Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians
High-risk medications like benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for hospitalized older adults, despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Prior interventions have not fully addressed how physicians make such prescribing decisions, particularly when experien...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) 2024-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1420-1430 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1430 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1420 |
container_title | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS) |
container_volume | 72 |
creator | Lauffenburger, Julie C DiFrancesco, Matthew F Bhatkhande, Gauri Crum, Katherine L Kim, Erin Robertson, Ted Oran, Rebecca Hanken, Kaitlin E Haff, Nancy Coll, Maxwell D Avorn, Jerry Choudhry, Niteesh K |
description | High-risk medications like benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for hospitalized older adults, despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Prior interventions have not fully addressed how physicians make such prescribing decisions, particularly when experiencing stress or cognitive overload. Simulation training may help improve prescribing decision-making but has not been evaluated for overprescribing.
In this two-arm pragmatic trial, we randomized 40 first-year medical resident physicians (i.e., interns) on inpatient general medicine services at an academic medical center to either intervention (a 40-minute immersive simulation training) or control (online educational training) groups. The primary outcome was the number of new benzodiazepine, sedative hypnotic, or antipsychotic orders for treatment-naïve older adults during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the same outcome by all providers, being discharged on one of the medications, and orders for related or control medications. Outcomes were measured using electronic health record data over each intern's service period (~2 weeks). Outcomes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for clustering.
In total, 522 treatment-naïve older adult patients were included in analyses. Over follow-up, interns prescribed ≥1 high-risk medication for 13 (4.9%) intervention patients and 13 (5.0%) control patients. The intervention led to no difference in the number of new prescriptions (Rate Ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.31-2.35) versus control and no difference in secondary outcomes. In secondary analyses, intervention interns wrote significantly fewer "as-needed" ("PRN") order types for the high-risk medications (RR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-0.99), and instead tended to write more "one-time" orders than control interns, though this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 0.60-7.99).
Although this simulation intervention did not impact total high-risk prescribing for hospitalized older adults, it did influence how the interns prescribed, resulting in fewer PRN orders, suggesting possibly greater ownership of care. Future interventions should consider this insight and implementation lessons raised.
Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04668248). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/jgs.18862 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2954776604</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2954776604</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-bdb139ebe5e99c233f880926bca7f399d18918be79c964d63cebdb8b08b7dc913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMo7rp68AtIwIseuiZNmyZHWfwHC3rQc0nStE1tm5q0wvrpze6qB-cyM8zvPQYeAOcYLXGom6byS8wYjQ_AHKckjtIEp4dgjhCKI0ZxMgMn3jcI4RgxdgxmhCUpTSmeg68XJ6pOjEbB0RnRQv0p2insfQXHWkPTDUKN0JbQm25qw8H2gRSm3xJhrk1VR874dzg47ZUzcie10LaFdlAUUzt6KDewmXpjHRzqjTfKiN6fgqNStF6f_fQFeLu_e109Ruvnh6fV7TpScUbGSBYSE66lTjXnKiakZAzxmEolspJwXmDGMZM644rTpKBE6SBhEjGZFYpjsgBXe9_B2Y9J-zHvjFe6bUWv7eTzmKdJllGKkoBe_kMbO7k-fJcTlBJOEMNb6npPKWe9d7rMB2c64TY5Rvk2kDwEku8CCezFj-MkO138kb8JkG_YxYhY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3053930814</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Lauffenburger, Julie C ; DiFrancesco, Matthew F ; Bhatkhande, Gauri ; Crum, Katherine L ; Kim, Erin ; Robertson, Ted ; Oran, Rebecca ; Hanken, Kaitlin E ; Haff, Nancy ; Coll, Maxwell D ; Avorn, Jerry ; Choudhry, Niteesh K</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauffenburger, Julie C ; DiFrancesco, Matthew F ; Bhatkhande, Gauri ; Crum, Katherine L ; Kim, Erin ; Robertson, Ted ; Oran, Rebecca ; Hanken, Kaitlin E ; Haff, Nancy ; Coll, Maxwell D ; Avorn, Jerry ; Choudhry, Niteesh K</creatorcontrib><description>High-risk medications like benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for hospitalized older adults, despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Prior interventions have not fully addressed how physicians make such prescribing decisions, particularly when experiencing stress or cognitive overload. Simulation training may help improve prescribing decision-making but has not been evaluated for overprescribing.
In this two-arm pragmatic trial, we randomized 40 first-year medical resident physicians (i.e., interns) on inpatient general medicine services at an academic medical center to either intervention (a 40-minute immersive simulation training) or control (online educational training) groups. The primary outcome was the number of new benzodiazepine, sedative hypnotic, or antipsychotic orders for treatment-naïve older adults during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the same outcome by all providers, being discharged on one of the medications, and orders for related or control medications. Outcomes were measured using electronic health record data over each intern's service period (~2 weeks). Outcomes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for clustering.
In total, 522 treatment-naïve older adult patients were included in analyses. Over follow-up, interns prescribed ≥1 high-risk medication for 13 (4.9%) intervention patients and 13 (5.0%) control patients. The intervention led to no difference in the number of new prescriptions (Rate Ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.31-2.35) versus control and no difference in secondary outcomes. In secondary analyses, intervention interns wrote significantly fewer "as-needed" ("PRN") order types for the high-risk medications (RR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-0.99), and instead tended to write more "one-time" orders than control interns, though this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 0.60-7.99).
Although this simulation intervention did not impact total high-risk prescribing for hospitalized older adults, it did influence how the interns prescribed, resulting in fewer PRN orders, suggesting possibly greater ownership of care. Future interventions should consider this insight and implementation lessons raised.
Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04668248).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-8614</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-5415</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/jgs.18862</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38456561</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Anesthesia ; Antipsychotics ; Benzodiazepines ; Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use ; Decision making ; Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data ; Electronic medical records ; Female ; Hospitalization ; Humans ; Hypnotics ; Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use ; Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control ; Internship and Residency - methods ; Intervention ; Male ; Medical education ; Medical Staff, Hospital - education ; Older people ; Patient safety ; Patients ; Physicians ; Practice Patterns, Physicians ; Prescriptions ; Simulation ; Simulation Training - methods ; Statistical analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2024-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1420-1430</ispartof><rights>2024 The American Geriatrics Society.</rights><rights>2024 American Geriatrics Society and Wiley Periodicals LLC.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-bdb139ebe5e99c233f880926bca7f399d18918be79c964d63cebdb8b08b7dc913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4940-4140 ; 0000-0002-0074-0645 ; 0000-0002-7597-2432</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38456561$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauffenburger, Julie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiFrancesco, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatkhande, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crum, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oran, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanken, Kaitlin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haff, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Maxwell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avorn, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhry, Niteesh K</creatorcontrib><title>Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians</title><title>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</title><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><description>High-risk medications like benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for hospitalized older adults, despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Prior interventions have not fully addressed how physicians make such prescribing decisions, particularly when experiencing stress or cognitive overload. Simulation training may help improve prescribing decision-making but has not been evaluated for overprescribing.
In this two-arm pragmatic trial, we randomized 40 first-year medical resident physicians (i.e., interns) on inpatient general medicine services at an academic medical center to either intervention (a 40-minute immersive simulation training) or control (online educational training) groups. The primary outcome was the number of new benzodiazepine, sedative hypnotic, or antipsychotic orders for treatment-naïve older adults during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the same outcome by all providers, being discharged on one of the medications, and orders for related or control medications. Outcomes were measured using electronic health record data over each intern's service period (~2 weeks). Outcomes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for clustering.
In total, 522 treatment-naïve older adult patients were included in analyses. Over follow-up, interns prescribed ≥1 high-risk medication for 13 (4.9%) intervention patients and 13 (5.0%) control patients. The intervention led to no difference in the number of new prescriptions (Rate Ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.31-2.35) versus control and no difference in secondary outcomes. In secondary analyses, intervention interns wrote significantly fewer "as-needed" ("PRN") order types for the high-risk medications (RR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-0.99), and instead tended to write more "one-time" orders than control interns, though this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 0.60-7.99).
Although this simulation intervention did not impact total high-risk prescribing for hospitalized older adults, it did influence how the interns prescribed, resulting in fewer PRN orders, suggesting possibly greater ownership of care. Future interventions should consider this insight and implementation lessons raised.
Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04668248).</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Antipsychotics</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control</subject><subject>Internship and Residency - methods</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Patient safety</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Practice Patterns, Physicians</subject><subject>Prescriptions</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation Training - methods</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><issn>0002-8614</issn><issn>1532-5415</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkU9LxDAQxYMo7rp68AtIwIseuiZNmyZHWfwHC3rQc0nStE1tm5q0wvrpze6qB-cyM8zvPQYeAOcYLXGom6byS8wYjQ_AHKckjtIEp4dgjhCKI0ZxMgMn3jcI4RgxdgxmhCUpTSmeg68XJ6pOjEbB0RnRQv0p2insfQXHWkPTDUKN0JbQm25qw8H2gRSm3xJhrk1VR874dzg47ZUzcie10LaFdlAUUzt6KDewmXpjHRzqjTfKiN6fgqNStF6f_fQFeLu_e109Ruvnh6fV7TpScUbGSBYSE66lTjXnKiakZAzxmEolspJwXmDGMZM644rTpKBE6SBhEjGZFYpjsgBXe9_B2Y9J-zHvjFe6bUWv7eTzmKdJllGKkoBe_kMbO7k-fJcTlBJOEMNb6npPKWe9d7rMB2c64TY5Rvk2kDwEku8CCezFj-MkO138kb8JkG_YxYhY</recordid><startdate>202405</startdate><enddate>202405</enddate><creator>Lauffenburger, Julie C</creator><creator>DiFrancesco, Matthew F</creator><creator>Bhatkhande, Gauri</creator><creator>Crum, Katherine L</creator><creator>Kim, Erin</creator><creator>Robertson, Ted</creator><creator>Oran, Rebecca</creator><creator>Hanken, Kaitlin E</creator><creator>Haff, Nancy</creator><creator>Coll, Maxwell D</creator><creator>Avorn, Jerry</creator><creator>Choudhry, Niteesh K</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QP</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-4140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-0645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-2432</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202405</creationdate><title>Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians</title><author>Lauffenburger, Julie C ; DiFrancesco, Matthew F ; Bhatkhande, Gauri ; Crum, Katherine L ; Kim, Erin ; Robertson, Ted ; Oran, Rebecca ; Hanken, Kaitlin E ; Haff, Nancy ; Coll, Maxwell D ; Avorn, Jerry ; Choudhry, Niteesh K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-bdb139ebe5e99c233f880926bca7f399d18918be79c964d63cebdb8b08b7dc913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Antipsychotics</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control</topic><topic>Internship and Residency - methods</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical Staff, Hospital - education</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Patient safety</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Practice Patterns, Physicians</topic><topic>Prescriptions</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation Training - methods</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauffenburger, Julie C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiFrancesco, Matthew F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhatkhande, Gauri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crum, Katherine L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robertson, Ted</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oran, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hanken, Kaitlin E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haff, Nancy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coll, Maxwell D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Avorn, Jerry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choudhry, Niteesh K</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Calcium & Calcified Tissue Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauffenburger, Julie C</au><au>DiFrancesco, Matthew F</au><au>Bhatkhande, Gauri</au><au>Crum, Katherine L</au><au>Kim, Erin</au><au>Robertson, Ted</au><au>Oran, Rebecca</au><au>Hanken, Kaitlin E</au><au>Haff, Nancy</au><au>Coll, Maxwell D</au><au>Avorn, Jerry</au><au>Choudhry, Niteesh K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS)</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Geriatr Soc</addtitle><date>2024-05</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>72</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1420</spage><epage>1430</epage><pages>1420-1430</pages><issn>0002-8614</issn><eissn>1532-5415</eissn><abstract>High-risk medications like benzodiazepines, sedative hypnotics, and antipsychotics are commonly prescribed for hospitalized older adults, despite guidelines recommending avoidance. Prior interventions have not fully addressed how physicians make such prescribing decisions, particularly when experiencing stress or cognitive overload. Simulation training may help improve prescribing decision-making but has not been evaluated for overprescribing.
In this two-arm pragmatic trial, we randomized 40 first-year medical resident physicians (i.e., interns) on inpatient general medicine services at an academic medical center to either intervention (a 40-minute immersive simulation training) or control (online educational training) groups. The primary outcome was the number of new benzodiazepine, sedative hypnotic, or antipsychotic orders for treatment-naïve older adults during hospitalization. Secondary outcomes included the same outcome by all providers, being discharged on one of the medications, and orders for related or control medications. Outcomes were measured using electronic health record data over each intern's service period (~2 weeks). Outcomes were evaluated using generalized estimating equations, adjusting for clustering.
In total, 522 treatment-naïve older adult patients were included in analyses. Over follow-up, interns prescribed ≥1 high-risk medication for 13 (4.9%) intervention patients and 13 (5.0%) control patients. The intervention led to no difference in the number of new prescriptions (Rate Ratio [RR]: 0.85, 95%CI: 0.31-2.35) versus control and no difference in secondary outcomes. In secondary analyses, intervention interns wrote significantly fewer "as-needed" ("PRN") order types for the high-risk medications (RR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.08-0.99), and instead tended to write more "one-time" orders than control interns, though this difference was not statistically significant (RR: 2.20, 95%CI: 0.60-7.99).
Although this simulation intervention did not impact total high-risk prescribing for hospitalized older adults, it did influence how the interns prescribed, resulting in fewer PRN orders, suggesting possibly greater ownership of care. Future interventions should consider this insight and implementation lessons raised.
Clinicaltrials.gov(NCT04668248).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38456561</pmid><doi>10.1111/jgs.18862</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4940-4140</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0074-0645</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7597-2432</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-8614 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Geriatrics Society (JAGS), 2024-05, Vol.72 (5), p.1420-1430 |
issn | 0002-8614 1532-5415 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2954776604 |
source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Adult Aged Anesthesia Antipsychotics Benzodiazepines Benzodiazepines - therapeutic use Decision making Drug Prescriptions - statistics & numerical data Electronic medical records Female Hospitalization Humans Hypnotics Hypnotics and Sedatives - therapeutic use Inappropriate Prescribing - prevention & control Internship and Residency - methods Intervention Male Medical education Medical Staff, Hospital - education Older people Patient safety Patients Physicians Practice Patterns, Physicians Prescriptions Simulation Simulation Training - methods Statistical analysis |
title | Pragmatic trial evaluating the impact of simulation training on high-risk prescribing to older adults by junior physicians |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T03%3A55%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pragmatic%20trial%20evaluating%20the%20impact%20of%20simulation%20training%20on%20high-risk%20prescribing%20to%20older%20adults%20by%20junior%20physicians&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Geriatrics%20Society%20(JAGS)&rft.au=Lauffenburger,%20Julie%20C&rft.date=2024-05&rft.volume=72&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1420&rft.epage=1430&rft.pages=1420-1430&rft.issn=0002-8614&rft.eissn=1532-5415&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/jgs.18862&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2954776604%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3053930814&rft_id=info:pmid/38456561&rfr_iscdi=true |