Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA

The basic assumptions of activation analysis are that the induced radioactivity is proportional to the amount of analyte, and that the quantity of radioactivity can be related simply to the number of counts observed. Quantitative measurement of activity (and of its uncertainty) is not always simple,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry 2007-02, Vol.271 (2), p.311-315
Hauptverfasser: Lindstrom, R. M., Zeisler, R., Greenberg, R. R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 315
container_issue 2
container_start_page 311
container_title Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry
container_volume 271
creator Lindstrom, R. M.
Zeisler, R.
Greenberg, R. R.
description The basic assumptions of activation analysis are that the induced radioactivity is proportional to the amount of analyte, and that the quantity of radioactivity can be related simply to the number of counts observed. Quantitative measurement of activity (and of its uncertainty) is not always simple, especially when accuracy better than a few percent is sought. Recent work with 77Ge and 76As has demonstrated that the accuracy of half-lives in the literature is sometimes insufficient. Despite these and other problems, quantitative understanding and documentation of uncertainties can be accomplished, providing demonstrable quality assurance and supporting claims of traceability to the Systeme International.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10967-007-0209-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29581854</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29581854</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-f2befcc8a25ff3c2d610b3d74b18365187974a3406eb74c972686c14f1ebe7f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9gysRnesxPbGRiiii-pgqW75bzYklGTFDtByr-nVZnu1dXRHQ5j9wiPCKCfMkKtND9WDgJqvlywFVbGcKENXLIVCKl4pSVes5ucvwGgNkau2HNDNCdHS-GGrpgH8mlycZiWIg5Fcl0cHU3xNx6H3rs8J9_7YSrCmIrPprllV8Hts7_7zzXbvb7sNu98-_X2sWm2nIRWEw-i9YHIOFGFIEl0CqGVnS5bNFJVaHStSydLUL7VJdVaKKMIy4C-9TrINXs43x7S-DP7PNk-ZvL7vRv8OGcr6sqgqcojiGeQ0phz8sEeUuxdWiyCPXmyZ0_2VE-e7CL_AGLcW7M</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29581854</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Lindstrom, R. M. ; Zeisler, R. ; Greenberg, R. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom, R. M. ; Zeisler, R. ; Greenberg, R. R.</creatorcontrib><description>The basic assumptions of activation analysis are that the induced radioactivity is proportional to the amount of analyte, and that the quantity of radioactivity can be related simply to the number of counts observed. Quantitative measurement of activity (and of its uncertainty) is not always simple, especially when accuracy better than a few percent is sought. Recent work with 77Ge and 76As has demonstrated that the accuracy of half-lives in the literature is sometimes insufficient. Despite these and other problems, quantitative understanding and documentation of uncertainties can be accomplished, providing demonstrable quality assurance and supporting claims of traceability to the Systeme International.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0236-5731</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1588-2780</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10967-007-0209-y</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 2007-02, Vol.271 (2), p.311-315</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-f2befcc8a25ff3c2d610b3d74b18365187974a3406eb74c972686c14f1ebe7f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-f2befcc8a25ff3c2d610b3d74b18365187974a3406eb74c972686c14f1ebe7f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,782,786,27931,27932</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeisler, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, R. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA</title><title>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</title><description>The basic assumptions of activation analysis are that the induced radioactivity is proportional to the amount of analyte, and that the quantity of radioactivity can be related simply to the number of counts observed. Quantitative measurement of activity (and of its uncertainty) is not always simple, especially when accuracy better than a few percent is sought. Recent work with 77Ge and 76As has demonstrated that the accuracy of half-lives in the literature is sometimes insufficient. Despite these and other problems, quantitative understanding and documentation of uncertainties can be accomplished, providing demonstrable quality assurance and supporting claims of traceability to the Systeme International.</description><issn>0236-5731</issn><issn>1588-2780</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwA9gysRnesxPbGRiiii-pgqW75bzYklGTFDtByr-nVZnu1dXRHQ5j9wiPCKCfMkKtND9WDgJqvlywFVbGcKENXLIVCKl4pSVes5ucvwGgNkau2HNDNCdHS-GGrpgH8mlycZiWIg5Fcl0cHU3xNx6H3rs8J9_7YSrCmIrPprllV8Hts7_7zzXbvb7sNu98-_X2sWm2nIRWEw-i9YHIOFGFIEl0CqGVnS5bNFJVaHStSydLUL7VJdVaKKMIy4C-9TrINXs43x7S-DP7PNk-ZvL7vRv8OGcr6sqgqcojiGeQ0phz8sEeUuxdWiyCPXmyZ0_2VE-e7CL_AGLcW7M</recordid><startdate>200702</startdate><enddate>200702</enddate><creator>Lindstrom, R. M.</creator><creator>Zeisler, R.</creator><creator>Greenberg, R. R.</creator><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200702</creationdate><title>Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA</title><author>Lindstrom, R. M. ; Zeisler, R. ; Greenberg, R. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c276t-f2befcc8a25ff3c2d610b3d74b18365187974a3406eb74c972686c14f1ebe7f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lindstrom, R. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeisler, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenberg, R. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lindstrom, R. M.</au><au>Zeisler, R.</au><au>Greenberg, R. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA</atitle><jtitle>Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry</jtitle><date>2007-02</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>271</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>311</spage><epage>315</epage><pages>311-315</pages><issn>0236-5731</issn><eissn>1588-2780</eissn><abstract>The basic assumptions of activation analysis are that the induced radioactivity is proportional to the amount of analyte, and that the quantity of radioactivity can be related simply to the number of counts observed. Quantitative measurement of activity (and of its uncertainty) is not always simple, especially when accuracy better than a few percent is sought. Recent work with 77Ge and 76As has demonstrated that the accuracy of half-lives in the literature is sometimes insufficient. Despite these and other problems, quantitative understanding and documentation of uncertainties can be accomplished, providing demonstrable quality assurance and supporting claims of traceability to the Systeme International.</abstract><doi>10.1007/s10967-007-0209-y</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0236-5731
ispartof Journal of radioanalytical and nuclear chemistry, 2007-02, Vol.271 (2), p.311-315
issn 0236-5731
1588-2780
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29581854
source SpringerNature Journals
title Accuracy and uncertainty in radioactivity measurement for NAA
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T16%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20and%20uncertainty%20in%20radioactivity%20measurement%20for%20NAA&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20radioanalytical%20and%20nuclear%20chemistry&rft.au=Lindstrom,%20R.%20M.&rft.date=2007-02&rft.volume=271&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=311&rft.epage=315&rft.pages=311-315&rft.issn=0236-5731&rft.eissn=1588-2780&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10967-007-0209-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29581854%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29581854&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true