Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone
The modeling of transport of organic liquid contaminants through the vadose zone often requires three-phase relative permeabilities. Since these are difficult to measure, predictive models are usually used. The objective of this study is to assess the ability of eight common models to predict the dr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of contaminant hydrology 2003-11, Vol.66 (3), p.261-285 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 285 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 261 |
| container_title | Journal of contaminant hydrology |
| container_volume | 66 |
| creator | Oliveira, Leonardo I. Demond, Avery H. |
| description | The modeling of transport of organic liquid contaminants through the vadose zone often requires three-phase relative permeabilities. Since these are difficult to measure, predictive models are usually used. The objective of this study is to assess the ability of eight common models to predict the drainage relative permeability to oil in a three-phase system (water–oil–air). A comparison of the models' estimates using data set from Oak [Oak, M.J., 1990. Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet Berea. In: Seventh Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Paper SPE/Doe 20183. Tulsa, OK, April 22–25] showed that they provide very different predictions for the same system. The goodness of the models does not increase with the amount of data or computation that the models require. Also, the calculations showed how different interpretations of the models and of the terminology associated with them can significantly impact the predictions. Thus, considerable error may be introduced into the simulations of organic liquid transport in the vadose zone depending on the selection and interpretation of the three-phase relative permeability model. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00029-9 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29648070</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0169772203000299</els_id><sourcerecordid>29648070</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-cf635b2ba7c86a56db96b9ec7a0a5de9788eebf4ca3b0914b9c3c7f5f5b9d8a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtrFTEUB_Agir2tfgQlG0UXo3lMXqsipVWh4MLuQx5n2sjcyTSZe6F-etPewS7vJiHwOyeH80foHSVfKKHy6-92mE4pxj4R_pkQwkxnXqAN1Yp3khDzEm3-kxN0WuufhpQm-jU6ob2Quidsg-bLuqStW1KecB7wXNqjPOBYXJrcLeDlrgB0852rgAuMDe4Bz1C24Hwa0_KAh1xwLrduSgGP6X6XIl6Km-qcy4LT1DoA3ruYW4O_eYI36NXgxgpv1_sM3Vxd3lz86K5_ff958e26c4KopQuD5MIz71TQ0gkZvZHeQFCOOBHBKK0B_NAHxz0xtPcm8KAGMQhvonb8DH08tJ1Lvt9BXew21QDj6CbIu2qZkb0mihyFVFIpmGHHYS81Z4I3KA4wlFxrgcGuW7WU2Mfs7FN29jEYS7h9ys6aVvd-_WDntxCfq9awGviwAleDG4e25ZDqsxOMM0X75s4PDtp-9wmKrSHBFCCmAmGxMacjo_wDIRS4ow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14683253</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Oliveira, Leonardo I. ; Demond, Avery H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Leonardo I. ; Demond, Avery H.</creatorcontrib><description>The modeling of transport of organic liquid contaminants through the vadose zone often requires three-phase relative permeabilities. Since these are difficult to measure, predictive models are usually used. The objective of this study is to assess the ability of eight common models to predict the drainage relative permeability to oil in a three-phase system (water–oil–air). A comparison of the models' estimates using data set from Oak [Oak, M.J., 1990. Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet Berea. In: Seventh Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Paper SPE/Doe 20183. Tulsa, OK, April 22–25] showed that they provide very different predictions for the same system. The goodness of the models does not increase with the amount of data or computation that the models require. Also, the calculations showed how different interpretations of the models and of the terminology associated with them can significantly impact the predictions. Thus, considerable error may be introduced into the simulations of organic liquid transport in the vadose zone depending on the selection and interpretation of the three-phase relative permeability model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0169-7722</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00029-9</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14568402</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JCOHE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filtration ; Forecasting ; Hydraulic properties ; Hydrogeology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Models, Theoretical ; Multiphase flow ; NAPL ; Permeability ; Pollution, environment geology ; Relative permeability ; Soil Pollutants - analysis ; vadose zone ; Water Movements ; Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2003-11, Vol.66 (3), p.261-285</ispartof><rights>2003 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-cf635b2ba7c86a56db96b9ec7a0a5de9788eebf4ca3b0914b9c3c7f5f5b9d8a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-cf635b2ba7c86a56db96b9ec7a0a5de9788eebf4ca3b0914b9c3c7f5f5b9d8a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00029-9$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15232714$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14568402$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Leonardo I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demond, Avery H.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone</title><title>Journal of contaminant hydrology</title><addtitle>J Contam Hydrol</addtitle><description>The modeling of transport of organic liquid contaminants through the vadose zone often requires three-phase relative permeabilities. Since these are difficult to measure, predictive models are usually used. The objective of this study is to assess the ability of eight common models to predict the drainage relative permeability to oil in a three-phase system (water–oil–air). A comparison of the models' estimates using data set from Oak [Oak, M.J., 1990. Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet Berea. In: Seventh Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Paper SPE/Doe 20183. Tulsa, OK, April 22–25] showed that they provide very different predictions for the same system. The goodness of the models does not increase with the amount of data or computation that the models require. Also, the calculations showed how different interpretations of the models and of the terminology associated with them can significantly impact the predictions. Thus, considerable error may be introduced into the simulations of organic liquid transport in the vadose zone depending on the selection and interpretation of the three-phase relative permeability model.</description><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filtration</subject><subject>Forecasting</subject><subject>Hydraulic properties</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Multiphase flow</subject><subject>NAPL</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Relative permeability</subject><subject>Soil Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>vadose zone</subject><subject>Water Movements</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - analysis</subject><issn>0169-7722</issn><issn>1873-6009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0UtrFTEUB_Agir2tfgQlG0UXo3lMXqsipVWh4MLuQx5n2sjcyTSZe6F-etPewS7vJiHwOyeH80foHSVfKKHy6-92mE4pxj4R_pkQwkxnXqAN1Yp3khDzEm3-kxN0WuufhpQm-jU6ob2Quidsg-bLuqStW1KecB7wXNqjPOBYXJrcLeDlrgB0852rgAuMDe4Bz1C24Hwa0_KAh1xwLrduSgGP6X6XIl6Km-qcy4LT1DoA3ruYW4O_eYI36NXgxgpv1_sM3Vxd3lz86K5_ff958e26c4KopQuD5MIz71TQ0gkZvZHeQFCOOBHBKK0B_NAHxz0xtPcm8KAGMQhvonb8DH08tJ1Lvt9BXew21QDj6CbIu2qZkb0mihyFVFIpmGHHYS81Z4I3KA4wlFxrgcGuW7WU2Mfs7FN29jEYS7h9ys6aVvd-_WDntxCfq9awGviwAleDG4e25ZDqsxOMM0X75s4PDtp-9wmKrSHBFCCmAmGxMacjo_wDIRS4ow</recordid><startdate>20031101</startdate><enddate>20031101</enddate><creator>Oliveira, Leonardo I.</creator><creator>Demond, Avery H.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20031101</creationdate><title>Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone</title><author>Oliveira, Leonardo I. ; Demond, Avery H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a507t-cf635b2ba7c86a56db96b9ec7a0a5de9788eebf4ca3b0914b9c3c7f5f5b9d8a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filtration</topic><topic>Forecasting</topic><topic>Hydraulic properties</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Multiphase flow</topic><topic>NAPL</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Relative permeability</topic><topic>Soil Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>vadose zone</topic><topic>Water Movements</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oliveira, Leonardo I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Demond, Avery H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of contaminant hydrology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oliveira, Leonardo I.</au><au>Demond, Avery H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone</atitle><jtitle>Journal of contaminant hydrology</jtitle><addtitle>J Contam Hydrol</addtitle><date>2003-11-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>66</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>261</spage><epage>285</epage><pages>261-285</pages><issn>0169-7722</issn><eissn>1873-6009</eissn><coden>JCOHE6</coden><abstract>The modeling of transport of organic liquid contaminants through the vadose zone often requires three-phase relative permeabilities. Since these are difficult to measure, predictive models are usually used. The objective of this study is to assess the ability of eight common models to predict the drainage relative permeability to oil in a three-phase system (water–oil–air). A comparison of the models' estimates using data set from Oak [Oak, M.J., 1990. Three-phase relative permeability of water-wet Berea. In: Seventh Symposium on Enhanced Oil Recovery, Paper SPE/Doe 20183. Tulsa, OK, April 22–25] showed that they provide very different predictions for the same system. The goodness of the models does not increase with the amount of data or computation that the models require. Also, the calculations showed how different interpretations of the models and of the terminology associated with them can significantly impact the predictions. Thus, considerable error may be introduced into the simulations of organic liquid transport in the vadose zone depending on the selection and interpretation of the three-phase relative permeability model.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>14568402</pmid><doi>10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00029-9</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0169-7722 |
| ispartof | Journal of contaminant hydrology, 2003-11, Vol.66 (3), p.261-285 |
| issn | 0169-7722 1873-6009 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29648070 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics Exact sciences and technology Filtration Forecasting Hydraulic properties Hydrogeology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Models, Theoretical Multiphase flow NAPL Permeability Pollution, environment geology Relative permeability Soil Pollutants - analysis vadose zone Water Movements Water Pollutants - analysis |
| title | Estimation of primary drainage three-phase relative permeability for organic liquid transport in the vadose zone |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T04%3A51%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimation%20of%20primary%20drainage%20three-phase%20relative%20permeability%20for%20organic%20liquid%20transport%20in%20the%20vadose%20zone&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20contaminant%20hydrology&rft.au=Oliveira,%20Leonardo%20I.&rft.date=2003-11-01&rft.volume=66&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=261&rft.epage=285&rft.pages=261-285&rft.issn=0169-7722&rft.eissn=1873-6009&rft.coden=JCOHE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0169-7722(03)00029-9&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29648070%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14683253&rft_id=info:pmid/14568402&rft_els_id=S0169772203000299&rfr_iscdi=true |