Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation
Background Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Laryngoscope 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 3053 |
---|---|
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 3049 |
container_title | The Laryngoscope |
container_volume | 134 |
creator | Miglani, Amar Rangel, India Smith, Cody Bansberg, Stephen F. Lal, Devyani Marino, Michael J. |
description | Background
Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment.
Methods
Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores.
Results
Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024
We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/lary.31286 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929058288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3068708988</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Myfpk2OY-gUxhSdoKeQtql2pM1MWmXf3nSdHjx4euF9fzy8PACcIjhGEOIrLe1mTBBm8R4YIkpQGHFO98HQH0nIKH4ZgCPnVhCihFB4CAaEYcIYj4bgfuKccq5SdROYIpDBwnwqHSyN0UFhbNC8q2Cqy7rMpA5mVuZl_dbBhXR-8aTWjR8Pynorm9LUx-CgkNqpk90cgeeb6-X0Npzfz-6mk3mYERTHIeZRFheRjDmRhBaY0TiVnPGUJjjnKY6iJKUEMhznWUoZTTGXES7S7oqShJARuOhz19Z8tMo1oipdprSWtTKtE5hjDinDjHl6_oeuTGtr_50gMGYJZHyrLnuVWeOcVYVY27LyzQoERVez6GoW25o9PttFtmml8l_606sHqAdfpVabf6LEfPL42od-A3gWhW0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3068708988</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><creator>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment.
Methods
Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores.
Results
Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024
We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-852X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-4995</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/lary.31286</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38238894</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Edema ; Endoscopy ; inflammation ; nasal endoscopy ; nasal septal perforation ; Nose ; objective assessment</subject><ispartof>The Laryngoscope, 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053</ispartof><rights>2024 The American Laryngological, Rhinological and Otological Society, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2091-9199 ; 0000-0002-8672-0310 ; 0000-0002-7593-2385 ; 0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Flary.31286$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Flary.31286$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38238894$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Devyani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><title>The Laryngoscope</title><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><description>Background
Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment.
Methods
Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores.
Results
Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024
We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Edema</subject><subject>Endoscopy</subject><subject>inflammation</subject><subject>nasal endoscopy</subject><subject>nasal septal perforation</subject><subject>Nose</subject><subject>objective assessment</subject><issn>0023-852X</issn><issn>1531-4995</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90E9LwzAYBvAgipvTix9ACl5E6Myfpk2OY-gUxhSdoKeQtql2pM1MWmXf3nSdHjx4euF9fzy8PACcIjhGEOIrLe1mTBBm8R4YIkpQGHFO98HQH0nIKH4ZgCPnVhCihFB4CAaEYcIYj4bgfuKccq5SdROYIpDBwnwqHSyN0UFhbNC8q2Cqy7rMpA5mVuZl_dbBhXR-8aTWjR8Pynorm9LUx-CgkNqpk90cgeeb6-X0Npzfz-6mk3mYERTHIeZRFheRjDmRhBaY0TiVnPGUJjjnKY6iJKUEMhznWUoZTTGXES7S7oqShJARuOhz19Z8tMo1oipdprSWtTKtE5hjDinDjHl6_oeuTGtr_50gMGYJZHyrLnuVWeOcVYVY27LyzQoERVez6GoW25o9PttFtmml8l_606sHqAdfpVabf6LEfPL42od-A3gWhW0</recordid><startdate>202407</startdate><enddate>202407</enddate><creator>Miglani, Amar</creator><creator>Rangel, India</creator><creator>Smith, Cody</creator><creator>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creator><creator>Lal, Devyani</creator><creator>Marino, Michael J.</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-9199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-0310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202407</creationdate><title>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</title><author>Miglani, Amar ; Rangel, India ; Smith, Cody ; Bansberg, Stephen F. ; Lal, Devyani ; Marino, Michael J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3166-294c6f4a693a35f2856ba989b572d9b2447b530826dcb585b29a42fb72d917733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Edema</topic><topic>Endoscopy</topic><topic>inflammation</topic><topic>nasal endoscopy</topic><topic>nasal septal perforation</topic><topic>Nose</topic><topic>objective assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Miglani, Amar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rangel, India</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smith, Cody</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bansberg, Stephen F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lal, Devyani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marino, Michael J.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Miglani, Amar</au><au>Rangel, India</au><au>Smith, Cody</au><au>Bansberg, Stephen F.</au><au>Lal, Devyani</au><au>Marino, Michael J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation</atitle><jtitle>The Laryngoscope</jtitle><addtitle>Laryngoscope</addtitle><date>2024-07</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>134</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>3049</spage><epage>3053</epage><pages>3049-3053</pages><issn>0023-852X</issn><eissn>1531-4995</eissn><abstract>Background
Nasal septal perforations (NSP) can have a heterogeneous appearance on endoscopic examination with varying degrees of crusting, inflammatory change, and associated septal deviation. The clinical applicability of these findings as contributors to patient symptoms may be enhanced by use of a standardized assessment.
Methods
Video nasal endoscopy recordings were obtained from 40 patients with NSP. Five raters with varied levels of training ranging from a senior resident to an experienced septal perforation surgeon independently reviewed the videos for the following exam findings: crusting, scarring, granulation tissue, septal deviation, and edema. Scoring for each item was reported on a 3‐point (0–2) scale, and each reviewer repeated scoring at a 14‐day interval. Interrater and intrarater agreement were calculated using Fleiss kappa for each item and the total scores. Additionally, endoscopy scores were correlated with patient‐reported NOSE‐Perf symptom scores.
Results
Interrater agreement for the overall instrument was in the “fair‐to‐moderate” range with the following interrater agreement for each item: crusting (0.458–0.575), scarring (0.286–0.308), granulation (0.403–0.406), deviation (0.487–0.494), and edema (0.253–0.406). Intrarater agreement was generally “substantial” for individual items as well as the overall instrument (0.688). The NSP endoscopy scores were moderately correlated with NOSE‐Perf scores (r = 0.44, p = 0.008).
Conclusions
An endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.
Level of Evidence
3 Laryngoscope, 134:3049–3053, 2024
We found that an endoscopic evaluation of NSP comprising five exam findings has acceptable interrater and intrarater reliability and correlates with patient‐reported outcomes. NSP endoscopy may be applied to future clinical studies for characterization of NSP and assessment of treatment outcomes.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>38238894</pmid><doi>10.1002/lary.31286</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2091-9199</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8672-0310</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7593-2385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7330-0969</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-852X |
ispartof | The Laryngoscope, 2024-07, Vol.134 (7), p.3049-3053 |
issn | 0023-852X 1531-4995 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2929058288 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete |
subjects | Agreements Edema Endoscopy inflammation nasal endoscopy nasal septal perforation Nose objective assessment |
title | Assessment of a Novel Tool for the Clinical Grading of Nasal Septal Perforation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T06%3A47%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20a%20Novel%20Tool%20for%20the%20Clinical%20Grading%20of%20Nasal%20Septal%20Perforation&rft.jtitle=The%20Laryngoscope&rft.au=Miglani,%20Amar&rft.date=2024-07&rft.volume=134&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=3049&rft.epage=3053&rft.pages=3049-3053&rft.issn=0023-852X&rft.eissn=1531-4995&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/lary.31286&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3068708988%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3068708988&rft_id=info:pmid/38238894&rfr_iscdi=true |