The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved
Saving one list of words, such as on a computer or by writing them down, can improve a person’s ability to learn and remember a second list of words that are not saved. This phenomenon, known as the saving enhanced memory effect, is typically observed by comparing the recall of nonsaved items when o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Memory & cognition 2024-08, Vol.52 (6), p.1325-1337 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1337 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 1325 |
container_title | Memory & cognition |
container_volume | 52 |
creator | Fellers, Craig Storm, Benjamin C. |
description | Saving one list of words, such as on a computer or by writing them down, can improve a person’s ability to learn and remember a second list of words that are not saved. This phenomenon, known as the saving enhanced memory effect, is typically observed by comparing the recall of nonsaved items when other items are saved versus when they are not saved. In past research, the effect has been shown to occur when participants save an entire list before learning a new list. In the current research, we examined whether the effect can be observed when participants save a subset of items within a single list. The results of two experiments confirmed that partial saving can lead to a saving enhanced memory effect, with the effect observed regardless of whether participants saved items by clicking a button on the computer or writing them out by hand. The effect was observed on an item-specific cued-recall test (Experiment
1
) as well as a free recall test that did not control the order of output (Experiment
2
). However, the effect size did vary as a function of how participants attempted to recall the items on the final test. Specifically, participants who initiated their output by recalling nonsaved items exhibited a significantly larger saving enhanced memory effect than those who initiated their output by reproducing saved items. Together, these findings expand our understanding of the saving enhanced memory effect and shine new light on the impacts of cognitive offloading on human memory. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2957166794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3100952759</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-1dd84a4cfe43ebe24d5f34c2c2709d280e15b00d60dc69ae04ebb28f8078fe3a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKJDEUQIM4jK3OD7iQgBs35dw8q2op4guE2TiMu5BKbuyWrpQmVS3990bbB7iYVSD35ORyCDlgcCJq1fzOTEjOKuCyAqakquQWmTEleKVaqbfJDKCFSgG_2yG7OT8AgFKt_kl2RCMb0KBn5N_tHGm2q0W8pxjnNjr0tMd-SGuKIaAbqbORdkiHLmNalenzHCMd4nJNLc1TuR3pEOhixD5Tm95s6PfJj2CXGX-9n3vk78X57dlVdfPn8vrs9KZyguuxYt430koXUArskEuvgpCOO15D63kDyFQH4DV4p1uLILHreBMaqJuAwoo9crzxPqbhacI8mn6RHS6XNuIwZcNbVTOt61YW9Ogb-jBMKZbtjGAlleK1agvFN5RLQ84Jg3lMi96mtWFgXrObTXZTspu37OZVffiunroe_eeTj84FEBsgl1G8x_T193-0L3VyjO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3100952759</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Complete</source><creator>Fellers, Craig ; Storm, Benjamin C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Fellers, Craig ; Storm, Benjamin C.</creatorcontrib><description>Saving one list of words, such as on a computer or by writing them down, can improve a person’s ability to learn and remember a second list of words that are not saved. This phenomenon, known as the saving enhanced memory effect, is typically observed by comparing the recall of nonsaved items when other items are saved versus when they are not saved. In past research, the effect has been shown to occur when participants save an entire list before learning a new list. In the current research, we examined whether the effect can be observed when participants save a subset of items within a single list. The results of two experiments confirmed that partial saving can lead to a saving enhanced memory effect, with the effect observed regardless of whether participants saved items by clicking a button on the computer or writing them out by hand. The effect was observed on an item-specific cued-recall test (Experiment
1
) as well as a free recall test that did not control the order of output (Experiment
2
). However, the effect size did vary as a function of how participants attempted to recall the items on the final test. Specifically, participants who initiated their output by recalling nonsaved items exhibited a significantly larger saving enhanced memory effect than those who initiated their output by reproducing saved items. Together, these findings expand our understanding of the saving enhanced memory effect and shine new light on the impacts of cognitive offloading on human memory.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0090-502X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5946</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38480606</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Adult ; Amnesia ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Cognitive Psychology ; Cues ; Experiments ; Humans ; Memory ; Mental Recall - physiology ; Observational learning ; Psychology ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Memory & cognition, 2024-08, Vol.52 (6), p.1325-1337</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Aug 2024</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-1dd84a4cfe43ebe24d5f34c2c2709d280e15b00d60dc69ae04ebb28f8078fe3a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5836-9191</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38480606$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fellers, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Benjamin C.</creatorcontrib><title>The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved</title><title>Memory & cognition</title><addtitle>Mem Cogn</addtitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><description>Saving one list of words, such as on a computer or by writing them down, can improve a person’s ability to learn and remember a second list of words that are not saved. This phenomenon, known as the saving enhanced memory effect, is typically observed by comparing the recall of nonsaved items when other items are saved versus when they are not saved. In past research, the effect has been shown to occur when participants save an entire list before learning a new list. In the current research, we examined whether the effect can be observed when participants save a subset of items within a single list. The results of two experiments confirmed that partial saving can lead to a saving enhanced memory effect, with the effect observed regardless of whether participants saved items by clicking a button on the computer or writing them out by hand. The effect was observed on an item-specific cued-recall test (Experiment
1
) as well as a free recall test that did not control the order of output (Experiment
2
). However, the effect size did vary as a function of how participants attempted to recall the items on the final test. Specifically, participants who initiated their output by recalling nonsaved items exhibited a significantly larger saving enhanced memory effect than those who initiated their output by reproducing saved items. Together, these findings expand our understanding of the saving enhanced memory effect and shine new light on the impacts of cognitive offloading on human memory.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Amnesia</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Cues</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Mental Recall - physiology</subject><subject>Observational learning</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKJDEUQIM4jK3OD7iQgBs35dw8q2op4guE2TiMu5BKbuyWrpQmVS3990bbB7iYVSD35ORyCDlgcCJq1fzOTEjOKuCyAqakquQWmTEleKVaqbfJDKCFSgG_2yG7OT8AgFKt_kl2RCMb0KBn5N_tHGm2q0W8pxjnNjr0tMd-SGuKIaAbqbORdkiHLmNalenzHCMd4nJNLc1TuR3pEOhixD5Tm95s6PfJj2CXGX-9n3vk78X57dlVdfPn8vrs9KZyguuxYt430koXUArskEuvgpCOO15D63kDyFQH4DV4p1uLILHreBMaqJuAwoo9crzxPqbhacI8mn6RHS6XNuIwZcNbVTOt61YW9Ogb-jBMKZbtjGAlleK1agvFN5RLQ84Jg3lMi96mtWFgXrObTXZTspu37OZVffiunroe_eeTj84FEBsgl1G8x_T193-0L3VyjO0</recordid><startdate>20240801</startdate><enddate>20240801</enddate><creator>Fellers, Craig</creator><creator>Storm, Benjamin C.</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5836-9191</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240801</creationdate><title>The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved</title><author>Fellers, Craig ; Storm, Benjamin C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-1dd84a4cfe43ebe24d5f34c2c2709d280e15b00d60dc69ae04ebb28f8078fe3a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Amnesia</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Cues</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Mental Recall - physiology</topic><topic>Observational learning</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fellers, Craig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Storm, Benjamin C.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fellers, Craig</au><au>Storm, Benjamin C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved</atitle><jtitle>Memory & cognition</jtitle><stitle>Mem Cogn</stitle><addtitle>Mem Cognit</addtitle><date>2024-08-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>52</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1325</spage><epage>1337</epage><pages>1325-1337</pages><issn>0090-502X</issn><issn>1532-5946</issn><eissn>1532-5946</eissn><abstract>Saving one list of words, such as on a computer or by writing them down, can improve a person’s ability to learn and remember a second list of words that are not saved. This phenomenon, known as the saving enhanced memory effect, is typically observed by comparing the recall of nonsaved items when other items are saved versus when they are not saved. In past research, the effect has been shown to occur when participants save an entire list before learning a new list. In the current research, we examined whether the effect can be observed when participants save a subset of items within a single list. The results of two experiments confirmed that partial saving can lead to a saving enhanced memory effect, with the effect observed regardless of whether participants saved items by clicking a button on the computer or writing them out by hand. The effect was observed on an item-specific cued-recall test (Experiment
1
) as well as a free recall test that did not control the order of output (Experiment
2
). However, the effect size did vary as a function of how participants attempted to recall the items on the final test. Specifically, participants who initiated their output by recalling nonsaved items exhibited a significantly larger saving enhanced memory effect than those who initiated their output by reproducing saved items. Together, these findings expand our understanding of the saving enhanced memory effect and shine new light on the impacts of cognitive offloading on human memory.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>38480606</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5836-9191</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0090-502X |
ispartof | Memory & cognition, 2024-08, Vol.52 (6), p.1325-1337 |
issn | 0090-502X 1532-5946 1532-5946 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2957166794 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals; EBSCOhost Business Source Complete |
subjects | Adult Amnesia Behavioral Science and Psychology Cognitive Psychology Cues Experiments Humans Memory Mental Recall - physiology Observational learning Psychology Young Adult |
title | The saving enhanced memory effect can be observed when only a subset of items are saved |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T00%3A27%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20saving%20enhanced%20memory%20effect%20can%20be%20observed%20when%20only%20a%20subset%20of%20items%20are%20saved&rft.jtitle=Memory%20&%20cognition&rft.au=Fellers,%20Craig&rft.date=2024-08-01&rft.volume=52&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1325&rft.epage=1337&rft.pages=1325-1337&rft.issn=0090-502X&rft.eissn=1532-5946&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13421-024-01545-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3100952759%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3100952759&rft_id=info:pmid/38480606&rfr_iscdi=true |