An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation

The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Smart materials and structures 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216
Hauptverfasser: Sodano, Henry A, Lloyd, Justin, Inman, Daniel J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1216
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1211
container_title Smart materials and structures
container_volume 15
creator Sodano, Henry A
Lloyd, Justin
Inman, Daniel J
description The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29438525</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>29438525</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pF_DUi4KH2rw0bXocwzcYeFEQLyFNn0ika2rSbfrtTd3Qwy6eAsnv-ZPnj9A5wdcEC5HhqshTUtIiIzzjGcblAZoQVpC0KPjLIZr8gmN0EsI7xoQIRiboddYl8NmDt0voBtUm2i175W1wXVLDsAHokgBr8PFJ6cGu4Ue4YAcYL1ZqcD4kxvmkdxvwyRt0EQ_WdafoyKg2wNnunKLn25un-X26eLx7mM8Wqc5pPqQ1K4XJmWgK0TRNCYYbjUEXNH62YYxqlnOuGa0YZ0SLEkitWV0BMFHjsuBsii63ub13HysIg1zaoKFtVQduFSStYjqnI6RbqL0LwYORfVxb-S9JsBxrlGNLcmxJEi65jDXGoYtdugpatcarTtvwNykIr2iOo0u3zrr-f7lX-37fyb4x7BtcJY5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>29438525</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</creator><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><description>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0964-1726</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-665X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications) ; General equipment and techniques ; Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy ; Measurement and testing methods ; Physics ; Servo and control equipment; robots ; Solid mechanics ; Structural and continuum mechanics ; Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><ispartof>Smart materials and structures, 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18159240$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><title>Smart materials and structures</title><description>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</subject><subject>General equipment and techniques</subject><subject>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</subject><subject>Measurement and testing methods</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Servo and control equipment; robots</subject><subject>Solid mechanics</subject><subject>Structural and continuum mechanics</subject><subject>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</subject><issn>0964-1726</issn><issn>1361-665X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0E1LwzAYB_AgCs7pF_DUi4KH2rw0bXocwzcYeFEQLyFNn0ika2rSbfrtTd3Qwy6eAsnv-ZPnj9A5wdcEC5HhqshTUtIiIzzjGcblAZoQVpC0KPjLIZr8gmN0EsI7xoQIRiboddYl8NmDt0voBtUm2i175W1wXVLDsAHokgBr8PFJ6cGu4Ue4YAcYL1ZqcD4kxvmkdxvwyRt0EQ_WdafoyKg2wNnunKLn25un-X26eLx7mM8Wqc5pPqQ1K4XJmWgK0TRNCYYbjUEXNH62YYxqlnOuGa0YZ0SLEkitWV0BMFHjsuBsii63ub13HysIg1zaoKFtVQduFSStYjqnI6RbqL0LwYORfVxb-S9JsBxrlGNLcmxJEi65jDXGoYtdugpatcarTtvwNykIr2iOo0u3zrr-f7lX-37fyb4x7BtcJY5Y</recordid><startdate>20061001</startdate><enddate>20061001</enddate><creator>Sodano, Henry A</creator><creator>Lloyd, Justin</creator><creator>Inman, Daniel J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20061001</creationdate><title>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</title><author>Sodano, Henry A ; Lloyd, Justin ; Inman, Daniel J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c424t-b378f438d68ddd7ef5fc0ec62726d332c3455c3293531c87e1bc3b9ee38b07653</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)</topic><topic>General equipment and techniques</topic><topic>Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy</topic><topic>Measurement and testing methods</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Servo and control equipment; robots</topic><topic>Solid mechanics</topic><topic>Structural and continuum mechanics</topic><topic>Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sodano, Henry A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lloyd, Justin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inman, Daniel J</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sodano, Henry A</au><au>Lloyd, Justin</au><au>Inman, Daniel J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation</atitle><jtitle>Smart materials and structures</jtitle><date>2006-10-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1211</spage><epage>1216</epage><pages>1211-1216</pages><issn>0964-1726</issn><eissn>1361-665X</eissn><abstract>The use of piezoelectric materials for power harvesting has attracted significant interest over the past few years. The majority of research on this subject has sought to quantify the amount of energy generated in power harvesting applications, or to develop methods of improving the amount of energy generated. Usually, a monolithic piezoelectric material with a traditional electrode pattern and poled through its thickness is used for power harvesting. However, in recent years several companies and research institutions have begun to develop and market a broad range of piezoelectric composite sensor/actuator packages, each conceived for specific operational advantages and characteristics. Commonly, these devices are employed in control and vibration suppression applications, and their potential for use in power-harvesting systems remains largely unknown. Two frequently implemented design techniques for improving the performance of such actuators are the use of interdigitated electrodes and piezofibers. This paper seeks to experimentally quantify the differences in performance in power-harvesting applications between several of these new actuators and to identify the reasons for their relative performance characteristics. A special focus on the structural and compositional differences between each actuator is incorporated in the discussion of the effectiveness of each actuator as a power-harvesting device.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0964-1726
ispartof Smart materials and structures, 2006-10, Vol.15 (5), p.1211-1216
issn 0964-1726
1361-665X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_29438525
source IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link
subjects Exact sciences and technology
Fundamental areas of phenomenology (including applications)
General equipment and techniques
Instruments, apparatus, components and techniques common to several branches of physics and astronomy
Measurement and testing methods
Physics
Servo and control equipment
robots
Solid mechanics
Structural and continuum mechanics
Vibration, mechanical wave, dynamic stability (aeroelasticity, vibration control...)
title An experimental comparison between several active composite actuators for power generation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T20%3A49%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20experimental%20comparison%20between%20several%20active%20composite%20actuators%20for%20power%20generation&rft.jtitle=Smart%20materials%20and%20structures&rft.au=Sodano,%20Henry%20A&rft.date=2006-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1211&rft.epage=1216&rft.pages=1211-1216&rft.issn=0964-1726&rft.eissn=1361-665X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0964-1726/15/5/007&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E29438525%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=29438525&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true