Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study

Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐e...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002
Hauptverfasser: Bishnoi, Sarwan, Kotasek, Dusan, Aghmesheh, Morteza, Yau, Thomas, Cosman, Rasha, Prawira, Amy, Moore, Maggie, Chan, Stephen L., Mant, Andrew, Eek, Richard, Zielinski, Robert, Su, Rila, Pan, Zhaoxuan, Ma, Yiding, Li, Fei, Li, Peiqi, Tse, Archie N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2002
container_issue 11
container_start_page 1991
container_title Cancer
container_volume 130
creator Bishnoi, Sarwan
Kotasek, Dusan
Aghmesheh, Morteza
Yau, Thomas
Cosman, Rasha
Prawira, Amy
Moore, Maggie
Chan, Stephen L.
Mant, Andrew
Eek, Richard
Zielinski, Robert
Su, Rila
Pan, Zhaoxuan
Ma, Yiding
Li, Fei
Li, Peiqi
Tse, Archie N.
description Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3. Results Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%). Conclusion CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors. Plain Language Summary CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands. In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.35226
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932025278</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3055830074</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwwOgK7EpiBT_J2E3SvmTRoCgSOwix3EYt44d4qTtsOIReCPehSfBM9OyYMHGvvfq0zlX9yD0kOBjgjF9rr0ej5mgVN5CC4LLPMOE09togTEuMsHZlwN0L8az1OZUsLvogBUcc1LwBfp1MisH1elq-fvHTw7Kt_DhJJUE9Nro8yFYP0Hjgj5XrYE5Wv8Vqk9b2x27Kxkc-dCp79Y726vmCVgPg5qs8VOESzutQbUXymvTQgzOtjDNfRjjC1hCZ8c4JTvr07Oee-WfQRuiSZ2JWrmkEtJoa3UzvhqUj2kKcZrbzX10p1MumgfX_yH6_OrlafUmW71__bZarjLNiJQZLaSQnDdaECapKTkxRGuRG5qLkpVF2WKieNcxzmUjmzxnpSY5V1Q0JS9kww7R0V53GMO32cSp7m3UxjnlTZhjTUtGMRU0LxL6-B_0LMyjT9vVDAtRsBQDT9TTPaXHEONounoY0_XGTU1wvb1vvY213sWa4EfXknPTm_YvepNjAsgeuLTObP4jVVfvqo970T_wXbDd</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3055830074</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><description>Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3. Results Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%). Conclusion CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors. Plain Language Summary CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands. In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors. This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35226</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38404184</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects ; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use ; Anticancer properties ; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use ; Antitumor activity ; anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody ; anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody ; Apoptosis ; Cell activation ; Cell death ; CS1002 ; CS1003 ; CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology ; Dosage ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Effectiveness ; Female ; Hepatocellular carcinoma ; Humans ; Immune checkpoint inhibitors ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects ; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use ; Immunoglobulin G ; Immunoglobulins ; Ligands ; Liver cancer ; Male ; Maximum Tolerated Dose ; Melanoma ; Metastases ; Microsatellite instability ; microsatellite instability‐high ; Microsatellites ; Middle Aged ; Mismatch repair ; mismatch repair‐deficient ; Monoclonal antibodies ; Neoplasms - drug therapy ; Neoplasms - pathology ; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors ; Safety ; Safety management ; Solid tumors ; Tumors</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002</ispartof><rights>2024 American Cancer Society.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.35226$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.35226$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38404184$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotasek, Dusan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prawira, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Rila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yiding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><title>Cancer</title><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><description>Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3. Results Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%). Conclusion CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors. Plain Language Summary CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands. In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors. This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</subject><subject>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Anticancer properties</subject><subject>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Antitumor activity</subject><subject>anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody</subject><subject>Apoptosis</subject><subject>Cell activation</subject><subject>Cell death</subject><subject>CS1002</subject><subject>CS1003</subject><subject>CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology</subject><subject>Dosage</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatocellular carcinoma</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects</subject><subject>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Immunoglobulin G</subject><subject>Immunoglobulins</subject><subject>Ligands</subject><subject>Liver cancer</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Maximum Tolerated Dose</subject><subject>Melanoma</subject><subject>Metastases</subject><subject>Microsatellite instability</subject><subject>microsatellite instability‐high</subject><subject>Microsatellites</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Mismatch repair</subject><subject>mismatch repair‐deficient</subject><subject>Monoclonal antibodies</subject><subject>Neoplasms - drug therapy</subject><subject>Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Safety management</subject><subject>Solid tumors</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhS0EokNhwwOgK7EpiBT_J2E3SvmTRoCgSOwix3EYt44d4qTtsOIReCPehSfBM9OyYMHGvvfq0zlX9yD0kOBjgjF9rr0ej5mgVN5CC4LLPMOE09togTEuMsHZlwN0L8az1OZUsLvogBUcc1LwBfp1MisH1elq-fvHTw7Kt_DhJJUE9Nro8yFYP0Hjgj5XrYE5Wv8Vqk9b2x27Kxkc-dCp79Y726vmCVgPg5qs8VOESzutQbUXymvTQgzOtjDNfRjjC1hCZ8c4JTvr07Oee-WfQRuiSZ2JWrmkEtJoa3UzvhqUj2kKcZrbzX10p1MumgfX_yH6_OrlafUmW71__bZarjLNiJQZLaSQnDdaECapKTkxRGuRG5qLkpVF2WKieNcxzmUjmzxnpSY5V1Q0JS9kww7R0V53GMO32cSp7m3UxjnlTZhjTUtGMRU0LxL6-B_0LMyjT9vVDAtRsBQDT9TTPaXHEONounoY0_XGTU1wvb1vvY213sWa4EfXknPTm_YvepNjAsgeuLTObP4jVVfvqo970T_wXbDd</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creator><creator>Kotasek, Dusan</creator><creator>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creator><creator>Yau, Thomas</creator><creator>Cosman, Rasha</creator><creator>Prawira, Amy</creator><creator>Moore, Maggie</creator><creator>Chan, Stephen L.</creator><creator>Mant, Andrew</creator><creator>Eek, Richard</creator><creator>Zielinski, Robert</creator><creator>Su, Rila</creator><creator>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creator><creator>Ma, Yiding</creator><creator>Li, Fei</creator><creator>Li, Peiqi</creator><creator>Tse, Archie N.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TO</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</title><author>Bishnoi, Sarwan ; Kotasek, Dusan ; Aghmesheh, Morteza ; Yau, Thomas ; Cosman, Rasha ; Prawira, Amy ; Moore, Maggie ; Chan, Stephen L. ; Mant, Andrew ; Eek, Richard ; Zielinski, Robert ; Su, Rila ; Pan, Zhaoxuan ; Ma, Yiding ; Li, Fei ; Li, Peiqi ; Tse, Archie N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-2865644bc51362e941e1cc57e27593989d01a4ff3446b6b7739c174a25b9486b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects</topic><topic>Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Anticancer properties</topic><topic>Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Antitumor activity</topic><topic>anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody</topic><topic>Apoptosis</topic><topic>Cell activation</topic><topic>Cell death</topic><topic>CS1002</topic><topic>CS1003</topic><topic>CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology</topic><topic>Dosage</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatocellular carcinoma</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Immune checkpoint inhibitors</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration &amp; dosage</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects</topic><topic>Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Immunoglobulin G</topic><topic>Immunoglobulins</topic><topic>Ligands</topic><topic>Liver cancer</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Maximum Tolerated Dose</topic><topic>Melanoma</topic><topic>Metastases</topic><topic>Microsatellite instability</topic><topic>microsatellite instability‐high</topic><topic>Microsatellites</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Mismatch repair</topic><topic>mismatch repair‐deficient</topic><topic>Monoclonal antibodies</topic><topic>Neoplasms - drug therapy</topic><topic>Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists &amp; inhibitors</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Safety management</topic><topic>Solid tumors</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bishnoi, Sarwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotasek, Dusan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Aghmesheh, Morteza</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yau, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cosman, Rasha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prawira, Amy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moore, Maggie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chan, Stephen L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mant, Andrew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eek, Richard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zielinski, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su, Rila</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pan, Zhaoxuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yiding</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Fei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Peiqi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tse, Archie N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Oncogenes and Growth Factors Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bishnoi, Sarwan</au><au>Kotasek, Dusan</au><au>Aghmesheh, Morteza</au><au>Yau, Thomas</au><au>Cosman, Rasha</au><au>Prawira, Amy</au><au>Moore, Maggie</au><au>Chan, Stephen L.</au><au>Mant, Andrew</au><au>Eek, Richard</au><au>Zielinski, Robert</au><au>Su, Rila</au><au>Pan, Zhaoxuan</au><au>Ma, Yiding</au><au>Li, Fei</au><au>Li, Peiqi</au><au>Tse, Archie N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><addtitle>Cancer</addtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>130</volume><issue>11</issue><spage>1991</spage><epage>2002</epage><pages>1991-2002</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><abstract>Background This study investigated the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003) in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Methods The phase 1 study involved phase 1a monotherapy dose‐escalation (part 1) and phase 1b combination therapy dose escalation (part 2) and expansion (part 3). Various dosing schedules of CS1002 (0.3, 1, or 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks, or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) were evaluated with 200 mg CS1003 every 3 weeks in part 3. Results Parts 1, 2, and 3 included a total of 13, 18, and 61 patients, respectively. No dose‐limiting toxicities or maximum tolerated doses were observed. Treatment‐related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 30.8%, 83.3%, and 75.0% of patients in parts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Grade ≥3 TRAEs were experienced by 15.4%, 50.0%, and 18.3% of patients in each part. Of 61 patients evaluable for efficacy, 23 (37.7%) achieved objective responses in multiple tumor types. Higher objective response rates were observed with conventional and high‐dose CS1002 regimens (1 mg/kg every 3 weeks or 3 mg/kg every 9 weeks) compared to low‐dose CS1002 (0.3 mg/kg every 3 weeks) in microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient tumors, melanoma, and hepatocellular carcinoma (50.0% vs. 58.8%, 14.3% vs. 42.9%, and 0% vs. 16.7%). Conclusion CS1002, as monotherapy, and in combination with CS1003, had a manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range. Promising antitumor activities were observed in patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, supporting further evaluation of this treatment combination for solid tumors. Plain Language Summary CS1002 is a human immunoglobulin (Ig) G1 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction of CTLA‐4 with its ligands and increases T‐cell activation/proliferation. CS1003, now named nofazinlimab, is a humanized, recombinant IgG4 monoclonal antibody that blocks the interaction between human PD‐1 and its ligands. In this original article, we determined the safety profile of CS1002 as monotherapy and in combination with CS1003. Furthermore, we explored the antitumor activity of the combination in anti–programmed cell death protein (ligand)‐1 (PD‐[L]1)‐naive microsatellite instability‐high/mismatch repair‐deficient (MSI‐H/dMMR) pan tumors, and anti–PD‐(L)1‐refractory melanoma and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). CS1002 in combination with CS1003 had manageable safety profile across a broad dosing range and showed promising antitumor activities across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003. This supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors. This was a phase 1a/1b, dose‐escalation and dose‐expansion study evaluating the safety and efficacy of an anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody (CS1002) as monotherapy and in combination with an anti–PD‐1 monoclonal antibody (CS1003/nofazinlimab), in patients with advanced/metastatic solid tumors. Promising antitumor activities were observed in heavily pretreated patients with immune oncology (IO)‐naive and IO‐refractory tumors across CS1002 dose levels when combined with CS1003, which supports further assessment of CS1002 in combination with CS1003 for the treatment of solid tumors.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38404184</pmid><doi>10.1002/cncr.35226</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-8523</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2024-06, Vol.130 (11), p.1991-2002
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2932025278
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - administration & dosage
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - adverse effects
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized - therapeutic use
Anticancer properties
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols - therapeutic use
Antitumor activity
anti‐programmed cell death protein 1 monoclonal antibody
anti–CTLA‐4 monoclonal antibody
Apoptosis
Cell activation
Cell death
CS1002
CS1003
CTLA-4 Antigen - antagonists & inhibitors
CTLA-4 Antigen - immunology
Dosage
Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
Effectiveness
Female
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Humans
Immune checkpoint inhibitors
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - administration & dosage
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - adverse effects
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors - therapeutic use
Immunoglobulin G
Immunoglobulins
Ligands
Liver cancer
Male
Maximum Tolerated Dose
Melanoma
Metastases
Microsatellite instability
microsatellite instability‐high
Microsatellites
Middle Aged
Mismatch repair
mismatch repair‐deficient
Monoclonal antibodies
Neoplasms - drug therapy
Neoplasms - pathology
Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor - antagonists & inhibitors
Safety
Safety management
Solid tumors
Tumors
title Dual CTLA‐4 and PD‐1 checkpoint blockade using CS1002 and CS1003 (nofazinlimab) in patients with advanced solid tumors: A first‐in‐human, dose‐escalation, and dose‐expansion study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T17%3A01%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dual%20CTLA%E2%80%904%20and%20PD%E2%80%901%20checkpoint%20blockade%20using%20CS1002%20and%20CS1003%20(nofazinlimab)%20in%20patients%20with%20advanced%20solid%20tumors:%20A%20first%E2%80%90in%E2%80%90human,%20dose%E2%80%90escalation,%20and%20dose%E2%80%90expansion%20study&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Bishnoi,%20Sarwan&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=130&rft.issue=11&rft.spage=1991&rft.epage=2002&rft.pages=1991-2002&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.35226&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3055830074%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3055830074&rft_id=info:pmid/38404184&rfr_iscdi=true