Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations

Application of Weibull statistics to tensile strength prediction in laminated composites with open holes is revisited. Quasi-isotropic carbon fiber laminates with two stacking sequences [45/0/−45/90]s and [0/45/90/−45]s with three different hole sizes of 2.54, 6.35 and 12.7 mm were considered for an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of materials science 2006-10, Vol.41 (20), p.6610-6621
Hauptverfasser: Iarve, E V, Mollenhauer, D, Whitney, T J, Kim, R
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 6621
container_issue 20
container_start_page 6610
container_title Journal of materials science
container_volume 41
creator Iarve, E V
Mollenhauer, D
Whitney, T J
Kim, R
description Application of Weibull statistics to tensile strength prediction in laminated composites with open holes is revisited. Quasi-isotropic carbon fiber laminates with two stacking sequences [45/0/−45/90]s and [0/45/90/−45]s with three different hole sizes of 2.54, 6.35 and 12.7 mm were considered for analysis and experimental examination. The first laminate showed 20% lower strength for smaller and 10% for the larger hole sizes. A novel critical failure volume (CFV) method with minimum scaling length constraint as well as the traditional Weibull integral method were applied. The strength prediction was based on the state of stress in the 0° ply by taking into account the redistribution of stress due to matrix damage in the form of splitting, delamination and matrix cracking of off axis plies. The state of matrix damage precipitating failure was recorded by using X-radiography and examined by a sectioning technique. The measured extent of damage was then included in a 3D stress analysis procedure by using a mesh independent crack modeling method to account for fiber direction stress redistribution. The CFV method gave results within one standard deviation from experimentally observed strength values for both laminates and all three hole sizes. The Weibull integral method underpredicted the strength in all cases from as much as 20–30% for smaller hole sizes to 8% for the large holes. The accuracy of failure predictions using CFV is attributed to the introduction of a minimum scaling length. This length has a physical meaning of the width of a process zone of formation of fiber macro-crack as a result of single fiber break interaction. Direct measurement or rigorous evaluation of this parameter is, however, difficult. Consistent with referenced micromechanical studies, its value was assigned equal to six times the Rosen’s ineffective length.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10853-006-0200-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29449954</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29449954</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cb6e84be13d43b010be3bd1a460f97eb18ef37c1e685a8d467ae1efa90f3d4e43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhoMoeBx9AHcBQdz0WLl0d9qdDKMODMzCGVyGdLrakyGdHJP0yHkSX9ecy8qFq4Kqrz6o-gl5y-CSAfQfMwPVigaga4ADNPtnZMPaXjRSgXhONgCcN1x27CV5lfMjALQ9Zxvy53tJGH6WLd0lnJwtLgbqArVx2cXsCmb629VprljOtR0shpLMgcufqPUmZ2eNpz_Qjav31ISJ2uTKsTkb59eE9Cn6dUG6YNnG6WxcnE1xQbs14chWdXYTntWvyYvZ-IxvzvWCPHy5vr_61tzefb25-nzbWCH60tixQyVHZGKSYgQGI4pxYkZ2MA89jkzhLHrLsFOtUZPseoMMZzPAXDdQigvy_uTdpfhrxVz04rJF703AuGbNBymHoT2AH_4L1v9zptTAVEXf_YM-xjWFeobmvB26QXRHITtR9Q05J5z1LrnFpH1V6UOm-pSprpnqQ6Z6L_4CNoqZrQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2259693654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations</title><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Iarve, E V ; Mollenhauer, D ; Whitney, T J ; Kim, R</creator><creatorcontrib>Iarve, E V ; Mollenhauer, D ; Whitney, T J ; Kim, R</creatorcontrib><description>Application of Weibull statistics to tensile strength prediction in laminated composites with open holes is revisited. Quasi-isotropic carbon fiber laminates with two stacking sequences [45/0/−45/90]s and [0/45/90/−45]s with three different hole sizes of 2.54, 6.35 and 12.7 mm were considered for analysis and experimental examination. The first laminate showed 20% lower strength for smaller and 10% for the larger hole sizes. A novel critical failure volume (CFV) method with minimum scaling length constraint as well as the traditional Weibull integral method were applied. The strength prediction was based on the state of stress in the 0° ply by taking into account the redistribution of stress due to matrix damage in the form of splitting, delamination and matrix cracking of off axis plies. The state of matrix damage precipitating failure was recorded by using X-radiography and examined by a sectioning technique. The measured extent of damage was then included in a 3D stress analysis procedure by using a mesh independent crack modeling method to account for fiber direction stress redistribution. The CFV method gave results within one standard deviation from experimentally observed strength values for both laminates and all three hole sizes. The Weibull integral method underpredicted the strength in all cases from as much as 20–30% for smaller hole sizes to 8% for the large holes. The accuracy of failure predictions using CFV is attributed to the introduction of a minimum scaling length. This length has a physical meaning of the width of a process zone of formation of fiber macro-crack as a result of single fiber break interaction. Direct measurement or rigorous evaluation of this parameter is, however, difficult. Consistent with referenced micromechanical studies, its value was assigned equal to six times the Rosen’s ineffective length.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-2461</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-4803</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10853-006-0200-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics ; Carbon fibers ; Composite materials ; Cracking (fracturing) ; Damage ; Failure ; Fibers ; Finite element method ; Fracture mechanics ; Hole size ; Integrals ; Laminates ; Layers ; Materials science ; Mathematical models ; Radiography ; Scaling ; Strength ; Stress analysis ; Stresses</subject><ispartof>Journal of materials science, 2006-10, Vol.41 (20), p.6610-6621</ispartof><rights>Journal of Materials Science is a copyright of Springer, (2006). All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cb6e84be13d43b010be3bd1a460f97eb18ef37c1e685a8d467ae1efa90f3d4e43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cb6e84be13d43b010be3bd1a460f97eb18ef37c1e685a8d467ae1efa90f3d4e43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Iarve, E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mollenhauer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, R</creatorcontrib><title>Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations</title><title>Journal of materials science</title><description>Application of Weibull statistics to tensile strength prediction in laminated composites with open holes is revisited. Quasi-isotropic carbon fiber laminates with two stacking sequences [45/0/−45/90]s and [0/45/90/−45]s with three different hole sizes of 2.54, 6.35 and 12.7 mm were considered for analysis and experimental examination. The first laminate showed 20% lower strength for smaller and 10% for the larger hole sizes. A novel critical failure volume (CFV) method with minimum scaling length constraint as well as the traditional Weibull integral method were applied. The strength prediction was based on the state of stress in the 0° ply by taking into account the redistribution of stress due to matrix damage in the form of splitting, delamination and matrix cracking of off axis plies. The state of matrix damage precipitating failure was recorded by using X-radiography and examined by a sectioning technique. The measured extent of damage was then included in a 3D stress analysis procedure by using a mesh independent crack modeling method to account for fiber direction stress redistribution. The CFV method gave results within one standard deviation from experimentally observed strength values for both laminates and all three hole sizes. The Weibull integral method underpredicted the strength in all cases from as much as 20–30% for smaller hole sizes to 8% for the large holes. The accuracy of failure predictions using CFV is attributed to the introduction of a minimum scaling length. This length has a physical meaning of the width of a process zone of formation of fiber macro-crack as a result of single fiber break interaction. Direct measurement or rigorous evaluation of this parameter is, however, difficult. Consistent with referenced micromechanical studies, its value was assigned equal to six times the Rosen’s ineffective length.</description><subject>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</subject><subject>Carbon fibers</subject><subject>Composite materials</subject><subject>Cracking (fracturing)</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Fibers</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Fracture mechanics</subject><subject>Hole size</subject><subject>Integrals</subject><subject>Laminates</subject><subject>Layers</subject><subject>Materials science</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Scaling</subject><subject>Strength</subject><subject>Stress analysis</subject><subject>Stresses</subject><issn>0022-2461</issn><issn>1573-4803</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kcuKFTEQhoMoeBx9AHcBQdz0WLl0d9qdDKMODMzCGVyGdLrakyGdHJP0yHkSX9ecy8qFq4Kqrz6o-gl5y-CSAfQfMwPVigaga4ADNPtnZMPaXjRSgXhONgCcN1x27CV5lfMjALQ9Zxvy53tJGH6WLd0lnJwtLgbqArVx2cXsCmb629VprljOtR0shpLMgcufqPUmZ2eNpz_Qjav31ISJ2uTKsTkb59eE9Cn6dUG6YNnG6WxcnE1xQbs14chWdXYTntWvyYvZ-IxvzvWCPHy5vr_61tzefb25-nzbWCH60tixQyVHZGKSYgQGI4pxYkZ2MA89jkzhLHrLsFOtUZPseoMMZzPAXDdQigvy_uTdpfhrxVz04rJF703AuGbNBymHoT2AH_4L1v9zptTAVEXf_YM-xjWFeobmvB26QXRHITtR9Q05J5z1LrnFpH1V6UOm-pSprpnqQ6Z6L_4CNoqZrQ</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Iarve, E V</creator><creator>Mollenhauer, D</creator><creator>Whitney, T J</creator><creator>Kim, R</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations</title><author>Iarve, E V ; Mollenhauer, D ; Whitney, T J ; Kim, R</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-cb6e84be13d43b010be3bd1a460f97eb18ef37c1e685a8d467ae1efa90f3d4e43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Carbon fiber reinforced plastics</topic><topic>Carbon fibers</topic><topic>Composite materials</topic><topic>Cracking (fracturing)</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Fibers</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Fracture mechanics</topic><topic>Hole size</topic><topic>Integrals</topic><topic>Laminates</topic><topic>Layers</topic><topic>Materials science</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Scaling</topic><topic>Strength</topic><topic>Stress analysis</topic><topic>Stresses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Iarve, E V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mollenhauer, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitney, T J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, R</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Journal of materials science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Iarve, E V</au><au>Mollenhauer, D</au><au>Whitney, T J</au><au>Kim, R</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of materials science</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>6610</spage><epage>6621</epage><pages>6610-6621</pages><issn>0022-2461</issn><eissn>1573-4803</eissn><abstract>Application of Weibull statistics to tensile strength prediction in laminated composites with open holes is revisited. Quasi-isotropic carbon fiber laminates with two stacking sequences [45/0/−45/90]s and [0/45/90/−45]s with three different hole sizes of 2.54, 6.35 and 12.7 mm were considered for analysis and experimental examination. The first laminate showed 20% lower strength for smaller and 10% for the larger hole sizes. A novel critical failure volume (CFV) method with minimum scaling length constraint as well as the traditional Weibull integral method were applied. The strength prediction was based on the state of stress in the 0° ply by taking into account the redistribution of stress due to matrix damage in the form of splitting, delamination and matrix cracking of off axis plies. The state of matrix damage precipitating failure was recorded by using X-radiography and examined by a sectioning technique. The measured extent of damage was then included in a 3D stress analysis procedure by using a mesh independent crack modeling method to account for fiber direction stress redistribution. The CFV method gave results within one standard deviation from experimentally observed strength values for both laminates and all three hole sizes. The Weibull integral method underpredicted the strength in all cases from as much as 20–30% for smaller hole sizes to 8% for the large holes. The accuracy of failure predictions using CFV is attributed to the introduction of a minimum scaling length. This length has a physical meaning of the width of a process zone of formation of fiber macro-crack as a result of single fiber break interaction. Direct measurement or rigorous evaluation of this parameter is, however, difficult. Consistent with referenced micromechanical studies, its value was assigned equal to six times the Rosen’s ineffective length.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10853-006-0200-y</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0022-2461
ispartof Journal of materials science, 2006-10, Vol.41 (20), p.6610-6621
issn 0022-2461
1573-4803
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29449954
source SpringerNature Journals
subjects Carbon fiber reinforced plastics
Carbon fibers
Composite materials
Cracking (fracturing)
Damage
Failure
Fibers
Finite element method
Fracture mechanics
Hole size
Integrals
Laminates
Layers
Materials science
Mathematical models
Radiography
Scaling
Strength
Stress analysis
Stresses
title Strength prediction in composites with stress concentrations: classical Weibull and critical failure volume methods with micromechanical considerations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-30T21%3A33%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Strength%20prediction%20in%20composites%20with%20stress%20concentrations:%20classical%20Weibull%20and%20critical%20failure%20volume%20methods%20with%20micromechanical%20considerations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20materials%20science&rft.au=Iarve,%20E%20V&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=6610&rft.epage=6621&rft.pages=6610-6621&rft.issn=0022-2461&rft.eissn=1573-4803&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10853-006-0200-y&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29449954%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2259693654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true