The Myriad Decision at 10

A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annual review of genomics and human genetics 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419
Hauptverfasser: Sherkow, Jacob S, Cook-Deegan, Robert, Greely, Henry T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 419
container_issue 1
container_start_page 397
container_title Annual review of genomics and human genetics
container_volume 25
creator Sherkow, Jacob S
Cook-Deegan, Robert
Greely, Henry T
description A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though, Myriad 's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on Myriad in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of Myriad thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.
doi_str_mv 10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934271884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2934271884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkDtPAzEQhC0EIiHwA2jQSTQ0Bj_WvjvREIWnFEQTJDrL8W3g0D2CnQPl3-NwgZ5qt5iZnf0IOeXsnHPQF7ZpOo-f9BWbtqaMMylkHFzIfIcMuQJFRS5fdje7SGkmGAzIQQjvjLEsA7ZPBjIDAZDCkBzP3jB5XPvSFsk1ujKUbZPYVcLZIdlb2Crg0XaOyPPtzWxyT6dPdw-T8ZRaodiKIro0tnLAlHAOrGYanRbOSjfP89xy5MBgnjngqVIuLbjKMy2kdAuti1h-RM763KVvPzoMK1OXwWFV2QbbLpj4C4iUx-ZRetlLnW9D8LgwS1_W1q8NZ2bDxmzZmB82pmdjejbRfbI91M1rLP68vzCi4KoXbFJsFXNK_Ar_uvENYOl21A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934271884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><description>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though, Myriad 's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on Myriad in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of Myriad thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-8204</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-293X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-293X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38424474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Genetic Testing ; genetics ; Humans ; law ; Myriad ; Patents as Topic ; Supreme Court ; Supreme Court Decisions ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239?crawler=true&amp;mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,780,784,4182,27924,27925,78254,78255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38424474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><title>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</title><addtitle>Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet</addtitle><description>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though, Myriad 's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on Myriad in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of Myriad thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</description><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>law</subject><subject>Myriad</subject><subject>Patents as Topic</subject><subject>Supreme Court</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1527-8204</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkDtPAzEQhC0EIiHwA2jQSTQ0Bj_WvjvREIWnFEQTJDrL8W3g0D2CnQPl3-NwgZ5qt5iZnf0IOeXsnHPQF7ZpOo-f9BWbtqaMMylkHFzIfIcMuQJFRS5fdje7SGkmGAzIQQjvjLEsA7ZPBjIDAZDCkBzP3jB5XPvSFsk1ujKUbZPYVcLZIdlb2Crg0XaOyPPtzWxyT6dPdw-T8ZRaodiKIro0tnLAlHAOrGYanRbOSjfP89xy5MBgnjngqVIuLbjKMy2kdAuti1h-RM763KVvPzoMK1OXwWFV2QbbLpj4C4iUx-ZRetlLnW9D8LgwS1_W1q8NZ2bDxmzZmB82pmdjejbRfbI91M1rLP68vzCi4KoXbFJsFXNK_Ar_uvENYOl21A</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Sherkow, Jacob S</creator><creator>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creator><creator>Greely, Henry T</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><scope>ZYWBE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><author>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>law</topic><topic>Myriad</topic><topic>Patents as Topic</topic><topic>Supreme Court</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><collection>Annual Reviews Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherkow, Jacob S</au><au>Cook-Deegan, Robert</au><au>Greely, Henry T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Myriad Decision at 10</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>397-419</pages><issn>1527-8204</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><eissn>1545-293X</eissn><abstract>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though, Myriad 's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on Myriad in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of Myriad thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><pmid>38424474</pmid><doi>10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1527-8204
ispartof Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419
issn 1527-8204
1545-293X
1545-293X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934271884
source Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals
subjects Genetic Testing
genetics
Humans
law
Myriad
Patents as Topic
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Decisions
United States
title The Myriad Decision at 10
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A35%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Myriad%20Decision%20at%2010&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20genomics%20and%20human%20genetics&rft.au=Sherkow,%20Jacob%20S&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=397-419&rft.issn=1527-8204&rft.eissn=1545-293X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_annua%3E2934271884%3C/proquest_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934271884&rft_id=info:pmid/38424474&rfr_iscdi=true