The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast

Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of applied mechanics 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.81-99
Hauptverfasser: Liang, Yueming, Spuskanyuk, Alexander V, Flores, Shane E, Hayhurst, David R, Hutchinson, John W, McMeeking, Robert M, Evans, Anthony G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 81
container_title Journal of applied mechanics
container_volume 74
creator Liang, Yueming
Spuskanyuk, Alexander V
Flores, Shane E
Hayhurst, David R
Hutchinson, John W
McMeeking, Robert M
Evans, Anthony G
description Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.
doi_str_mv 10.1115/1.2178837
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29594046</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29594046</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-a05774a25490b83c8d317846403bb23af92e5bc83207702ef1c5588d4f8080003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL126yUXAxmncySy2-oKJoxWW4k2bolHRSkynivzfSgqu7-e7hnA-hU0quKKXyml4xqo3heg-NqGSmqglX-2hECKOVqbk6REc5Lwkh0igxQnq28PjN53Xss8exxc9-gBA6h9-hn393boFfofch4yHiTxh8wrcB8nCMDloI2Z_s7hh93N_NJo_V9OXhaXIzrYBrNVRApNYCmBQ1aQx3Zs5LPaEE4U3DOLQ187JxhjOiNWG-pU5KY-aiNcSUknyMLra56xS_Nj4PdtVl50MopeImW1bLWhChCni5BV2KOSff2nXqVpB-LCX2T42ldqemsOe7UMgOQpugd13-fyhmlGa8cGdbDvLK22XcpL5stUJJWTP-CwvPaII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29594046</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast</title><source>ASME Transactions Journals (Current)</source><creator>Liang, Yueming ; Spuskanyuk, Alexander V ; Flores, Shane E ; Hayhurst, David R ; Hutchinson, John W ; McMeeking, Robert M ; Evans, Anthony G</creator><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yueming ; Spuskanyuk, Alexander V ; Flores, Shane E ; Hayhurst, David R ; Hutchinson, John W ; McMeeking, Robert M ; Evans, Anthony G</creatorcontrib><description>Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8936</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-9036</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1115/1.2178837</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAMCAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: ASME</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...) ; Mechanical contact (friction...) ; Physics ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><ispartof>Journal of applied mechanics, 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.81-99</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-a05774a25490b83c8d317846403bb23af92e5bc83207702ef1c5588d4f8080003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-a05774a25490b83c8d317846403bb23af92e5bc83207702ef1c5588d4f8080003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,38499</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18646723$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yueming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spuskanyuk, Alexander V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Shane E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayhurst, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMeeking, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Anthony G</creatorcontrib><title>The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast</title><title>Journal of applied mechanics</title><addtitle>J. Appl. Mech</addtitle><description>Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</subject><subject>Mechanical contact (friction...)</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><issn>0021-8936</issn><issn>1528-9036</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKsL126yUXAxmncySy2-oKJoxWW4k2bolHRSkynivzfSgqu7-e7hnA-hU0quKKXyml4xqo3heg-NqGSmqglX-2hECKOVqbk6REc5Lwkh0igxQnq28PjN53Xss8exxc9-gBA6h9-hn393boFfofch4yHiTxh8wrcB8nCMDloI2Z_s7hh93N_NJo_V9OXhaXIzrYBrNVRApNYCmBQ1aQx3Zs5LPaEE4U3DOLQ187JxhjOiNWG-pU5KY-aiNcSUknyMLra56xS_Nj4PdtVl50MopeImW1bLWhChCni5BV2KOSff2nXqVpB-LCX2T42ldqemsOe7UMgOQpugd13-fyhmlGa8cGdbDvLK22XcpL5stUJJWTP-CwvPaII</recordid><startdate>20070101</startdate><enddate>20070101</enddate><creator>Liang, Yueming</creator><creator>Spuskanyuk, Alexander V</creator><creator>Flores, Shane E</creator><creator>Hayhurst, David R</creator><creator>Hutchinson, John W</creator><creator>McMeeking, Robert M</creator><creator>Evans, Anthony G</creator><general>ASME</general><general>American Society of Mechanical Engineers</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070101</creationdate><title>The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast</title><author>Liang, Yueming ; Spuskanyuk, Alexander V ; Flores, Shane E ; Hayhurst, David R ; Hutchinson, John W ; McMeeking, Robert M ; Evans, Anthony G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a376t-a05774a25490b83c8d317846403bb23af92e5bc83207702ef1c5588d4f8080003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)</topic><topic>Mechanical contact (friction...)</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Liang, Yueming</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Spuskanyuk, Alexander V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Flores, Shane E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayhurst, David R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hutchinson, John W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMeeking, Robert M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evans, Anthony G</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of applied mechanics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Liang, Yueming</au><au>Spuskanyuk, Alexander V</au><au>Flores, Shane E</au><au>Hayhurst, David R</au><au>Hutchinson, John W</au><au>McMeeking, Robert M</au><au>Evans, Anthony G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast</atitle><jtitle>Journal of applied mechanics</jtitle><stitle>J. Appl. Mech</stitle><date>2007-01-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>81</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>81-99</pages><issn>0021-8936</issn><eissn>1528-9036</eissn><coden>JAMCAV</coden><abstract>Metallic sandwich panels subject to underwater blast respond in a manner dependent on the relative time scales for core crushing and water cavitation. This article examines the response at impulses representative of an (especially relevant) domain: wherein the water cavitates before the core crushes. Three core topologies (square honeycomb, I-core, and corrugated) have been used to address fundamental issues affecting panel design. Their ranking is based on three performance metrics: the back-face deflection, the tearing susceptibility of the faces, and the loads transmitted to the supports. The results are interpreted by comparing with analytic solutions based on a three-stage response model. In stage I, the wet face acquires its maximum velocity with some water attached. In stage II, the core crushes and all of the constituents (wet and dry face and core) converge onto a common velocity. In stage III, the panel deflects and deforms, dissipating its kinetic energy by plastic bending, stretching, shearing, and indentation. The results provide insight about three aspects of the response. (i) Two inherently different regimes have been elucidated, designated strong (STC) and soft (SOC), differentiated by a stage II/III time scale parameter. The best overall performance has been found for soft-core designs. (ii) The foregoing analytic models are found to underestimate the kinetic energy and, consequently, exaggerate the performance benefits. The discrepancy has been resolved by a more complete model for the fluid/structure interaction. (iii) The kinetic energy acquired at the end of the second stage accounts fully for the plastic dissipation occurring in the third stage, indicating that the additional momentum acquired after the end of the second stage does not affect panel performance.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>ASME</pub><doi>10.1115/1.2178837</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8936
ispartof Journal of applied mechanics, 2007-01, Vol.74 (1), p.81-99
issn 0021-8936
1528-9036
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29594046
source ASME Transactions Journals (Current)
subjects Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
Inelasticity (thermoplasticity, viscoplasticity...)
Mechanical contact (friction...)
Physics
Solid mechanics
Structural and continuum mechanics
Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)
title The Response of Metallic Sandwich Panels to Water Blast
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T01%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Response%20of%20Metallic%20Sandwich%20Panels%20to%20Water%20Blast&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20applied%20mechanics&rft.au=Liang,%20Yueming&rft.date=2007-01-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=81&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=81-99&rft.issn=0021-8936&rft.eissn=1528-9036&rft.coden=JAMCAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1115/1.2178837&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29594046%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29594046&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true