Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study
Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cancer 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 2002 |
---|---|
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 1991 |
container_title | Cancer |
container_volume | 130 |
creator | Bishnoi, Sarwan Kotasek, Dusan Aghmesheh, Morteza Yau, Thomas Cosman, Rasha Prawira, Amy Moore, Maggie Chan, Stephen L. Mant, Andrew Eek, Richard Zielinski, Robert Su, Rila Pan, Zhaoxuan Ma, Yiding Li, Fei Li, Peiqi Tse, Archie N. |
description | Background
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.
Methods
The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3.
Results
Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%).
Conclusion
CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors.
Plain Language Summary
CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands.
In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/cncr.35226 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932025278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055830074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwwOgK7EpiBT_J2E3SvmTRoCgSOwix3EYt44d4qTtsOIReCPehSfBM9OyYMHGvvfq0zlX9yD0kOBjgjF9rr0ej5mgVN5CC4LLPMOE09togTEuMsHZlwN0L8az1OZUsLvogBUcc1LwBfp1MisH1elq-fvHTw7Kt_DhJJUE9Nro8yFYP0Hjgj5XrYE5Wv8Vqk9b2x27Kxkc-dCp79Y726vmCVgPg5qs8VOESzutQbUXymvTQgzOtjDNfRjjC1hCZ8c4JTvr07Oee-WfQRuiSZ2JWrmkEtJoa3UzvhqUj2kKcZrbzX10p1MumgfX_yH6_OrlafUmW71__bZarjLNiJQZLaSQnDdaECapKTkxRGuRG5qLkpVF2WKieNcxzmUjmzxnpSY5V1Q0JS9kww7R0V53GMO32cSp7m3UxjnlTZhjTUtGMRU0LxL6-B_0LMyjT9vVDAtRsBQDT9TTPaXHEONounoY0_XGTU1wvb1vvY213sWa4EfXknPTm_YvepNjAsgeuLTObP4jVVfvqo970T_wXbDd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055830074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.
Methods
The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3.
Results
Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%).
Conclusion
CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors.
Plain Language Summary
CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands.
In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.
This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38404184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Anticancer properties ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Antitumor activity ; anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody ; anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody ; Apoptosis ; Cell activation ; Cell death ; CS1002 ; CS1003 ; CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors ; CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology ; Dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration & dosage ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Ligands ; Liver cancer ; Male ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Microsatellite instability ; microsatellite instability‐high ; Microsatellites ; Middle Aged ; Mismatch repair ; mismatch repair‐deficient ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors ; Safety ; Safety management ; Solid tumors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002</ispartof><rights>2024 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.35226$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.35226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38404184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotasek, Dusan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prawira, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Rila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yiding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.
Methods
The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3.
Results
Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%).
Conclusion
CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors.
Plain Language Summary
CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands.
In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.
This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antitumor activity</subject><subject>anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Cell activation</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>CS1002</subject><subject>CS1003</subject><subject>CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration & dosage</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum Tolerated Dose</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Microsatellite instability</subject><subject>microsatellite instability‐high</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mismatch repair</subject><subject>mismatch repair‐deficient</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwwOgK7EpiBT_J2E3SvmTRoCgSOwix3EYt44d4qTtsOIReCPehSfBM9OyYMHGvvfq0zlX9yD0kOBjgjF9rr0ej5mgVN5CC4LLPMOE09togTEuMsHZlwN0L8az1OZUsLvogBUcc1LwBfp1MisH1elq-fvHTw7Kt_DhJJUE9Nro8yFYP0Hjgj5XrYE5Wv8Vqk9b2x27Kxkc-dCp79Y726vmCVgPg5qs8VOESzutQbUXymvTQgzOtjDNfRjjC1hCZ8c4JTvr07Oee-WfQRuiSZ2JWrmkEtJoa3UzvhqUj2kKcZrbzX10p1MumgfX_yH6_OrlafUmW71__bZarjLNiJQZLaSQnDdaECapKTkxRGuRG5qLkpVF2WKieNcxzmUjmzxnpSY5V1Q0JS9kww7R0V53GMO32cSp7m3UxjnlTZhjTUtGMRU0LxL6-B_0LMyjT9vVDAtRsBQDT9TTPaXHEONounoY0_XGTU1wvb1vvY213sWa4EfXknPTm_YvepNjAsgeuLTObP4jVVfvqo970T_wXbDd</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creator><creator>Kotasek, Dusan</creator><creator>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creator><creator>Yau, Thomas</creator><creator>Cosman, Rasha</creator><creator>Prawira, Amy</creator><creator>Moore, Maggie</creator><creator>Chan, Stephen L.</creator><creator>Mant, Andrew</creator><creator>Eek, Richard</creator><creator>Zielinski, Robert</creator><creator>Su, Rila</creator><creator>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creator><creator>Ma, Yiding</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><creator>Li, Peiqi</creator><creator>Tse, Archie N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><author>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antitumor activity</topic><topic>anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Cell activation</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>CS1002</topic><topic>CS1003</topic><topic>CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration & dosage</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum Tolerated Dose</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Microsatellite instability</topic><topic>microsatellite instability‐high</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mismatch repair</topic><topic>mismatch repair‐deficient</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotasek, Dusan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prawira, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Rila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yiding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bishnoi, Sarwan</au><au>Kotasek, Dusan</au><au>Aghmesheh, Morteza</au><au>Yau, Thomas</au><au>Cosman, Rasha</au><au>Prawira, Amy</au><au>Moore, Maggie</au><au>Chan, Stephen L.</au><au>Mant, Andrew</au><au>Eek, Richard</au><au>Zielinski, Robert</au><au>Su, Rila</au><au>Pan, Zhaoxuan</au><au>Ma, Yiding</au><au>Li, Fei</au><au>Li, Peiqi</au><au>Tse, Archie N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1991</spage><epage>2002</epage><pages>1991-2002</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background
This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors.
Methods
The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3.
Results
Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%).
Conclusion
CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors.
Plain Language Summary
CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands.
In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.
This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38404184</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.35226</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0008-543X |
ispartof | Cancer, 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002 |
issn | 0008-543X 1097-0142 1097-0142 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932025278 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use Anticancer properties Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use Antitumor activity anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody Apoptosis Cell activation Cell death CS1002 CS1003 CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology Dosage Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Effectiveness Female Hepatocellular carcinoma Humans Immune checkpoint inhibitors Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration & dosage Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use Immunoglobulin G Immunoglobulins Ligands Liver cancer Male Maximum Tolerated Dose Melanoma Metastases Microsatellite instability microsatellite instability‐high Microsatellites Middle Aged Mismatch repair mismatch repair‐deficient Monoclonal antibodies Neoplasms - drug therapy Neoplasms - pathology Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors Safety Safety management Solid tumors Tumors |
title | Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual%20CTLA%E2%80%904%20and%20PD%E2%80%901%20checkpoint%20blockade%20using%20CS1002%20and%20CS1003%20(nofazinlimab)%20in%20patients%20with%20advanced%20solid%20tumors:%20A%20first%E2%80%90in%E2%80%90human,%20dose%E2%80%90escalation,%20and%20dose%E2%80%90expansion%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Bishnoi,%20Sarwan&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1991&rft.epage=2002&rft.pages=1991-2002&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.35226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3055830074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055830074&rft_id=info:pmid/38404184&rfr_iscdi=true |