The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review

To systematically evaluate the effect of smoking cessation training on nursing students’ learning outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373280). Ten electronic English and Chinese databases were searched to identify articles on nurs...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nurse education in practice 2024-02, Vol.75, p.103907, Article 103907
Hauptverfasser: Zhang, Guowen, Zhou, Jie, Luk, Tzu Tsun, Lam, Veronica Suk Fun, Yao, Zhuangyan, Wang, Man Ping, Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 103907
container_title Nurse education in practice
container_volume 75
creator Zhang, Guowen
Zhou, Jie
Luk, Tzu Tsun
Lam, Veronica Suk Fun
Yao, Zhuangyan
Wang, Man Ping
Cheung, Yee Tak Derek
description To systematically evaluate the effect of smoking cessation training on nursing students’ learning outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373280). Ten electronic English and Chinese databases were searched to identify articles on nursing students’ smoking cessation training from inception to October 2022. Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Twelve moderate methodological quality studies (three randomized controlled trials and nine quasi-experimental studies) with 2114 undergraduate nursing students were included. Teaching strategies included didactic lectures, collaborative learning, blended learning and the service-learning approach. Eight studies showed that the training significantly increased nursing students’ knowledge of smoking cessation (p < 0.05) and three of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.83–1.31). Seven studies showed that training enhanced students’ attitudes/motivation towards smoking cessation interventions significantly (p < 0.05) and two of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 1.11–1.84). Nine studies reported that students’ self-efficacy improved significantly after training (p < 0.05) and six of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.98–2.18). Two one-group pre-post studies showed training significantly improved students’ practice of 5 A’s behavior (p < 0.05), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d < 0.50). This review showed that smoking cessation training had a positive and large effect on undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes/motivation and self-efficacy towards smoking cessation intervention, but the effect of changing the practice of 5 A’s was modest. We noted that very few RCTs were done and most studies only used subjective measures. More robust experimental studies with long-term follow-up are warranted in evaluating nursing students’ practice/behavior of smoking cessation intervention and patients’ quitting outcomes. Blended and collaborative learning are recommended in smoking cessation education.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103907
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928853829</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1471595324000362</els_id><sourcerecordid>2927844683</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8215fde5225262107920517b846734c1730242ff507e771ca51d072f49f533373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1vFSEUxYnR2A_9B1wYEjdu5snHMDDGTdNoNWnipq4JZe5Uxjfw5IKm_72Mr7pw4Qpy-Z0T7jmEvOBsxxkf3iy7CIe8E0z0bSBHph-RU2607JQQ8nG795p3alTyhJwhLqyJmB6ekhNpJDNjr0_JcvMV6B5cjiHe0VSLTysgTTPFNX3bZh4QXQkp0pJd-I2FSGucIN9lN1VXgMaacXvAUieIBd_SC4r3WGBtSk8z_Ajw8xl5Mrs9wvOH85x8-fD-5vJjd_356tPlxXXnpVSlM4KreYK2ghKD4EyPgimub00_aNl7rmXbV8yzYhq05t4pPjEt5n6clZRSy3Py-uh7yOl7BSx2Dehhv3cRUkUrRmGMkkaMDX31D7qkmmP73UZp0_eDkY0SR8rnhJhhtoccVpfvLWd2a8IudmvCbk3YYxNN9PLBut6uMP2V_Im-Ae-OALQsWj7Zog8QPUwhgy92SuF__r8APvuY-w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2927844683</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><creator>Zhang, Guowen ; Zhou, Jie ; Luk, Tzu Tsun ; Lam, Veronica Suk Fun ; Yao, Zhuangyan ; Wang, Man Ping ; Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guowen ; Zhou, Jie ; Luk, Tzu Tsun ; Lam, Veronica Suk Fun ; Yao, Zhuangyan ; Wang, Man Ping ; Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</creatorcontrib><description>To systematically evaluate the effect of smoking cessation training on nursing students’ learning outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373280). Ten electronic English and Chinese databases were searched to identify articles on nursing students’ smoking cessation training from inception to October 2022. Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Twelve moderate methodological quality studies (three randomized controlled trials and nine quasi-experimental studies) with 2114 undergraduate nursing students were included. Teaching strategies included didactic lectures, collaborative learning, blended learning and the service-learning approach. Eight studies showed that the training significantly increased nursing students’ knowledge of smoking cessation (p &lt; 0.05) and three of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.83–1.31). Seven studies showed that training enhanced students’ attitudes/motivation towards smoking cessation interventions significantly (p &lt; 0.05) and two of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 1.11–1.84). Nine studies reported that students’ self-efficacy improved significantly after training (p &lt; 0.05) and six of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.98–2.18). Two one-group pre-post studies showed training significantly improved students’ practice of 5 A’s behavior (p &lt; 0.05), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d &lt; 0.50). This review showed that smoking cessation training had a positive and large effect on undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes/motivation and self-efficacy towards smoking cessation intervention, but the effect of changing the practice of 5 A’s was modest. We noted that very few RCTs were done and most studies only used subjective measures. More robust experimental studies with long-term follow-up are warranted in evaluating nursing students’ practice/behavior of smoking cessation intervention and patients’ quitting outcomes. Blended and collaborative learning are recommended in smoking cessation education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-5953</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-5223</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103907</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38308947</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Scotland: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Attitudes ; Clinical trials ; Collaborative learning ; Curricula ; Curriculum ; Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate ; Educational objectives ; Educational research ; Evidence-based nursing ; Health promotion ; Humans ; Intervention ; Keywords ; Learning ; Learning Processes ; Lectures ; Medical education ; Medical personnel ; Meta Analysis ; Motivation ; Nurses ; Nursing ; Nursing education ; Nursing Students ; Professional practice ; Professionals ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Self Efficacy ; Service learning ; Smoking ; Smoking Cessation ; Students ; Students, Nursing - psychology ; Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Systematic review ; Teaching methods ; Tobacco</subject><ispartof>Nurse education in practice, 2024-02, Vol.75, p.103907, Article 103907</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>2024. Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8215fde5225262107920517b846734c1730242ff507e771ca51d072f49f533373</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2927844683?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,3537,12827,27905,27906,30980,45976,64364,64366,64368,72218</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38308947$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Tzu Tsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Veronica Suk Fun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Zhuangyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Man Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</creatorcontrib><title>The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review</title><title>Nurse education in practice</title><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><description>To systematically evaluate the effect of smoking cessation training on nursing students’ learning outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373280). Ten electronic English and Chinese databases were searched to identify articles on nursing students’ smoking cessation training from inception to October 2022. Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Twelve moderate methodological quality studies (three randomized controlled trials and nine quasi-experimental studies) with 2114 undergraduate nursing students were included. Teaching strategies included didactic lectures, collaborative learning, blended learning and the service-learning approach. Eight studies showed that the training significantly increased nursing students’ knowledge of smoking cessation (p &lt; 0.05) and three of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.83–1.31). Seven studies showed that training enhanced students’ attitudes/motivation towards smoking cessation interventions significantly (p &lt; 0.05) and two of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 1.11–1.84). Nine studies reported that students’ self-efficacy improved significantly after training (p &lt; 0.05) and six of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.98–2.18). Two one-group pre-post studies showed training significantly improved students’ practice of 5 A’s behavior (p &lt; 0.05), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d &lt; 0.50). This review showed that smoking cessation training had a positive and large effect on undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes/motivation and self-efficacy towards smoking cessation intervention, but the effect of changing the practice of 5 A’s was modest. We noted that very few RCTs were done and most studies only used subjective measures. More robust experimental studies with long-term follow-up are warranted in evaluating nursing students’ practice/behavior of smoking cessation intervention and patients’ quitting outcomes. Blended and collaborative learning are recommended in smoking cessation education.</description><subject>Attitudes</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Collaborative learning</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Curriculum</subject><subject>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</subject><subject>Educational objectives</subject><subject>Educational research</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Health promotion</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Keywords</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Learning Processes</subject><subject>Lectures</subject><subject>Medical education</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Meta Analysis</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing education</subject><subject>Nursing Students</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Service learning</subject><subject>Smoking</subject><subject>Smoking Cessation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - psychology</subject><subject>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><subject>Tobacco</subject><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kc1vFSEUxYnR2A_9B1wYEjdu5snHMDDGTdNoNWnipq4JZe5Uxjfw5IKm_72Mr7pw4Qpy-Z0T7jmEvOBsxxkf3iy7CIe8E0z0bSBHph-RU2607JQQ8nG795p3alTyhJwhLqyJmB6ekhNpJDNjr0_JcvMV6B5cjiHe0VSLTysgTTPFNX3bZh4QXQkp0pJd-I2FSGucIN9lN1VXgMaacXvAUieIBd_SC4r3WGBtSk8z_Ajw8xl5Mrs9wvOH85x8-fD-5vJjd_356tPlxXXnpVSlM4KreYK2ghKD4EyPgimub00_aNl7rmXbV8yzYhq05t4pPjEt5n6clZRSy3Py-uh7yOl7BSx2Dehhv3cRUkUrRmGMkkaMDX31D7qkmmP73UZp0_eDkY0SR8rnhJhhtoccVpfvLWd2a8IudmvCbk3YYxNN9PLBut6uMP2V_Im-Ae-OALQsWj7Zog8QPUwhgy92SuF__r8APvuY-w</recordid><startdate>202402</startdate><enddate>202402</enddate><creator>Zhang, Guowen</creator><creator>Zhou, Jie</creator><creator>Luk, Tzu Tsun</creator><creator>Lam, Veronica Suk Fun</creator><creator>Yao, Zhuangyan</creator><creator>Wang, Man Ping</creator><creator>Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202402</creationdate><title>The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review</title><author>Zhang, Guowen ; Zhou, Jie ; Luk, Tzu Tsun ; Lam, Veronica Suk Fun ; Yao, Zhuangyan ; Wang, Man Ping ; Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-8215fde5225262107920517b846734c1730242ff507e771ca51d072f49f533373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Attitudes</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Collaborative learning</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Curriculum</topic><topic>Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate</topic><topic>Educational objectives</topic><topic>Educational research</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Health promotion</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Keywords</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Learning Processes</topic><topic>Lectures</topic><topic>Medical education</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Meta Analysis</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing education</topic><topic>Nursing Students</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Service learning</topic><topic>Smoking</topic><topic>Smoking Cessation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - psychology</topic><topic>Students, Nursing - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><topic>Tobacco</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Guowen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Jie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luk, Tzu Tsun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lam, Veronica Suk Fun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yao, Zhuangyan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Man Ping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Guowen</au><au>Zhou, Jie</au><au>Luk, Tzu Tsun</au><au>Lam, Veronica Suk Fun</au><au>Yao, Zhuangyan</au><au>Wang, Man Ping</au><au>Cheung, Yee Tak Derek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Nurse education in practice</jtitle><addtitle>Nurse Educ Pract</addtitle><date>2024-02</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>75</volume><spage>103907</spage><pages>103907-</pages><artnum>103907</artnum><issn>1471-5953</issn><issn>1873-5223</issn><eissn>1873-5223</eissn><abstract>To systematically evaluate the effect of smoking cessation training on nursing students’ learning outcomes. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42022373280). Ten electronic English and Chinese databases were searched to identify articles on nursing students’ smoking cessation training from inception to October 2022. Medical Education Research Study Quality Instrument was used to assess the methodological quality of eligible studies. Twelve moderate methodological quality studies (three randomized controlled trials and nine quasi-experimental studies) with 2114 undergraduate nursing students were included. Teaching strategies included didactic lectures, collaborative learning, blended learning and the service-learning approach. Eight studies showed that the training significantly increased nursing students’ knowledge of smoking cessation (p &lt; 0.05) and three of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.83–1.31). Seven studies showed that training enhanced students’ attitudes/motivation towards smoking cessation interventions significantly (p &lt; 0.05) and two of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 1.11–1.84). Nine studies reported that students’ self-efficacy improved significantly after training (p &lt; 0.05) and six of them showed a large effect size (Cohen’s d: 0.98–2.18). Two one-group pre-post studies showed training significantly improved students’ practice of 5 A’s behavior (p &lt; 0.05), with a small effect size (Cohen’s d &lt; 0.50). This review showed that smoking cessation training had a positive and large effect on undergraduate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes/motivation and self-efficacy towards smoking cessation intervention, but the effect of changing the practice of 5 A’s was modest. We noted that very few RCTs were done and most studies only used subjective measures. More robust experimental studies with long-term follow-up are warranted in evaluating nursing students’ practice/behavior of smoking cessation intervention and patients’ quitting outcomes. Blended and collaborative learning are recommended in smoking cessation education.</abstract><cop>Scotland</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>38308947</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103907</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-5953
ispartof Nurse education in practice, 2024-02, Vol.75, p.103907, Article 103907
issn 1471-5953
1873-5223
1873-5223
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928853829
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland
subjects Attitudes
Clinical trials
Collaborative learning
Curricula
Curriculum
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
Educational objectives
Educational research
Evidence-based nursing
Health promotion
Humans
Intervention
Keywords
Learning
Learning Processes
Lectures
Medical education
Medical personnel
Meta Analysis
Motivation
Nurses
Nursing
Nursing education
Nursing Students
Professional practice
Professionals
Quasi-experimental methods
Self Efficacy
Service learning
Smoking
Smoking Cessation
Students
Students, Nursing - psychology
Students, Nursing - statistics & numerical data
Systematic review
Teaching methods
Tobacco
title The learning outcomes of smoking cessation training in undergraduate nursing students: A systematic review
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T11%3A44%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20learning%20outcomes%20of%20smoking%20cessation%20training%20in%20undergraduate%20nursing%20students:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Nurse%20education%20in%20practice&rft.au=Zhang,%20Guowen&rft.date=2024-02&rft.volume=75&rft.spage=103907&rft.pages=103907-&rft.artnum=103907&rft.issn=1471-5953&rft.eissn=1873-5223&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.nepr.2024.103907&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2927844683%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2927844683&rft_id=info:pmid/38308947&rft_els_id=S1471595324000362&rfr_iscdi=true