Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts
The Waquoit Bay Watershed ecological risk assessment was performed by an interdisciplinary and interagency workgroup. This paper focuses on the steps taken to formulate the analysis plan for this watershed assessment. The workgroup initially conducted a series of meetings with the general public and...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental management (New York) 2004-05, Vol.33 (5), p.730-740 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 740 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 730 |
container_title | Environmental management (New York) |
container_volume | 33 |
creator | Serveiss, Victor B Bowen, Jennifer L Dow, David Valiela, Ivan |
description | The Waquoit Bay Watershed ecological risk assessment was performed by an interdisciplinary and interagency workgroup. This paper focuses on the steps taken to formulate the analysis plan for this watershed assessment. The workgroup initially conducted a series of meetings with the general public and local and state managers to determine environmental management objectives for the watershed. The workgroup then decided that more information was needed on the impacts of six stressors: nutrient enrichment, physical alteration of habitat, altered freshwater flow, toxic chemicals, pathogens, and fisheries harvesting. Assessment endpoints were selected to establish the link between environmental management objectives, impacts of stressors, and scientifically measurable endpoints. The following assessment end-points were selected: estuarine eelgrass cover, scallop abundance, finfish diversity and abundance, wetland bird distribution and abundance, piping plover distribution and abundance, tissue contaminant levels, and brook trout distribution and abundance in streams. A conceptual model was developed to show the pathways between human activities, stressors, and ecological effects. The workgroup analyzed comparative risks, by first ranking stressors in terms of their potential risk to biotic resources in the watershed. Then stressors were evaluated by considering the components of stressors (e.g., the stressor chemical pollution included both heavy metals and chlorinated solvents components) in terms of intensity and extensiveness. The workgroup identified nutrient enrichment as the major stressor. Nutrient enrichment comprised both phosphorus enrichment in freshwater ponds and nitrogen enrichment within estuaries. Because phosphorus impacts were being analyzed and mitigated by the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, this assessment focused on nitrogen. The process followed to identify the predominant stressor and focus the analyses on nitrogen impacts on eelgrass and scallops will serve as an example of how to increase the use of the findings of a watershed assessment in decision making. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00267-004-0085-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29551604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16181974</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5449dc178c57b3c9163e173b474c486a932431400b13af86a8bb74e3622aa3443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuOPqD_BiiAdPtlINNHB0J34la7y40RuhGWaGsbuZpehDn_3jMs4kJl48EN4UT1WFPIQ8B_YGGFNvkbG2Uw1joh4tm-UBWYHgbVNfzUOyYrwTDcj2xxV5gnhgjHGt5WNyBVIyzg1bkV93GKcdDT4NaRe9G2iO-JM6xIA4hqnQkmjc1BC3Cy37QEd3SJm6qexzOqZdmKKnWHLFazlOf5jv7n5OsdAbt9RcQsZ92Lyma3cMdJ1q-lIXOL-fMZSCT8mjrRswPLvc1-Tuw_tv60_N7dePn9fvbhvPdVcaKYTZeFDaS9Vzb6DjARTvhRJe6M4Z3goOgrEeuNvWgu57JQLv2tY5LgS_Jq_Oc4853c8Bix0j-jAMbgppRtsaKaFj_wehAw1GncCX_4CHNOepfsKq1hitNJwgOEM-J8QctvaY4-jyYoHZk0d79mirR3vyaJfa8-IyeO7HsPnbcRHHfwOm2ZkW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>729987814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Serveiss, Victor B ; Bowen, Jennifer L ; Dow, David ; Valiela, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Serveiss, Victor B ; Bowen, Jennifer L ; Dow, David ; Valiela, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>The Waquoit Bay Watershed ecological risk assessment was performed by an interdisciplinary and interagency workgroup. This paper focuses on the steps taken to formulate the analysis plan for this watershed assessment. The workgroup initially conducted a series of meetings with the general public and local and state managers to determine environmental management objectives for the watershed. The workgroup then decided that more information was needed on the impacts of six stressors: nutrient enrichment, physical alteration of habitat, altered freshwater flow, toxic chemicals, pathogens, and fisheries harvesting. Assessment endpoints were selected to establish the link between environmental management objectives, impacts of stressors, and scientifically measurable endpoints. The following assessment end-points were selected: estuarine eelgrass cover, scallop abundance, finfish diversity and abundance, wetland bird distribution and abundance, piping plover distribution and abundance, tissue contaminant levels, and brook trout distribution and abundance in streams. A conceptual model was developed to show the pathways between human activities, stressors, and ecological effects. The workgroup analyzed comparative risks, by first ranking stressors in terms of their potential risk to biotic resources in the watershed. Then stressors were evaluated by considering the components of stressors (e.g., the stressor chemical pollution included both heavy metals and chlorinated solvents components) in terms of intensity and extensiveness. The workgroup identified nutrient enrichment as the major stressor. Nutrient enrichment comprised both phosphorus enrichment in freshwater ponds and nitrogen enrichment within estuaries. Because phosphorus impacts were being analyzed and mitigated by the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, this assessment focused on nitrogen. The process followed to identify the predominant stressor and focus the analyses on nitrogen impacts on eelgrass and scallops will serve as an example of how to increase the use of the findings of a watershed assessment in decision making.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-004-0085-y</identifier><identifier>PMID: 15503390</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anthropogenic factors ; Aquatic birds ; Chemical pollution ; Contaminants ; Ecological effects ; Ecology ; Environmental management ; Environmental Monitoring ; Estuaries ; Fish harvest ; Freshwater ; Freshwater fish ; Heavy metals ; Humans ; Marine ; Massachusetts ; Mollusca - growth & development ; Nitrogen ; Nitrogen - analysis ; Nitrogen enrichment ; Nutrient flow ; Phosphorus - analysis ; Poaceae - growth & development ; Population Dynamics ; Risk Assessment ; Streams ; Water Pollutants - poisoning ; Water Supply ; Watersheds</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2004-05, Vol.33 (5), p.730-740</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag 2004</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5449dc178c57b3c9163e173b474c486a932431400b13af86a8bb74e3622aa3443</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15503390$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serveiss, Victor B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dow, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valiela, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>The Waquoit Bay Watershed ecological risk assessment was performed by an interdisciplinary and interagency workgroup. This paper focuses on the steps taken to formulate the analysis plan for this watershed assessment. The workgroup initially conducted a series of meetings with the general public and local and state managers to determine environmental management objectives for the watershed. The workgroup then decided that more information was needed on the impacts of six stressors: nutrient enrichment, physical alteration of habitat, altered freshwater flow, toxic chemicals, pathogens, and fisheries harvesting. Assessment endpoints were selected to establish the link between environmental management objectives, impacts of stressors, and scientifically measurable endpoints. The following assessment end-points were selected: estuarine eelgrass cover, scallop abundance, finfish diversity and abundance, wetland bird distribution and abundance, piping plover distribution and abundance, tissue contaminant levels, and brook trout distribution and abundance in streams. A conceptual model was developed to show the pathways between human activities, stressors, and ecological effects. The workgroup analyzed comparative risks, by first ranking stressors in terms of their potential risk to biotic resources in the watershed. Then stressors were evaluated by considering the components of stressors (e.g., the stressor chemical pollution included both heavy metals and chlorinated solvents components) in terms of intensity and extensiveness. The workgroup identified nutrient enrichment as the major stressor. Nutrient enrichment comprised both phosphorus enrichment in freshwater ponds and nitrogen enrichment within estuaries. Because phosphorus impacts were being analyzed and mitigated by the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, this assessment focused on nitrogen. The process followed to identify the predominant stressor and focus the analyses on nitrogen impacts on eelgrass and scallops will serve as an example of how to increase the use of the findings of a watershed assessment in decision making.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anthropogenic factors</subject><subject>Aquatic birds</subject><subject>Chemical pollution</subject><subject>Contaminants</subject><subject>Ecological effects</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring</subject><subject>Estuaries</subject><subject>Fish harvest</subject><subject>Freshwater</subject><subject>Freshwater fish</subject><subject>Heavy metals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Mollusca - growth & development</subject><subject>Nitrogen</subject><subject>Nitrogen - analysis</subject><subject>Nitrogen enrichment</subject><subject>Nutrient flow</subject><subject>Phosphorus - analysis</subject><subject>Poaceae - growth & development</subject><subject>Population Dynamics</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Water Pollutants - poisoning</subject><subject>Water Supply</subject><subject>Watersheds</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkU2PFCEQhonRuOPqD_BiiAdPtlINNHB0J34la7y40RuhGWaGsbuZpehDn_3jMs4kJl48EN4UT1WFPIQ8B_YGGFNvkbG2Uw1joh4tm-UBWYHgbVNfzUOyYrwTDcj2xxV5gnhgjHGt5WNyBVIyzg1bkV93GKcdDT4NaRe9G2iO-JM6xIA4hqnQkmjc1BC3Cy37QEd3SJm6qexzOqZdmKKnWHLFazlOf5jv7n5OsdAbt9RcQsZ92Lyma3cMdJ1q-lIXOL-fMZSCT8mjrRswPLvc1-Tuw_tv60_N7dePn9fvbhvPdVcaKYTZeFDaS9Vzb6DjARTvhRJe6M4Z3goOgrEeuNvWgu57JQLv2tY5LgS_Jq_Oc4853c8Bix0j-jAMbgppRtsaKaFj_wehAw1GncCX_4CHNOepfsKq1hitNJwgOEM-J8QctvaY4-jyYoHZk0d79mirR3vyaJfa8-IyeO7HsPnbcRHHfwOm2ZkW</recordid><startdate>20040501</startdate><enddate>20040501</enddate><creator>Serveiss, Victor B</creator><creator>Bowen, Jennifer L</creator><creator>Dow, David</creator><creator>Valiela, Ivan</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040501</creationdate><title>Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts</title><author>Serveiss, Victor B ; Bowen, Jennifer L ; Dow, David ; Valiela, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c386t-5449dc178c57b3c9163e173b474c486a932431400b13af86a8bb74e3622aa3443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anthropogenic factors</topic><topic>Aquatic birds</topic><topic>Chemical pollution</topic><topic>Contaminants</topic><topic>Ecological effects</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring</topic><topic>Estuaries</topic><topic>Fish harvest</topic><topic>Freshwater</topic><topic>Freshwater fish</topic><topic>Heavy metals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Mollusca - growth & development</topic><topic>Nitrogen</topic><topic>Nitrogen - analysis</topic><topic>Nitrogen enrichment</topic><topic>Nutrient flow</topic><topic>Phosphorus - analysis</topic><topic>Poaceae - growth & development</topic><topic>Population Dynamics</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Water Pollutants - poisoning</topic><topic>Water Supply</topic><topic>Watersheds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serveiss, Victor B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dow, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valiela, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serveiss, Victor B</au><au>Bowen, Jennifer L</au><au>Dow, David</au><au>Valiela, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2004-05-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>730</spage><epage>740</epage><pages>730-740</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><abstract>The Waquoit Bay Watershed ecological risk assessment was performed by an interdisciplinary and interagency workgroup. This paper focuses on the steps taken to formulate the analysis plan for this watershed assessment. The workgroup initially conducted a series of meetings with the general public and local and state managers to determine environmental management objectives for the watershed. The workgroup then decided that more information was needed on the impacts of six stressors: nutrient enrichment, physical alteration of habitat, altered freshwater flow, toxic chemicals, pathogens, and fisheries harvesting. Assessment endpoints were selected to establish the link between environmental management objectives, impacts of stressors, and scientifically measurable endpoints. The following assessment end-points were selected: estuarine eelgrass cover, scallop abundance, finfish diversity and abundance, wetland bird distribution and abundance, piping plover distribution and abundance, tissue contaminant levels, and brook trout distribution and abundance in streams. A conceptual model was developed to show the pathways between human activities, stressors, and ecological effects. The workgroup analyzed comparative risks, by first ranking stressors in terms of their potential risk to biotic resources in the watershed. Then stressors were evaluated by considering the components of stressors (e.g., the stressor chemical pollution included both heavy metals and chlorinated solvents components) in terms of intensity and extensiveness. The workgroup identified nutrient enrichment as the major stressor. Nutrient enrichment comprised both phosphorus enrichment in freshwater ponds and nitrogen enrichment within estuaries. Because phosphorus impacts were being analyzed and mitigated by the Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence, this assessment focused on nitrogen. The process followed to identify the predominant stressor and focus the analyses on nitrogen impacts on eelgrass and scallops will serve as an example of how to increase the use of the findings of a watershed assessment in decision making.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><pmid>15503390</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-004-0085-y</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-152X |
ispartof | Environmental management (New York), 2004-05, Vol.33 (5), p.730-740 |
issn | 0364-152X 1432-1009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29551604 |
source | MEDLINE; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Animals Anthropogenic factors Aquatic birds Chemical pollution Contaminants Ecological effects Ecology Environmental management Environmental Monitoring Estuaries Fish harvest Freshwater Freshwater fish Heavy metals Humans Marine Massachusetts Mollusca - growth & development Nitrogen Nitrogen - analysis Nitrogen enrichment Nutrient flow Phosphorus - analysis Poaceae - growth & development Population Dynamics Risk Assessment Streams Water Pollutants - poisoning Water Supply Watersheds |
title | Using ecological risk assessment to identify the major anthropogenic stressor in the Waquoit Bay Watershed, Cape Cod, Massachusetts |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T21%3A40%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20ecological%20risk%20assessment%20to%20identify%20the%20major%20anthropogenic%20stressor%20in%20the%20Waquoit%20Bay%20Watershed,%20Cape%20Cod,%20Massachusetts&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Serveiss,%20Victor%20B&rft.date=2004-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=730&rft.epage=740&rft.pages=730-740&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-004-0085-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E16181974%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=729987814&rft_id=info:pmid/15503390&rfr_iscdi=true |