Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation

Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Laryngoscope 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053
Hauptverfasser: Miglani, Amar, Rangel, India, Smith, Cody, Bansberg, Stephen F., Lal, Devyani, Marino, Michael J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3053
container_issue 7
container_start_page 3049
container_title The Laryngoscope
container_volume 134
creator Miglani, Amar
Rangel, India
Smith, Cody
Bansberg, Stephen F.
Lal, Devyani
Marino, Michael J.
description Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment. Methods Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores. Results Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008). Conclusions An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024 We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/lary.31286
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929058288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068708988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Myfpk2OY-gUxhSdoKeQtql2pM1MWmXf3nSdHjx4euF9fzy8PACcIjhGEOIrLe1mTBBm8R4YIkpQGHFO98HQH0nIKH4ZgCPnVhCihFB4CAaEYcIYj4bgfuKccq5SdROYIpDBwnwqHSyN0UFhbNC8q2Cqy7rMpA5mVuZl_dbBhXR-8aTWjR8Pynorm9LUx-CgkNqpk90cgeeb6-X0Npzfz-6mk3mYERTHIeZRFheRjDmRhBaY0TiVnPGUJjjnKY6iJKUEMhznWUoZTTGXES7S7oqShJARuOhz19Z8tMo1oipdprSWtTKtE5hjDinDjHl6_oeuTGtr_50gMGYJZHyrLnuVWeOcVYVY27LyzQoERVez6GoW25o9PttFtmml8l_606sHqAdfpVabf6LEfPL42od-A3gWhW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068708988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment. Methods Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores. Results Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008). Conclusions An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024 We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.31286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38238894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Edema ; Endoscopy ; inflammation ; nasal endoscopy ; nasal septal perforation ; Nose ; objective assessment</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053</ispartof><rights>2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2091-9199 ; 0000-0002-8672-0310 ; 0000-0002-7593-2385 ; 0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.31286$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.31286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38238894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Devyani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment. Methods Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores. Results Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008). Conclusions An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024 We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>inflammation</subject><subject>nasal endoscopy</subject><subject>nasal septal perforation</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>objective assessment</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Myfpk2OY-gUxhSdoKeQtql2pM1MWmXf3nSdHjx4euF9fzy8PACcIjhGEOIrLe1mTBBm8R4YIkpQGHFO98HQH0nIKH4ZgCPnVhCihFB4CAaEYcIYj4bgfuKccq5SdROYIpDBwnwqHSyN0UFhbNC8q2Cqy7rMpA5mVuZl_dbBhXR-8aTWjR8Pynorm9LUx-CgkNqpk90cgeeb6-X0Npzfz-6mk3mYERTHIeZRFheRjDmRhBaY0TiVnPGUJjjnKY6iJKUEMhznWUoZTTGXES7S7oqShJARuOhz19Z8tMo1oipdprSWtTKtE5hjDinDjHl6_oeuTGtr_50gMGYJZHyrLnuVWeOcVYVY27LyzQoERVez6GoW25o9PttFtmml8l_606sHqAdfpVabf6LEfPL42od-A3gWhW0</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Miglani, Amar</creator><creator>Rangel, India</creator><creator>Smith, Cody</creator><creator>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creator><creator>Lal, Devyani</creator><creator>Marino, Michael J.</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-9199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-0310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><author>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>inflammation</topic><topic>nasal endoscopy</topic><topic>nasal septal perforation</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>objective assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Devyani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miglani, Amar</au><au>Rangel, India</au><au>Smith, Cody</au><au>Bansberg, Stephen F.</au><au>Lal, Devyani</au><au>Marino, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3049</spage><epage>3053</epage><pages>3049-3053</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment. Methods Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores. Results Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008). Conclusions An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes. Level of Evidence 3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024 We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38238894</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.31286</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-9199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-0310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-852X
ispartof The Laryngoscope, 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053
issn 0023-852X
1531-4995
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929058288
source Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete
subjects Agreements
Edema
Endoscopy
inflammation
nasal endoscopy
nasal septal perforation
Nose
objective assessment
title Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20a%20Novel%20Tool%20for%20the%20Clinical%20Grading%20of%20Nasal%20Septal%20Perforation&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Miglani,%20Amar&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3049&rft.epage=3053&rft.pages=3049-3053&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.31286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068708988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068708988&rft_id=info:pmid/38238894&rfr_iscdi=true