The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewe...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology 2024-05, Vol.34 (4), p.1945-1956
Hauptverfasser: Butler, James J., Healy, Hazel, Anil, Utkarsh, Habibi, Akram, Azam, Mohammad T., Walls, Raymond J., Kennedy, John G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1956
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1945
container_title European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology
container_volume 34
creator Butler, James J.
Healy, Hazel
Anil, Utkarsh
Habibi, Akram
Azam, Mohammad T.
Walls, Raymond J.
Kennedy, John G.
description Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed. Results Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR. Level of evidence III.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2956681532</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2956681532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9efc806aa16efd4f4346b4ce693254330e897e1bcb1812d86fd621e58163de53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUuPFCEURonROA_9Ay4MiRs3pZdnU-7MRB2TSdyMa0JTl25GqmiBnkn_e3F6fMSFK0ju-T5uOIS8YPCGAazeVgA1wgBcDiCM1gN7RE6ZFHxgoM3jv-4n5KzWGwCmRqaekhNh5IpLoU_J7fUWaY2bJYbo3eKR5kC32LDklnfR01zr_ajFvNCQU8p3cdnQlptL1C3fElJX2rbkXXK1Hd5RR-uhNpx7wtOCtxHvOjfRGZsb3OLSocb6jDwJLlV8_nCek68fP1xfXA5XXz59vnh_NXjBdRv8iMEb0M4xjWGSQQqp19KjHgVXUghAM66Qrf2aGcYno8OkOUNlmBYTKnFOXh97dyV_32Ntdo7VY0puwbyvlo9Ka8OU4B199Q96k_el71utAKVhxWCETvEj5Uv_mYLB7kqcXTlYBvanFXu0YrsVe2_Fsh56-VC9X884_Y780tABcQRqHy0bLH_e_k_tD3N9mYc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3056071090</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Butler, James J. ; Healy, Hazel ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Habibi, Akram ; Azam, Mohammad T. ; Walls, Raymond J. ; Kennedy, John G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Butler, James J. ; Healy, Hazel ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Habibi, Akram ; Azam, Mohammad T. ; Walls, Raymond J. ; Kennedy, John G.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed. Results Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR. Level of evidence III.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1633-8065</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1068</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38472436</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Paris: Springer Paris</publisher><subject>Ankle ; Ankle Joint - physiopathology ; Ankle Joint - surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle - adverse effects ; Clinical outcomes ; Humans ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Original Article ; Ossification, Heterotopic - epidemiology ; Ossification, Heterotopic - etiology ; Ossification, Heterotopic - physiopathology ; Postoperative Complications - epidemiology ; Postoperative Complications - etiology ; Postoperative Complications - physiopathology ; Prevalence ; Range of motion ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Surgical Orthopedics ; Systematic review ; Transplants &amp; implants ; Traumatic Surgery</subject><ispartof>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology, 2024-05, Vol.34 (4), p.1945-1956</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature 2024. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9efc806aa16efd4f4346b4ce693254330e897e1bcb1812d86fd621e58163de53</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-6223-4544</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38472436$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Butler, James J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Utkarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habibi, Akram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azam, Mohammad T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, John G.</creatorcontrib><title>The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><title>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</title><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><description>Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed. Results Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR. Level of evidence III.</description><subject>Ankle</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</subject><subject>Ankle Joint - surgery</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle - adverse effects</subject><subject>Clinical outcomes</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - epidemiology</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - etiology</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - physiopathology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - etiology</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Range of motion</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Surgical Orthopedics</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Transplants &amp; implants</subject><subject>Traumatic Surgery</subject><issn>1432-1068</issn><issn>1633-8065</issn><issn>1432-1068</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kUuPFCEURonROA_9Ay4MiRs3pZdnU-7MRB2TSdyMa0JTl25GqmiBnkn_e3F6fMSFK0ju-T5uOIS8YPCGAazeVgA1wgBcDiCM1gN7RE6ZFHxgoM3jv-4n5KzWGwCmRqaekhNh5IpLoU_J7fUWaY2bJYbo3eKR5kC32LDklnfR01zr_ajFvNCQU8p3cdnQlptL1C3fElJX2rbkXXK1Hd5RR-uhNpx7wtOCtxHvOjfRGZsb3OLSocb6jDwJLlV8_nCek68fP1xfXA5XXz59vnh_NXjBdRv8iMEb0M4xjWGSQQqp19KjHgVXUghAM66Qrf2aGcYno8OkOUNlmBYTKnFOXh97dyV_32Ntdo7VY0puwbyvlo9Ka8OU4B199Q96k_el71utAKVhxWCETvEj5Uv_mYLB7kqcXTlYBvanFXu0YrsVe2_Fsh56-VC9X884_Y780tABcQRqHy0bLH_e_k_tD3N9mYc</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Butler, James J.</creator><creator>Healy, Hazel</creator><creator>Anil, Utkarsh</creator><creator>Habibi, Akram</creator><creator>Azam, Mohammad T.</creator><creator>Walls, Raymond J.</creator><creator>Kennedy, John G.</creator><general>Springer Paris</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6223-4544</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis</title><author>Butler, James J. ; Healy, Hazel ; Anil, Utkarsh ; Habibi, Akram ; Azam, Mohammad T. ; Walls, Raymond J. ; Kennedy, John G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c326t-c9efc806aa16efd4f4346b4ce693254330e897e1bcb1812d86fd621e58163de53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Ankle</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - physiopathology</topic><topic>Ankle Joint - surgery</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle - adverse effects</topic><topic>Clinical outcomes</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - epidemiology</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - etiology</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - physiopathology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - epidemiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - etiology</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications - physiopathology</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Range of motion</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Surgical Orthopedics</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Transplants &amp; implants</topic><topic>Traumatic Surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Butler, James J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Healy, Hazel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anil, Utkarsh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Habibi, Akram</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Azam, Mohammad T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walls, Raymond J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, John G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Butler, James J.</au><au>Healy, Hazel</au><au>Anil, Utkarsh</au><au>Habibi, Akram</au><au>Azam, Mohammad T.</au><au>Walls, Raymond J.</au><au>Kennedy, John G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis</atitle><jtitle>European journal of orthopaedic surgery &amp; traumatology</jtitle><stitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</stitle><addtitle>Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1945</spage><epage>1956</epage><pages>1945-1956</pages><issn>1432-1068</issn><issn>1633-8065</issn><eissn>1432-1068</eissn><abstract>Purpose The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the prevalence and clinical significance of heterotopic ossification (HO) following total ankle replacement (TAR). Methods During August 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases were systematically reviewed to identify clinical studies reporting HO following TAR. Data regarding surgical characteristics, pathological characteristics, subjective clinical outcomes, ankle range of motion, radiographic outcomes, reoperation rates were extracted and analysed. Results Twenty-seven studies with 2639 patients (2695 ankles) at a weighed mean follow-up time of 52.8 ± 26.9 months were included. The pooled prevalence rate was 44.6% (0.25; 0.66). The implant with the highest rate of HO was the INBONE I (100%) and BOX (100%) implants. The most common modified Brooker staging was grade 1 (132 patients, 27.0%). Random effects models of standardized mean differences found no difference in American orthopedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) scores, visual analog scale scores (VAS) and ankle range of motion (ROM) between patients with HO and patients without HO. Random effects models of correlation coefficients found no correlation between AOFAS, VAS and ROM and the presence of HO. The surgical intervention rate for symptomatic HO was 4.2%. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis found that HO is a common finding following TAR that is not associated with inferior clinical outcomes. Surgical intervention was required only for moderate-to-severe, symptomatic HO following TAR. This study is limited by the marked heterogeneity and low level and quality of evidence of the included studies. Further higher quality studies are warranted to determine the precise prevalence and impact of HO on outcomes following TAR. Level of evidence III.</abstract><cop>Paris</cop><pub>Springer Paris</pub><pmid>38472436</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6223-4544</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-1068
ispartof European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology, 2024-05, Vol.34 (4), p.1945-1956
issn 1432-1068
1633-8065
1432-1068
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2956681532
source MEDLINE; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Ankle
Ankle Joint - physiopathology
Ankle Joint - surgery
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Ankle - adverse effects
Clinical outcomes
Humans
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Original Article
Ossification, Heterotopic - epidemiology
Ossification, Heterotopic - etiology
Ossification, Heterotopic - physiopathology
Postoperative Complications - epidemiology
Postoperative Complications - etiology
Postoperative Complications - physiopathology
Prevalence
Range of motion
Range of Motion, Articular
Reoperation - statistics & numerical data
Surgical Orthopedics
Systematic review
Transplants & implants
Traumatic Surgery
title The significance of heterotopic ossification following total ankle arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A09%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20significance%20of%20heterotopic%20ossification%20following%20total%20ankle%20arthroplasty:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20orthopaedic%20surgery%20&%20traumatology&rft.au=Butler,%20James%20J.&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1945&rft.epage=1956&rft.pages=1945-1956&rft.issn=1432-1068&rft.eissn=1432-1068&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00590-024-03866-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2956681532%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3056071090&rft_id=info:pmid/38472436&rfr_iscdi=true