An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation
The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Smart materials and structures 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1216 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 1211 |
container_title | Smart materials and structures |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | Sodano, Henry A Lloyd, Justin Inman, Daniel J |
description | The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29438525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29438525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pF_DUi4KH2rw0bXocwzcYeFEQLyFNn0ika2rSbfrtTd3Qwy6eAsnv-ZPnj9A5wdcEC5HhqshTUtIiIzzjGcblAZoQVpC0KPjLIZr8gmN0EsI7xoQIRiboddYl8NmDt0voBtUm2i175W1wXVLDsAHokgBr8PFJ6cGu4Ue4YAcYL1ZqcD4kxvmkdxvwyRt0EQ_WdafoyKg2wNnunKLn25un-X26eLx7mM8Wqc5pPqQ1K4XJmWgK0TRNCYYbjUEXNH62YYxqlnOuGa0YZ0SLEkitWV0BMFHjsuBsii63ub13HysIg1zaoKFtVQduFSStYjqnI6RbqL0LwYORfVxb-S9JsBxrlGNLcmxJEi65jDXGoYtdugpatcarTtvwNykIr2iOo0u3zrr-f7lX-37fyb4x7BtcJY5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29438525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><description>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-1726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-665X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; General equipment and techniques ; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy ; Measurement and testing methods ; Physics ; Servo and control equipment; robots ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><ispartof>Smart materials and structures, 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18159240$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><title>Smart materials and structures</title><description>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>General equipment and techniques</subject><subject>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</subject><subject>Measurement and testing methods</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Servo and control equipment; robots</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><issn>0964-1726</issn><issn>1361-665X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pF_DUi4KH2rw0bXocwzcYeFEQLyFNn0ika2rSbfrtTd3Qwy6eAsnv-ZPnj9A5wdcEC5HhqshTUtIiIzzjGcblAZoQVpC0KPjLIZr8gmN0EsI7xoQIRiboddYl8NmDt0voBtUm2i175W1wXVLDsAHokgBr8PFJ6cGu4Ue4YAcYL1ZqcD4kxvmkdxvwyRt0EQ_WdafoyKg2wNnunKLn25un-X26eLx7mM8Wqc5pPqQ1K4XJmWgK0TRNCYYbjUEXNH62YYxqlnOuGa0YZ0SLEkitWV0BMFHjsuBsii63ub13HysIg1zaoKFtVQduFSStYjqnI6RbqL0LwYORfVxb-S9JsBxrlGNLcmxJEi65jDXGoYtdugpatcarTtvwNykIr2iOo0u3zrr-f7lX-37fyb4x7BtcJY5Y</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Sodano, Henry A</creator><creator>Lloyd, Justin</creator><creator>Inman, Daniel J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><author>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>General equipment and techniques</topic><topic>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</topic><topic>Measurement and testing methods</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Servo and control equipment; robots</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sodano, Henry A</au><au>Lloyd, Justin</au><au>Inman, Daniel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</atitle><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1216</epage><pages>1211-1216</pages><issn>0964-1726</issn><eissn>1361-665X</eissn><abstract>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0964-1726 |
ispartof | Smart materials and structures, 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216 |
issn | 0964-1726 1361-665X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29438525 |
source | IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
subjects | Exact sciences and technology Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) General equipment and techniques Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy Measurement and testing methods Physics Servo and control equipment robots Solid mechanics Structural and continuum mechanics Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...) |
title | An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20experimental%20comparison%20between%20several%20active%20composite%20actuators%20for%20power%20generation&rft.jtitle=Smart%20materials%20and%20structures&rft.au=Sodano,%20Henry%20A&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1216&rft.pages=1211-1216&rft.issn=0964-1726&rft.eissn=1361-665X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29438525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29438525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |