Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil
Amphibians are currently considered to be covered by pesticide Environmental Risk Assessment schemes by surrogacy assumptions of exposure and susceptibility based on typical laboratory test species such as fish, mammals, and birds. While multiple reviews have shown for this approach to be adequate i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental pollution (1987) 2024-04, Vol.346, p.123614-123614, Article 123614 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 123614 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 123614 |
container_title | Environmental pollution (1987) |
container_volume | 346 |
creator | Mingo, Valentin Foudoulakis, Manousos Wheeler, James R. |
description | Amphibians are currently considered to be covered by pesticide Environmental Risk Assessment schemes by surrogacy assumptions of exposure and susceptibility based on typical laboratory test species such as fish, mammals, and birds. While multiple reviews have shown for this approach to be adequate in the case of aquatic stages, the same cannot be definitively stated for terrestrial stages. Concerns have risen that exposure of amphibians is likely to be highly influenced by dermal absorption, primarily due to the high permeability of their skin and the lack of a protective layer, such as fur or feathers. It is thus hypothesized that dermal uptake could be a significant route of exposure. Consequently, it is necessary to determine the relative importance of different exposure routes that might affect the integrated toxicity outcome for terrestrial amphibian life-stages. Here, a one-compartment Toxicokinetic model was derived and tested using a publicly available dataset containing relevant exposure and uptake information for juvenile anurans exposed to 13 different pesticides. Modelled body burdens were then compared to measured burdens for a total of 815 individuals. Overall, a good concordance between modelled and measured values was observed, with the predicted and measured body burdens differing by a factor of 2 on average (overall R2 of 0.80 and correlation coefficient of 0.89), suggesting good predictivity of the model. Accordingly, the model predicts realistic body burdens for a variety of frog and toad species, and overall, for anurans. As the model includes rehydration (implicit in the evaluated studies) but currently does not account for metabolism, it can be seen as a worst-case assessment.
We suggest toxicokinetic models, such as the one here presented, could be used to characterize dermal exposure in amphibians, screen for pesticides of concern, and prioritize risk assessment efforts, whilst reducing the need for de novo vertebrate testing.
[Display omitted]
•A one compartment Toxicokinetic (TK) model is described for anurans.•The model allows to extrapolate body burdens after exposure to contaminated soil.•On average, model predictions deviated from measured data by a factor of 2.•Only in 1% of cases, estimates underestimated exposure by > 10x compared to measured data.•The model could be used to reduce the need de novo vertebrate testing. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123614 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2942189796</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749124003282</els_id><sourcerecordid>3153570715</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-72f1a0b88145c1e684a3047794a0f1fba9f5979a7d68b2392f9cae4c04989ba3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUhS0EYqbAP6gqL9lk6ldie4NUIfqQqNiwY2E59jXjaRKndoLEv29GoSzb1dl8555770HoIyU7Smjz-bCD4WVM3Y4RJnaU8YaKE7SlSvKqEUycoi1hja6k0HSDPpRyIIQIzvk52nDFlayF2qKnn-D2dohlig73yUPXxeEZp4BtP-5jG-2A2-RfcTtnD0PBNkyQsYfc2w7P42R_wZEe4Tgheig45NTjkmJ3ic6C7QpcvekFevx693j7vbp_-Pbj9st95bgmUyVZoJa0SlFROwqNEpYTIaUWlgQaWqtDraW20jeqZVyzoJ0F4YjQSreWX6DrdeyY0-952cP0sbjlEDtAmovhtOa1JHKR_6FMC0bVEtYsqFhRl1MpGYIZc-xtfjWUmGMB5mDWAsyxALMWsNg-vSXMbQ_-3fT34wtwswKwfOQlQjbFRRgc-JjBTcan-O-EP5simNg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2942189796</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Mingo, Valentin ; Foudoulakis, Manousos ; Wheeler, James R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Mingo, Valentin ; Foudoulakis, Manousos ; Wheeler, James R.</creatorcontrib><description>Amphibians are currently considered to be covered by pesticide Environmental Risk Assessment schemes by surrogacy assumptions of exposure and susceptibility based on typical laboratory test species such as fish, mammals, and birds. While multiple reviews have shown for this approach to be adequate in the case of aquatic stages, the same cannot be definitively stated for terrestrial stages. Concerns have risen that exposure of amphibians is likely to be highly influenced by dermal absorption, primarily due to the high permeability of their skin and the lack of a protective layer, such as fur or feathers. It is thus hypothesized that dermal uptake could be a significant route of exposure. Consequently, it is necessary to determine the relative importance of different exposure routes that might affect the integrated toxicity outcome for terrestrial amphibian life-stages. Here, a one-compartment Toxicokinetic model was derived and tested using a publicly available dataset containing relevant exposure and uptake information for juvenile anurans exposed to 13 different pesticides. Modelled body burdens were then compared to measured burdens for a total of 815 individuals. Overall, a good concordance between modelled and measured values was observed, with the predicted and measured body burdens differing by a factor of 2 on average (overall R2 of 0.80 and correlation coefficient of 0.89), suggesting good predictivity of the model. Accordingly, the model predicts realistic body burdens for a variety of frog and toad species, and overall, for anurans. As the model includes rehydration (implicit in the evaluated studies) but currently does not account for metabolism, it can be seen as a worst-case assessment.
We suggest toxicokinetic models, such as the one here presented, could be used to characterize dermal exposure in amphibians, screen for pesticides of concern, and prioritize risk assessment efforts, whilst reducing the need for de novo vertebrate testing.
[Display omitted]
•A one compartment Toxicokinetic (TK) model is described for anurans.•The model allows to extrapolate body burdens after exposure to contaminated soil.•On average, model predictions deviated from measured data by a factor of 2.•Only in 1% of cases, estimates underestimated exposure by > 10x compared to measured data.•The model could be used to reduce the need de novo vertebrate testing.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123614</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38387548</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Animals ; Anura ; Anuran ; Body Burden ; data collection ; Dermal exposure ; environmental assessment ; fish ; frogs ; fur ; Hydration ; juveniles ; laboratory experimentation ; Mammals - metabolism ; metabolism ; Passive uptake ; permeability ; pesticides ; Pesticides - analysis ; pollution ; rehydration ; Risk assessment ; Skin ; skin absorption ; Soil ; species ; TK model ; toads ; toxicity</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2024-04, Vol.346, p.123614-123614, Article 123614</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-72f1a0b88145c1e684a3047794a0f1fba9f5979a7d68b2392f9cae4c04989ba3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7174-2859</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123614$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38387548$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mingo, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foudoulakis, Manousos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, James R.</creatorcontrib><title>Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Amphibians are currently considered to be covered by pesticide Environmental Risk Assessment schemes by surrogacy assumptions of exposure and susceptibility based on typical laboratory test species such as fish, mammals, and birds. While multiple reviews have shown for this approach to be adequate in the case of aquatic stages, the same cannot be definitively stated for terrestrial stages. Concerns have risen that exposure of amphibians is likely to be highly influenced by dermal absorption, primarily due to the high permeability of their skin and the lack of a protective layer, such as fur or feathers. It is thus hypothesized that dermal uptake could be a significant route of exposure. Consequently, it is necessary to determine the relative importance of different exposure routes that might affect the integrated toxicity outcome for terrestrial amphibian life-stages. Here, a one-compartment Toxicokinetic model was derived and tested using a publicly available dataset containing relevant exposure and uptake information for juvenile anurans exposed to 13 different pesticides. Modelled body burdens were then compared to measured burdens for a total of 815 individuals. Overall, a good concordance between modelled and measured values was observed, with the predicted and measured body burdens differing by a factor of 2 on average (overall R2 of 0.80 and correlation coefficient of 0.89), suggesting good predictivity of the model. Accordingly, the model predicts realistic body burdens for a variety of frog and toad species, and overall, for anurans. As the model includes rehydration (implicit in the evaluated studies) but currently does not account for metabolism, it can be seen as a worst-case assessment.
We suggest toxicokinetic models, such as the one here presented, could be used to characterize dermal exposure in amphibians, screen for pesticides of concern, and prioritize risk assessment efforts, whilst reducing the need for de novo vertebrate testing.
[Display omitted]
•A one compartment Toxicokinetic (TK) model is described for anurans.•The model allows to extrapolate body burdens after exposure to contaminated soil.•On average, model predictions deviated from measured data by a factor of 2.•Only in 1% of cases, estimates underestimated exposure by > 10x compared to measured data.•The model could be used to reduce the need de novo vertebrate testing.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Anura</subject><subject>Anuran</subject><subject>Body Burden</subject><subject>data collection</subject><subject>Dermal exposure</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>fish</subject><subject>frogs</subject><subject>fur</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>juveniles</subject><subject>laboratory experimentation</subject><subject>Mammals - metabolism</subject><subject>metabolism</subject><subject>Passive uptake</subject><subject>permeability</subject><subject>pesticides</subject><subject>Pesticides - analysis</subject><subject>pollution</subject><subject>rehydration</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Skin</subject><subject>skin absorption</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>species</subject><subject>TK model</subject><subject>toads</subject><subject>toxicity</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkUtP3DAUhS0EYqbAP6gqL9lk6ldie4NUIfqQqNiwY2E59jXjaRKndoLEv29GoSzb1dl8555770HoIyU7Smjz-bCD4WVM3Y4RJnaU8YaKE7SlSvKqEUycoi1hja6k0HSDPpRyIIQIzvk52nDFlayF2qKnn-D2dohlig73yUPXxeEZp4BtP-5jG-2A2-RfcTtnD0PBNkyQsYfc2w7P42R_wZEe4Tgheig45NTjkmJ3ic6C7QpcvekFevx693j7vbp_-Pbj9st95bgmUyVZoJa0SlFROwqNEpYTIaUWlgQaWqtDraW20jeqZVyzoJ0F4YjQSreWX6DrdeyY0-952cP0sbjlEDtAmovhtOa1JHKR_6FMC0bVEtYsqFhRl1MpGYIZc-xtfjWUmGMB5mDWAsyxALMWsNg-vSXMbQ_-3fT34wtwswKwfOQlQjbFRRgc-JjBTcan-O-EP5simNg</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Mingo, Valentin</creator><creator>Foudoulakis, Manousos</creator><creator>Wheeler, James R.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-2859</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil</title><author>Mingo, Valentin ; Foudoulakis, Manousos ; Wheeler, James R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-72f1a0b88145c1e684a3047794a0f1fba9f5979a7d68b2392f9cae4c04989ba3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Anura</topic><topic>Anuran</topic><topic>Body Burden</topic><topic>data collection</topic><topic>Dermal exposure</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>fish</topic><topic>frogs</topic><topic>fur</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>juveniles</topic><topic>laboratory experimentation</topic><topic>Mammals - metabolism</topic><topic>metabolism</topic><topic>Passive uptake</topic><topic>permeability</topic><topic>pesticides</topic><topic>Pesticides - analysis</topic><topic>pollution</topic><topic>rehydration</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Skin</topic><topic>skin absorption</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>species</topic><topic>TK model</topic><topic>toads</topic><topic>toxicity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mingo, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foudoulakis, Manousos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wheeler, James R.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mingo, Valentin</au><au>Foudoulakis, Manousos</au><au>Wheeler, James R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>346</volume><spage>123614</spage><epage>123614</epage><pages>123614-123614</pages><artnum>123614</artnum><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>Amphibians are currently considered to be covered by pesticide Environmental Risk Assessment schemes by surrogacy assumptions of exposure and susceptibility based on typical laboratory test species such as fish, mammals, and birds. While multiple reviews have shown for this approach to be adequate in the case of aquatic stages, the same cannot be definitively stated for terrestrial stages. Concerns have risen that exposure of amphibians is likely to be highly influenced by dermal absorption, primarily due to the high permeability of their skin and the lack of a protective layer, such as fur or feathers. It is thus hypothesized that dermal uptake could be a significant route of exposure. Consequently, it is necessary to determine the relative importance of different exposure routes that might affect the integrated toxicity outcome for terrestrial amphibian life-stages. Here, a one-compartment Toxicokinetic model was derived and tested using a publicly available dataset containing relevant exposure and uptake information for juvenile anurans exposed to 13 different pesticides. Modelled body burdens were then compared to measured burdens for a total of 815 individuals. Overall, a good concordance between modelled and measured values was observed, with the predicted and measured body burdens differing by a factor of 2 on average (overall R2 of 0.80 and correlation coefficient of 0.89), suggesting good predictivity of the model. Accordingly, the model predicts realistic body burdens for a variety of frog and toad species, and overall, for anurans. As the model includes rehydration (implicit in the evaluated studies) but currently does not account for metabolism, it can be seen as a worst-case assessment.
We suggest toxicokinetic models, such as the one here presented, could be used to characterize dermal exposure in amphibians, screen for pesticides of concern, and prioritize risk assessment efforts, whilst reducing the need for de novo vertebrate testing.
[Display omitted]
•A one compartment Toxicokinetic (TK) model is described for anurans.•The model allows to extrapolate body burdens after exposure to contaminated soil.•On average, model predictions deviated from measured data by a factor of 2.•Only in 1% of cases, estimates underestimated exposure by > 10x compared to measured data.•The model could be used to reduce the need de novo vertebrate testing.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38387548</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123614</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7174-2859</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0269-7491 |
ispartof | Environmental pollution (1987), 2024-04, Vol.346, p.123614-123614, Article 123614 |
issn | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2942189796 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Animals Anura Anuran Body Burden data collection Dermal exposure environmental assessment fish frogs fur Hydration juveniles laboratory experimentation Mammals - metabolism metabolism Passive uptake permeability pesticides Pesticides - analysis pollution rehydration Risk assessment Skin skin absorption Soil species TK model toads toxicity |
title | Mechanistic modelling of amphibian body burdens after dermal uptake of pesticides from soil |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T20%3A10%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Mechanistic%20modelling%20of%20amphibian%20body%20burdens%20after%20dermal%20uptake%20of%20pesticides%20from%20soil&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Mingo,%20Valentin&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=346&rft.spage=123614&rft.epage=123614&rft.pages=123614-123614&rft.artnum=123614&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.123614&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3153570715%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2942189796&rft_id=info:pmid/38387548&rft_els_id=S0269749124003282&rfr_iscdi=true |