlqUzKTazJD7b83l3ulYGm7CiHPe5KTg9AhwV8IlvgrxoRhQnFHMOkox-IVWhHa9y2XTLxGq815W4HaR29Lua1bSlT3Bu2TDvdE9XyF5OU6TBCbmMCG6bq5u3FTE4OfNxuf09iEyS5lzqGiMqcM167RYSrv0J6HWNz73XqAfp38uDo-ay9-np4ff79oDWdqbg0wTjslJbOKMmw9AecBOm28Bd8bZl1vqJLMOCOUtkKD05YzkJoIrjU9QEfbuuucfi-uzMMYinExwuTSUgYhCKdKEVHl52dlVxsWQvEXIZGY4_rqCj_-B2_Tkut31WJYqq7-PKuIbJHJqZTs_LDOYYR8PxA8bMY0PBpTzXzYFV706OxDYjeXCj7tABQD0WeYTCgPjgrOqFTVia0Lk095hLuUox1muI8p_ws9un6Y_8w1-e3FJH26g78btr4W</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>208923024</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins</title><source>Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles)</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ferguson, S. A. ; Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L. ; Marras, W. S. ; Waters, T. R. ; Davis, K. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, S. A. ; Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L. ; Marras, W. S. ; Waters, T. R. ; Davis, K. G.</creatorcontrib><description>The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior - posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior - posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0014-0139</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1366-5847</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00140130210123507</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12061965</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ERGOAX</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Adult ; Applied physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Compressive Strength - physiology ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Equipment Design ; Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology ; Female ; Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology ; Humans ; Industrial Bins ; Industrial equipment ; Lifting ; Low Back Disorder ; Male ; Medical disorders ; Medical sciences ; Posture - physiology ; Spinal cord ; Spinal Loading ; Spine - physiology ; Task Performance and Analysis ; Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><ispartof>Ergonomics, 2002-05, Vol.45 (6), p.399-414</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2002</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group May 15, 2002</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ca45329884d9340df1aefaa2bcfdaf6c4de6c3984cec79bd7baebd54a8b175bb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ca45329884d9340df1aefaa2bcfdaf6c4de6c3984cec79bd7baebd54a8b175bb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/00140130210123507$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00140130210123507$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13754389$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12061965$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marras, W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, K. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins</title><title>Ergonomics</title><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><description>The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior - posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior - posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Applied physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Compressive Strength - physiology</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Industrial Bins</subject><subject>Industrial equipment</subject><subject>Lifting</subject><subject>Low Back Disorder</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical disorders</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Posture - physiology</subject><subject>Spinal cord</subject><subject>Spinal Loading</subject><subject>Spine - physiology</subject><subject>Task Performance and Analysis</subject><subject>Weight-Bearing - physiology</subject><issn>0014-0139</issn><issn>1366-5847</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0U1rFTEUBuAgFnut_oBuZBC0q9FkkkwScCPFfkDBRet6OPlqUzKTazJD7b83l3ulYGm7CiHPe5KTg9AhwV8IlvgrxoRhQnFHMOkox-IVWhHa9y2XTLxGq815W4HaR29Lua1bSlT3Bu2TDvdE9XyF5OU6TBCbmMCG6bq5u3FTE4OfNxuf09iEyS5lzqGiMqcM167RYSrv0J6HWNz73XqAfp38uDo-ay9-np4ff79oDWdqbg0wTjslJbOKMmw9AecBOm28Bd8bZl1vqJLMOCOUtkKD05YzkJoIrjU9QEfbuuucfi-uzMMYinExwuTSUgYhCKdKEVHl52dlVxsWQvEXIZGY4_rqCj_-B2_Tkut31WJYqq7-PKuIbJHJqZTs_LDOYYR8PxA8bMY0PBpTzXzYFV706OxDYjeXCj7tABQD0WeYTCgPjgrOqFTVia0Lk095hLuUox1muI8p_ws9un6Y_8w1-e3FJH26g78btr4W</recordid><startdate>20020515</startdate><enddate>20020515</enddate><creator>Ferguson, S. A.</creator><creator>Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L.</creator><creator>Marras, W. S.</creator><creator>Waters, T. R.</creator><creator>Davis, K. G.</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis LLC</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020515</creationdate><title>Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins</title><author>Ferguson, S. A. ; Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L. ; Marras, W. S. ; Waters, T. R. ; Davis, K. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ca45329884d9340df1aefaa2bcfdaf6c4de6c3984cec79bd7baebd54a8b175bb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Applied physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Compressive Strength - physiology</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Industrial Bins</topic><topic>Industrial equipment</topic><topic>Lifting</topic><topic>Low Back Disorder</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical disorders</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Posture - physiology</topic><topic>Spinal cord</topic><topic>Spinal Loading</topic><topic>Spine - physiology</topic><topic>Task Performance and Analysis</topic><topic>Weight-Bearing - physiology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, S. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marras, W. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Waters, T. R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, K. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ferguson, S. A.</au><au>Gaudes-MacLaren, L. L.</au><au>Marras, W. S.</au><au>Waters, T. R.</au><au>Davis, K. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins</atitle><jtitle>Ergonomics</jtitle><addtitle>Ergonomics</addtitle><date>2002-05-15</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>414</epage><pages>399-414</pages><issn>0014-0139</issn><eissn>1366-5847</eissn><coden>ERGOAX</coden><abstract>The study documented three-dimensional spinal loading during lifting from an industrial bin. Two lifting styles and two bin design factors were examined in Phase I. The lifting style measures in Phase I were one hand versus two hand and standing on one foot versus two feet. The bin design variables were region of load in the bin and bin height. The Phase II study examined one-handed lifting styles with and without supporting body weight with the free hand on the bin as well as region and the number of feet. Twelve male and 12 female subjects lifted an 11.3 kg box from the bin. Spinal compression, lateral shear and anterior - posterior shear forces were estimated using a validated EMG-assisted biomechanical model. Phase I results indicated that the bin design factor of region had the greatest impact on spinal loading. The upper front region minimized spinal loading for all lifting styles. Furthermore, the lifting style of two hands and two feet minimized spinal loading. However, comparing Phase I two-handed lifting with Phase II one-handed supported lifting, the one-handed supported lifting techniques had lower compressive and anterior - posterior shear loads in the lower regions as well as the upper back region of the bin. A bin design that facilitates lifting from the upper front region of the bin reduces spinal loading more effectively than specific lifting styles. Furthermore, a bin design with a hand hold may facilitate workers using a supported lifting style that reduces spinal loading.</abstract><cop>London</cop><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><pmid>12061965</pmid><doi>10.1080/00140130210123507</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0014-0139 |
ispartof | Ergonomics, 2002-05, Vol.45 (6), p.399-414 |
issn | 0014-0139 1366-5847 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29657795 |
source | Taylor & Francis:Master (3349 titles); MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult Applied physiology Biological and medical sciences Compressive Strength - physiology Environmental Monitoring - methods Equipment Design Ergonomics. Work place. Occupational physiology Female Human physiology applied to population studies and life conditions. Human ecophysiology Humans Industrial Bins Industrial equipment Lifting Low Back Disorder Male Medical disorders Medical sciences Posture - physiology Spinal cord Spinal Loading Spine - physiology Task Performance and Analysis Weight-Bearing - physiology |
title | Spinal loading when lifting from industrial storage bins |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A11%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Spinal%20loading%20when%20lifting%20from%20industrial%20storage%20bins&rft.jtitle=Ergonomics&rft.au=Ferguson,%20S.%20A.&rft.date=2002-05-15&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=414&rft.pages=399-414&rft.issn=0014-0139&rft.eissn=1366-5847&rft.coden=ERGOAX&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00140130210123507&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E389182531%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=208923024&rft_id=info:pmid/12061965&rfr_iscdi=true |