Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial
Resilience training has beneficial effects on the ability of undergraduate students to withstand adversity and stress. However, there are inconsistencies in the content and delivery approaches for resilience training. Given the increasing shifts towards computer‐assisted instruction, there is a need...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Stress and health 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.e3367-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | e3367 |
container_title | Stress and health |
container_volume | 40 |
creator | Ang, Wei How Darryl Shorey, Shefaly Zheng, Zhongjia James Ng, Wai Hung Daniel Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei Shah, Lubna Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn Lau, Ying |
description | Resilience training has beneficial effects on the ability of undergraduate students to withstand adversity and stress. However, there are inconsistencies in the content and delivery approaches for resilience training. Given the increasing shifts towards computer‐assisted instruction, there is a need to develop and evaluate innovative approaches for resilience training. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of two versions of the Resilience Skills Enhancement (RISE) programme. A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effects of blended learning (BL) and a self‐guided RISE programme on the resilience, social support, and learning outcomes of undergraduate students. One hundred and fourteen students were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either BL or the self‐guided RISE programme. The within‐group analyses indicated significant improvements in resilience scores for the BL (F = 37.74, p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/smi.3367 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928956674</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928956674</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-7dc29d99b080f2504e977225c2dd47d6b52c8d8534858fcb566d66c78cdf0b003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kdFqFTEQhoNYbHsUfAIJeOPNtrPJ7ibxrpSjFioFq9dLNpltU7PJMdmt1Csfob6iT2JqjxYErzIZvvlI5ifkeQ0HNQA7zJM74LwTj8he3XJWMaXk423NAdpdsp_zFQCIVsgnZJfLWoJo-B75sb7WftGzCxd0vkQag3cB6QfMzjsMBun5Z-d9putwqct1wjDTTYoXSU8TUj3FMrgEi6l0bBEhzfNiC5Vf0yNq4zJ4_Pn9dihaSzc6ae_R06SDjZP7hpaaGOYUS9fSOTntn5KdUfuMz7bninx6s_54_K46PXt7cnx0WhkuuaiENUxZpQaQMLIWGlRCMNYaZm0jbDe0zEgrW97IVo5maLvOdp0R0tgRBgC-Iq_uveU3XxbMcz-5bNB7HTAuuWeKSVWmyppW5OU_6FVcUiiv6zkokAJANQ9Ck2LOCcd-k9yk001fQ38XU19i6u9iKuiLrXAZJrR_wT-5FKC6B746jzf_FfXn709-C38BpG6fFg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>3090870094</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Ang, Wei How Darryl ; Shorey, Shefaly ; Zheng, Zhongjia James ; Ng, Wai Hung Daniel ; Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei ; Shah, Lubna ; Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn ; Lau, Ying</creator><creatorcontrib>Ang, Wei How Darryl ; Shorey, Shefaly ; Zheng, Zhongjia James ; Ng, Wai Hung Daniel ; Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei ; Shah, Lubna ; Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn ; Lau, Ying</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Resilience training has beneficial effects on the ability of undergraduate students to withstand adversity and stress. However, there are inconsistencies in the content and delivery approaches for resilience training. Given the increasing shifts towards computer‐assisted instruction, there is a need to develop and evaluate innovative approaches for resilience training. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of two versions of the Resilience Skills Enhancement (RISE) programme. A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effects of blended learning (BL) and a self‐guided RISE programme on the resilience, social support, and learning outcomes of undergraduate students. One hundred and fourteen students were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either BL or the self‐guided RISE programme. The within‐group analyses indicated significant improvements in resilience scores for the BL (F = 37.74, p < 0.001) and self‐guided groups (F = 10.16, p < 0.001) with moderate (d = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.00) to large effect sizes (d = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.50) respectively. There were also significant differences across the three time points for social support scores for the BL (F = 4.50, p < 0.05) and self‐guided groups (F = 4.59, p < 0.05). Students in the BL group had considerable improvements in self‐efficacy of learning and performance (F = 5.42, p < 0.01) and meta‐cognitive self‐regulation scores (F = 5.91, p < 0.01). In the between‐group analyses, both BL and self‐guided RISE were comparable for resilience, social support, and learning scores (p > 0.05). The study provided preliminary evidence that both modes, BL and self‐guided RISE programme lead to positive effects on the resilience, social support, and learning scores of students.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1532-3005</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1532-2998</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-2998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/smi.3367</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38180743</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; blended learning ; Clinical trials ; College students ; Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods ; Double-Blind Method ; Female ; Humans ; learning ; Male ; Program Evaluation ; randomized controlled trial ; resilience ; resilience training ; Resilience, Psychological ; self‐guided ; Social discrimination learning ; Social interactions ; Social Support ; Students - psychology ; Training ; undergraduate students ; Universities ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Stress and health, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.e3367-n/a</ispartof><rights>2024 The Authors. Stress and Health published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.</rights><rights>2024. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-7dc29d99b080f2504e977225c2dd47d6b52c8d8534858fcb566d66c78cdf0b003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-7dc29d99b080f2504e977225c2dd47d6b52c8d8534858fcb566d66c78cdf0b003</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1286-3175 ; 0000-0002-8289-3441 ; 0000-0002-9442-2102 ; 0000-0001-5583-2814 ; 0000-0003-4130-3932 ; 0000-0002-4209-1647 ; 0000-0001-8153-6226 ; 0000-0001-7443-0941</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fsmi.3367$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fsmi.3367$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38180743$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ang, Wei How Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Shefaly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhongjia James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Wai Hung Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Lubna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ying</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial</title><title>Stress and health</title><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Resilience training has beneficial effects on the ability of undergraduate students to withstand adversity and stress. However, there are inconsistencies in the content and delivery approaches for resilience training. Given the increasing shifts towards computer‐assisted instruction, there is a need to develop and evaluate innovative approaches for resilience training. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of two versions of the Resilience Skills Enhancement (RISE) programme. A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effects of blended learning (BL) and a self‐guided RISE programme on the resilience, social support, and learning outcomes of undergraduate students. One hundred and fourteen students were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either BL or the self‐guided RISE programme. The within‐group analyses indicated significant improvements in resilience scores for the BL (F = 37.74, p < 0.001) and self‐guided groups (F = 10.16, p < 0.001) with moderate (d = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.00) to large effect sizes (d = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.50) respectively. There were also significant differences across the three time points for social support scores for the BL (F = 4.50, p < 0.05) and self‐guided groups (F = 4.59, p < 0.05). Students in the BL group had considerable improvements in self‐efficacy of learning and performance (F = 5.42, p < 0.01) and meta‐cognitive self‐regulation scores (F = 5.91, p < 0.01). In the between‐group analyses, both BL and self‐guided RISE were comparable for resilience, social support, and learning scores (p > 0.05). The study provided preliminary evidence that both modes, BL and self‐guided RISE programme lead to positive effects on the resilience, social support, and learning scores of students.]]></description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>blended learning</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>learning</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>resilience</subject><subject>resilience training</subject><subject>Resilience, Psychological</subject><subject>self‐guided</subject><subject>Social discrimination learning</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>Students - psychology</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>undergraduate students</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1532-3005</issn><issn>1532-2998</issn><issn>1532-2998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>WIN</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kdFqFTEQhoNYbHsUfAIJeOPNtrPJ7ibxrpSjFioFq9dLNpltU7PJMdmt1Csfob6iT2JqjxYErzIZvvlI5ifkeQ0HNQA7zJM74LwTj8he3XJWMaXk423NAdpdsp_zFQCIVsgnZJfLWoJo-B75sb7WftGzCxd0vkQag3cB6QfMzjsMBun5Z-d9putwqct1wjDTTYoXSU8TUj3FMrgEi6l0bBEhzfNiC5Vf0yNq4zJ4_Pn9dihaSzc6ae_R06SDjZP7hpaaGOYUS9fSOTntn5KdUfuMz7bninx6s_54_K46PXt7cnx0WhkuuaiENUxZpQaQMLIWGlRCMNYaZm0jbDe0zEgrW97IVo5maLvOdp0R0tgRBgC-Iq_uveU3XxbMcz-5bNB7HTAuuWeKSVWmyppW5OU_6FVcUiiv6zkokAJANQ9Ck2LOCcd-k9yk001fQ38XU19i6u9iKuiLrXAZJrR_wT-5FKC6B746jzf_FfXn709-C38BpG6fFg</recordid><startdate>202408</startdate><enddate>202408</enddate><creator>Ang, Wei How Darryl</creator><creator>Shorey, Shefaly</creator><creator>Zheng, Zhongjia James</creator><creator>Ng, Wai Hung Daniel</creator><creator>Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei</creator><creator>Shah, Lubna</creator><creator>Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn</creator><creator>Lau, Ying</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-3175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-3441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-2102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-2814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4130-3932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-1647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-6226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-0941</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202408</creationdate><title>Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial</title><author>Ang, Wei How Darryl ; Shorey, Shefaly ; Zheng, Zhongjia James ; Ng, Wai Hung Daniel ; Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei ; Shah, Lubna ; Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn ; Lau, Ying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3837-7dc29d99b080f2504e977225c2dd47d6b52c8d8534858fcb566d66c78cdf0b003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>blended learning</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>learning</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>resilience</topic><topic>resilience training</topic><topic>Resilience, Psychological</topic><topic>self‐guided</topic><topic>Social discrimination learning</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>Students - psychology</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>undergraduate students</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ang, Wei How Darryl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shorey, Shefaly</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Zhongjia James</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Wai Hung Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Lubna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lau, Ying</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ang, Wei How Darryl</au><au>Shorey, Shefaly</au><au>Zheng, Zhongjia James</au><au>Ng, Wai Hung Daniel</au><au>Chen, Emmanuel Chih‐Wei</au><au>Shah, Lubna</au><au>Chew, Han Shi Jocelyn</au><au>Lau, Ying</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>Stress and health</jtitle><addtitle>Stress Health</addtitle><date>2024-08</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>e3367</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e3367-n/a</pages><issn>1532-3005</issn><issn>1532-2998</issn><eissn>1532-2998</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Resilience training has beneficial effects on the ability of undergraduate students to withstand adversity and stress. However, there are inconsistencies in the content and delivery approaches for resilience training. Given the increasing shifts towards computer‐assisted instruction, there is a need to develop and evaluate innovative approaches for resilience training. This study aimed to examine the efficacy of two versions of the Resilience Skills Enhancement (RISE) programme. A randomized controlled trial was used to evaluate the effects of blended learning (BL) and a self‐guided RISE programme on the resilience, social support, and learning outcomes of undergraduate students. One hundred and fourteen students were recruited and randomly allocated to receive either BL or the self‐guided RISE programme. The within‐group analyses indicated significant improvements in resilience scores for the BL (F = 37.74, p < 0.001) and self‐guided groups (F = 10.16, p < 0.001) with moderate (d = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.25, 1.00) to large effect sizes (d = 1.11, 95% CI: 0.71, 1.50) respectively. There were also significant differences across the three time points for social support scores for the BL (F = 4.50, p < 0.05) and self‐guided groups (F = 4.59, p < 0.05). Students in the BL group had considerable improvements in self‐efficacy of learning and performance (F = 5.42, p < 0.01) and meta‐cognitive self‐regulation scores (F = 5.91, p < 0.01). In the between‐group analyses, both BL and self‐guided RISE were comparable for resilience, social support, and learning scores (p > 0.05). The study provided preliminary evidence that both modes, BL and self‐guided RISE programme lead to positive effects on the resilience, social support, and learning scores of students.]]></abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>38180743</pmid><doi>10.1002/smi.3367</doi><tpages>18</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1286-3175</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8289-3441</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9442-2102</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5583-2814</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4130-3932</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4209-1647</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8153-6226</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7443-0941</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1532-3005 |
ispartof | Stress and health, 2024-08, Vol.40 (4), p.e3367-n/a |
issn | 1532-3005 1532-2998 1532-2998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928956674 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adult blended learning Clinical trials College students Computer-Assisted Instruction - methods Double-Blind Method Female Humans learning Male Program Evaluation randomized controlled trial resilience resilience training Resilience, Psychological self‐guided Social discrimination learning Social interactions Social Support Students - psychology Training undergraduate students Universities Young Adult |
title | Evaluating the online Resilience Skills Enhancement programme among undergraduate students: A double‐blind parallel randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T11%3A56%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20online%20Resilience%20Skills%20Enhancement%20programme%20among%20undergraduate%20students:%20A%20double%E2%80%90blind%20parallel%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=Stress%20and%20health&rft.au=Ang,%20Wei%20How%20Darryl&rft.date=2024-08&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=e3367&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e3367-n/a&rft.issn=1532-3005&rft.eissn=1532-2998&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/smi.3367&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928956674%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=3090870094&rft_id=info:pmid/38180743&rfr_iscdi=true |