The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages
Abstract Objective Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages. Methods This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who und...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of breast imaging 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.556-563 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 563 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 556 |
container_title | Journal of breast imaging |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Holtz, Jamie N Woodard, Genevieve A Hayward, Jessica H Ray, Kimberly M Kannan, Neeta Greenwood, Heather I Joe, Bonnie N Lee, Amie Y |
description | Abstract
Objective
Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages.
Methods
This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who underwent targeted US for focal breast symptoms at an academic imaging facility over an 18-year period (2000–2018). Clinical, imaging, and pathology results were reviewed. Malignant outcomes were determined by histology. Benign outcomes were confirmed by pathology or ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency table analyses were performed at the presentation level.
Results
The study cohort comprised 178 presentations in 175 pregnant women. Mean age was 34.7 years (standard deviation, 5.2). The majority (153/178, 86.0%) were more than 30 years old. At presentation, 42.1% (75/178) were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 27.0% (48/178) in the second, and 29.8% (53/178) in the third. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable lump (162/178, 91.0%), followed by focal pain (7/178, 3.9%). The vast majority (174/178, 97.8%) of cases were non-malignant. However, targeted US detected all 4 malignancies (cancer detection rate, 22/1000; negative predictive value 136/136, 100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% (4/4) and 78.2% (136/174), respectively.
Conclusion
Benign causes of symptoms in pregnant women were far more common; malignancy was rare, accounting for only 2.2% (4/178) of cases. Targeted breast US detected all malignancies, supporting US as the primary imaging modality for evaluating symptomatic pregnant women, regardless of age. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/jbi/wbab058 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934272403</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jbi/wbab058</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2934272403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-106087bbddeddbd497072d63d6853038e43ccc9abb7d2b47d2fcf22385d80c313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgihtzJ--SkwhSl6_14zjH_ICBgpseS9KksyNtapIq--_N7PToJQnk9z7wPgCcY3SDUUYnW1FNvgQXaJoegSGJKY5iTLLjvzdGAzB2bosQIiz8JPgUDGjKCMtYNgR69a7gK9edgqaEK243yisJ19pb7kzXSFgaC31Az7aqud3BxWfQ3Fem2U_cWsWdhy-7uvWmdrBqAlSbhjcevpla_aCZ1nC2Ue4MnJRcOzU-3COwvlus5g_R8un-cT5bRgUlyEcYxShNhJBSSSkkyxKUEBlTGadTimiqGC2KIuNCJJIIFo6yKAmh6VSmqKCYjsBVn9ta89Ep5_O6coXSmjfKdC4nGWUkIQzRQK97WljjnFVl3vZ75hjl-4bz0HB-aDjoi0NwJ2ol_-xvnwFc9sB07b9J34odhNI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934272403</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages</title><source>Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current)</source><creator>Holtz, Jamie N ; Woodard, Genevieve A ; Hayward, Jessica H ; Ray, Kimberly M ; Kannan, Neeta ; Greenwood, Heather I ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Lee, Amie Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Jamie N ; Woodard, Genevieve A ; Hayward, Jessica H ; Ray, Kimberly M ; Kannan, Neeta ; Greenwood, Heather I ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Lee, Amie Y</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract
Objective
Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages.
Methods
This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who underwent targeted US for focal breast symptoms at an academic imaging facility over an 18-year period (2000–2018). Clinical, imaging, and pathology results were reviewed. Malignant outcomes were determined by histology. Benign outcomes were confirmed by pathology or ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency table analyses were performed at the presentation level.
Results
The study cohort comprised 178 presentations in 175 pregnant women. Mean age was 34.7 years (standard deviation, 5.2). The majority (153/178, 86.0%) were more than 30 years old. At presentation, 42.1% (75/178) were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 27.0% (48/178) in the second, and 29.8% (53/178) in the third. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable lump (162/178, 91.0%), followed by focal pain (7/178, 3.9%). The vast majority (174/178, 97.8%) of cases were non-malignant. However, targeted US detected all 4 malignancies (cancer detection rate, 22/1000; negative predictive value 136/136, 100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% (4/4) and 78.2% (136/174), respectively.
Conclusion
Benign causes of symptoms in pregnant women were far more common; malignancy was rare, accounting for only 2.2% (4/178) of cases. Targeted breast US detected all malignancies, supporting US as the primary imaging modality for evaluating symptomatic pregnant women, regardless of age.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2631-6110</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2631-6129</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jbi/wbab058</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38424949</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>US: Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Journal of breast imaging, 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.556-563</ispartof><rights>Society of Breast Imaging 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2021</rights><rights>Society of Breast Imaging 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-106087bbddeddbd497072d63d6853038e43ccc9abb7d2b47d2fcf22385d80c313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-106087bbddeddbd497072d63d6853038e43ccc9abb7d2b47d2fcf22385d80c313</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0589-996X ; 0000-0001-7682-5023</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1584,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38424949$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Jamie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Genevieve A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Jessica H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Kimberly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amie Y</creatorcontrib><title>The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages</title><title>Journal of breast imaging</title><addtitle>J Breast Imaging</addtitle><description>Abstract
Objective
Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages.
Methods
This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who underwent targeted US for focal breast symptoms at an academic imaging facility over an 18-year period (2000–2018). Clinical, imaging, and pathology results were reviewed. Malignant outcomes were determined by histology. Benign outcomes were confirmed by pathology or ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency table analyses were performed at the presentation level.
Results
The study cohort comprised 178 presentations in 175 pregnant women. Mean age was 34.7 years (standard deviation, 5.2). The majority (153/178, 86.0%) were more than 30 years old. At presentation, 42.1% (75/178) were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 27.0% (48/178) in the second, and 29.8% (53/178) in the third. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable lump (162/178, 91.0%), followed by focal pain (7/178, 3.9%). The vast majority (174/178, 97.8%) of cases were non-malignant. However, targeted US detected all 4 malignancies (cancer detection rate, 22/1000; negative predictive value 136/136, 100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% (4/4) and 78.2% (136/174), respectively.
Conclusion
Benign causes of symptoms in pregnant women were far more common; malignancy was rare, accounting for only 2.2% (4/178) of cases. Targeted breast US detected all malignancies, supporting US as the primary imaging modality for evaluating symptomatic pregnant women, regardless of age.</description><issn>2631-6110</issn><issn>2631-6129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90M1LwzAYBvAgihtzJ--SkwhSl6_14zjH_ICBgpseS9KksyNtapIq--_N7PToJQnk9z7wPgCcY3SDUUYnW1FNvgQXaJoegSGJKY5iTLLjvzdGAzB2bosQIiz8JPgUDGjKCMtYNgR69a7gK9edgqaEK243yisJ19pb7kzXSFgaC31Az7aqud3BxWfQ3Fem2U_cWsWdhy-7uvWmdrBqAlSbhjcevpla_aCZ1nC2Ue4MnJRcOzU-3COwvlus5g_R8un-cT5bRgUlyEcYxShNhJBSSSkkyxKUEBlTGadTimiqGC2KIuNCJJIIFo6yKAmh6VSmqKCYjsBVn9ta89Ep5_O6coXSmjfKdC4nGWUkIQzRQK97WljjnFVl3vZ75hjl-4bz0HB-aDjoi0NwJ2ol_-xvnwFc9sB07b9J34odhNI</recordid><startdate>20210916</startdate><enddate>20210916</enddate><creator>Holtz, Jamie N</creator><creator>Woodard, Genevieve A</creator><creator>Hayward, Jessica H</creator><creator>Ray, Kimberly M</creator><creator>Kannan, Neeta</creator><creator>Greenwood, Heather I</creator><creator>Joe, Bonnie N</creator><creator>Lee, Amie Y</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-996X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-5023</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210916</creationdate><title>The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages</title><author>Holtz, Jamie N ; Woodard, Genevieve A ; Hayward, Jessica H ; Ray, Kimberly M ; Kannan, Neeta ; Greenwood, Heather I ; Joe, Bonnie N ; Lee, Amie Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c320t-106087bbddeddbd497072d63d6853038e43ccc9abb7d2b47d2fcf22385d80c313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holtz, Jamie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Woodard, Genevieve A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayward, Jessica H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ray, Kimberly M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kannan, Neeta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greenwood, Heather I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joe, Bonnie N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Amie Y</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of breast imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holtz, Jamie N</au><au>Woodard, Genevieve A</au><au>Hayward, Jessica H</au><au>Ray, Kimberly M</au><au>Kannan, Neeta</au><au>Greenwood, Heather I</au><au>Joe, Bonnie N</au><au>Lee, Amie Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages</atitle><jtitle>Journal of breast imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Breast Imaging</addtitle><date>2021-09-16</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>556</spage><epage>563</epage><pages>556-563</pages><issn>2631-6110</issn><eissn>2631-6129</eissn><abstract>Abstract
Objective
Data on breast imaging in symptomatic pregnant women are limited. Our aim was to assess the value of targeted breast US for the primary evaluation of breast symptoms in pregnant women of all ages.
Methods
This IRB-approved retrospective study included all pregnant patients who underwent targeted US for focal breast symptoms at an academic imaging facility over an 18-year period (2000–2018). Clinical, imaging, and pathology results were reviewed. Malignant outcomes were determined by histology. Benign outcomes were confirmed by pathology or ≥2 years of follow-up. Descriptive statistics and 2 × 2 contingency table analyses were performed at the presentation level.
Results
The study cohort comprised 178 presentations in 175 pregnant women. Mean age was 34.7 years (standard deviation, 5.2). The majority (153/178, 86.0%) were more than 30 years old. At presentation, 42.1% (75/178) were in the first trimester of pregnancy, 27.0% (48/178) in the second, and 29.8% (53/178) in the third. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable lump (162/178, 91.0%), followed by focal pain (7/178, 3.9%). The vast majority (174/178, 97.8%) of cases were non-malignant. However, targeted US detected all 4 malignancies (cancer detection rate, 22/1000; negative predictive value 136/136, 100%). Sensitivity and specificity were 100% (4/4) and 78.2% (136/174), respectively.
Conclusion
Benign causes of symptoms in pregnant women were far more common; malignancy was rare, accounting for only 2.2% (4/178) of cases. Targeted breast US detected all malignancies, supporting US as the primary imaging modality for evaluating symptomatic pregnant women, regardless of age.</abstract><cop>US</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><pmid>38424949</pmid><doi>10.1093/jbi/wbab058</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0589-996X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7682-5023</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2631-6110 |
ispartof | Journal of breast imaging, 2021-09, Vol.3 (5), p.556-563 |
issn | 2631-6110 2631-6129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934272403 |
source | Oxford University Press Journals All Titles (1996-Current) |
title | The Value of Targeted Ultrasound for the Primary Evaluation of Breast Symptoms in Pregnant Women of All Ages |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T01%3A54%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Value%20of%20Targeted%20Ultrasound%20for%20the%20Primary%20Evaluation%20of%20Breast%20Symptoms%20in%20Pregnant%20Women%20of%20All%20Ages&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20breast%20imaging&rft.au=Holtz,%20Jamie%20N&rft.date=2021-09-16&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=556&rft.epage=563&rft.pages=556-563&rft.issn=2631-6110&rft.eissn=2631-6129&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jbi/wbab058&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2934272403%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934272403&rft_id=info:pmid/38424949&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jbi/wbab058&rfr_iscdi=true |