Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study
Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 701 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 693 |
container_title | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica |
container_volume | 68 |
creator | Lauridsen, Signe Voigt Bøtker, Morten Thingemann Eldrup, Nikolaj Juhl-Olsen, Peter |
description | Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.
We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.
Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/aas.14393 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932940905</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3039705708</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IwIseqknTbJOjLH6BoAc9lzSZslnapuZD2H9v1NWDcxkGHl7mfRA6peSK5rlWKlzRikm2h-aUSVkseb3cR3NCCC04rcsZOgphk09WSXmIZkxUlDPO5mj94mHtwmSj6vHk7BgL1xVaecCpj14Fl0aD7Yh9mmLyYLBqjRvsmHHlfLQaqxGS34YhFAp7iD6ngY72A7B264zgEJPZHqODTvUBTnZ7gd7ubl9XD8XT8_3j6uap0IyIWLSEgtRCac0Ep6DaupQVB6I7YjihplYdL1siuC4B6lZ0tGOlqriCygjDDFugi5_cybv3BCE2gw0a-j6_6VJoSslyIpGEZ_T8H7pxyedmoWGEyZrwmohMXf5QOjcLHrpm8nZQfttQ0nzpb7L-5lt_Zs92iakdwPyRv77ZJ_dsgl0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3039705708</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creator><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><description>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.
We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.
Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0001-5172</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1399-6576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/aas.14393</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38415353</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Abdomen ; Aneurysms ; Aorta ; Aortic aneurysms ; Cohort analysis ; Delay ; Electronic health records ; Electronic medical records ; Emergency medical services ; Health services ; Patients ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; Survival ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Ultrasound</subject><ispartof>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38415353$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><title>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</title><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><description>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.
We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.
Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</description><subject>Abdomen</subject><subject>Aneurysms</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>Aortic aneurysms</subject><subject>Cohort analysis</subject><subject>Delay</subject><subject>Electronic health records</subject><subject>Electronic medical records</subject><subject>Emergency medical services</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>Survival</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Ultrasound</subject><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LxDAQhoMo7rp68A9IwIseqknTbJOjLH6BoAc9lzSZslnapuZD2H9v1NWDcxkGHl7mfRA6peSK5rlWKlzRikm2h-aUSVkseb3cR3NCCC04rcsZOgphk09WSXmIZkxUlDPO5mj94mHtwmSj6vHk7BgL1xVaecCpj14Fl0aD7Yh9mmLyYLBqjRvsmHHlfLQaqxGS34YhFAp7iD6ngY72A7B264zgEJPZHqODTvUBTnZ7gd7ubl9XD8XT8_3j6uap0IyIWLSEgtRCac0Ep6DaupQVB6I7YjihplYdL1siuC4B6lZ0tGOlqriCygjDDFugi5_cybv3BCE2gw0a-j6_6VJoSslyIpGEZ_T8H7pxyedmoWGEyZrwmohMXf5QOjcLHrpm8nZQfttQ0nzpb7L-5lt_Zs92iakdwPyRv77ZJ_dsgl0</recordid><startdate>20240501</startdate><enddate>20240501</enddate><creator>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creator><creator>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creator><creator>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creator><creator>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240501</creationdate><title>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</title><author>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt ; Bøtker, Morten Thingemann ; Eldrup, Nikolaj ; Juhl-Olsen, Peter</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c308t-b01e9c8acc3851eab72945e0cf0d501d7af52b085c2ee7b8f1f32a45ae4d8d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Abdomen</topic><topic>Aneurysms</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>Aortic aneurysms</topic><topic>Cohort analysis</topic><topic>Delay</topic><topic>Electronic health records</topic><topic>Electronic medical records</topic><topic>Emergency medical services</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>Survival</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Ultrasound</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eldrup, Nikolaj</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lauridsen, Signe Voigt</au><au>Bøtker, Morten Thingemann</au><au>Eldrup, Nikolaj</au><au>Juhl-Olsen, Peter</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study</atitle><jtitle>Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica</jtitle><addtitle>Acta Anaesthesiol Scand</addtitle><date>2024-05-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>693</spage><epage>701</epage><pages>693-701</pages><issn>0001-5172</issn><issn>1399-6576</issn><eissn>1399-6576</eissn><abstract>Patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) require immediate vascular treatment to survive. The use of prehospital point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) may support clinical assessment, correct diagnosis, appropriate triage and reduce system delay. The aim was to study the process of care and outcome in patients receiving prehospital POCUS versus patients not receiving prehospital POCUS in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending aortic rupture.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in patients diagnosed with rAAA in the Central Denmark Region treated by a prehospital critical care physician from 1 January 2017 to 31 December 2021. Performance of prehospital POCUS was extracted from the prehospital electronic health records. System delay was defined as the time from the emergency phone call to the emergency medical service dispatch centre until the start of surgery. Data on patients primary hospital admission to a centre with/without vascular treatment expertise, treatments and complications including death were extracted from electronic health records.
We included 169 patients; prehospital POCUS was performed in 124 patients (73%). Emergency surgical treatment was performed in 71 patients. The overall survival in the POCUS group was 39% versus 16% in the NO POCUS group (hazard ratio (HR) (95% 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41-0.89, p = .011). In the POCUS group 99/124 (80%) were directly admitted to a vascular surgical centre versus 25/45 (56%) in the NO POCUS, RD 24% (95% CI: 8-40)), (p = .002). In the POCUS group, system delay was a median of 142 minutes (interquartile range (IQR) 121-189) and a median of 232 minutes (IQR 166-305) in the NO POCUS group (p = .006). In a multivariable analysis incorporating age, sex, previously known rAAA, and typical clinical symptoms of rAAA, the HR for death was 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.86 (p = .008) favouring prehospital POCUS.
Prehospital POCUS was associated with reduced time to treatment, higher chance of operability and significantly higher 30-day survival in patients with rAAA, ruptured iliac aneurysm or impending rupture of an AAA in this retrospective study. Residual confounding cannot be excluded. This study supports the clinical relevance of prehospital POCUS of the abdominal aorta.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38415353</pmid><doi>10.1111/aas.14393</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3584-2270</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0001-5172 |
ispartof | Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2024-05, Vol.68 (5), p.693-701 |
issn | 0001-5172 1399-6576 1399-6576 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932940905 |
source | Wiley Online Library All Journals |
subjects | Abdomen Aneurysms Aorta Aortic aneurysms Cohort analysis Delay Electronic health records Electronic medical records Emergency medical services Health services Patients Rupture Rupturing Survival Ultrasonic imaging Ultrasound |
title | Prehospital point-of-care ultrasound in ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms-a retrospective cohort study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T20%3A24%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prehospital%20point-of-care%20ultrasound%20in%20ruptured%20abdominal%20aortic%20aneurysms-a%20retrospective%20cohort%20study&rft.jtitle=Acta%20anaesthesiologica%20Scandinavica&rft.au=Lauridsen,%20Signe%20Voigt&rft.date=2024-05-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=693&rft.epage=701&rft.pages=693-701&rft.issn=0001-5172&rft.eissn=1399-6576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/aas.14393&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3039705708%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3039705708&rft_id=info:pmid/38415353&rfr_iscdi=true |