The Myriad Decision at 10
A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc. , concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annual review of genomics and human genetics 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 419 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 397 |
container_title | Annual review of genomics and human genetics |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Sherkow, Jacob S Cook-Deegan, Robert Greely, Henry T |
description | A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though,
Myriad
's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on
Myriad
in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of
Myriad
thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_annua</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934271884</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2934271884</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkDtPAzEQhC0EIiHwA2jQSTQ0Bj_WvjvREIWnFEQTJDrL8W3g0D2CnQPl3-NwgZ5qt5iZnf0IOeXsnHPQF7ZpOo-f9BWbtqaMMylkHFzIfIcMuQJFRS5fdje7SGkmGAzIQQjvjLEsA7ZPBjIDAZDCkBzP3jB5XPvSFsk1ujKUbZPYVcLZIdlb2Crg0XaOyPPtzWxyT6dPdw-T8ZRaodiKIro0tnLAlHAOrGYanRbOSjfP89xy5MBgnjngqVIuLbjKMy2kdAuti1h-RM763KVvPzoMK1OXwWFV2QbbLpj4C4iUx-ZRetlLnW9D8LgwS1_W1q8NZ2bDxmzZmB82pmdjejbRfbI91M1rLP68vzCi4KoXbFJsFXNK_Ar_uvENYOl21A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2934271884</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><source>Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</creator><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><description>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though,
Myriad
's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on
Myriad
in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of
Myriad
thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1527-8204</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1545-293X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1545-293X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38424474</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Annual Reviews</publisher><subject>Genetic Testing ; genetics ; Humans ; law ; Myriad ; Patents as Topic ; Supreme Court ; Supreme Court Decisions ; United States</subject><ispartof>Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239?crawler=true&mimetype=application/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239$$EHTML$$P50$$Gannualreviews$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>70,314,780,784,4182,27924,27925,78254,78255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38424474$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><title>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</title><addtitle>Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet</addtitle><description>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though,
Myriad
's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on
Myriad
in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of
Myriad
thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</description><subject>Genetic Testing</subject><subject>genetics</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>law</subject><subject>Myriad</subject><subject>Patents as Topic</subject><subject>Supreme Court</subject><subject>Supreme Court Decisions</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>1527-8204</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqVkDtPAzEQhC0EIiHwA2jQSTQ0Bj_WvjvREIWnFEQTJDrL8W3g0D2CnQPl3-NwgZ5qt5iZnf0IOeXsnHPQF7ZpOo-f9BWbtqaMMylkHFzIfIcMuQJFRS5fdje7SGkmGAzIQQjvjLEsA7ZPBjIDAZDCkBzP3jB5XPvSFsk1ujKUbZPYVcLZIdlb2Crg0XaOyPPtzWxyT6dPdw-T8ZRaodiKIro0tnLAlHAOrGYanRbOSjfP89xy5MBgnjngqVIuLbjKMy2kdAuti1h-RM763KVvPzoMK1OXwWFV2QbbLpj4C4iUx-ZRetlLnW9D8LgwS1_W1q8NZ2bDxmzZmB82pmdjejbRfbI91M1rLP68vzCi4KoXbFJsFXNK_Ar_uvENYOl21A</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Sherkow, Jacob S</creator><creator>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creator><creator>Greely, Henry T</creator><general>Annual Reviews</general><scope>ZYWBE</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>The Myriad Decision at 10</title><author>Sherkow, Jacob S ; Cook-Deegan, Robert ; Greely, Henry T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a250t-eec7146c4052cc4a606ec62ca3cb999a1e1404b8c41755c7d15986233cf66d103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Genetic Testing</topic><topic>genetics</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>law</topic><topic>Myriad</topic><topic>Patents as Topic</topic><topic>Supreme Court</topic><topic>Supreme Court Decisions</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sherkow, Jacob S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cook-Deegan, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Greely, Henry T</creatorcontrib><collection>Annual Reviews Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sherkow, Jacob S</au><au>Cook-Deegan, Robert</au><au>Greely, Henry T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Myriad Decision at 10</atitle><jtitle>Annual review of genomics and human genetics</jtitle><addtitle>Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>397</spage><epage>419</epage><pages>397-419</pages><issn>1527-8204</issn><issn>1545-293X</issn><eissn>1545-293X</eissn><abstract>A decade ago, the US Supreme Court decided
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, concluding that isolated genes were not patentable subject matter. Beyond being a mere patent dispute, the case was a political and cultural phenomenon, viewed as a harbinger for the health of the biotechnology industry. With a decade of perspective, though,
Myriad
's impact seems much narrower. The law surrounding patentable subject matter—while greatly transformed—only centered on
Myriad
in small part. The case had only a modest impact on patenting practices both in and outside the United States. And persistent efforts to legislatively overturn the decision have not borne fruit. The significance of
Myriad
thus remains, even a decade later, hidden by larger developments in science and law that have occurred since the case was decided.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Annual Reviews</pub><pmid>38424474</pmid><doi>10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1527-8204 |
ispartof | Annual review of genomics and human genetics, 2024-08, Vol.25 (1), p.397-419 |
issn | 1527-8204 1545-293X 1545-293X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2934271884 |
source | Annual Reviews Complete A-Z List; MEDLINE; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Genetic Testing genetics Humans law Myriad Patents as Topic Supreme Court Supreme Court Decisions United States |
title | The Myriad Decision at 10 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T10%3A35%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_annua&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Myriad%20Decision%20at%2010&rft.jtitle=Annual%20review%20of%20genomics%20and%20human%20genetics&rft.au=Sherkow,%20Jacob%20S&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=397&rft.epage=419&rft.pages=397-419&rft.issn=1527-8204&rft.eissn=1545-293X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1146/annurev-genom-010323-011239&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_annua%3E2934271884%3C/proquest_annua%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2934271884&rft_id=info:pmid/38424474&rfr_iscdi=true |