Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater
The implementation of low-cost, simple mitigation measures is required for the timely control and sustainable management of pollution problems in developing countries. Recently, the use of anaerobic systems for wastewater treatment has received a growing attention since they represent an alternative...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Water science and technology 1999, Vol.39 (5), p.97-103 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 103 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 5 |
| container_start_page | 97 |
| container_title | Water science and technology |
| container_volume | 39 |
| creator | El-Gohary, Fatma A. Nasr, Fayza A. |
| description | The implementation of low-cost, simple mitigation measures is required for the timely control and sustainable management of pollution problems in developing countries. Recently, the use of anaerobic systems for wastewater treatment has received a growing attention since they represent an alternative costeffective approach for removal of pollutants. Therefore, evaluation of the performance of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor, as a pre-tretment step for industrial as well as domestic wastewater was fhe subject of this study. The results obtained showed fhat the performance of one-stage UASB at 8hrs hydraulic retention time (HRT) for domestic wastewater treatment was quite satisfactory. COD
tot and BOD
tot removal values averaged 77% and 83%. Comparison of the performance of a one-stage versus two-stage reactor, having the same volume and operated at fhe same HRT (8 hr) and biomass concentration indicated an improvement in the quality of the two-stage effluent. With regard to the wastewater discharged from a potato-chips factory, the use of one-stage UASB at a detention time of 18hrs and an average organic load of 2.9
kg BOD/m
3/d gave good results. Average residual values of COD, BOD, TSS and oil and grease in the treated effluent were 650, 342, 203 and 63
mg/l, respectively. Operation of a two-stage pilot-scale UASB indicated better performance as expressed by COD and BOD removal values. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00113-4 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29615750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0273122399001134</els_id><sourcerecordid>1943363879</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8674aa4ae1b8230b0aa3baa6247461e883d4d4e6dfcc9d4c72f785e45294def3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1LAzEQBuDgB1irP0EoKKLC6iSTTTYnkeIXFDzoPaTZCay0uzVJFf-9WysKXvQ0l2fekHkZO-BwzoGri0cQGgsuBJ4YcwrAORZygw24MaowGsUm2wWoQKKSXGyxwbffYbspPQOARgkDdjbuUi4oBPK5eaXRIlKRI7k8pzaPujB6cynTm8sU99h2cLNE-19zyJ5urp_Gd8Xk4fZ-fDUpPGqRi0pp6Zx0xKeVQJiCczh1TgmppeJUVVjLWpKqg_emll6LoKuSZCmMrCngkB2vYxexe1lSynbeJE-zmWupWyYrjOKlLuEfkGvQGv-EHBUooWQPD3_B524Z2_6zlhuJqLDSplflWvnYpRQp2EVs5i6-Ww521Y79bMeurm2NsZ_t2FX60Ve6S97NQnStb9LPcqm1RN6zyzWj_savDUWbfEOtp7qJfUm27po_HvoAMzOe6A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1943363879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>El-Gohary, Fatma A. ; Nasr, Fayza A.</creator><creatorcontrib>El-Gohary, Fatma A. ; Nasr, Fayza A.</creatorcontrib><description>The implementation of low-cost, simple mitigation measures is required for the timely control and sustainable management of pollution problems in developing countries. Recently, the use of anaerobic systems for wastewater treatment has received a growing attention since they represent an alternative costeffective approach for removal of pollutants. Therefore, evaluation of the performance of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor, as a pre-tretment step for industrial as well as domestic wastewater was fhe subject of this study. The results obtained showed fhat the performance of one-stage UASB at 8hrs hydraulic retention time (HRT) for domestic wastewater treatment was quite satisfactory. COD
tot and BOD
tot removal values averaged 77% and 83%. Comparison of the performance of a one-stage versus two-stage reactor, having the same volume and operated at fhe same HRT (8 hr) and biomass concentration indicated an improvement in the quality of the two-stage effluent. With regard to the wastewater discharged from a potato-chips factory, the use of one-stage UASB at a detention time of 18hrs and an average organic load of 2.9
kg BOD/m
3/d gave good results. Average residual values of COD, BOD, TSS and oil and grease in the treated effluent were 650, 342, 203 and 63
mg/l, respectively. Operation of a two-stage pilot-scale UASB indicated better performance as expressed by COD and BOD removal values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-1223</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0080436412</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780080436418</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1996-9732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00113-4</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WSTED4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Science</publisher><subject>Anaerobic systems ; Anaerobic treatment ; Applied sciences ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biological treatment of waters ; Biotechnology ; Detention time ; Developing countries ; domestic ; Domestic wastewater ; Effluent treatment ; Effluents ; Environment and pollution ; Evaluation ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General purification processes ; Grease ; Hydraulic retention time ; industrial ; Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects ; LDCs ; Mitigation ; Organic loading ; Pollutant removal ; Pollutants ; Pollution ; Potatoes ; Pretreatment ; Reactors ; Removal ; Retention time ; Sludge ; Sustainability management ; UASB ; Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors ; Wastewater ; Wastewater discharges ; Wastewater treatment ; Wastewaters ; Water treatment ; Water treatment and pollution</subject><ispartof>Water science and technology, 1999, Vol.39 (5), p.97-103</ispartof><rights>1999 Elsevier Science Ltd</rights><rights>1999 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright IWA Publishing Mar 1999</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8674aa4ae1b8230b0aa3baa6247461e883d4d4e6dfcc9d4c72f785e45294def3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,782,786,791,792,4026,4052,4053,23937,23938,25147,27930,27931,27932</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1577431$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>El-Gohary, Fatma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Fayza A.</creatorcontrib><title>Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater</title><title>Water science and technology</title><description>The implementation of low-cost, simple mitigation measures is required for the timely control and sustainable management of pollution problems in developing countries. Recently, the use of anaerobic systems for wastewater treatment has received a growing attention since they represent an alternative costeffective approach for removal of pollutants. Therefore, evaluation of the performance of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor, as a pre-tretment step for industrial as well as domestic wastewater was fhe subject of this study. The results obtained showed fhat the performance of one-stage UASB at 8hrs hydraulic retention time (HRT) for domestic wastewater treatment was quite satisfactory. COD
tot and BOD
tot removal values averaged 77% and 83%. Comparison of the performance of a one-stage versus two-stage reactor, having the same volume and operated at fhe same HRT (8 hr) and biomass concentration indicated an improvement in the quality of the two-stage effluent. With regard to the wastewater discharged from a potato-chips factory, the use of one-stage UASB at a detention time of 18hrs and an average organic load of 2.9
kg BOD/m
3/d gave good results. Average residual values of COD, BOD, TSS and oil and grease in the treated effluent were 650, 342, 203 and 63
mg/l, respectively. Operation of a two-stage pilot-scale UASB indicated better performance as expressed by COD and BOD removal values.</description><subject>Anaerobic systems</subject><subject>Anaerobic treatment</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biological treatment of waters</subject><subject>Biotechnology</subject><subject>Detention time</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>domestic</subject><subject>Domestic wastewater</subject><subject>Effluent treatment</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>Environment and pollution</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General purification processes</subject><subject>Grease</subject><subject>Hydraulic retention time</subject><subject>industrial</subject><subject>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Mitigation</subject><subject>Organic loading</subject><subject>Pollutant removal</subject><subject>Pollutants</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Potatoes</subject><subject>Pretreatment</subject><subject>Reactors</subject><subject>Removal</subject><subject>Retention time</subject><subject>Sludge</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>UASB</subject><subject>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</subject><subject>Wastewater</subject><subject>Wastewater discharges</subject><subject>Wastewater treatment</subject><subject>Wastewaters</subject><subject>Water treatment</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><issn>0273-1223</issn><issn>1996-9732</issn><isbn>0080436412</isbn><isbn>9780080436418</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0U1LAzEQBuDgB1irP0EoKKLC6iSTTTYnkeIXFDzoPaTZCay0uzVJFf-9WysKXvQ0l2fekHkZO-BwzoGri0cQGgsuBJ4YcwrAORZygw24MaowGsUm2wWoQKKSXGyxwbffYbspPQOARgkDdjbuUi4oBPK5eaXRIlKRI7k8pzaPujB6cynTm8sU99h2cLNE-19zyJ5urp_Gd8Xk4fZ-fDUpPGqRi0pp6Zx0xKeVQJiCczh1TgmppeJUVVjLWpKqg_emll6LoKuSZCmMrCngkB2vYxexe1lSynbeJE-zmWupWyYrjOKlLuEfkGvQGv-EHBUooWQPD3_B524Z2_6zlhuJqLDSplflWvnYpRQp2EVs5i6-Ww521Y79bMeurm2NsZ_t2FX60Ve6S97NQnStb9LPcqm1RN6zyzWj_savDUWbfEOtp7qJfUm27po_HvoAMzOe6A</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>El-Gohary, Fatma A.</creator><creator>Nasr, Fayza A.</creator><general>Elsevier Science</general><general>Pergamon</general><general>IWA Publishing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater</title><author>El-Gohary, Fatma A. ; Nasr, Fayza A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-8674aa4ae1b8230b0aa3baa6247461e883d4d4e6dfcc9d4c72f785e45294def3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Anaerobic systems</topic><topic>Anaerobic treatment</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biological treatment of waters</topic><topic>Biotechnology</topic><topic>Detention time</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>domestic</topic><topic>Domestic wastewater</topic><topic>Effluent treatment</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>Environment and pollution</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General purification processes</topic><topic>Grease</topic><topic>Hydraulic retention time</topic><topic>industrial</topic><topic>Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Mitigation</topic><topic>Organic loading</topic><topic>Pollutant removal</topic><topic>Pollutants</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Potatoes</topic><topic>Pretreatment</topic><topic>Reactors</topic><topic>Removal</topic><topic>Retention time</topic><topic>Sludge</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>UASB</topic><topic>Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors</topic><topic>Wastewater</topic><topic>Wastewater discharges</topic><topic>Wastewater treatment</topic><topic>Wastewaters</topic><topic>Water treatment</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>El-Gohary, Fatma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasr, Fayza A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>El-Gohary, Fatma A.</au><au>Nasr, Fayza A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater</atitle><jtitle>Water science and technology</jtitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>97</spage><epage>103</epage><pages>97-103</pages><issn>0273-1223</issn><eissn>1996-9732</eissn><isbn>0080436412</isbn><isbn>9780080436418</isbn><coden>WSTED4</coden><abstract>The implementation of low-cost, simple mitigation measures is required for the timely control and sustainable management of pollution problems in developing countries. Recently, the use of anaerobic systems for wastewater treatment has received a growing attention since they represent an alternative costeffective approach for removal of pollutants. Therefore, evaluation of the performance of an Upflow Anaerobic Sludge Blanket Reactor, as a pre-tretment step for industrial as well as domestic wastewater was fhe subject of this study. The results obtained showed fhat the performance of one-stage UASB at 8hrs hydraulic retention time (HRT) for domestic wastewater treatment was quite satisfactory. COD
tot and BOD
tot removal values averaged 77% and 83%. Comparison of the performance of a one-stage versus two-stage reactor, having the same volume and operated at fhe same HRT (8 hr) and biomass concentration indicated an improvement in the quality of the two-stage effluent. With regard to the wastewater discharged from a potato-chips factory, the use of one-stage UASB at a detention time of 18hrs and an average organic load of 2.9
kg BOD/m
3/d gave good results. Average residual values of COD, BOD, TSS and oil and grease in the treated effluent were 650, 342, 203 and 63
mg/l, respectively. Operation of a two-stage pilot-scale UASB indicated better performance as expressed by COD and BOD removal values.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Science</pub><doi>10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00113-4</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0273-1223 |
| ispartof | Water science and technology, 1999, Vol.39 (5), p.97-103 |
| issn | 0273-1223 1996-9732 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29615750 |
| source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Anaerobic systems Anaerobic treatment Applied sciences Biological and medical sciences Biological treatment of waters Biotechnology Detention time Developing countries domestic Domestic wastewater Effluent treatment Effluents Environment and pollution Evaluation Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General purification processes Grease Hydraulic retention time industrial Industrial applications and implications. Economical aspects LDCs Mitigation Organic loading Pollutant removal Pollutants Pollution Potatoes Pretreatment Reactors Removal Retention time Sludge Sustainability management UASB Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactors Wastewater Wastewater discharges Wastewater treatment Wastewaters Water treatment Water treatment and pollution |
| title | Cost-effective pre-treatment of wastewater |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-03T21%3A00%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cost-effective%20pre-treatment%20of%20wastewater&rft.jtitle=Water%20science%20and%20technology&rft.au=El-Gohary,%20Fatma%20A.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=97&rft.epage=103&rft.pages=97-103&rft.issn=0273-1223&rft.eissn=1996-9732&rft.isbn=0080436412&rft.isbn_list=9780080436418&rft.coden=WSTED4&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00113-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1943363879%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1943363879&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0273122399001134&rfr_iscdi=true |