Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS). When planning for transcatheter intervention, caudal vena cava (CVC) measurements are typically obtained from two‐dimensional (2D) imaging to aid in stent selection. We hypothesized that cli...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary radiology & ultrasound 2024-03, Vol.65 (2), p.130-137
Hauptverfasser: Jackson, Erin, Markovic, Lauren E., Perlini, Michael
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 137
container_issue 2
container_start_page 130
container_title Veterinary radiology & ultrasound
container_volume 65
creator Jackson, Erin
Markovic, Lauren E.
Perlini, Michael
description Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS). When planning for transcatheter intervention, caudal vena cava (CVC) measurements are typically obtained from two‐dimensional (2D) imaging to aid in stent selection. We hypothesized that clinically applicable three‐dimensional (3D) IHPSS models can be generated, and CVC measurements will not differ between 2D images and 3D models. Computed tomography angiography datasets from client‐owned dogs with IHPSS at the University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Materialise Mimics 25.0 and 3‐matic 17.0 were used for 3D modeling. Caudal vena cava diameters were measured in 2D dorsal and transverse planes 20 mm cranial and caudal from the shunt ostium and were compared with CVC diameters from 3D models. Length was measured in the 2D dorsal plane between midpoints of each diameter and compared to the 3D model length. Data are presented as mean (SD), and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. Three‐dimensional models were generated for 32 IHPSS (15 right‐, 12 left‐, and five central‐divisional). Two‐dimensional dorsal and transverse area‐associated diameter measurements were 16.7 mm (5.6) and 15.5 mm (4.2) cranial; 14.9 mm (4.2) and 14.3 mm (3.7) caudal. Three‐dimensional area‐associated diameter measurements were 15.3 mm (4.4) cranial and 14.0 mm (3.6) caudal. The 2D length was 61.5 mm (7.1) compared with 3D 59.9 mm (7.2). Intraclass correlation coefficients comparing 2D and 3D diameters were all >0.80, indicating very good agreement, with good agreement (>0.60) for length. Clinically applicable 3D IHPSS models can be generated using engineering software. Measurements from 3D models are consistent with 2D planar imaging. Both 2D CTA and 3D virtual models can be utilized for preprocedural planning, depending on clinician preference.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/vru.13337
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929066594</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2929066594</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2857-5cd543351ed496cd895e52e1cf7db219d92315fb42d0bf7638cdcf79a84866a93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFqGzEQhkVJqR23h7xA2GNy2HglrVbSsZg2KRgKIc51kaVZW2F3tZW0Db71EUIeMU8SuXZ6CHQuGvF_8w_Mj9AZLq5wqvlvP15hSin_gKaYl0UuSIVPUl8wkQss6ASdhvBQFIRxwj-hCRWES87xFD0vXDcob4PrM9dk8dG9_HkytoM-WNerNrOd2th-k0WXxa0HeCd3zkC719Ow7aNXWxhUtDobnI8u7EKELv3CduxjyMawR3VaOUYwybNzG6-G7S5T_cYe-8_oY6PaAF-O7wytvn-7W9zky5_XPxZfl7kmgvGcacNKShkGU8pKGyEZMAJYN9ysCZZGEopZsy6JKdYNr6jQJmlSiVJUlZJ0hi4OvoN3v0YIse5s0NC2qgc3hppIIouqYrJM6OUB1d6F4KGpB58O43c1Lup9BHWKoP4bQWLPj7bjugPzj3y7eQLmB-DRtrD7v1N9f7s6WL4CjZyXmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2929066594</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Jackson, Erin ; Markovic, Lauren E. ; Perlini, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Erin ; Markovic, Lauren E. ; Perlini, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS). When planning for transcatheter intervention, caudal vena cava (CVC) measurements are typically obtained from two‐dimensional (2D) imaging to aid in stent selection. We hypothesized that clinically applicable three‐dimensional (3D) IHPSS models can be generated, and CVC measurements will not differ between 2D images and 3D models. Computed tomography angiography datasets from client‐owned dogs with IHPSS at the University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Materialise Mimics 25.0 and 3‐matic 17.0 were used for 3D modeling. Caudal vena cava diameters were measured in 2D dorsal and transverse planes 20 mm cranial and caudal from the shunt ostium and were compared with CVC diameters from 3D models. Length was measured in the 2D dorsal plane between midpoints of each diameter and compared to the 3D model length. Data are presented as mean (SD), and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. Three‐dimensional models were generated for 32 IHPSS (15 right‐, 12 left‐, and five central‐divisional). Two‐dimensional dorsal and transverse area‐associated diameter measurements were 16.7 mm (5.6) and 15.5 mm (4.2) cranial; 14.9 mm (4.2) and 14.3 mm (3.7) caudal. Three‐dimensional area‐associated diameter measurements were 15.3 mm (4.4) cranial and 14.0 mm (3.6) caudal. The 2D length was 61.5 mm (7.1) compared with 3D 59.9 mm (7.2). Intraclass correlation coefficients comparing 2D and 3D diameters were all &gt;0.80, indicating very good agreement, with good agreement (&gt;0.60) for length. Clinically applicable 3D IHPSS models can be generated using engineering software. Measurements from 3D models are consistent with 2D planar imaging. Both 2D CTA and 3D virtual models can be utilized for preprocedural planning, depending on clinician preference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1058-8183</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1740-8261</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/vru.13337</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38279771</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England</publisher><subject>Animals ; canine ; Computed Tomography Angiography - veterinary ; dog ; Dogs ; Hospitals, Animal ; Hospitals, Teaching ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - veterinary ; liver ; planning ; Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - veterinary ; stent ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - veterinary ; transcatheter</subject><ispartof>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound, 2024-03, Vol.65 (2), p.130-137</ispartof><rights>2024 American College of Veterinary Radiology.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2857-5cd543351ed496cd895e52e1cf7db219d92315fb42d0bf7638cdcf79a84866a93</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5986-6296</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111%2Fvru.13337$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111%2Fvru.13337$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38279771$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markovic, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlini, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography</title><title>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</title><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><description>Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS). When planning for transcatheter intervention, caudal vena cava (CVC) measurements are typically obtained from two‐dimensional (2D) imaging to aid in stent selection. We hypothesized that clinically applicable three‐dimensional (3D) IHPSS models can be generated, and CVC measurements will not differ between 2D images and 3D models. Computed tomography angiography datasets from client‐owned dogs with IHPSS at the University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Materialise Mimics 25.0 and 3‐matic 17.0 were used for 3D modeling. Caudal vena cava diameters were measured in 2D dorsal and transverse planes 20 mm cranial and caudal from the shunt ostium and were compared with CVC diameters from 3D models. Length was measured in the 2D dorsal plane between midpoints of each diameter and compared to the 3D model length. Data are presented as mean (SD), and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. Three‐dimensional models were generated for 32 IHPSS (15 right‐, 12 left‐, and five central‐divisional). Two‐dimensional dorsal and transverse area‐associated diameter measurements were 16.7 mm (5.6) and 15.5 mm (4.2) cranial; 14.9 mm (4.2) and 14.3 mm (3.7) caudal. Three‐dimensional area‐associated diameter measurements were 15.3 mm (4.4) cranial and 14.0 mm (3.6) caudal. The 2D length was 61.5 mm (7.1) compared with 3D 59.9 mm (7.2). Intraclass correlation coefficients comparing 2D and 3D diameters were all &gt;0.80, indicating very good agreement, with good agreement (&gt;0.60) for length. Clinically applicable 3D IHPSS models can be generated using engineering software. Measurements from 3D models are consistent with 2D planar imaging. Both 2D CTA and 3D virtual models can be utilized for preprocedural planning, depending on clinician preference.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>canine</subject><subject>Computed Tomography Angiography - veterinary</subject><subject>dog</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Hospitals, Animal</subject><subject>Hospitals, Teaching</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - veterinary</subject><subject>liver</subject><subject>planning</subject><subject>Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - veterinary</subject><subject>stent</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - veterinary</subject><subject>transcatheter</subject><issn>1058-8183</issn><issn>1740-8261</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFqGzEQhkVJqR23h7xA2GNy2HglrVbSsZg2KRgKIc51kaVZW2F3tZW0Db71EUIeMU8SuXZ6CHQuGvF_8w_Mj9AZLq5wqvlvP15hSin_gKaYl0UuSIVPUl8wkQss6ASdhvBQFIRxwj-hCRWES87xFD0vXDcob4PrM9dk8dG9_HkytoM-WNerNrOd2th-k0WXxa0HeCd3zkC719Ow7aNXWxhUtDobnI8u7EKELv3CduxjyMawR3VaOUYwybNzG6-G7S5T_cYe-8_oY6PaAF-O7wytvn-7W9zky5_XPxZfl7kmgvGcacNKShkGU8pKGyEZMAJYN9ysCZZGEopZsy6JKdYNr6jQJmlSiVJUlZJ0hi4OvoN3v0YIse5s0NC2qgc3hppIIouqYrJM6OUB1d6F4KGpB58O43c1Lup9BHWKoP4bQWLPj7bjugPzj3y7eQLmB-DRtrD7v1N9f7s6WL4CjZyXmw</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>Jackson, Erin</creator><creator>Markovic, Lauren E.</creator><creator>Perlini, Michael</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-6296</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography</title><author>Jackson, Erin ; Markovic, Lauren E. ; Perlini, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2857-5cd543351ed496cd895e52e1cf7db219d92315fb42d0bf7638cdcf79a84866a93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>canine</topic><topic>Computed Tomography Angiography - veterinary</topic><topic>dog</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Hospitals, Animal</topic><topic>Hospitals, Teaching</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - veterinary</topic><topic>liver</topic><topic>planning</topic><topic>Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - veterinary</topic><topic>stent</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - veterinary</topic><topic>transcatheter</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jackson, Erin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markovic, Lauren E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perlini, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jackson, Erin</au><au>Markovic, Lauren E.</au><au>Perlini, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography</atitle><jtitle>Veterinary radiology &amp; ultrasound</jtitle><addtitle>Vet Radiol Ultrasound</addtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>65</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>130</spage><epage>137</epage><pages>130-137</pages><issn>1058-8183</issn><eissn>1740-8261</eissn><abstract>Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used for the diagnosis of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (IHPSS). When planning for transcatheter intervention, caudal vena cava (CVC) measurements are typically obtained from two‐dimensional (2D) imaging to aid in stent selection. We hypothesized that clinically applicable three‐dimensional (3D) IHPSS models can be generated, and CVC measurements will not differ between 2D images and 3D models. Computed tomography angiography datasets from client‐owned dogs with IHPSS at the University of Georgia Veterinary Teaching Hospital from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed. Materialise Mimics 25.0 and 3‐matic 17.0 were used for 3D modeling. Caudal vena cava diameters were measured in 2D dorsal and transverse planes 20 mm cranial and caudal from the shunt ostium and were compared with CVC diameters from 3D models. Length was measured in the 2D dorsal plane between midpoints of each diameter and compared to the 3D model length. Data are presented as mean (SD), and intraclass correlation coefficients were performed. Three‐dimensional models were generated for 32 IHPSS (15 right‐, 12 left‐, and five central‐divisional). Two‐dimensional dorsal and transverse area‐associated diameter measurements were 16.7 mm (5.6) and 15.5 mm (4.2) cranial; 14.9 mm (4.2) and 14.3 mm (3.7) caudal. Three‐dimensional area‐associated diameter measurements were 15.3 mm (4.4) cranial and 14.0 mm (3.6) caudal. The 2D length was 61.5 mm (7.1) compared with 3D 59.9 mm (7.2). Intraclass correlation coefficients comparing 2D and 3D diameters were all &gt;0.80, indicating very good agreement, with good agreement (&gt;0.60) for length. Clinically applicable 3D IHPSS models can be generated using engineering software. Measurements from 3D models are consistent with 2D planar imaging. Both 2D CTA and 3D virtual models can be utilized for preprocedural planning, depending on clinician preference.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pmid>38279771</pmid><doi>10.1111/vru.13337</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5986-6296</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1058-8183
ispartof Veterinary radiology & ultrasound, 2024-03, Vol.65 (2), p.130-137
issn 1058-8183
1740-8261
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929066594
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals
subjects Animals
canine
Computed Tomography Angiography - veterinary
dog
Dogs
Hospitals, Animal
Hospitals, Teaching
Humans
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - veterinary
liver
planning
Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic - veterinary
stent
Tomography, X-Ray Computed - veterinary
transcatheter
title Comparison of two‐dimensional imaging to three‐dimensional modeling of intrahepatic portosystemic shunts using computed tomography angiography
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T17%3A17%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20two%E2%80%90dimensional%20imaging%20to%20three%E2%80%90dimensional%20modeling%20of%20intrahepatic%20portosystemic%20shunts%20using%20computed%20tomography%20angiography&rft.jtitle=Veterinary%20radiology%20&%20ultrasound&rft.au=Jackson,%20Erin&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=65&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=137&rft.pages=130-137&rft.issn=1058-8183&rft.eissn=1740-8261&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/vru.13337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2929066594%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2929066594&rft_id=info:pmid/38279771&rfr_iscdi=true