Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study

Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701
Hauptverfasser: Lauridsen, Signe Voigt, Bøtker, Morten Thingemann, Eldrup, Nikolaj, Juhl-Olsen, Peter
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 701
container_issue 5
container_start_page 693
container_title Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica
container_volume 68
creator Lauridsen, Signe Voigt
Bøtker, Morten Thingemann
Eldrup, Nikolaj
Juhl-Olsen, Peter
description Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/aas.14393
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932940905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3039705708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IwIseqknTbJOjLH6BoAc9lzSZslnapuZD2H9v1NWDcxkGHl7mfRA6peSK5rlWKlzRikm2h-aUSVkseb3cR3NCCC04rcsZOgphk09WSXmIZkxUlDPO5mj94mHtwmSj6vHk7BgL1xVaecCpj14Fl0aD7Yh9mmLyYLBqjRvsmHHlfLQaqxGS34YhFAp7iD6ngY72A7B264zgEJPZHqODTvUBTnZ7gd7ubl9XD8XT8_3j6uap0IyIWLSEgtRCac0Ep6DaupQVB6I7YjihplYdL1siuC4B6lZ0tGOlqriCygjDDFugi5_cybv3BCE2gw0a-j6_6VJoSslyIpGEZ_T8H7pxyedmoWGEyZrwmohMXf5QOjcLHrpm8nZQfttQ0nzpb7L-5lt_Zs92iakdwPyRv77ZJ_dsgl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039705708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aas.14393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38415353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Aneurysms ; Aorta ; Aortic aneurysms ; Cohort analysis ; Delay ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Emergency medical services ; Health services ; Patients ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Survival ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38415353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic aneurysms</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IwIseqknTbJOjLH6BoAc9lzSZslnapuZD2H9v1NWDcxkGHl7mfRA6peSK5rlWKlzRikm2h-aUSVkseb3cR3NCCC04rcsZOgphk09WSXmIZkxUlDPO5mj94mHtwmSj6vHk7BgL1xVaecCpj14Fl0aD7Yh9mmLyYLBqjRvsmHHlfLQaqxGS34YhFAp7iD6ngY72A7B264zgEJPZHqODTvUBTnZ7gd7ubl9XD8XT8_3j6uap0IyIWLSEgtRCac0Ep6DaupQVB6I7YjihplYdL1siuC4B6lZ0tGOlqriCygjDDFugi5_cybv3BCE2gw0a-j6_6VJoSslyIpGEZ_T8H7pxyedmoWGEyZrwmohMXf5QOjcLHrpm8nZQfttQ0nzpb7L-5lt_Zs92iakdwPyRv77ZJ_dsgl0</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creator><creator>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creator><creator>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creator><creator>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic aneurysms</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</au><au>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</au><au>Eldrup, Nikolaj</au><au>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>693-701</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><abstract>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture. We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records. We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS. Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38415353</pmid><doi>10.1111/aas.14393</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0001-5172
ispartof Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701
issn 0001-5172
1399-6576
1399-6576
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932940905
source Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Abdomen
Aneurysms
Aorta
Aortic aneurysms
Cohort analysis
Delay
Electronic health records
Electronic medical records
Emergency medical services
Health services
Patients
Rupture
Rupturing
Survival
Ultrasonic imaging
Ultrasound
title Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prehospital%20point-of-care%20ultrasound%20in%20ruptured%20abdominal%20aortic%20aneurysms-a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Lauridsen,%20Signe%20Voigt&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=693-701&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aas.14393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3039705708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039705708&rft_id=info:pmid/38415353&rfr_iscdi=true