Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity
Oocyte donation has greatly expanded in the past several decades since the first procedure was performed in 1983. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of cycles using donor oocytes increased from 18,011 cycles in 2010 to 27,131 cycles in 2019. Oocyte donation has become an import...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) 2024-04, Vol.143 (4), p.e90-e93 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | e93 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e90 |
container_title | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953) |
container_volume | 143 |
creator | Tsai, Shelun Eaton, Jennifer L |
description | Oocyte donation has greatly expanded in the past several decades since the first procedure was performed in 1983. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of cycles using donor oocytes increased from 18,011 cycles in 2010 to 27,131 cycles in 2019. Oocyte donation has become an important reproductive option for women with diminished ovarian reserve, recurrent failed in vitro fertilization, or heritable genetic conditions. It is also particularly important for single men, same-sex male couples, and men with a transgender woman partner. More recently, societal changes accompanying the expansion of social media and broader access to direct-to-consumer DNA testing have raised concerns about privacy and anonymity. In this article, we review two specific aspects of donor privacy: privacy related to personal identifiers provided by clinics or donor egg bank websites and privacy related to direct-to-consumer genetic testing. We also provide clinical recommendations specific to the United States for working with oocyte donors and donor oocyte recipients. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005523 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929129306</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929129306</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-b05e1f5edb016319b7775abd79f232679389efdba1498f00179950cdd6fbf8623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE9LAzEQxYMotla_gUiOXrbmz-5m461UrUKhQi16W7KbxEa6SU2ywn57t7SKOJc5zHszb34AXGI0xoizm8liNkZ_KssIPQJDXDCaEErfjsEQIcITVqTpAJyF8NGLcM7pKRjQgiJMcjoEYiKlVyEY-w6fvfkSdQenztbK2wCXrfeutXI3XLi6iwreOSuicRYaC-NawZU1UUm4jCKqcAtnzir4auIaTqyzXWNidw5OtNgEdXHoI7B6uH-ZPibzxexpOpknNWY4JhXKFNaZklUfkmJeMcYyUUnGNaEkZ5wWXGlZCZzyQvefMM4zVEuZ60oXOaEjcL3fu_Xus1Uhlo0JtdpshFWuDSXhhGPCKcp7abqX1t6F4JUut940wnclRuUObtnDLf_D7W1Xhwtt1Sj5a_qhSb8BIYh0_A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2929129306</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity</title><source>Journals@Ovid Complete</source><creator>Tsai, Shelun ; Eaton, Jennifer L</creator><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Shelun ; Eaton, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><description>Oocyte donation has greatly expanded in the past several decades since the first procedure was performed in 1983. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of cycles using donor oocytes increased from 18,011 cycles in 2010 to 27,131 cycles in 2019. Oocyte donation has become an important reproductive option for women with diminished ovarian reserve, recurrent failed in vitro fertilization, or heritable genetic conditions. It is also particularly important for single men, same-sex male couples, and men with a transgender woman partner. More recently, societal changes accompanying the expansion of social media and broader access to direct-to-consumer DNA testing have raised concerns about privacy and anonymity. In this article, we review two specific aspects of donor privacy: privacy related to personal identifiers provided by clinics or donor egg bank websites and privacy related to direct-to-consumer genetic testing. We also provide clinical recommendations specific to the United States for working with oocyte donors and donor oocyte recipients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-7844</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-233X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005523</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38301263</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><ispartof>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2024-04, Vol.143 (4), p.e90-e93</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-b05e1f5edb016319b7775abd79f232679389efdba1498f00179950cdd6fbf8623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38301263$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Shelun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><title>Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity</title><title>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</title><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><description>Oocyte donation has greatly expanded in the past several decades since the first procedure was performed in 1983. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of cycles using donor oocytes increased from 18,011 cycles in 2010 to 27,131 cycles in 2019. Oocyte donation has become an important reproductive option for women with diminished ovarian reserve, recurrent failed in vitro fertilization, or heritable genetic conditions. It is also particularly important for single men, same-sex male couples, and men with a transgender woman partner. More recently, societal changes accompanying the expansion of social media and broader access to direct-to-consumer DNA testing have raised concerns about privacy and anonymity. In this article, we review two specific aspects of donor privacy: privacy related to personal identifiers provided by clinics or donor egg bank websites and privacy related to direct-to-consumer genetic testing. We also provide clinical recommendations specific to the United States for working with oocyte donors and donor oocyte recipients.</description><issn>0029-7844</issn><issn>1873-233X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE9LAzEQxYMotla_gUiOXrbmz-5m461UrUKhQi16W7KbxEa6SU2ywn57t7SKOJc5zHszb34AXGI0xoizm8liNkZ_KssIPQJDXDCaEErfjsEQIcITVqTpAJyF8NGLcM7pKRjQgiJMcjoEYiKlVyEY-w6fvfkSdQenztbK2wCXrfeutXI3XLi6iwreOSuicRYaC-NawZU1UUm4jCKqcAtnzir4auIaTqyzXWNidw5OtNgEdXHoI7B6uH-ZPibzxexpOpknNWY4JhXKFNaZklUfkmJeMcYyUUnGNaEkZ5wWXGlZCZzyQvefMM4zVEuZ60oXOaEjcL3fu_Xus1Uhlo0JtdpshFWuDSXhhGPCKcp7abqX1t6F4JUut940wnclRuUObtnDLf_D7W1Xhwtt1Sj5a_qhSb8BIYh0_A</recordid><startdate>20240401</startdate><enddate>20240401</enddate><creator>Tsai, Shelun</creator><creator>Eaton, Jennifer L</creator><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240401</creationdate><title>Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity</title><author>Tsai, Shelun ; Eaton, Jennifer L</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c171t-b05e1f5edb016319b7775abd79f232679389efdba1498f00179950cdd6fbf8623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Shelun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eaton, Jennifer L</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tsai, Shelun</au><au>Eaton, Jennifer L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity</atitle><jtitle>Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953)</jtitle><addtitle>Obstet Gynecol</addtitle><date>2024-04-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>143</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e90</spage><epage>e93</epage><pages>e90-e93</pages><issn>0029-7844</issn><eissn>1873-233X</eissn><abstract>Oocyte donation has greatly expanded in the past several decades since the first procedure was performed in 1983. According to the Centers for Disease Control, the number of cycles using donor oocytes increased from 18,011 cycles in 2010 to 27,131 cycles in 2019. Oocyte donation has become an important reproductive option for women with diminished ovarian reserve, recurrent failed in vitro fertilization, or heritable genetic conditions. It is also particularly important for single men, same-sex male couples, and men with a transgender woman partner. More recently, societal changes accompanying the expansion of social media and broader access to direct-to-consumer DNA testing have raised concerns about privacy and anonymity. In this article, we review two specific aspects of donor privacy: privacy related to personal identifiers provided by clinics or donor egg bank websites and privacy related to direct-to-consumer genetic testing. We also provide clinical recommendations specific to the United States for working with oocyte donors and donor oocyte recipients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>38301263</pmid><doi>10.1097/AOG.0000000000005523</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0029-7844 |
ispartof | Obstetrics and gynecology (New York. 1953), 2024-04, Vol.143 (4), p.e90-e93 |
issn | 0029-7844 1873-233X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929129306 |
source | Journals@Ovid Complete |
title | Addressing Privacy Concerns Surrounding Oocyte Donation in the United States: Gone With Anonymity |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T22%3A24%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Addressing%20Privacy%20Concerns%20Surrounding%20Oocyte%20Donation%20in%20the%20United%20States:%20Gone%20With%20Anonymity&rft.jtitle=Obstetrics%20and%20gynecology%20(New%20York.%201953)&rft.au=Tsai,%20Shelun&rft.date=2024-04-01&rft.volume=143&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e90&rft.epage=e93&rft.pages=e90-e93&rft.issn=0029-7844&rft.eissn=1873-233X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005523&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929129306%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2929129306&rft_id=info:pmid/38301263&rfr_iscdi=true |