A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries

•Social prescribing is a way to direct patients to local, non-clinical services to assist them in improving their health and well-being.•Scale and scope of programmes vary significantly across the countries surveyed.•Social prescribing offers flexibility for adaptation to different contexts and need...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health policy (Amsterdam) 2024-04, Vol.142, p.104992-104992, Article 104992
Hauptverfasser: Scarpetti, Giada, Shadowen, Hannah, Williams, Gemma A., Winkelmann, Juliane, Kroneman, Madelon, Groenewegen, Peter P., De Jong, Judith D., Fronteira, Inês, Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo, Hsiung, Sonia, Slade, Siân, Rojatz, Daniela, Kallayova, Daniela, Katreniakova, Zuzana, Nagyova, Iveta, Kylänen, Marika, Vracko, Pia, Jesurasa, Amrita, Wallace, Zoe, Wallace, Carolyn, Costongs, Caroline, Barnes, Andrew J., van Ginneken, Ewout
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 104992
container_issue
container_start_page 104992
container_title Health policy (Amsterdam)
container_volume 142
creator Scarpetti, Giada
Shadowen, Hannah
Williams, Gemma A.
Winkelmann, Juliane
Kroneman, Madelon
Groenewegen, Peter P.
De Jong, Judith D.
Fronteira, Inês
Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo
Hsiung, Sonia
Slade, Siân
Rojatz, Daniela
Kallayova, Daniela
Katreniakova, Zuzana
Nagyova, Iveta
Kylänen, Marika
Vracko, Pia
Jesurasa, Amrita
Wallace, Zoe
Wallace, Carolyn
Costongs, Caroline
Barnes, Andrew J.
van Ginneken, Ewout
description •Social prescribing is a way to direct patients to local, non-clinical services to assist them in improving their health and well-being.•Scale and scope of programmes vary significantly across the countries surveyed.•Social prescribing offers flexibility for adaptation to different contexts and needs.•Robust evidence on impact is limited and context-dependent, although there are indications of cost-effectiveness and a positive influence on health. Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928586157</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0168851024000022</els_id><sourcerecordid>2928586157</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-3ceb41a0835c5c5ef8894f03fdbe6bfee205bfb46f6dda7925f08106fc456d3d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmxQ_EsdZVhUvqRJCgrXlOOPGVRoHOyni73FpYYtmYWl05s74IHRD8Jxgwu828wZUOzS9a-cU0yx2s7KkJ2hKREFTjvPsFE0jKVKREzxBFyFsMMYFY_wcTZhgXHBOpuh1kWi37ZW3wXWJM0lw2qo26T0E7W1lu3Wi-t47pRsIidLehZAMn9DuIGnsukltFwMgpozd4C2ES3RmVBvg6vjO0PvD_dvyKV29PD4vF6tUZxQPKdNQZURhwXIdC4wQZWYwM3UFvDIAFOeVqTJueF2roqS5wYJgbnSW85rVbIZuD7nxuI8RwiC3NmhoW9WBG4OkJRW54CQvIloc0J_rPRjZe7tV_ksSLPc-5Ub--ZR7n_LgM05eH5eM1Rbqv7lfgRFYHACIX91Z8DJoC52G2nrQg6yd_XfJN0bWjM4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928586157</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Scarpetti, Giada ; Shadowen, Hannah ; Williams, Gemma A. ; Winkelmann, Juliane ; Kroneman, Madelon ; Groenewegen, Peter P. ; De Jong, Judith D. ; Fronteira, Inês ; Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo ; Hsiung, Sonia ; Slade, Siân ; Rojatz, Daniela ; Kallayova, Daniela ; Katreniakova, Zuzana ; Nagyova, Iveta ; Kylänen, Marika ; Vracko, Pia ; Jesurasa, Amrita ; Wallace, Zoe ; Wallace, Carolyn ; Costongs, Caroline ; Barnes, Andrew J. ; van Ginneken, Ewout</creator><creatorcontrib>Scarpetti, Giada ; Shadowen, Hannah ; Williams, Gemma A. ; Winkelmann, Juliane ; Kroneman, Madelon ; Groenewegen, Peter P. ; De Jong, Judith D. ; Fronteira, Inês ; Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo ; Hsiung, Sonia ; Slade, Siân ; Rojatz, Daniela ; Kallayova, Daniela ; Katreniakova, Zuzana ; Nagyova, Iveta ; Kylänen, Marika ; Vracko, Pia ; Jesurasa, Amrita ; Wallace, Zoe ; Wallace, Carolyn ; Costongs, Caroline ; Barnes, Andrew J. ; van Ginneken, Ewout</creatorcontrib><description>•Social prescribing is a way to direct patients to local, non-clinical services to assist them in improving their health and well-being.•Scale and scope of programmes vary significantly across the countries surveyed.•Social prescribing offers flexibility for adaptation to different contexts and needs.•Robust evidence on impact is limited and context-dependent, although there are indications of cost-effectiveness and a positive influence on health. Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-8510</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-6054</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992</identifier><identifier>PMID: 38368661</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ireland: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Community referral ; COVID-19 ; Developed Countries ; England ; Humans ; Link worker ; Pandemics ; Person-centred care ; Social determinants of health ; Social prescribing ; Social Support ; United States</subject><ispartof>Health policy (Amsterdam), 2024-04, Vol.142, p.104992-104992, Article 104992</ispartof><rights>2024</rights><rights>Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-3ceb41a0835c5c5ef8894f03fdbe6bfee205bfb46f6dda7925f08106fc456d3d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-3ceb41a0835c5c5ef8894f03fdbe6bfee205bfb46f6dda7925f08106fc456d3d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1243-196X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851024000022$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38368661$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Scarpetti, Giada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadowen, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroneman, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenewegen, Peter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Judith D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fronteira, Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Siân</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojatz, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallayova, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katreniakova, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagyova, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kylänen, Marika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vracko, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesurasa, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costongs, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ginneken, Ewout</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries</title><title>Health policy (Amsterdam)</title><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><description>•Social prescribing is a way to direct patients to local, non-clinical services to assist them in improving their health and well-being.•Scale and scope of programmes vary significantly across the countries surveyed.•Social prescribing offers flexibility for adaptation to different contexts and needs.•Robust evidence on impact is limited and context-dependent, although there are indications of cost-effectiveness and a positive influence on health. Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.</description><subject>Community referral</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Developed Countries</subject><subject>England</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Link worker</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Person-centred care</subject><subject>Social determinants of health</subject><subject>Social prescribing</subject><subject>Social Support</subject><subject>United States</subject><issn>0168-8510</issn><issn>1872-6054</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMtOwzAQRS0EoqXwC5AlmxQ_EsdZVhUvqRJCgrXlOOPGVRoHOyni73FpYYtmYWl05s74IHRD8Jxgwu828wZUOzS9a-cU0yx2s7KkJ2hKREFTjvPsFE0jKVKREzxBFyFsMMYFY_wcTZhgXHBOpuh1kWi37ZW3wXWJM0lw2qo26T0E7W1lu3Wi-t47pRsIidLehZAMn9DuIGnsukltFwMgpozd4C2ES3RmVBvg6vjO0PvD_dvyKV29PD4vF6tUZxQPKdNQZURhwXIdC4wQZWYwM3UFvDIAFOeVqTJueF2roqS5wYJgbnSW85rVbIZuD7nxuI8RwiC3NmhoW9WBG4OkJRW54CQvIloc0J_rPRjZe7tV_ksSLPc-5Ub--ZR7n_LgM05eH5eM1Rbqv7lfgRFYHACIX91Z8DJoC52G2nrQg6yd_XfJN0bWjM4</recordid><startdate>202404</startdate><enddate>202404</enddate><creator>Scarpetti, Giada</creator><creator>Shadowen, Hannah</creator><creator>Williams, Gemma A.</creator><creator>Winkelmann, Juliane</creator><creator>Kroneman, Madelon</creator><creator>Groenewegen, Peter P.</creator><creator>De Jong, Judith D.</creator><creator>Fronteira, Inês</creator><creator>Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo</creator><creator>Hsiung, Sonia</creator><creator>Slade, Siân</creator><creator>Rojatz, Daniela</creator><creator>Kallayova, Daniela</creator><creator>Katreniakova, Zuzana</creator><creator>Nagyova, Iveta</creator><creator>Kylänen, Marika</creator><creator>Vracko, Pia</creator><creator>Jesurasa, Amrita</creator><creator>Wallace, Zoe</creator><creator>Wallace, Carolyn</creator><creator>Costongs, Caroline</creator><creator>Barnes, Andrew J.</creator><creator>van Ginneken, Ewout</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>6I.</scope><scope>AAFTH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-196X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202404</creationdate><title>A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries</title><author>Scarpetti, Giada ; Shadowen, Hannah ; Williams, Gemma A. ; Winkelmann, Juliane ; Kroneman, Madelon ; Groenewegen, Peter P. ; De Jong, Judith D. ; Fronteira, Inês ; Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo ; Hsiung, Sonia ; Slade, Siân ; Rojatz, Daniela ; Kallayova, Daniela ; Katreniakova, Zuzana ; Nagyova, Iveta ; Kylänen, Marika ; Vracko, Pia ; Jesurasa, Amrita ; Wallace, Zoe ; Wallace, Carolyn ; Costongs, Caroline ; Barnes, Andrew J. ; van Ginneken, Ewout</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-3ceb41a0835c5c5ef8894f03fdbe6bfee205bfb46f6dda7925f08106fc456d3d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Community referral</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Developed Countries</topic><topic>England</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Link worker</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Person-centred care</topic><topic>Social determinants of health</topic><topic>Social prescribing</topic><topic>Social Support</topic><topic>United States</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Scarpetti, Giada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadowen, Hannah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, Gemma A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winkelmann, Juliane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kroneman, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Groenewegen, Peter P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Jong, Judith D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fronteira, Inês</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsiung, Sonia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slade, Siân</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rojatz, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallayova, Daniela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katreniakova, Zuzana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagyova, Iveta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kylänen, Marika</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vracko, Pia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jesurasa, Amrita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Zoe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wallace, Carolyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Costongs, Caroline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barnes, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Ginneken, Ewout</creatorcontrib><collection>ScienceDirect Open Access Titles</collection><collection>Elsevier:ScienceDirect:Open Access</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Scarpetti, Giada</au><au>Shadowen, Hannah</au><au>Williams, Gemma A.</au><au>Winkelmann, Juliane</au><au>Kroneman, Madelon</au><au>Groenewegen, Peter P.</au><au>De Jong, Judith D.</au><au>Fronteira, Inês</au><au>Augusto, Gonçalo Figueiredo</au><au>Hsiung, Sonia</au><au>Slade, Siân</au><au>Rojatz, Daniela</au><au>Kallayova, Daniela</au><au>Katreniakova, Zuzana</au><au>Nagyova, Iveta</au><au>Kylänen, Marika</au><au>Vracko, Pia</au><au>Jesurasa, Amrita</au><au>Wallace, Zoe</au><au>Wallace, Carolyn</au><au>Costongs, Caroline</au><au>Barnes, Andrew J.</au><au>van Ginneken, Ewout</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries</atitle><jtitle>Health policy (Amsterdam)</jtitle><addtitle>Health Policy</addtitle><date>2024-04</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>142</volume><spage>104992</spage><epage>104992</epage><pages>104992-104992</pages><artnum>104992</artnum><issn>0168-8510</issn><eissn>1872-6054</eissn><abstract>•Social prescribing is a way to direct patients to local, non-clinical services to assist them in improving their health and well-being.•Scale and scope of programmes vary significantly across the countries surveyed.•Social prescribing offers flexibility for adaptation to different contexts and needs.•Robust evidence on impact is limited and context-dependent, although there are indications of cost-effectiveness and a positive influence on health. Social prescribing connects patients with community resources to improve their health and well-being. It is gaining momentum globally due to its potential for addressing non-medical causes of illness while building on existing resources and enhancing overall health at a relatively low cost. The COVID-19 pandemic further underscored the need for policy interventions to address health-related social issues such as loneliness and isolation. This paper presents evidence of the conceptualisation and implementation of social prescribing schemes in twelve countries: Australia, Austria, Canada, England, Finland, Germany, Portugal, the Slovak Republic, Slovenia, the Netherlands, the United States and Wales. Twelve countries were identified through the Health Systems and Policy Monitor (HSPM) network and the EuroHealthNet Partnership. Information was collected through a twelve open-ended question survey based on a conceptual model inspired by the WHO's Health System Framework. We found that social prescribing can take different forms, and the scale of implementation also varies significantly. Robust evidence on impact is scarce and highly context-specific, with some indications of cost-effectiveness and positive impact on well-being. This paper provides insights into social prescribing in various contexts and may guide countries interested in holistically tackling health-related social factors and strengthening community-based care. Policies can support a more seamless integration of social prescribing into existing care, improve collaboration among sectors and training programs for health and social care professionals.</abstract><cop>Ireland</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>38368661</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1243-196X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-8510
ispartof Health policy (Amsterdam), 2024-04, Vol.142, p.104992-104992, Article 104992
issn 0168-8510
1872-6054
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_2928586157
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Community referral
COVID-19
Developed Countries
England
Humans
Link worker
Pandemics
Person-centred care
Social determinants of health
Social prescribing
Social Support
United States
title A comparison of social prescribing approaches across twelve high-income countries
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A52%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20social%20prescribing%20approaches%20across%20twelve%20high-income%20countries&rft.jtitle=Health%20policy%20(Amsterdam)&rft.au=Scarpetti,%20Giada&rft.date=2024-04&rft.volume=142&rft.spage=104992&rft.epage=104992&rft.pages=104992-104992&rft.artnum=104992&rft.issn=0168-8510&rft.eissn=1872-6054&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.healthpol.2024.104992&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2928586157%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928586157&rft_id=info:pmid/38368661&rft_els_id=S0168851024000022&rfr_iscdi=true