Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement
A novel idea of utilizing only a computer to determine leaf area and perimeter was developed. The procedure is essentially computer software developed in Visual Basic that uses the computer monitor as the working surface to trace leaf outline and determines leaf area, perimeter, length, and width. T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Computers and electronics in agriculture 2006-04, Vol.51 (1), p.1-16 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 16 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Computers and electronics in agriculture |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Igathinathane, C. Prakash, V.S.S. Padma, U. Babu, G. Ravi Womac, A.R. |
description | A novel idea of utilizing only a computer to determine leaf area and perimeter was developed. The procedure is essentially computer software developed in Visual Basic that uses the computer monitor as the working surface to trace leaf outline and determines leaf area, perimeter, length, and width. Testing the software for effects of orientation, shape, and size of objects was carried out using opaque (paper) and transparent (polyvinyl chloride sheet) geometrical planar objects of known properties, such as regular polygons (three to eight sides), rectangles, and circles, developed by AutoCAD precision drawings. Direct leaf samples of mango, guava, egg plant, and castor representing varied shapes and sizes were used in measurements and results were also compared with existing graphical and digital planimetric methods. Component methods used in determination were area under the curve (AUC) and pixel count (PC), which was further divided into pixel count-inside (PCI) and pixel count-total (PCT). In general, geometrical objects area and perimeter measurements were found to be independent of orientation, shape, and size. However, perimeters of squares and rectangles obtained by PC methods were affected by object orientation. As the traced transparent samples do not offer appreciable improvement in estimations, opaque samples are recommended because they are convenient and directly used in measurements. Based on the performance with geometrical objects, the software was considered to handle objects of any shape and size equally well. Measurements with direct leaf samples compared well with the graphical (−4.62% to 7.81% deviation) and digital planimetric (−4.05% to 8.48% deviation) results, and variation was found to exist even among these basic methods possibly due to unavoidable manual tracing errors. Based on this study, PCI method for area and AUC method for perimeter determination are recommended. The developed software proved to be an accurate method for measurements of area and perimeter of leaves and other planar objects, such as maps; extends the application of personal computers to such measurements; and was less expensive as it does not require additional hardware. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.compag.2005.10.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29479494</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168169905001730</els_id><sourcerecordid>29479494</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-598c442256d1de50f7f96ea3fe454308f4d62143bc93cf345e7a1ab411e790cb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-A8Fe9NY1SdOmuQiy-LGw4EH3HGbTydKlbdakXfHfm1LBm6dhZp55GR5CrhldMMqK-_3CuPYAuwWnNI-jBaXZCZmxUvJUMipPySxiZcoKpc7JRQh7GntVyhlZrroePZi-PmIypgyxTYKz_Rd4TCo8YuMOLXZ9Yp1PGgSbxAUkLUIYPI6bS3JmoQl49VvnZPP89LF8TddvL6vl4zo1Ipd9mqvSCMF5XlSswpxaaVWBkFkUuchoaUVVcCayrVGZsZnIUQKDrWAMpaJmm83J3ZR78O5zwNDrtg4GmwY6dEPQXAmphBIRFBNovAvBo9UHX7fgvzWjejSm93oypkdj4zQai2e3v_kQDDTWQ2fq8Hcr84IrziN3M3EWnIadj8zmnVOWUUaLgnEZiYeJwKjjWKPXwdTYGaxqj6bXlav_f-UHr86MuA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29479494</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Igathinathane, C. ; Prakash, V.S.S. ; Padma, U. ; Babu, G. Ravi ; Womac, A.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C. ; Prakash, V.S.S. ; Padma, U. ; Babu, G. Ravi ; Womac, A.R.</creatorcontrib><description>A novel idea of utilizing only a computer to determine leaf area and perimeter was developed. The procedure is essentially computer software developed in Visual Basic that uses the computer monitor as the working surface to trace leaf outline and determines leaf area, perimeter, length, and width. Testing the software for effects of orientation, shape, and size of objects was carried out using opaque (paper) and transparent (polyvinyl chloride sheet) geometrical planar objects of known properties, such as regular polygons (three to eight sides), rectangles, and circles, developed by AutoCAD precision drawings. Direct leaf samples of mango, guava, egg plant, and castor representing varied shapes and sizes were used in measurements and results were also compared with existing graphical and digital planimetric methods. Component methods used in determination were area under the curve (AUC) and pixel count (PC), which was further divided into pixel count-inside (PCI) and pixel count-total (PCT). In general, geometrical objects area and perimeter measurements were found to be independent of orientation, shape, and size. However, perimeters of squares and rectangles obtained by PC methods were affected by object orientation. As the traced transparent samples do not offer appreciable improvement in estimations, opaque samples are recommended because they are convenient and directly used in measurements. Based on the performance with geometrical objects, the software was considered to handle objects of any shape and size equally well. Measurements with direct leaf samples compared well with the graphical (−4.62% to 7.81% deviation) and digital planimetric (−4.05% to 8.48% deviation) results, and variation was found to exist even among these basic methods possibly due to unavoidable manual tracing errors. Based on this study, PCI method for area and AUC method for perimeter determination are recommended. The developed software proved to be an accurate method for measurements of area and perimeter of leaves and other planar objects, such as maps; extends the application of personal computers to such measurements; and was less expensive as it does not require additional hardware.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-1699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-7107</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.compag.2005.10.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CEAGE6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Area ; Biological and medical sciences ; computer software ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Leaf ; leaf area ; Measurement ; Perimeter ; Pixel ; Software development</subject><ispartof>Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2006-04, Vol.51 (1), p.1-16</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-598c442256d1de50f7f96ea3fe454308f4d62143bc93cf345e7a1ab411e790cb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-598c442256d1de50f7f96ea3fe454308f4d62143bc93cf345e7a1ab411e790cb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2005.10.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17562922$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, V.S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padma, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, G. Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womac, A.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement</title><title>Computers and electronics in agriculture</title><description>A novel idea of utilizing only a computer to determine leaf area and perimeter was developed. The procedure is essentially computer software developed in Visual Basic that uses the computer monitor as the working surface to trace leaf outline and determines leaf area, perimeter, length, and width. Testing the software for effects of orientation, shape, and size of objects was carried out using opaque (paper) and transparent (polyvinyl chloride sheet) geometrical planar objects of known properties, such as regular polygons (three to eight sides), rectangles, and circles, developed by AutoCAD precision drawings. Direct leaf samples of mango, guava, egg plant, and castor representing varied shapes and sizes were used in measurements and results were also compared with existing graphical and digital planimetric methods. Component methods used in determination were area under the curve (AUC) and pixel count (PC), which was further divided into pixel count-inside (PCI) and pixel count-total (PCT). In general, geometrical objects area and perimeter measurements were found to be independent of orientation, shape, and size. However, perimeters of squares and rectangles obtained by PC methods were affected by object orientation. As the traced transparent samples do not offer appreciable improvement in estimations, opaque samples are recommended because they are convenient and directly used in measurements. Based on the performance with geometrical objects, the software was considered to handle objects of any shape and size equally well. Measurements with direct leaf samples compared well with the graphical (−4.62% to 7.81% deviation) and digital planimetric (−4.05% to 8.48% deviation) results, and variation was found to exist even among these basic methods possibly due to unavoidable manual tracing errors. Based on this study, PCI method for area and AUC method for perimeter determination are recommended. The developed software proved to be an accurate method for measurements of area and perimeter of leaves and other planar objects, such as maps; extends the application of personal computers to such measurements; and was less expensive as it does not require additional hardware.</description><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Area</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>computer software</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Leaf</subject><subject>leaf area</subject><subject>Measurement</subject><subject>Perimeter</subject><subject>Pixel</subject><subject>Software development</subject><issn>0168-1699</issn><issn>1872-7107</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-A8Fe9NY1SdOmuQiy-LGw4EH3HGbTydKlbdakXfHfm1LBm6dhZp55GR5CrhldMMqK-_3CuPYAuwWnNI-jBaXZCZmxUvJUMipPySxiZcoKpc7JRQh7GntVyhlZrroePZi-PmIypgyxTYKz_Rd4TCo8YuMOLXZ9Yp1PGgSbxAUkLUIYPI6bS3JmoQl49VvnZPP89LF8TddvL6vl4zo1Ipd9mqvSCMF5XlSswpxaaVWBkFkUuchoaUVVcCayrVGZsZnIUQKDrWAMpaJmm83J3ZR78O5zwNDrtg4GmwY6dEPQXAmphBIRFBNovAvBo9UHX7fgvzWjejSm93oypkdj4zQai2e3v_kQDDTWQ2fq8Hcr84IrziN3M3EWnIadj8zmnVOWUUaLgnEZiYeJwKjjWKPXwdTYGaxqj6bXlav_f-UHr86MuA</recordid><startdate>20060401</startdate><enddate>20060401</enddate><creator>Igathinathane, C.</creator><creator>Prakash, V.S.S.</creator><creator>Padma, U.</creator><creator>Babu, G. Ravi</creator><creator>Womac, A.R.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060401</creationdate><title>Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement</title><author>Igathinathane, C. ; Prakash, V.S.S. ; Padma, U. ; Babu, G. Ravi ; Womac, A.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-598c442256d1de50f7f96ea3fe454308f4d62143bc93cf345e7a1ab411e790cb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Area</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>computer software</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Leaf</topic><topic>leaf area</topic><topic>Measurement</topic><topic>Perimeter</topic><topic>Pixel</topic><topic>Software development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Igathinathane, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prakash, V.S.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Padma, U.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Babu, G. Ravi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Womac, A.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Igathinathane, C.</au><au>Prakash, V.S.S.</au><au>Padma, U.</au><au>Babu, G. Ravi</au><au>Womac, A.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement</atitle><jtitle>Computers and electronics in agriculture</jtitle><date>2006-04-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>16</epage><pages>1-16</pages><issn>0168-1699</issn><eissn>1872-7107</eissn><coden>CEAGE6</coden><abstract>A novel idea of utilizing only a computer to determine leaf area and perimeter was developed. The procedure is essentially computer software developed in Visual Basic that uses the computer monitor as the working surface to trace leaf outline and determines leaf area, perimeter, length, and width. Testing the software for effects of orientation, shape, and size of objects was carried out using opaque (paper) and transparent (polyvinyl chloride sheet) geometrical planar objects of known properties, such as regular polygons (three to eight sides), rectangles, and circles, developed by AutoCAD precision drawings. Direct leaf samples of mango, guava, egg plant, and castor representing varied shapes and sizes were used in measurements and results were also compared with existing graphical and digital planimetric methods. Component methods used in determination were area under the curve (AUC) and pixel count (PC), which was further divided into pixel count-inside (PCI) and pixel count-total (PCT). In general, geometrical objects area and perimeter measurements were found to be independent of orientation, shape, and size. However, perimeters of squares and rectangles obtained by PC methods were affected by object orientation. As the traced transparent samples do not offer appreciable improvement in estimations, opaque samples are recommended because they are convenient and directly used in measurements. Based on the performance with geometrical objects, the software was considered to handle objects of any shape and size equally well. Measurements with direct leaf samples compared well with the graphical (−4.62% to 7.81% deviation) and digital planimetric (−4.05% to 8.48% deviation) results, and variation was found to exist even among these basic methods possibly due to unavoidable manual tracing errors. Based on this study, PCI method for area and AUC method for perimeter determination are recommended. The developed software proved to be an accurate method for measurements of area and perimeter of leaves and other planar objects, such as maps; extends the application of personal computers to such measurements; and was less expensive as it does not require additional hardware.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.compag.2005.10.003</doi><tpages>16</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-1699 |
ispartof | Computers and electronics in agriculture, 2006-04, Vol.51 (1), p.1-16 |
issn | 0168-1699 1872-7107 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29479494 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions Area Biological and medical sciences computer software Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Leaf leaf area Measurement Perimeter Pixel Software development |
title | Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T11%3A50%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Interactive%20computer%20software%20development%20for%20leaf%20area%20measurement&rft.jtitle=Computers%20and%20electronics%20in%20agriculture&rft.au=Igathinathane,%20C.&rft.date=2006-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=16&rft.pages=1-16&rft.issn=0168-1699&rft.eissn=1872-7107&rft.coden=CEAGE6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.compag.2005.10.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29479494%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29479494&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0168169905001730&rfr_iscdi=true |