Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah
An environmental study for the appraisal of work hazards and safety in Jeddah Industrial Estate (JIE), Saudi Arabia has been conducted. The study is based upon a representative (stratified random) sample of 44 enterprises, including 52 plants and employing 5830 workers.Nearly 2/3 of the workers have...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental monitoring and assessment 1993-08, Vol.27 (1), p.35-68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 68 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 35 |
container_title | Environmental monitoring and assessment |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | NOWEIR, M. H ALIDRISI, M. M AL-JIFFRY, M. S |
description | An environmental study for the appraisal of work hazards and safety in Jeddah Industrial Estate (JIE), Saudi Arabia has been conducted. The study is based upon a representative (stratified random) sample of 44 enterprises, including 52 plants and employing 5830 workers.Nearly 2/3 of the workers have heat exposure, orginating from climatic heat and heat dissipated from industrial operations, while exposure to noise is slightly less, and is attributed to noisy operations and machinery and to lack of meticulous maintenance; both exposures are mild in most of the plants and moderate in some. Mild exposures to nonionizing radiations (UV and IR) and to deficient illumination occur in 25% and 19.2% of the plants studied. Respiratory exposure to chemical agents (organic and inorganic dusts, metal fumes, gases and vapours - including asphyxiants, irritants, liver and nervous system offenders and acid and alkali mists) occurs in 75% of the plants, particularly in the medium-size enterprises plants; however, is mainly mild with a few moderate and severe exposures. Skin absorption contributes to absorption of chemical agents in 29% of the plants, and direct skin contact to chemicals (particularly to lubricating oils) occurs in 81% of the plants.Meanwhile, only eight plants, out of the 32 plants where controls for physical hazards are required (51.2%), apply engineering controls, and even in a few of these plants the efficiency of the control measures has been rated 'bad'. A few of them provide personal protective equipment, and even no maintenance to this equipment is provided.The level of safety is better in the large plants than in the small and medium-size plants; the safety score is the best in the recently established plants, while is the worst in the plastic industry, which is relatively old. The appraisal of fire protection is better than that of the safety, due to efficient supervision of the General Directorate of Civil Defense (GDCD). However, most of the safety problems are managerial and are preventable.First aid is present in all enterprises, as required by the Saudi Labor Laws; however, an in-plant medical service is present in 75% of the large enterprises, in 31.6% of the medium-size and in only 17.6% of the small enterprises. Also, satisfactory medical, accidents and absenteeism records exist in only 15.9% of the enterprises; safety supervision exists in 27.3, and safety education exists in 91% of them, while no environmental monitoring is carried out |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/BF02401764 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29536591</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29536591</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-56b92fdb5862af3ace213eae085504834533347f0ae40f54cb080c9a86a5cddf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFK3Viz9AchAPQnT2O3usxfpBwYuew3Q_aDRt6m6C6K83pbUePc3lmRfmHULOKFxTAH1zOwEmgGol9siASs1zZqTZJwOgSueKK3NEjlN6AwCjhTkkR0wwBoaZAbkfrVYRq4R11oTss4nv2Ry_MbqU4dJlCYNvv7JqmbVz3w_XpTZWPb5LLbZ-vfPkncP5CTkIWCd_up1D8jq5exk_5NPn-8fxaJpbrlWbSzUzLLiZLBTDwNF6RrlHD4WUIAouJOdc6ADoBQQp7AwKsAYLhdI6F_iQXG5yV7H56Hxqy0WVrK9rXPqmS2V_OVfS0H9hX03RN8P_h4IzRfU68WoDbWxSij6Uq1gtMH6VFMr1I8q_R_T4fJvazRbe7ehv8z242AJMFusQcWmrtHPCUKGE5j8GuI20</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14326171</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah</title><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>NOWEIR, M. H ; ALIDRISI, M. M ; AL-JIFFRY, M. S</creator><creatorcontrib>NOWEIR, M. H ; ALIDRISI, M. M ; AL-JIFFRY, M. S</creatorcontrib><description>An environmental study for the appraisal of work hazards and safety in Jeddah Industrial Estate (JIE), Saudi Arabia has been conducted. The study is based upon a representative (stratified random) sample of 44 enterprises, including 52 plants and employing 5830 workers.Nearly 2/3 of the workers have heat exposure, orginating from climatic heat and heat dissipated from industrial operations, while exposure to noise is slightly less, and is attributed to noisy operations and machinery and to lack of meticulous maintenance; both exposures are mild in most of the plants and moderate in some. Mild exposures to nonionizing radiations (UV and IR) and to deficient illumination occur in 25% and 19.2% of the plants studied. Respiratory exposure to chemical agents (organic and inorganic dusts, metal fumes, gases and vapours - including asphyxiants, irritants, liver and nervous system offenders and acid and alkali mists) occurs in 75% of the plants, particularly in the medium-size enterprises plants; however, is mainly mild with a few moderate and severe exposures. Skin absorption contributes to absorption of chemical agents in 29% of the plants, and direct skin contact to chemicals (particularly to lubricating oils) occurs in 81% of the plants.Meanwhile, only eight plants, out of the 32 plants where controls for physical hazards are required (51.2%), apply engineering controls, and even in a few of these plants the efficiency of the control measures has been rated 'bad'. A few of them provide personal protective equipment, and even no maintenance to this equipment is provided.The level of safety is better in the large plants than in the small and medium-size plants; the safety score is the best in the recently established plants, while is the worst in the plastic industry, which is relatively old. The appraisal of fire protection is better than that of the safety, due to efficient supervision of the General Directorate of Civil Defense (GDCD). However, most of the safety problems are managerial and are preventable.First aid is present in all enterprises, as required by the Saudi Labor Laws; however, an in-plant medical service is present in 75% of the large enterprises, in 31.6% of the medium-size and in only 17.6% of the small enterprises. Also, satisfactory medical, accidents and absenteeism records exist in only 15.9% of the enterprises; safety supervision exists in 27.3, and safety education exists in 91% of them, while no environmental monitoring is carried out in any enterprise. Sanitation facilities exist in satisfactory numbers in most of the enterprises; however, their maintenance is poor in most of them, due to lack of hygienic supervision. All enterprises dispose of their liquid wastes into the JIE sewerage system without any treatment, while the solid wastes are collected by the city authorities in 56.8% of them; both wastes are anticipated to cause environmental pollution problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0167-6369</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-2959</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/BF02401764</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24220929</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMASDH</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrect: Springer</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Atmospheric pollution ; Exact sciences and technology ; Indoor pollution and occupational exposure ; Pollution</subject><ispartof>Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1993-08, Vol.27 (1), p.35-68</ispartof><rights>1993 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-56b92fdb5862af3ace213eae085504834533347f0ae40f54cb080c9a86a5cddf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-56b92fdb5862af3ace213eae085504834533347f0ae40f54cb080c9a86a5cddf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=4914647$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24220929$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>NOWEIR, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALIDRISI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-JIFFRY, M. S</creatorcontrib><title>Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah</title><title>Environmental monitoring and assessment</title><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><description>An environmental study for the appraisal of work hazards and safety in Jeddah Industrial Estate (JIE), Saudi Arabia has been conducted. The study is based upon a representative (stratified random) sample of 44 enterprises, including 52 plants and employing 5830 workers.Nearly 2/3 of the workers have heat exposure, orginating from climatic heat and heat dissipated from industrial operations, while exposure to noise is slightly less, and is attributed to noisy operations and machinery and to lack of meticulous maintenance; both exposures are mild in most of the plants and moderate in some. Mild exposures to nonionizing radiations (UV and IR) and to deficient illumination occur in 25% and 19.2% of the plants studied. Respiratory exposure to chemical agents (organic and inorganic dusts, metal fumes, gases and vapours - including asphyxiants, irritants, liver and nervous system offenders and acid and alkali mists) occurs in 75% of the plants, particularly in the medium-size enterprises plants; however, is mainly mild with a few moderate and severe exposures. Skin absorption contributes to absorption of chemical agents in 29% of the plants, and direct skin contact to chemicals (particularly to lubricating oils) occurs in 81% of the plants.Meanwhile, only eight plants, out of the 32 plants where controls for physical hazards are required (51.2%), apply engineering controls, and even in a few of these plants the efficiency of the control measures has been rated 'bad'. A few of them provide personal protective equipment, and even no maintenance to this equipment is provided.The level of safety is better in the large plants than in the small and medium-size plants; the safety score is the best in the recently established plants, while is the worst in the plastic industry, which is relatively old. The appraisal of fire protection is better than that of the safety, due to efficient supervision of the General Directorate of Civil Defense (GDCD). However, most of the safety problems are managerial and are preventable.First aid is present in all enterprises, as required by the Saudi Labor Laws; however, an in-plant medical service is present in 75% of the large enterprises, in 31.6% of the medium-size and in only 17.6% of the small enterprises. Also, satisfactory medical, accidents and absenteeism records exist in only 15.9% of the enterprises; safety supervision exists in 27.3, and safety education exists in 91% of them, while no environmental monitoring is carried out in any enterprise. Sanitation facilities exist in satisfactory numbers in most of the enterprises; however, their maintenance is poor in most of them, due to lack of hygienic supervision. All enterprises dispose of their liquid wastes into the JIE sewerage system without any treatment, while the solid wastes are collected by the city authorities in 56.8% of them; both wastes are anticipated to cause environmental pollution problems.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollution</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Indoor pollution and occupational exposure</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><issn>0167-6369</issn><issn>1573-2959</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1993</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0U1Lw0AQBuBFFK3Viz9AchAPQnT2O3usxfpBwYuew3Q_aDRt6m6C6K83pbUePc3lmRfmHULOKFxTAH1zOwEmgGol9siASs1zZqTZJwOgSueKK3NEjlN6AwCjhTkkR0wwBoaZAbkfrVYRq4R11oTss4nv2Ry_MbqU4dJlCYNvv7JqmbVz3w_XpTZWPb5LLbZ-vfPkncP5CTkIWCd_up1D8jq5exk_5NPn-8fxaJpbrlWbSzUzLLiZLBTDwNF6RrlHD4WUIAouJOdc6ADoBQQp7AwKsAYLhdI6F_iQXG5yV7H56Hxqy0WVrK9rXPqmS2V_OVfS0H9hX03RN8P_h4IzRfU68WoDbWxSij6Uq1gtMH6VFMr1I8q_R_T4fJvazRbe7ehv8z242AJMFusQcWmrtHPCUKGE5j8GuI20</recordid><startdate>19930801</startdate><enddate>19930801</enddate><creator>NOWEIR, M. H</creator><creator>ALIDRISI, M. M</creator><creator>AL-JIFFRY, M. S</creator><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19930801</creationdate><title>Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah</title><author>NOWEIR, M. H ; ALIDRISI, M. M ; AL-JIFFRY, M. S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-56b92fdb5862af3ace213eae085504834533347f0ae40f54cb080c9a86a5cddf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1993</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollution</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Indoor pollution and occupational exposure</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>NOWEIR, M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ALIDRISI, M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AL-JIFFRY, M. S</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>NOWEIR, M. H</au><au>ALIDRISI, M. M</au><au>AL-JIFFRY, M. S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah</atitle><jtitle>Environmental monitoring and assessment</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Monit Assess</addtitle><date>1993-08-01</date><risdate>1993</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>35</spage><epage>68</epage><pages>35-68</pages><issn>0167-6369</issn><eissn>1573-2959</eissn><coden>EMASDH</coden><abstract>An environmental study for the appraisal of work hazards and safety in Jeddah Industrial Estate (JIE), Saudi Arabia has been conducted. The study is based upon a representative (stratified random) sample of 44 enterprises, including 52 plants and employing 5830 workers.Nearly 2/3 of the workers have heat exposure, orginating from climatic heat and heat dissipated from industrial operations, while exposure to noise is slightly less, and is attributed to noisy operations and machinery and to lack of meticulous maintenance; both exposures are mild in most of the plants and moderate in some. Mild exposures to nonionizing radiations (UV and IR) and to deficient illumination occur in 25% and 19.2% of the plants studied. Respiratory exposure to chemical agents (organic and inorganic dusts, metal fumes, gases and vapours - including asphyxiants, irritants, liver and nervous system offenders and acid and alkali mists) occurs in 75% of the plants, particularly in the medium-size enterprises plants; however, is mainly mild with a few moderate and severe exposures. Skin absorption contributes to absorption of chemical agents in 29% of the plants, and direct skin contact to chemicals (particularly to lubricating oils) occurs in 81% of the plants.Meanwhile, only eight plants, out of the 32 plants where controls for physical hazards are required (51.2%), apply engineering controls, and even in a few of these plants the efficiency of the control measures has been rated 'bad'. A few of them provide personal protective equipment, and even no maintenance to this equipment is provided.The level of safety is better in the large plants than in the small and medium-size plants; the safety score is the best in the recently established plants, while is the worst in the plastic industry, which is relatively old. The appraisal of fire protection is better than that of the safety, due to efficient supervision of the General Directorate of Civil Defense (GDCD). However, most of the safety problems are managerial and are preventable.First aid is present in all enterprises, as required by the Saudi Labor Laws; however, an in-plant medical service is present in 75% of the large enterprises, in 31.6% of the medium-size and in only 17.6% of the small enterprises. Also, satisfactory medical, accidents and absenteeism records exist in only 15.9% of the enterprises; safety supervision exists in 27.3, and safety education exists in 91% of them, while no environmental monitoring is carried out in any enterprise. Sanitation facilities exist in satisfactory numbers in most of the enterprises; however, their maintenance is poor in most of them, due to lack of hygienic supervision. All enterprises dispose of their liquid wastes into the JIE sewerage system without any treatment, while the solid wastes are collected by the city authorities in 56.8% of them; both wastes are anticipated to cause environmental pollution problems.</abstract><cop>Dordrect</cop><pub>Springer</pub><pmid>24220929</pmid><doi>10.1007/BF02401764</doi><tpages>34</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0167-6369 |
ispartof | Environmental monitoring and assessment, 1993-08, Vol.27 (1), p.35-68 |
issn | 0167-6369 1573-2959 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29536591 |
source | SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Applied sciences Atmospheric pollution Exact sciences and technology Indoor pollution and occupational exposure Pollution |
title | Appraisal of work hazards and safety in the industrial Estate of Jeddah |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A16%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Appraisal%20of%20work%20hazards%20and%20safety%20in%20the%20industrial%20Estate%20of%20Jeddah&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20monitoring%20and%20assessment&rft.au=NOWEIR,%20M.%20H&rft.date=1993-08-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=35&rft.epage=68&rft.pages=35-68&rft.issn=0167-6369&rft.eissn=1573-2959&rft.coden=EMASDH&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/BF02401764&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29536591%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14326171&rft_id=info:pmid/24220929&rfr_iscdi=true |