Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment

Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and wi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chest 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.950-958
Hauptverfasser: Piscitello, Gina M., Lyons, Patrick G., Koch, Valerie Gutmann, Parker, William F., Huber, Michael T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 958
container_issue 4
container_start_page 950
container_title Chest
container_volume 165
creator Piscitello, Gina M.
Lyons, Patrick G.
Koch, Valerie Gutmann
Parker, William F.
Huber, Michael T.
description Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; how do these policies approach ethically controversial scenarios; and how do these policies address sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment? This national cross-sectional survey assessed the content of hospital policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. We distributed the survey electronically to American Society for Bioethics and Humanities members between July and August 2023 and descriptively analyzed responses. Among 93 respondents from hospitals or hospital systems representing all 50 US states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, DC, 92% had policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Hospitals varied in their stated guidance, permitting life-sustaining treatment to be withheld or withdrawn in cases of patient or surrogate request (82%), physiologic futility (81%), and potentially inappropriate treatment (64%). Of the 8% of hospitals with policies that addressed patient sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, these policies provided opposing recommendations to either exclude sociodemographic factors in decision-making or actively acknowledge and incorporate these factors in decision-making. Only 3% of hospitals had policies that recommended collecting and maintaining information about patients for whom life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn that could be used to identify disparities in decision-making. Although most surveyed US hospital policies addressed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, these policies varied widely in criteria and processes. Surveyed policies also rarely addressed sociodemographic disparities in these decisions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.028
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928966555</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0012369224000011</els_id><sourcerecordid>2928966555</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8155e6683142a5f01cc53fbfd8763d5b6ed19c83b87681d5891ce1c6306865c03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFPGzEQha2KCgLlF1RCPnLZrceOjffAAUHbIEVqpVI4Wo49Sxxt1sF2qPj3dQj02NPojd6bp_kI-QysBQbqy6p1S8yl5YyLFnjLuP5AJtAJaIScigMyYQx4I1THj8hxzitWNXTqkBwJDXoKSk2In8W8CcUO9Gccgnuh9zYFW0IcaRjplfcJcw7jI71BF3JdZ1oifQhluYyDp3b0r8In-4fOQ4_Nr20uNoy7yF1CW9Y4lk_kY2-HjKdv84T8_vb17nrWzH98v72-mjdOsK40GqREpbSAKbeyZ-CcFP2i9_pCCS8XCj10TotF1Rq81B04BKcEU1pJx8QJOd_f3aT4tK1szDpkh8NgR4zbbHjHdaeUlLJaxd7qUsw5YW82KaxtejHAzA6vWZlXvGaH1wA3FW9Nnb0VbBdr9P8y7zyr4XJvwPrmc8Bksgs4OvQhoSvGx_Dfgr9RtYzV</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928966555</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Piscitello, Gina M. ; Lyons, Patrick G. ; Koch, Valerie Gutmann ; Parker, William F. ; Huber, Michael T.</creator><creatorcontrib>Piscitello, Gina M. ; Lyons, Patrick G. ; Koch, Valerie Gutmann ; Parker, William F. ; Huber, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><description>Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; how do these policies approach ethically controversial scenarios; and how do these policies address sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment? This national cross-sectional survey assessed the content of hospital policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. We distributed the survey electronically to American Society for Bioethics and Humanities members between July and August 2023 and descriptively analyzed responses. Among 93 respondents from hospitals or hospital systems representing all 50 US states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, DC, 92% had policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Hospitals varied in their stated guidance, permitting life-sustaining treatment to be withheld or withdrawn in cases of patient or surrogate request (82%), physiologic futility (81%), and potentially inappropriate treatment (64%). Of the 8% of hospitals with policies that addressed patient sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, these policies provided opposing recommendations to either exclude sociodemographic factors in decision-making or actively acknowledge and incorporate these factors in decision-making. Only 3% of hospitals had policies that recommended collecting and maintaining information about patients for whom life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn that could be used to identify disparities in decision-making. Although most surveyed US hospital policies addressed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, these policies varied widely in criteria and processes. Surveyed policies also rarely addressed sociodemographic disparities in these decisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0012-3692</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1931-3543</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.028</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38184166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>clinical medical ethics ; health disparities ; hospital policy ; life-sustaining treatment</subject><ispartof>Chest, 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.950-958</ispartof><rights>2024 American College of Chest Physicians</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8155e6683142a5f01cc53fbfd8763d5b6ed19c83b87681d5891ce1c6306865c03</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3958-4491 ; 0000-0002-1557-2787 ; 0000-0001-7938-5350 ; 0000-0001-5688-5678</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38184166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Piscitello, Gina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Valerie Gutmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><title>Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment</title><title>Chest</title><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><description>Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; how do these policies approach ethically controversial scenarios; and how do these policies address sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment? This national cross-sectional survey assessed the content of hospital policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. We distributed the survey electronically to American Society for Bioethics and Humanities members between July and August 2023 and descriptively analyzed responses. Among 93 respondents from hospitals or hospital systems representing all 50 US states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, DC, 92% had policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Hospitals varied in their stated guidance, permitting life-sustaining treatment to be withheld or withdrawn in cases of patient or surrogate request (82%), physiologic futility (81%), and potentially inappropriate treatment (64%). Of the 8% of hospitals with policies that addressed patient sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, these policies provided opposing recommendations to either exclude sociodemographic factors in decision-making or actively acknowledge and incorporate these factors in decision-making. Only 3% of hospitals had policies that recommended collecting and maintaining information about patients for whom life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn that could be used to identify disparities in decision-making. Although most surveyed US hospital policies addressed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, these policies varied widely in criteria and processes. Surveyed policies also rarely addressed sociodemographic disparities in these decisions.</description><subject>clinical medical ethics</subject><subject>health disparities</subject><subject>hospital policy</subject><subject>life-sustaining treatment</subject><issn>0012-3692</issn><issn>1931-3543</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEFPGzEQha2KCgLlF1RCPnLZrceOjffAAUHbIEVqpVI4Wo49Sxxt1sF2qPj3dQj02NPojd6bp_kI-QysBQbqy6p1S8yl5YyLFnjLuP5AJtAJaIScigMyYQx4I1THj8hxzitWNXTqkBwJDXoKSk2In8W8CcUO9Gccgnuh9zYFW0IcaRjplfcJcw7jI71BF3JdZ1oifQhluYyDp3b0r8In-4fOQ4_Nr20uNoy7yF1CW9Y4lk_kY2-HjKdv84T8_vb17nrWzH98v72-mjdOsK40GqREpbSAKbeyZ-CcFP2i9_pCCS8XCj10TotF1Rq81B04BKcEU1pJx8QJOd_f3aT4tK1szDpkh8NgR4zbbHjHdaeUlLJaxd7qUsw5YW82KaxtejHAzA6vWZlXvGaH1wA3FW9Nnb0VbBdr9P8y7zyr4XJvwPrmc8Bksgs4OvQhoSvGx_Dfgr9RtYzV</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Piscitello, Gina M.</creator><creator>Lyons, Patrick G.</creator><creator>Koch, Valerie Gutmann</creator><creator>Parker, William F.</creator><creator>Huber, Michael T.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-4491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-5350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-5678</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment</title><author>Piscitello, Gina M. ; Lyons, Patrick G. ; Koch, Valerie Gutmann ; Parker, William F. ; Huber, Michael T.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c309t-8155e6683142a5f01cc53fbfd8763d5b6ed19c83b87681d5891ce1c6306865c03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>clinical medical ethics</topic><topic>health disparities</topic><topic>hospital policy</topic><topic>life-sustaining treatment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Piscitello, Gina M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyons, Patrick G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koch, Valerie Gutmann</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parker, William F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huber, Michael T.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Chest</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Piscitello, Gina M.</au><au>Lyons, Patrick G.</au><au>Koch, Valerie Gutmann</au><au>Parker, William F.</au><au>Huber, Michael T.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment</atitle><jtitle>Chest</jtitle><addtitle>Chest</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>165</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>950</spage><epage>958</epage><pages>950-958</pages><issn>0012-3692</issn><eissn>1931-3543</eissn><abstract>Sociodemographic disparities in physician decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment exist. Little is known about the content of hospital policies that guide physicians involved in these decisions. What is the prevalence of US hospitals with policies that address withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining treatment; how do these policies approach ethically controversial scenarios; and how do these policies address sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold and withdraw life-sustaining treatment? This national cross-sectional survey assessed the content of hospital policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. We distributed the survey electronically to American Society for Bioethics and Humanities members between July and August 2023 and descriptively analyzed responses. Among 93 respondents from hospitals or hospital systems representing all 50 US states, Puerto Rico, and Washington, DC, 92% had policies addressing decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. Hospitals varied in their stated guidance, permitting life-sustaining treatment to be withheld or withdrawn in cases of patient or surrogate request (82%), physiologic futility (81%), and potentially inappropriate treatment (64%). Of the 8% of hospitals with policies that addressed patient sociodemographic disparities in decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment, these policies provided opposing recommendations to either exclude sociodemographic factors in decision-making or actively acknowledge and incorporate these factors in decision-making. Only 3% of hospitals had policies that recommended collecting and maintaining information about patients for whom life-sustaining treatment was withheld or withdrawn that could be used to identify disparities in decision-making. Although most surveyed US hospital policies addressed withholding or withdrawing life-sustaining treatment, these policies varied widely in criteria and processes. Surveyed policies also rarely addressed sociodemographic disparities in these decisions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>38184166</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.028</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3958-4491</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1557-2787</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7938-5350</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5688-5678</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0012-3692
ispartof Chest, 2024-04, Vol.165 (4), p.950-958
issn 0012-3692
1931-3543
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928966555
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects clinical medical ethics
health disparities
hospital policy
life-sustaining treatment
title Hospital Policy Variation in Addressing Decisions to Withhold and Withdraw Life-Sustaining Treatment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T16%3A07%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hospital%20Policy%20Variation%20in%20Addressing%20Decisions%20to%20Withhold%20and%20Withdraw%20Life-Sustaining%20Treatment&rft.jtitle=Chest&rft.au=Piscitello,%20Gina%20M.&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=165&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=950&rft.epage=958&rft.pages=950-958&rft.issn=0012-3692&rft.eissn=1931-3543&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.chest.2023.12.028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928966555%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928966555&rft_id=info:pmid/38184166&rft_els_id=S0012369224000011&rfr_iscdi=true