Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has become an important tool for the study of in-vivo brain function due to its modulatory effects. Over the past two decades, interest in the influence of tDCS on behaviour has increased markedly, resulting in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Cortex 2024-04, Vol.173, p.61-79 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 79 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 61 |
container_title | Cortex |
container_volume | 173 |
creator | Willmot, Nicholas Leow, Li-Ann Filmer, Hannah L. Dux, Paul E. |
description | Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has become an important tool for the study of in-vivo brain function due to its modulatory effects. Over the past two decades, interest in the influence of tDCS on behaviour has increased markedly, resulting in a large body of literature spanning multiple domains. However, the effect of tDCS on human performance often varies, bringing into question the reliability of this approach. While reviews and meta-analyses highlight the contributions of methodological inconsistencies and individual differences, no published studies have directly tested the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour. Here, we conducted a large scale, double-blinded, sham-controlled registered report to assess the reliability of two single-session low-dose tDCS montages, previously found to impact response selection and motor learning operations, across two separate time periods. Our planned analysis found no evidence for either protocol being effective nor reliable. Post-hoc explorative analyses found evidence that tDCS influenced motor learning, but not response selection learning. In addition, the reliability of motor learning performance across trials was shown to be disrupted by tDCS. These findings are amongst the first to shed light specifically on the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour and provide valuable information to the field. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.015 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2930474730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0010945224000133</els_id><sourcerecordid>2930474730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8177dcdb0a05c24dd16f803224faf70c98d812fb09d053b4e71d94efd54ab1963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlySZh_EjjsECqylNCYgGsLceegKs0KbZTwd9jVGDJakaje2fuHEJOKBQU6Ox8WZjBR_woGDBeUFYALXfIlNYVzyUFtkumABTyWpRsQg5CWAIwkGW5TyZccskok1Nye_2x7gbv-tcsvmHm-uh17nrrNs6Ouss8dk43rnPxMxvaLF4tni6yeRq_uhDRo03tOuU4Inut7gIe_9RD8nJz_by4yx8eb-8X84fcCJAxBasqa2wDGkrDhLV01krgjIlWtxWYWlpJWdtAbaHkjcCK2lpga0uhG1rP-CE52-5d--F9xBDVygWDXad7HMagWM1BVKLikKRiKzV-CMFjq9berbT_VBTUN0K1VFuE6huhokwlhMl2-nNhbFZo_0y_zJLgcivA9OfGoVfBOOwNWufRRGUH9_-FL7s0g_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930474730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Willmot, Nicholas ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</creator><creatorcontrib>Willmot, Nicholas ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><description>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has become an important tool for the study of in-vivo brain function due to its modulatory effects. Over the past two decades, interest in the influence of tDCS on behaviour has increased markedly, resulting in a large body of literature spanning multiple domains. However, the effect of tDCS on human performance often varies, bringing into question the reliability of this approach. While reviews and meta-analyses highlight the contributions of methodological inconsistencies and individual differences, no published studies have directly tested the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour. Here, we conducted a large scale, double-blinded, sham-controlled registered report to assess the reliability of two single-session low-dose tDCS montages, previously found to impact response selection and motor learning operations, across two separate time periods. Our planned analysis found no evidence for either protocol being effective nor reliable. Post-hoc explorative analyses found evidence that tDCS influenced motor learning, but not response selection learning. In addition, the reliability of motor learning performance across trials was shown to be disrupted by tDCS. These findings are amongst the first to shed light specifically on the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour and provide valuable information to the field.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0010-9452</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1973-8102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.015</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38382128</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Behaviour ; Humans ; Intra-individual ; Learning ; Motor-learning ; Pre-Registration Publication ; Reliability ; Reproducibility of Results ; Response-learning ; tDCS ; Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods ; Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><ispartof>Cortex, 2024-04, Vol.173, p.61-79</ispartof><rights>2024 The Author(s)</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8177dcdb0a05c24dd16f803224faf70c98d812fb09d053b4e71d94efd54ab1963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8177dcdb0a05c24dd16f803224faf70c98d812fb09d053b4e71d94efd54ab1963</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9005-8975 ; 0000-0001-9496-4975</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.015$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38382128$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Willmot, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leow, Li-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filmer, Hannah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report</title><title>Cortex</title><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><description>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has become an important tool for the study of in-vivo brain function due to its modulatory effects. Over the past two decades, interest in the influence of tDCS on behaviour has increased markedly, resulting in a large body of literature spanning multiple domains. However, the effect of tDCS on human performance often varies, bringing into question the reliability of this approach. While reviews and meta-analyses highlight the contributions of methodological inconsistencies and individual differences, no published studies have directly tested the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour. Here, we conducted a large scale, double-blinded, sham-controlled registered report to assess the reliability of two single-session low-dose tDCS montages, previously found to impact response selection and motor learning operations, across two separate time periods. Our planned analysis found no evidence for either protocol being effective nor reliable. Post-hoc explorative analyses found evidence that tDCS influenced motor learning, but not response selection learning. In addition, the reliability of motor learning performance across trials was shown to be disrupted by tDCS. These findings are amongst the first to shed light specifically on the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour and provide valuable information to the field.</description><subject>Behaviour</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intra-individual</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Motor-learning</subject><subject>Pre-Registration Publication</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Response-learning</subject><subject>tDCS</subject><subject>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</subject><issn>0010-9452</issn><issn>1973-8102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EouXxBwhlySZh_EjjsECqylNCYgGsLceegKs0KbZTwd9jVGDJakaje2fuHEJOKBQU6Ox8WZjBR_woGDBeUFYALXfIlNYVzyUFtkumABTyWpRsQg5CWAIwkGW5TyZccskok1Nye_2x7gbv-tcsvmHm-uh17nrrNs6Ouss8dk43rnPxMxvaLF4tni6yeRq_uhDRo03tOuU4Inut7gIe_9RD8nJz_by4yx8eb-8X84fcCJAxBasqa2wDGkrDhLV01krgjIlWtxWYWlpJWdtAbaHkjcCK2lpga0uhG1rP-CE52-5d--F9xBDVygWDXad7HMagWM1BVKLikKRiKzV-CMFjq9berbT_VBTUN0K1VFuE6huhokwlhMl2-nNhbFZo_0y_zJLgcivA9OfGoVfBOOwNWufRRGUH9_-FL7s0g_Q</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Willmot, Nicholas</creator><creator>Leow, Li-Ann</creator><creator>Filmer, Hannah L.</creator><creator>Dux, Paul E.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-4975</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report</title><author>Willmot, Nicholas ; Leow, Li-Ann ; Filmer, Hannah L. ; Dux, Paul E.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c408t-8177dcdb0a05c24dd16f803224faf70c98d812fb09d053b4e71d94efd54ab1963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Behaviour</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intra-individual</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Motor-learning</topic><topic>Pre-Registration Publication</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Response-learning</topic><topic>tDCS</topic><topic>Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Willmot, Nicholas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leow, Li-Ann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Filmer, Hannah L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dux, Paul E.</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Willmot, Nicholas</au><au>Leow, Li-Ann</au><au>Filmer, Hannah L.</au><au>Dux, Paul E.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report</atitle><jtitle>Cortex</jtitle><addtitle>Cortex</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>173</volume><spage>61</spage><epage>79</epage><pages>61-79</pages><issn>0010-9452</issn><eissn>1973-8102</eissn><abstract>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, has become an important tool for the study of in-vivo brain function due to its modulatory effects. Over the past two decades, interest in the influence of tDCS on behaviour has increased markedly, resulting in a large body of literature spanning multiple domains. However, the effect of tDCS on human performance often varies, bringing into question the reliability of this approach. While reviews and meta-analyses highlight the contributions of methodological inconsistencies and individual differences, no published studies have directly tested the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour. Here, we conducted a large scale, double-blinded, sham-controlled registered report to assess the reliability of two single-session low-dose tDCS montages, previously found to impact response selection and motor learning operations, across two separate time periods. Our planned analysis found no evidence for either protocol being effective nor reliable. Post-hoc explorative analyses found evidence that tDCS influenced motor learning, but not response selection learning. In addition, the reliability of motor learning performance across trials was shown to be disrupted by tDCS. These findings are amongst the first to shed light specifically on the intra-individual reliability of tDCS effects on behaviour and provide valuable information to the field.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38382128</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.015</doi><tpages>19</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9005-8975</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9496-4975</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0010-9452 |
ispartof | Cortex, 2024-04, Vol.173, p.61-79 |
issn | 0010-9452 1973-8102 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2930474730 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | Behaviour Humans Intra-individual Learning Motor-learning Pre-Registration Publication Reliability Reproducibility of Results Response-learning tDCS Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation - methods Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation - methods |
title | Exploring the intra-individual reliability of tDCS: A registered report |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T19%3A12%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20the%20intra-individual%20reliability%20of%20tDCS:%20A%20registered%20report&rft.jtitle=Cortex&rft.au=Willmot,%20Nicholas&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=173&rft.spage=61&rft.epage=79&rft.pages=61-79&rft.issn=0010-9452&rft.eissn=1973-8102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.cortex.2023.12.015&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2930474730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930474730&rft_id=info:pmid/38382128&rft_els_id=S0010945224000133&rfr_iscdi=true |