Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement
ː Early detection of loss of proprioception is essential to prevent injury and maintain professional work activities. However, although many different methods are present for wrist proprioception measurement, these methods' validity and reliability studies are quite limited. To compare the vali...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies 2024-01, Vol.37, p.170-176 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 176 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 170 |
| container_title | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies |
| container_volume | 37 |
| creator | Seven, Barış Zorlular, Ali Oskay, Deran |
| description | ː Early detection of loss of proprioception is essential to prevent injury and maintain professional work activities. However, although many different methods are present for wrist proprioception measurement, these methods' validity and reliability studies are quite limited.
To compare the validity and reliability of the goniometer, inclinometer, and joint position sense goniometer methods used in measuring wrist active joint position sense (AJPS).
ː Thirty-two volunteer healthy participants (64 wrists) between the ages of 19–31 (mean age:23,34 ± 3,84) were included in the study. Wrist AJPS was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer as a reference standard in addition to an inclinometer, goniometer, and joint position sense goniometer (JPSG). Spearman's Correlation Coefficient was used for validity analysis, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3,1) was used to analyze test-retest reliability.
ː It was found that the goniometer (p |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.018 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2937337149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1360859223002267</els_id><sourcerecordid>2937337149</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e52848079ed7fd4cddfada2e15664aca2906ebda02e461965b01e9e7cfd0acd83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOBCEURYnROP-AC8PSTZUMNZG4MR2nxMSNrgkFjzSdqqIFSuPfS9utS1dAuPfkvYPQBSUlJbS5XpWrfkwlI4yXlJaEdnvomNacFYJ1fD_feUOKrhbsCJ3EuCKEiIqJQ3TEu4qzjtBj5Bd-XKvgop-wtzgtAX-owRmXvrCaDA4wONW7YfP--Q8A2DhrIcCU8Ahp6U3EcwSDrQ_4M6MSXge_Ds5rWCeXwSOoOAcYc-MMHVg1RDjfnafo7f7udfFYPL88PC1unwvN6yYVULOu6kgrwLTWVNoYq4xiQOumqZRWTJAGeqMIg6qhoql7QkFAq60hSpuOn6KrLTeP8j5DTHJ0UcMwqAn8HCUTvOW8pZXIUbaN6uBjDGBlnn1U4UtSIjei5UpuRMuNaEmpzKJz6XLHn_sRzF_l12wO3GwDkLf8cBBk1A4mDcYF0Eka7_7jfwOBJZKN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937337149</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Seven, Barış ; Zorlular, Ali ; Oskay, Deran</creator><creatorcontrib>Seven, Barış ; Zorlular, Ali ; Oskay, Deran</creatorcontrib><description>ː Early detection of loss of proprioception is essential to prevent injury and maintain professional work activities. However, although many different methods are present for wrist proprioception measurement, these methods' validity and reliability studies are quite limited.
To compare the validity and reliability of the goniometer, inclinometer, and joint position sense goniometer methods used in measuring wrist active joint position sense (AJPS).
ː Thirty-two volunteer healthy participants (64 wrists) between the ages of 19–31 (mean age:23,34 ± 3,84) were included in the study. Wrist AJPS was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer as a reference standard in addition to an inclinometer, goniometer, and joint position sense goniometer (JPSG). Spearman's Correlation Coefficient was used for validity analysis, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3,1) was used to analyze test-retest reliability.
ː It was found that the goniometer (p < 0.001, r = 0.529) is a moderately valid method to assess active wrist joint position sense. The JPSG (p < 0.001, r = 0.432) and inclinometer (p = 0.005, r = 0.350) have weak validity. According to the results of ICC3,1 analysis, the goniometer (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.422) and JPSG (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.369) were found to have poor reliability in assessing wrist AJPS, and the inclinometer (p = 0,183, ICC3,1 = 0,114) was not found as a reliable method.
ː Our results suggest that the JPSG and inclinometer should not be used in the wrist active joint position sense evaluation because of weak validity and poor reliability. The goniometer can be used in clinics and academic research to evaluate wrist joint position sense if the rater lacks a reliable and valid measurement tool.
•Proprioception is important in maintaining the wrist's optimal position during functional mobility.•Although various tools are used to assess proprioception, the validity and reliability studies of these tools are limited.•The inclinometer is valid in evaluating joint position sense but not reliable.•The JPSG has low validity and poor test-retest reliability.•In clinics and research, a goniometer can be used to assess wrist JPS when a valid and reliable tool is unavailable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1360-8592</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-9283</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38432801</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Exercise Therapy ; Humans ; Infant, Newborn ; Proprioception ; Reproducibility of Results ; Wrist ; Wrist Joint ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-01, Vol.37, p.170-176</ispartof><rights>2023 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e52848079ed7fd4cddfada2e15664aca2906ebda02e461965b01e9e7cfd0acd83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e52848079ed7fd4cddfada2e15664aca2906ebda02e461965b01e9e7cfd0acd83</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2809-4761</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859223002267$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27903,27904,65309</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38432801$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Seven, Barış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorlular, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oskay, Deran</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement</title><title>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</title><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><description>ː Early detection of loss of proprioception is essential to prevent injury and maintain professional work activities. However, although many different methods are present for wrist proprioception measurement, these methods' validity and reliability studies are quite limited.
To compare the validity and reliability of the goniometer, inclinometer, and joint position sense goniometer methods used in measuring wrist active joint position sense (AJPS).
ː Thirty-two volunteer healthy participants (64 wrists) between the ages of 19–31 (mean age:23,34 ± 3,84) were included in the study. Wrist AJPS was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer as a reference standard in addition to an inclinometer, goniometer, and joint position sense goniometer (JPSG). Spearman's Correlation Coefficient was used for validity analysis, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3,1) was used to analyze test-retest reliability.
ː It was found that the goniometer (p < 0.001, r = 0.529) is a moderately valid method to assess active wrist joint position sense. The JPSG (p < 0.001, r = 0.432) and inclinometer (p = 0.005, r = 0.350) have weak validity. According to the results of ICC3,1 analysis, the goniometer (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.422) and JPSG (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.369) were found to have poor reliability in assessing wrist AJPS, and the inclinometer (p = 0,183, ICC3,1 = 0,114) was not found as a reliable method.
ː Our results suggest that the JPSG and inclinometer should not be used in the wrist active joint position sense evaluation because of weak validity and poor reliability. The goniometer can be used in clinics and academic research to evaluate wrist joint position sense if the rater lacks a reliable and valid measurement tool.
•Proprioception is important in maintaining the wrist's optimal position during functional mobility.•Although various tools are used to assess proprioception, the validity and reliability studies of these tools are limited.•The inclinometer is valid in evaluating joint position sense but not reliable.•The JPSG has low validity and poor test-retest reliability.•In clinics and research, a goniometer can be used to assess wrist JPS when a valid and reliable tool is unavailable.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Exercise Therapy</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Proprioception</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Wrist</subject><subject>Wrist Joint</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1360-8592</issn><issn>1532-9283</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMlOBCEURYnROP-AC8PSTZUMNZG4MR2nxMSNrgkFjzSdqqIFSuPfS9utS1dAuPfkvYPQBSUlJbS5XpWrfkwlI4yXlJaEdnvomNacFYJ1fD_feUOKrhbsCJ3EuCKEiIqJQ3TEu4qzjtBj5Bd-XKvgop-wtzgtAX-owRmXvrCaDA4wONW7YfP--Q8A2DhrIcCU8Ahp6U3EcwSDrQ_4M6MSXge_Ds5rWCeXwSOoOAcYc-MMHVg1RDjfnafo7f7udfFYPL88PC1unwvN6yYVULOu6kgrwLTWVNoYq4xiQOumqZRWTJAGeqMIg6qhoql7QkFAq60hSpuOn6KrLTeP8j5DTHJ0UcMwqAn8HCUTvOW8pZXIUbaN6uBjDGBlnn1U4UtSIjei5UpuRMuNaEmpzKJz6XLHn_sRzF_l12wO3GwDkLf8cBBk1A4mDcYF0Eka7_7jfwOBJZKN</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Seven, Barış</creator><creator>Zorlular, Ali</creator><creator>Oskay, Deran</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-4761</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement</title><author>Seven, Barış ; Zorlular, Ali ; Oskay, Deran</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c356t-e52848079ed7fd4cddfada2e15664aca2906ebda02e461965b01e9e7cfd0acd83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Exercise Therapy</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Proprioception</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Wrist</topic><topic>Wrist Joint</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Seven, Barış</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zorlular, Ali</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oskay, Deran</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Seven, Barış</au><au>Zorlular, Ali</au><au>Oskay, Deran</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement</atitle><jtitle>Journal of bodywork and movement therapies</jtitle><addtitle>J Bodyw Mov Ther</addtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>37</volume><spage>170</spage><epage>176</epage><pages>170-176</pages><issn>1360-8592</issn><eissn>1532-9283</eissn><abstract>ː Early detection of loss of proprioception is essential to prevent injury and maintain professional work activities. However, although many different methods are present for wrist proprioception measurement, these methods' validity and reliability studies are quite limited.
To compare the validity and reliability of the goniometer, inclinometer, and joint position sense goniometer methods used in measuring wrist active joint position sense (AJPS).
ː Thirty-two volunteer healthy participants (64 wrists) between the ages of 19–31 (mean age:23,34 ± 3,84) were included in the study. Wrist AJPS was assessed with an isokinetic dynamometer as a reference standard in addition to an inclinometer, goniometer, and joint position sense goniometer (JPSG). Spearman's Correlation Coefficient was used for validity analysis, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC3,1) was used to analyze test-retest reliability.
ː It was found that the goniometer (p < 0.001, r = 0.529) is a moderately valid method to assess active wrist joint position sense. The JPSG (p < 0.001, r = 0.432) and inclinometer (p = 0.005, r = 0.350) have weak validity. According to the results of ICC3,1 analysis, the goniometer (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.422) and JPSG (p < 0.001, ICC3,1 = 0.369) were found to have poor reliability in assessing wrist AJPS, and the inclinometer (p = 0,183, ICC3,1 = 0,114) was not found as a reliable method.
ː Our results suggest that the JPSG and inclinometer should not be used in the wrist active joint position sense evaluation because of weak validity and poor reliability. The goniometer can be used in clinics and academic research to evaluate wrist joint position sense if the rater lacks a reliable and valid measurement tool.
•Proprioception is important in maintaining the wrist's optimal position during functional mobility.•Although various tools are used to assess proprioception, the validity and reliability studies of these tools are limited.•The inclinometer is valid in evaluating joint position sense but not reliable.•The JPSG has low validity and poor test-retest reliability.•In clinics and research, a goniometer can be used to assess wrist JPS when a valid and reliable tool is unavailable.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38432801</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.018</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2809-4761</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1360-8592 |
| ispartof | Journal of bodywork and movement therapies, 2024-01, Vol.37, p.170-176 |
| issn | 1360-8592 1532-9283 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2937337149 |
| source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
| subjects | Adult Exercise Therapy Humans Infant, Newborn Proprioception Reproducibility of Results Wrist Wrist Joint Young Adult |
| title | Comparison of the validity and reliability of three different methods used for wrist proprioception measurement |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A12%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20the%20validity%20and%20reliability%20of%20three%20different%20methods%20used%20for%20wrist%20proprioception%20measurement&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20bodywork%20and%20movement%20therapies&rft.au=Seven,%20Bar%C4%B1%C5%9F&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=37&rft.spage=170&rft.epage=176&rft.pages=170-176&rft.issn=1360-8592&rft.eissn=1532-9283&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jbmt.2023.11.018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2937337149%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937337149&rft_id=info:pmid/38432801&rft_els_id=S1360859223002267&rfr_iscdi=true |