Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers

US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impac...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Fuel (Guildford) 2006, Vol.85 (2), p.204-212
Hauptverfasser: Romero, Carlos E., Li, Ying, Bilirgen, Harun, Sarunac, Nenad, Levy, Edward K.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 212
container_issue 2
container_start_page 204
container_title Fuel (Guildford)
container_volume 85
creator Romero, Carlos E.
Li, Ying
Bilirgen, Harun
Sarunac, Nenad
Levy, Edward K.
description US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impacted by factors such as coal type, boiler operation, fly ash characteristics and type of environmental control equipment installed on the unit. Field data show a wide variation in the fraction of mercury that is emitted in the gaseous phase, as elemental and oxidized mercury vapor, and as particulate-bound mercury. Oxidized mercury is a preferable species because is less volatile at stack temperatures, water-soluble, and tends to interact with mineral matter and char, and cold-end air pollution control devices. There is also evidence that boiler-operating conditions could be used to influence mercury behavior in the boiler, since they affect the thermo-chemical conditions for mercury formation and reduction. However, operation of boiler control settings, which result in mercury removal benefits, should also consider the tradeoff between mercury reduction and other emissions (for example, NO x and CO), the level of unburned carbon in the fly ash, unit efficiency and the performance of particulate control equipment. This paper reports fieldwork performed to investigate the feasibility of affecting mercury emissions from coal-fired plants by manipulating boiler control settings. Full-scale testing was performed at two units. One of the units is equipped with a back-end train that includes a rotary air preheater followed by two electrostatic precipitators in series. The other unit is equipped with hot and cold precipitators and a tubular air preheater. A strategy for mercury control by selectively manipulating boiler control settings, if used in combination with other control measures such as sorbent injection, should provide a cost-effective option for mercury control.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29517418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0016236105003030</els_id><sourcerecordid>19646751</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-800ad70f6e27df0d2402f7f1c891bc2e791cc68bc1c3a226e2b0cdece90c91bf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpF721TtJHWvAi4gtWvOg5ZCcTydJt1qQV9tubdRe86Skw-c0kzJ-xCw4FB95cLws7UV8IgLqAqoBSHLAZb2WZS16Xh2wGSeWibPgxO4lxCQCyrasZW75446xDPTo_ZN5mC-96CplfU0i14SNDPxi3vY2Z9SFbUcApbDJauRh_qoHMhDvghsR1n1uXitk0ut6Nm_3IeMaOrO4jne_PU_b-cP9295TPXx-f727nOVYNjHkLoI0E25CQxoIRFQgrLce24wsUJDuO2LQL5FhqIRJbABpC6gCTsOUpu9rNXQf_OVEcVfoqUt_rgfwUlehqLive_gt511SNrPn_sJJSdmWXoNhBDD7GQFatg1vpsFEc1DYotVTboNQ2KAWVSkGlpsv9dB1R9zboAV387ZSlEF0Lyd3sHKXlfTkKKqKjAcmkbeOojHd_PfMNN-6r4g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>14777939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Romero, Carlos E. ; Li, Ying ; Bilirgen, Harun ; Sarunac, Nenad ; Levy, Edward K.</creator><creatorcontrib>Romero, Carlos E. ; Li, Ying ; Bilirgen, Harun ; Sarunac, Nenad ; Levy, Edward K.</creatorcontrib><description>US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impacted by factors such as coal type, boiler operation, fly ash characteristics and type of environmental control equipment installed on the unit. Field data show a wide variation in the fraction of mercury that is emitted in the gaseous phase, as elemental and oxidized mercury vapor, and as particulate-bound mercury. Oxidized mercury is a preferable species because is less volatile at stack temperatures, water-soluble, and tends to interact with mineral matter and char, and cold-end air pollution control devices. There is also evidence that boiler-operating conditions could be used to influence mercury behavior in the boiler, since they affect the thermo-chemical conditions for mercury formation and reduction. However, operation of boiler control settings, which result in mercury removal benefits, should also consider the tradeoff between mercury reduction and other emissions (for example, NO x and CO), the level of unburned carbon in the fly ash, unit efficiency and the performance of particulate control equipment. This paper reports fieldwork performed to investigate the feasibility of affecting mercury emissions from coal-fired plants by manipulating boiler control settings. Full-scale testing was performed at two units. One of the units is equipped with a back-end train that includes a rotary air preheater followed by two electrostatic precipitators in series. The other unit is equipped with hot and cold precipitators and a tubular air preheater. A strategy for mercury control by selectively manipulating boiler control settings, if used in combination with other control measures such as sorbent injection, should provide a cost-effective option for mercury control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7153</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries ; Applied sciences ; Boiler optimization ; Boilers ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc ; Exact sciences and technology ; Mercury emissions ; Pollution reduction</subject><ispartof>Fuel (Guildford), 2006, Vol.85 (2), p.204-212</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-800ad70f6e27df0d2402f7f1c891bc2e791cc68bc1c3a226e2b0cdece90c91bf3</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>310,311,315,782,786,791,792,3552,4026,4052,4053,23937,23938,25147,27930,27931,27932,46002</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17322980$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Romero, Carlos E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilirgen, Harun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarunac, Nenad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Edward K.</creatorcontrib><title>Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers</title><title>Fuel (Guildford)</title><description>US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impacted by factors such as coal type, boiler operation, fly ash characteristics and type of environmental control equipment installed on the unit. Field data show a wide variation in the fraction of mercury that is emitted in the gaseous phase, as elemental and oxidized mercury vapor, and as particulate-bound mercury. Oxidized mercury is a preferable species because is less volatile at stack temperatures, water-soluble, and tends to interact with mineral matter and char, and cold-end air pollution control devices. There is also evidence that boiler-operating conditions could be used to influence mercury behavior in the boiler, since they affect the thermo-chemical conditions for mercury formation and reduction. However, operation of boiler control settings, which result in mercury removal benefits, should also consider the tradeoff between mercury reduction and other emissions (for example, NO x and CO), the level of unburned carbon in the fly ash, unit efficiency and the performance of particulate control equipment. This paper reports fieldwork performed to investigate the feasibility of affecting mercury emissions from coal-fired plants by manipulating boiler control settings. Full-scale testing was performed at two units. One of the units is equipped with a back-end train that includes a rotary air preheater followed by two electrostatic precipitators in series. The other unit is equipped with hot and cold precipitators and a tubular air preheater. A strategy for mercury control by selectively manipulating boiler control settings, if used in combination with other control measures such as sorbent injection, should provide a cost-effective option for mercury control.</description><subject>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Boiler optimization</subject><subject>Boilers</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Mercury emissions</subject><subject>Pollution reduction</subject><issn>0016-2361</issn><issn>1873-7153</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqF0UtLxDAQB_AgCq6PL-CpF721TtJHWvAi4gtWvOg5ZCcTydJt1qQV9tubdRe86Skw-c0kzJ-xCw4FB95cLws7UV8IgLqAqoBSHLAZb2WZS16Xh2wGSeWibPgxO4lxCQCyrasZW75446xDPTo_ZN5mC-96CplfU0i14SNDPxi3vY2Z9SFbUcApbDJauRh_qoHMhDvghsR1n1uXitk0ut6Nm_3IeMaOrO4jne_PU_b-cP9295TPXx-f727nOVYNjHkLoI0E25CQxoIRFQgrLce24wsUJDuO2LQL5FhqIRJbABpC6gCTsOUpu9rNXQf_OVEcVfoqUt_rgfwUlehqLive_gt511SNrPn_sJJSdmWXoNhBDD7GQFatg1vpsFEc1DYotVTboNQ2KAWVSkGlpsv9dB1R9zboAV387ZSlEF0Lyd3sHKXlfTkKKqKjAcmkbeOojHd_PfMNN-6r4g</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Romero, Carlos E.</creator><creator>Li, Ying</creator><creator>Bilirgen, Harun</creator><creator>Sarunac, Nenad</creator><creator>Levy, Edward K.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers</title><author>Romero, Carlos E. ; Li, Ying ; Bilirgen, Harun ; Sarunac, Nenad ; Levy, Edward K.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-800ad70f6e27df0d2402f7f1c891bc2e791cc68bc1c3a226e2b0cdece90c91bf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Air pollution caused by fuel industries</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Boiler optimization</topic><topic>Boilers</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Mercury emissions</topic><topic>Pollution reduction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Romero, Carlos E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilirgen, Harun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarunac, Nenad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Levy, Edward K.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Romero, Carlos E.</au><au>Li, Ying</au><au>Bilirgen, Harun</au><au>Sarunac, Nenad</au><au>Levy, Edward K.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers</atitle><jtitle>Fuel (Guildford)</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>85</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>204</spage><epage>212</epage><pages>204-212</pages><issn>0016-2361</issn><eissn>1873-7153</eissn><abstract>US EPA's studies have determined that mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants pose significant hazards to public health and must be reduced. Coal-fired power plants represent a significant fraction of the anthropogenic emissions of mercury into the atmosphere. Mercury emissions are impacted by factors such as coal type, boiler operation, fly ash characteristics and type of environmental control equipment installed on the unit. Field data show a wide variation in the fraction of mercury that is emitted in the gaseous phase, as elemental and oxidized mercury vapor, and as particulate-bound mercury. Oxidized mercury is a preferable species because is less volatile at stack temperatures, water-soluble, and tends to interact with mineral matter and char, and cold-end air pollution control devices. There is also evidence that boiler-operating conditions could be used to influence mercury behavior in the boiler, since they affect the thermo-chemical conditions for mercury formation and reduction. However, operation of boiler control settings, which result in mercury removal benefits, should also consider the tradeoff between mercury reduction and other emissions (for example, NO x and CO), the level of unburned carbon in the fly ash, unit efficiency and the performance of particulate control equipment. This paper reports fieldwork performed to investigate the feasibility of affecting mercury emissions from coal-fired plants by manipulating boiler control settings. Full-scale testing was performed at two units. One of the units is equipped with a back-end train that includes a rotary air preheater followed by two electrostatic precipitators in series. The other unit is equipped with hot and cold precipitators and a tubular air preheater. A strategy for mercury control by selectively manipulating boiler control settings, if used in combination with other control measures such as sorbent injection, should provide a cost-effective option for mercury control.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-2361
ispartof Fuel (Guildford), 2006, Vol.85 (2), p.204-212
issn 0016-2361
1873-7153
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29517418
source Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Air pollution caused by fuel industries
Applied sciences
Boiler optimization
Boilers
Energy
Energy. Thermal use of fuels
Equipments for energy generation and conversion: thermal, electrical, mechanical energy, etc
Exact sciences and technology
Mercury emissions
Pollution reduction
title Modification of boiler operating conditions for mercury emissions reductions in coal-fired utility boilers
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-05T03%3A32%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modification%20of%20boiler%20operating%20conditions%20for%20mercury%20emissions%20reductions%20in%20coal-fired%20utility%20boilers&rft.jtitle=Fuel%20(Guildford)&rft.au=Romero,%20Carlos%20E.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=85&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=204&rft.epage=212&rft.pages=204-212&rft.issn=0016-2361&rft.eissn=1873-7153&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.fuel.2005.04.032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E19646751%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=14777939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0016236105003030&rfr_iscdi=true